Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

A Systematic Analysis of Temporal Trends in the Handgrip Strength of 2,216,320 Children and Adolescents Between 1967 and 2017

  • Systematic Review
  • Published:
Sports Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objective

To estimate national and international temporal trends in handgrip strength for children and adolescents, and to examine relationships between trends in handgrip strength and trends in health-related and sociodemographic indicators.

Methods

Data were obtained through a systematic search of studies reporting temporal trends in the handgrip strength for apparently healthy 9–17-year-olds, and by examining large national fitness datasets. Temporal trends at the country–sex–age level were estimated by sample-weighted regression models relating the year of testing to mean handgrip strength. International and national trends were estimated by a post-stratified population-weighting procedure. Pearson’s correlations quantified relationships between national trends in handgrip strength and national trends in health-related/sociodemographic indicators.

Results

2,216,320 children and adolescents from 13 high-, 5 upper-middle-, and 1 low-income countries/special administrative regions between 1967 and 2017 collectively showed a moderate improvement of 19.4% (95% CI 18.4–20.4) or 3.8% per decade (95% CI 3.6–4.0). The international rate of improvement progressively increased over time, with more recent values (post-2000) close to two times larger than those from the 1960s/1970s. Improvements were larger for children (9–12 years) compared to adolescents (13–17 years), and similar for boys and girls. Trends differed between countries, with relationships between national trends in handgrip strength and national trends in health-related/sociodemographic indicators negligible-to-weak and not statistically significant.

Conclusions

There has been a substantial improvement in absolute handgrip strength for children and adolescents since 1967. There is a need for improved international surveillance of handgrip strength, especially in low- and middle-income countries, to more confidently determine true international trends.

PROSPERO Registration Number

CRD42013003657.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

Data Availability Statement

The datasets analyzed in this review are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

References

  1. Ross R, Blair SN, Arena R, Church TS, Després J, Franklin BA, et al. Importance of assessing cardiorespiratory fitness in clinical practice: a case for fitness as a clinical vital sign: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2016;134(24):e653–99.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Harber MP, Kaminsky LA, Arena R, Blair SN, Franklin BA, Myers J, et al. Impact of cardiorespiratory fitness on all-cause and disease-specific mortality: advances since 2009. Prog Cardiovasc Dis. 2017;60(1):11–20.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. American College of Sports Medicine. ACSM’s guidelines for exercise testing and prescription. 10th ed. Baltimore: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2018.

