Skip to main content
Log in

Development of Proxy Model for Hydraulic Fracturing and Seismic Wave Propagation Processes

  • Special Issue
  • Published:
Mathematical Geosciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Characterization of discrete fracture networks is necessary for unconventional reservoir development, as they control the flow of fluids toward the hydraulically fractured well. Interpretation of microseismic data provides information about the discrete fracture network in the vicinity of a well. While microseismic interpretation is currently based on plotting the swarm of microseismic events, the inference of fracture-related information from such data is likely to be non-unique. To address this non-uniqueness, the presented workflow involves applying a forward model that produces a synthetic seismogram corresponding to a suite of natural fractured reservoir models. The characteristics of the generated seismograms can be compared with the observed seismogram to determine the suite of fracture models that best reflect the observed seismic signature. The available full physics models are computationally expensive and cannot be applied within this framework. Hence, a proxy model is developed that is computationally inexpensive so that it can be applied on a large ensemble of models within the Bayesian model selection framework described above. Seismic wave propagation during a fracturing job involves many intermediate processes such as diffraction and reflection. As analytical solutions for most of these processes exist, a coupled analytical model is proposed. Firstly, a hydraulic fracture propagation model is coupled with a model for the interaction between a hydraulic fracture and a natural fracture. This interaction results in slip events along natural fractures that in turn can trigger a seismic event. With knowledge of the location of the slip event, a Green’s function solution is applied to model the propagation of the seismic wave. Using the results from the slip event and Green’s function, a synthetic seismogram is generated. Finally, the seismic signature from multiple slip events along several natural fractures is combined. Validation of individual elements of the coupled proxy model to experiments is shown. A comparison of the developed proxy model with more computationally expensive models is also performed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17
Fig. 18
Fig. 19
Fig. 20
Fig. 21

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adachi J, Siebrits E, Peirce A, Desroches J (2007) Computer simulation of hydraulic fractures. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 44(5):739–757

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aki K, Richards PG (2002) Quantitative seismology. University Science Books, Sausalito

    Google Scholar 

  • Blanton TL (1982) An experimental study of interaction between hydraulically induced and pre-existing fractures. In: SPE unconventional gas recovery symposium, Society of Petroleum Engineers

  • Bouchon M (2003) A review of the discrete wavenumber method. Pure Appl Geophys 160(3):445–465

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bunger AP, Detournay E, Garagash DI (2005) Toughness-dominated hydraulic fracture with leak-off. Int J Fract 134(2):175–190

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Detournay E, Garagash D (2003) The near-tip region of a fluid-driven fracture propagating in a permeable elastic solid. J Fluid Mech 494:1–32

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Detournay E, Peirce A, Bunger A (2007) Viscosity-dominated hydraulic fractures. In: 1st Canada-US rock mechanics symposium, American Rock Mechanics Association

  • Economides MJ, Nolte KG (1989) Reservoir stimulation, vol 2. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs

    Google Scholar 

  • Garagash DI (2006) Propagation of a plane-strain hydraulic fracture with a fluid lag: early-time solution. Int J Solids Struct 43(18):5811–5835

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Geertsma J, De Klerk F (1969) A rapid method of predicting width and extent of hydraulically induced fractures. J Pet Technol 21(12):1–571

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gu H, Weng X, Lund JB, Mack MG, Ganguly U, Suarez-Rivera R (2012) Hydraulic fracture crossing natural fracture at nonorthogonal angles: a criterion and its validation. SPE Prod Oper 27(01):20–26

    Google Scholar 

  • Gudmundsson A (2011) Rock fractures in geological processes. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Guglielmi Y, Cappa F, Avouac JP, Henry P, Elsworth D (2015) Seismicity triggered by fluid injection-induced aseismic slip. Science 348(6240):1224–1226

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Herrmann RB (2013) Computer programs in seismology: an evolving tool for instruction and research. Seismol Res Lett 84:1081–1088

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huang W, Wang R, Li H, Chen Y (2017) Unveiling the signals from extremely noisy microseismic data for high-resolution hydraulic fracturing monitoring. Sci Rep 7(1):11996

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Khristianovic S, Zheltov Y (1955) Formation of vertical fractures by means of highly viscous liquid. In: 4th world petroleum congress, World Petroleum Congress

  • Mangrove (2017) Petrel simulation suite. Schlumberger, Houston

    Google Scholar 

  • Nordgren R (1972) Propagation of a vertical hydraulic fracture. Soc Pet Eng J 12(04):306–314

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perkins T, Kern L (1961) Widths of hydraulic fractures. J Pet Technol 13(09):937–949

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Potluri N, Zhu D, Hill A D (2005) The effect of natural fractures on hydraulic fracture propagation. In: SPE European formation damage conference, society of petroleum engineers

  • Renshaw C, Pollard D (1995) An experimentally verified criterion for propagation across unbounded frictional interfaces in brittle, linear elastic materials. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci Geomech Abstr 32:237–249

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sneddon IN (1946) The distribution of stress in the neighbourhood of a crack in an elastic solid. Proc R Soc Lond A 187(1009):229–260

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tanioka Y, Ruff LJ (1997) Source time functions. Seismol Res Lett 68(3):386–400

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Warpinski N, Teufel L (1987) Influence of geologic discontinuities on hydraulic fracture propagation (includes associated papers 17011 and 17074). J Pet Technol 39(02):209–220

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Warpinski N, Abou-Sayed I, Moschovidis Z, Parker C (1993) Hydraulic fracture model comparison study: complete results. Technical report, Sandia National Labs., Albuquerque, NM (United States); Gas Research Inst., Chicago, IL (United States)

Download references

Acknowledgements

Support from NSF in the form of Grant UP60D60 is gratefully acknowledged. Funding was provided by the Directorate for Computer and Information Science and Engineering.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Manik Singh.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Singh, M., Srinivasan, S. Development of Proxy Model for Hydraulic Fracturing and Seismic Wave Propagation Processes. Math Geosci 52, 81–110 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11004-019-09830-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11004-019-09830-8

Keywords

Navigation