    Google Scholar 

  4. García-Hermoso A, Ramírez-Campillo R, Izquierdo M. Is muscular fitness associated with future health benefits in children and adolescents? A systematic review and meta-analysis of longitudinal studies. Sports Med. 2019;49(7):1079–94.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Leong DP, Teo KK, Rangarajan S, Lopez-Jaramillo P, Avezum A, Orlandini A, et al. Prognostic value of grip strength: findings from the Prospective Urban Rural Epidemiology (PURE) study. Lancet. 2015;386(9990):266–73.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. McGrath RP, Kraemer WJ, Snih SA, Peterson MD. Handgrip strength and health in aging adults. Sports Med. 2018;48(9):1993–2000.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Ortega FB, Ruiz JR, Castillo MJ, Sjoström M. Physical fitness in childhood and adolescence: a powerful marker of health. Int J Obes (Lond). 2008;32(1):1–11.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Smith JJ, Eather N, Morgan PJ, Plotnikoff RC, Faigenbaum AD, Lubans DR. The health benefits of muscular fitness for children and adolescents: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Sports Med. 2014;44(9):1209–23.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Gale CR, Martyn CN, Cooper C, Sayer AA. Grip strength, body composition, and mortality. Int J Epidemiol. 2007;36(1):228–35.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Newman AB, Kupelian V, Visser M, Simonsick EM, Goodpaster BH, Kritchevsky SB, et al. Strength, but not muscle mass, is associated with mortality in the health, aging and body composition study cohort. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2006;61(1):72–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Mainous AG, Tanner RJ, Anton SD, Jo A. Grip strength as a marker of hypertension and diabetes in healthy weight adults. Am J Prev Med. 2015;49(6):850–8.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Hamasaki H, Kawashima Y, Katsuyama H, Sako A, Goto A, Yanai H. Association of handgrip strength with hospitalization, cardiovascular events, and mortality in Japanese patients with type 2 diabetes. Sci Rep. 2017;7(1):7041.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Bohannon RW. Hand-grip dynamometry predicts future outcomes in aging adults. J Geriatr Phys Ther. 2008;31(1):3–10.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Chan BK, Marshall LM, Winters KM, Faulkner KA, Schwartz AV, Orwoll ES. Incident fall risk and physical activity and physical performance among older men: the Osteoporotic Fractures in Men Study. Am J Epidemiol. 2006;165(6):696–703.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. McGrath R, Robinson-Lane SG, Peterson MD, Bailey RR, Vincent BM. Muscle strength and functional limitations: preserving function in older Mexican Americans. J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2018;19(5):391–8.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Taekema DG, Gussekloo J, Maier AB, Westendorp RG, de Craen AJ. Handgrip strength as a predictor of functional, psychological and social health. A prospective population-based study among the oldest old. Age Ageing. 2010;39(3):331–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Buchman AS, Wilson RS, Boyle PA, Bienias JL, Bennett DA. Grip strength and the risk of incident Alzheimer’s disease. Neuroepidemiology. 2007;29(1–2):66–73.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Fraser BJ, Blizzard L, Schmidt MD, Juonala M, Dwyer T, Venn AJ, et al. Childhood cardiorespiratory fitness, muscular fitness and adult measures of glucose homeostasis. J Sci Med Sport. 2018;21(9):935–40.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Grøntved A, Ried-Larsen M, Ekelund U, Froberg K, Brage S, Andersen LB. Independent and combined association of muscle strength and cardiorespiratory fitness in youth with insulin resistance and beta-cell function in young adulthood: the European Youth Heart Study. Diabetes Care. 2013;36(9):2575–81.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Ortega FB, Silventoinen K, Tynelius P, Rasmussen F. Muscular strength in male adolescents and premature death: cohort study of one million participants. BMJ. 2012;345:e7279.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Artero EG, Ruiz JR, Ortega FB, España-Romero V, Vicente-Rodríguez G, Molnar D, et al. Muscular and cardiorespiratory fitness are independently associated with metabolic risk in adolescents: the HELENA study. Pediatr Diabetes. 2011;12(8):704–12.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Castro-Piñero J, Perez-Bey A, Cuenca-Garcia M, Cabanas-Sanchez V, Gómez-Martínez S, Veiga OL, et al. Muscle fitness cut points for early assessment of cardiovascular risk in children and adolescents. J Pediatr. 2019;206:134–41.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Peterson MD, Gordon PM, Smeding S, Visich P. Grip strength is associated with longitudinal health maintenance and improvement in adolescents. J Pediatr. 2018;202:226–30.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Peterson MD, Zhang P, Saltarelli WA, Visich PS, Gordon PM. Low muscle strength thresholds for the detection of cardiometabolic risk in adolescents. Am J Prev Med. 2016;50(5):593–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Ramírez-Vélez R, Peña-Ibagon JC, Martínez-Torres J, Tordecilla-Sanders A, Correa-Bautista JE, Lobelo F, et al. Handgrip strength cutoff for cardiometabolic risk index among Colombian children and adolescents: the FUPRECOL Study. Sci Rep. 2017;7:42622.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Saint-Maurice PF, Laurson K, Welk G, Eisenmann J, Gracia-Marco L, Artero EG, et al. Grip strength cutpoints for youth based on a clinically relevant bone health outcome. Arch Osteoporos. 2018;13(1):92.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Australian Government Department of Health. Australian 24-hour movement guidelines for children (5–12 years) and young people (13–17 years): an integration of physical activity, sedentary behaviour, and sleep. https://www.health.gov.au/internet/main/publishing.nsf/Content/health-24-hours-phys-act-guidelines. Accessed 7 July 2019.

  28. Canadian Society for Exercise Physiology. Canadian 24-hour movement guidelines for children and youth (ages 5–17 years): an integration of physical activity, sedentary behaviour and sleep. https://csepguidelines.ca/children-and-youth-5-17/. Accessed 7 July 2019.

  29. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Physical activity guidelines for Americans. 2nd ed. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services; 2018.

  30. World Health Organization. Global recommendations on physical activity for health. Geneva: WHO Press; 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Milliken LA, Faigenbaum AD, Loud RL, Westcott WL. Correlates of upper and lower body muscular strength in children. J Strength Cond Res. 2008;22(4):1339–46.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Wind AE, Takken T, Helders PJ, Engelbert RH. Is grip strength a predictor for total muscle strength in healthy children, adolescents, and young adults? Eur J Pediatr. 2010;169(3):281–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Artero EG, España-Romero V, Castro-Piñero J, Ortega FB, Suni J, Castillo-Garzon MJ, et al. Reliability of field-based fitness tests in youth. Int J Sports Med. 2011;32(3):159–69.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Mathiowetz V, Weber K, Volland G, Kashman N. Reliability and validity of grip and pinch strength evaluations. J Hand Surg Am. 1984;9(2):222–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Vermeulen J, Neyens JC, Spreeuwenberg MD, van Rossum E, Hewson DJ, de Witte LP. Measuring grip strength in older adults: comparing the grip-ball with the Jamar dynamometer. J Geriatr Phys Ther. 2015;38(3):148–53.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Ortega FB, Artero EG, Ruiz JR, Vicente-Rodriguez G, Bergman P, Hagströmer M, et al. Reliability of health-related physical fitness tests in European adolescents. The HELENA Study. Int J Obes (Lond). 2008;32(Suppl 5):S49–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Institute of Medicine. Fitness measures and health outcomes in youth. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press; 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Ruiz JR, Castro-Piñero J, España-Romero V, Artero EG, Ortega FB, Cuenca MM, et al. Field-based fitness assessment in young people: the ALPHA health-related fitness test battery for children and adolescents. Br J Sports Med. 2011;45(6):518–24.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Tomkinson GR, Lang JJ, Tremblay MS. Temporal trends in the cardiorespiratory fitness of children and adolescents representing 19 high-income and upper middle-income countries between 1981 and 2014. Br J Sports Med. 2019;53(8):478–86.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Lamoureux NR, Fitzgerald JS, Norton KI, Sabato T, Tremblay MS, Tomkinson GR. Temporal trends in the cardiorespiratory fitness of 2,525,827 adults between 1967 and 2016: a systematic review. Sports Med. 2019;49(1):41–55.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Silverman IW. The secular trend for grip strength in Canada and the United States. J Sports Sci. 2011;29(6):599–606.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Silverman IW. Age as a moderator of the secular trend for grip strength in Canada and the United States. Ann Hum Biol. 2015;42(3):199–209.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Tremblay MS, Shields M, Laviolette M, Craig CL, Janssen I, Connor Gorber S. Fitness of Canadian children and youth: results from the 2007–2009 Canadian Health Measures Survey. Health Rep. 2010;21(1):7–20.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Malina RM, Reyes ME, Tan SK, Little BB. Secular change in muscular strength of indigenous rural youth 6–17 years in Oaxaca, southern Mexico: 1968–2000. Ann Hum Biol. 2010;37(2):168–84.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Dos Santos FK, Prista A, Gomes TN, et al. Secular trends in physical fitness of Mozambican school-aged children and adolescents. Am J Hum Biol. 2015;27(2):201–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Ignasiak Z, Sławińska T, Malina RM. Short term secular change in body size and physical fitness of youth 7–15 years in Southwestern Poland: 2001–2002 and 2010–2011. Anthropol Rev. 2016;79(3):311–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Saczuk J, Wasiluk A. Changes in the somatic and fitness variables in girls over two decades. Biomed Hum Kinet. 2010;2(1):102–5.

    Google Scholar 

  48. Saczuk J, Wasiluk A, Zalech M. Generation changes over the period of 1986–2006 in the physical fitness of boys aged 7–19 from eastern Poland at particular stages of education. Biomed Hum Kinet. 2012;4:112–6.

    Google Scholar 

  49. Haslofça F, Kutlay E, Haslofça E. 11–12 yaş Türk çocuklarının bazı fiziksel uygunluk değerlerindeki otuz yıllık değişimlerin incelenmesi (Analysis of three decade changes in physical fitness characteristics of Turkish children aged between 11 and 12). Spor Hekimliği Dergisi (Turk J Sports Med). 2017;52(4):137–45.

    Google Scholar 

  50. Sandercock GRH, Cohen DD. Temporal trends in muscular fitness of English 10-year-olds 1998–2014: an allometric approach. J Sci Med Sport. 2019;22(2):201–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG, PRISMA Group. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. BMJ. 2009;339:2535.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Cohen J. Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. 2nd ed. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum; 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  53. Tomkinson GR, Macfarlane D, Noi S, Dae-Yeon K, Wang Z, Hong R. Temporal changes in long-distance running performance of Asian children between 1964 and 2009. Sports Med. 2012;42(4):267–79.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Tomkinson GR, Olds TS. Secular changes in pediatric aerobic fitness test performance: the global picture. Med Sport Sci. 2007;50:46–66.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. United Nations, Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Population Division. World population prospects 2019: data booklet (ST/ESA/SER.A/424). New York: United Nations; 2019.

  56. NCD Risk Factor Collaboration (NCD-RisC). Worldwide trends in body-mass index, underweight, overweight, and obesity from 1975 to 2016: a pooled analysis of 2416 population-based measurement studies in 128.9 million children, adolescents, and adults. Lancet. 2017;390(10113):2627–42.

  57. Inchley J, Currie D, Jewell J. Adolescent obesity and related behaviours: trends and inequalities in the WHO European region, 2002–2014. Observations from the Health Behaviour in School-aged Children (HBSC) WHO collaborative cross-national study. Copenhagen: World Health Organization; 2017.

    Google Scholar 

  58. World Bank. GINI index (World Bank estimate). https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/si.pov.gini. Accessed 27 Jun 2019.

  59. United Nations Development Programme. Human development indices and indicators: 2018 statistical update. New York: United Nations Development Programme; 2018.

    Google Scholar 

  60. World Bank. Urban population growth (annual %). https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/SP.URB.GROW. Accessed 27 June 2019.

  61. Catley MJ, Tomkinson GR. Normative health-related fitness values for children: analysis of 85347 test results on 9–17-year-old Australians since 1985. Br J Sports Med. 2013;47(2):98–108.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  62. Malina RM. Secular changes in growth, maturation, and physical performance. Exerc Sport Sci Rev. 1978;6:203–55.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  63. Tomkinson GR, Carver KD, Atkinson F, Daniell ND, Lewis LK, Fitzgerald JS, et al. European normative values for physical fitness in children and adolescents aged 9–17 years: results from 2 779 165 Eurofit performances representing 30 countries. Br J Sports Med. 2018;52(22):1445–56.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  64. Dimitrova D. Fizicheska deesposobnost na podrastvashtite vuv vruska s vuzrastovite promeni v telesnite razmeri I sustava na telesnata masa (Physical fitness of children and adolescents in relation with age-specific changes in body composition). Doctoral dissertation. Sofia: National Sports Academy; 2001.

  65. Slanchev P, Janev B, Genov F, Shterev P, Boev P, Sepetliev D, et al. Fizichesko razvitie, fizicheska deesposobnost I nervo-psichichna reaktivnost na naselenieto na Bulgaria: III Nacionalno izsledvane (1980–1982) (Physical development, physical fitness and neuropsychic reactivity of Bulgarian population: III National Project [1980–1982]). Sofia: Bulgarian Union for Physical Education and Sports; 1992.

  66. Yanev B, Shterev P, Boev P, Genov F, Sepetliev D, Popov I, et al. Fizichesko razvitie, fizicheska deesposobnost I nervo-psichichna reaktivnost na naselenieto (Physical development, physical fitness and neuropsychic reactivity of the Bulgarian people from birth up to age 60). Sofia: Bulgarian Union for Physical Education and Sports; 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  67. Yanev B, Shterev P, Boev P, Semerdjieva R, Sepetliev D. Fizichesko razvitie I deesposobnost na naselenieto na Bulgaria ot rajdaneto do 26 godini, tom I (Physical development and fitness of Bulgarian people from the birth up to the age of 26, volume I). Sofia: Bulgarian Academy of Sciences; 1965.

  68. Fortier MD, Katzmarzyk PT, Malina RM, Bouchard C. Seven-year stability of physical activity and musculoskeletal fitness in the Canadian population. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2001;33(11):1905–11.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  69. Research Group of Physical Fitness and Health Research of Chinese School Students. Reports on the Physical Fitness and Health Research of Chinese School Students 2000. Beijing: Higher Education Press; 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  70. Research Group of Physical Fitness and Health Research of Chinese School Students. Reports on the Physical Fitness and Health Research of Chinese School Students 2005. Beijing: Higher Education Press; 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  71. Research Group of Physical Fitness and Health Research of Chinese School Students. Reports on the Physical Fitness and Health Research of Chinese School Students 2010. Beijing: Higher Education Press; 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  72. Research Group of Physical Fitness and Health Research of Chinese School Students. Reports on the Physical Fitness and Health Research of Chinese School Students 2014. Beijing: Higher Education Press; 2016.

    Google Scholar 

  73. Education Bureau, Government of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region. Physical education—surveys on ‘physical fitness status of Hong Kong school pupils’. Primary: 1999–2000. https://www.edb.gov.hk/en/curriculum-development/kla/pe/references_resource/fitness-survey/index.html. Accessed 23 Sep 2018.

  74. Education Bureau, Government of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region. Physical education—surveys on ‘physical fitness status of Hong Kong school pupils’. Primary: 2003–2004. https://www.edb.gov.hk/en/curriculum-development/kla/pe/references_resource/fitness-survey/index.html. Accessed 23 Sep 2018.

  75. Education Bureau, Government of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region. Physical education—surveys on ‘physical fitness status of Hong Kong school pupils’. Primary: 2005–2006. https://www.edb.gov.hk/en/curriculum-development/kla/pe/references_resource/fitness-survey/index.html. Accessed 23 Sep 2018.

  76. Education Bureau, Government of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region. Physical education—surveys on ‘physical fitness status of Hong Kong school pupils’. Primary: 2010–2011. https://www.edb.gov.hk/en/curriculum-development/kla/pe/references_resource/fitness-survey/index.html. Accessed 23 Sep 2018.

  77. Education Bureau, Government of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region. Physical education—surveys on ‘physical fitness status of Hong Kong school pupils’. Primary: 2015–2016. https://www.edb.gov.hk/en/curriculum-development/kla/pe/references_resource/fitness-survey/index.html. Accessed 23 Sep 2018.

  78. Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology. Report book on the survey of physical fitness and athletic ability. Tokyo: Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology; 1968.

    Google Scholar 

  79. Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology. Report book on the survey of physical fitness and athletic ability. Tokyo: Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology; 1969.

    Google Scholar 

  80. Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology. Report book on the survey of physical fitness and athletic ability. Tokyo: Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology; 1970.

    Google Scholar 

  81. Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology. Report book on the survey of physical fitness and athletic ability. Tokyo: Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology; 1971.

    Google Scholar 

  82. Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology. Report book on the survey of physical fitness and athletic ability. Tokyo: Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology; 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  83. Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology. Report book on the survey of physical fitness and athletic ability. Tokyo: Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology; 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  84. Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology. Report book on the survey of physical fitness and athletic ability. Tokyo: Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology; 1974.

    Google Scholar 

  85. Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology. Report book on the survey of physical fitness and athletic ability. Tokyo: Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology; 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  86. Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology. Report book on the survey of physical fitness and athletic ability. Tokyo: Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology; 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  87. Ministry of Education. Report book on the survey of physical fitness and athletic ability. Tokyo: Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology; 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  88. Ministry of Education. Report book on the survey of physical fitness and athletic ability. Tokyo: Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology; 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  89. Ministry of Education. Report book on the survey of physical fitness and athletic ability. Tokyo: Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology; 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  90. Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology. Report book on the survey of physical fitness and athletic ability. Tokyo: Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology; 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  91. Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology. Report book on the survey of physical fitness and athletic ability. Tokyo: Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology; 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  92. Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology. Report book on the survey of physical fitness and athletic ability. Tokyo: Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology; 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  93. Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology. Report book on the survey of physical fitness and athletic ability. Tokyo: Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology; 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  94. Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology. Report book on the survey of physical fitness and athletic ability. Tokyo: Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology; 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  95. Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology. Report book on the survey of physical fitness and athletic ability. Tokyo: Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology; 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  96. Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology. Report book on the survey of physical fitness and athletic ability. Tokyo: Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology; 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  97. Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology. Report book on the survey of physical fitness and athletic ability. Tokyo: Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology; 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  98. Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology. Report book on the survey of physical fitness and athletic ability. Tokyo: Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology; 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  99. Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology. Report book on the survey of physical fitness and athletic ability. Tokyo: Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology; 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  100. Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology. Report book on the survey of physical fitness and athletic ability. Tokyo: Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology; 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  101. Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology. Report book on the survey of physical fitness and athletic ability. Tokyo: Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology; 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  102. Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology. Report book on the survey of physical fitness and athletic ability. Tokyo: Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology; 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  103. Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology. Report book on the survey of physical fitness and athletic ability. Tokyo: Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology; 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  104. Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology. Report book on the survey of physical fitness and athletic ability. Tokyo: Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology; 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  105. Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology. Report book on the survey of physical fitness and athletic ability. Tokyo: Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology; 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  106. Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology. Report book on the survey of physical fitness and athletic ability. Tokyo: Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology; 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  107. Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology. Report book on the survey of physical fitness and athletic ability. Tokyo: Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology; 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  108. Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology. Report book on the survey of physical fitness and athletic ability. Tokyo: Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology; 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  109. Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology. Report book on the survey of physical fitness and athletic ability. Tokyo: Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology; 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  110. Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology. Report book on the survey of physical fitness and athletic ability. Tokyo: Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology; 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  111. Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology. Report book on the survey of physical fitness and athletic ability. Tokyo: Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology; 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  112. Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology. Report book on the survey of physical fitness and athletic ability. Tokyo: Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology; 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  113. Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology. Report book on the survey of physical fitness and athletic ability. Tokyo: Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology; 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  114. Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology. Report book on the survey of physical fitness and athletic ability. Tokyo: Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology; 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  115. Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology. Report book on the survey of physical fitness and athletic ability. Tokyo: Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology; 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  116. Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology. Report book on the survey of physical fitness and athletic ability. Tokyo: Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology; 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  117. Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology. Report book on the survey of physical fitness and athletic ability. Tokyo: Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology; 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  118. Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology. Report book on the survey of physical fitness and athletic ability. Tokyo: Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology; 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  119. Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology. Report book on the survey of physical fitness and athletic ability. Tokyo: Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology; 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  120. Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology. Report book on the survey of physical fitness and athletic ability. Tokyo: Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology; 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  121. Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology. Report book on the survey of physical fitness and athletic ability. Tokyo: Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology; 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  122. Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology. Report book on the survey of physical fitness and athletic ability. Tokyo: Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology; 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  123. Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology. Report book on the survey of physical fitness and athletic ability. Tokyo: Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology; 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  124. Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology. Report book on the survey of physical fitness and athletic ability. Tokyo: Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology; 2014.

    Google Scholar 

  125. Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology. Report book on the survey of physical fitness and athletic ability. Tokyo: Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology; 2015.

    Google Scholar 

  126. Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology. Report book on the survey of physical fitness and athletic ability. Tokyo: Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology; 2016.

    Google Scholar 

  127. Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology. Report book on the survey of physical fitness and athletic ability. Tokyo: Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology; 2017.

    Google Scholar 

  128. Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology. Report book on the survey of physical fitness and athletic ability. Tokyo: Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology; 2018.

    Google Scholar 

  129. Przeweda R, Dobosz J. Growth and physical fitness of Polish youths in two successive decades. J Sports Med Phys Fitness. 2003;43(4):465–74.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  130. Klanarong S. Socio-demographic distribution of health-related fitness of Thai children. Doctoral dissertation. Adelaide, SA: University of South Australia; 2005.

  131. Espenchade AS, Meleney HE. Motor performances of adolescent boys and girls of today in comparison with those 24 years ago. Res Q. 1961;32(2):186–9.

    Google Scholar 

  132. Montpetit RR, Montoye HJ, Laeding L. Grip strength of school children, Saginaw, Michigan: 1899 and 1964. Res Q. 1967;38(2):231–40.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  133. World Bank. World Bank country and lending groups. http://data.worldbank.org/about/country-and-lending-groups. Accessed 27 June 2019.

  134. World Bank. Land area (sq. km). https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/AG.LND.TOTL.K2. Accessed 27 June 2019.

  135. Malina RM. Anthropometric correlates of strength and motor performance. Exerc Sport Sci Rev. 1975;3:249–74.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  136. Malina RM. Anthropometry, strength and motor fitness. In: Ulijaszek SJ, Mascie-Taylor CGN, editors. Anthropometry: the individual and the population. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1994. p. 160–77.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  137. Malina RM. Secular trends in growth, maturation and physical performance: a review. Anthropol Rev. 2004;67:3–31.

    Google Scholar 

  138. Backstrand JR. The history and future of food fortification in the United States: a public health perspective. Nutr Rev. 2002;60(1):15–26.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  139. Cutler D, Miller G. The role of public health improvements in health advances: the twentieth-century United States. Demography. 2005;42(1):1–22.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  140. Moliner-Urdiales D, Ruiz JR, Ortega FB, Jiménez-Pavón D, Vicente-Rodriguez G, Rey-López JP, et al. Secular trends in health-related physical fitness in Spanish adolescents: the AVENA and HELENA studies. J Sci Med Sport. 2010;13(6):584–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  141. Olds TS. One million skinfolds: secular trends in the fatness of young people 1951–2004. Eur J Clin Nutr. 2009;63(8):934–46.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  142. Fukunaga T, Miyatani M, Tachi M, Kouzaki M, Kawakami Y, Kanehisa H. Muscle volume is a major determinant of joint torque in humans. Acta Physiol Scand. 2001;172(4):249–55.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  143. Malina RM, Bouchard C, Bar-Or O. Growth, maturation and physical activity. 2nd ed. Champaign: Human Kinetics; 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  144. Roche AF. Secular trends in stature, weight, and maturation. Monogr Soc Res Child Dev. 1979;44(3–4):3–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  145. Smith JJ, Eather N, Weaver RG, Riley N, Beets MW, Lubans DR. Behavioral correlates of muscular fitness in children and adolescents: a systematic review. Sports Med. 2019;49(6):887–904.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  146. Booth VM, Rowlands AV, Dollman J. Physical activity temporal trends among children and adolescents. J Sci Med Sport. 2015;18(4):418–25.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  147. Ekelund U, Tomkinson G, Armstrong N. What proportion of youth are physically active? Measurement issues, levels and recent time trends. Br J Sports Med. 2011;45(11):859–65.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  148. Knuth AG, Hallal PC. Temporal trends in physical activity: a systematic review. J Phys Act Health. 2009;6(5):548–59.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  149. Lang JJ, Larouche R, Tremblay MS. The association between physical fitness and health in a nationally representative sample of Canadian children and youth aged 6 to 17 years. Health Promot Chronic Dis Prev Can. 2019;39(3):104–11.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  150. Aubert S, Barnes JD, Abdeta C, Abi Nader P, Adeniyi AF, Aguilar-Farias N, et al. Global Matrix 3.0 physical activity report card grades for children and youth: results and analysis from 49 countries. J Phys Act Health. 2018;15(Suppl 2):S251–73.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  151. Rioux BV, Kuwornu P, Sharma A, Tremblay MS, McGavock JM, Sénéchal M. Association between handgrip muscle strength and cardiometabolic z-score in children 6 to 19 years of age: results from the Canadian Health Measures Survey. Metab Syndr Relat Disord. 2017;15(7):379–84.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  152. Zaqout M, Michels N, Bammann K, Ahrens W, Sprengeler O, Molnar D, et al. Influence of physical fitness on cardio-metabolic risk factors in European children. The IDEFICS study. Int J Obes (Lond). 2016;40(7):1119–25.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  153. Artero EG, España-Romero V, Jiménez-Pavón D, Martinez-Gómez D, Warnberg J, Gómez-Martínez S, et al. Muscular fitness, fatness and inflammatory biomarkers in adolescents. Pediatr Obes. 2014;9(5):391–400.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  154. Delvaux K, Lefevre J, Philippaerts R, Dequeker J, Thomis M, Vanreusel B, et al. Bone mass and lifetime physical activity in Flemish males: a 27-year follow-up study. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2001;33(11):1868–75.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  155. Vicente-Rodríguez G, Urzanqui A, Mesana MI, Ortega FB, Ruiz JR, Ezquerra J, et al. Physical fitness effect on bone mass is mediated by the independent association between lean mass and bone mass through adolescence: a cross-sectional study. J Bone Miner Metab. 2008;26(3):288–94.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  156. Ramírez-Vélez R, Tordecilla-Sanders A, Correa-Bautista JE, Peterson MD, Garcia-Hermoso A. Handgrip strength and ideal cardiovascular health among Colombian children and adolescents. J Pediatr. 2016;179:82–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  157. Katzmarzyk PT, Mason C. The physical activity transition. J Phys Act Health. 2009;6(3):269–80.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  158. Tomkinson GR, Lang JJ, Tremblay MS, Dale M, LeBlanc AG, Belanger K, et al. International normative 20 m shuttle run values from 1 142 026 children and youth representing 50 countries. Br J Sports Med. 2017;51(21):1545–54.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  159. Tomkinson GR, Lang JJ, Blanchard J, Léger LA, Tremblay MS. The 20-m shuttle run: assessment and interpretation of data in relation to youth aerobic fitness and health. Pediatr Exerc Sci. 2019;31(2):152–63.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank the authors of the included studies for generously clarifying details of their studies and/or for providing additional data. We would also like to thank Dr. Yang Liu, Dr. Tetsuhiro Kidokoro, Dr. Shingo Noi, Dr. Duncan Macfarlane, and Dr. Koya Suzuki for their assistance with the national fitness data from China, Hong Kong, and Japan.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

GRT and FLD developed the research question and designed the study. GRT and FLD had full access to all the data in the study and take responsibility for the integrity of the data. GRT and FLD led the statistical analysis, synthesis of results, and writing of the report. All authors contributed to the interpretation of results, editing and critical reviewing of the final report, and approved the final report.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Grant R. Tomkinson.

Ethics declarations

Funding

No funding was received for this project.

Conflict of interest

Faith L. Dooley, Tori Kaster, John S. Fitzgerald, Tanis J. Walch, Madison Annandale, Katia Ferrar, Justin J. Lang, Jordan J. Smith, and Grant R. Tomkinson declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Additional information

The content and views expressed in this article are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect those of the Government of Canada.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 51 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Dooley, F.L., Kaster, T., Fitzgerald, J.S. et al. A Systematic Analysis of Temporal Trends in the Handgrip Strength of 2,216,320 Children and Adolescents Between 1967 and 2017. Sports Med 50, 1129–1144 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40279-020-01265-0

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40279-020-01265-0

Navigation