Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Agronomic effectiveness of urea deep placement technology for upland maize production

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Effective fertilizer management is critical for sustainable maize production. Field trials were conducted in six locations in northern Ghana during the 2016 and 2017 farming seasons to evaluate the agronomic effectiveness and economic viability of urea deep placement technology (UDP), which involves deep placement of urea supergranules (USG), for maize production. This fertilization strategy was compared with four other maize fertilization strategies: (1) microdosing (MD); (2) farmer practice (FP), which involves surface broadcasting of granular fertilizer; (3) modified farmer practice (MFP), where granular fertilizer was incorporated into the soil; and (4) NPK-only, where no supplemental N was added. Averaged across all six locations and both years, UDP produced 18% more grain yield than MFP, 38% more than MD, 155% more than FP, and 270% more than NPK-only. The greatest apparent N recovery efficiency of 73% occurred in MD, followed by UDP (68%), NPK-only (63%), MFP (61%) and FP (35%), in that order. However, agronomic efficiency followed the order: UDP > MFP = MD > NPK-only = FP. The greatest gross profit margin of 49% was obtained with UDP, followed by MFP (41%) and MD (33%). Farmer practice resulted in a break-even level (3%) whereas NPK-only resulted in a loss (< − 35%). From the combined results, we conclude that, barring other external factors such as drought, flooding, pests, diseases, etc., UDP could be one of the most efficient fertilizer management strategies for sustainable maize production. Further studies should evaluate optimum timing of USG application for increased productivity and profitability.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abdullahi S, Abdulwahab K, Abubakar GS (2017) Gross margin analysis of modern groundnut oil extraction in Gombe Metropolis, Gombe State, Nigeria. World J Agric Res 5:58–63

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Adjei MB, Gardner CS, Mayo D, Seawright T, Jennings E (2000) Fertilizer treatment effects on forage yield and quality of tropical pasture grasses. Proc Soil Crop Sci Soc Fla 59:32–37

    Google Scholar 

  • Adu-Gyamfi R, Agyin-Birikorang S, Tindjina I, Ahmed SM, Twumasi AD, Avornyo VK, Singh U (2019) One-time fertilizer briquettes application for maize production in savanna agroecologies of Ghana. Agron J 111:1–12. https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj2019.04.0292

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Agyin-Birikorang S, Winings JH, Yin X, Singh U, Sanabria J (2018) Field evaluation of agronomic effectiveness of multi-nutrient fertilizer briquettes for upland crop production. Nutr Cycl Agroecosyst 110:395–406

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Akudugu MA, Guo E, Dadzie SK (2012) Adoption of modern agricultural production technologies by farm households in Ghana: What factors influence their decisions? J Biol Agric Healthcare 2:1–13

    Google Scholar 

  • Bandaogo A, Bidjokazo F, Youl S, Safo E, Abaidoo R, Opoku A (2015) Effect of fertilizer deep placement with urea supergranule on nitrogen use efficiency of irrigated rice in Sourou Valley (Burkina Faso). Nutr Cycl Agroecosyst 102:79–89

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Banful AB (2008) Operational details of the 2008 fertilizer subsidy in Ghana. Preliminary report, draft. 2008. International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI), Washington, DC

  • Bowen WT, Diamond RB, Singh U, Thompson TP (2004) Urea deep placement increases yield and save Nitrogen fertilizer in farmer’s field in Bangladesh. Rice is life: scientific perspectives for the 21st century. In: Proceedings of the world rice research conference held in Tsukuba, Japan, 4–7 November. pp 369–372

  • Brammer H (1962) In: Wills JB (ed) Soils: in agriculture and landuse in Ghana. Oxford University Press, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Bray RH, Kurtz LT (1945) Determination of total, organic, and available forms of phosphorus in soils. Soil Sci 59:39–45

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bremner JM (1996) Nitrogen—total. In: Sparks DL (ed) Methods of soil analysis. Part 3: chemical methods. ASA, SSSA, CSSA, Madison

    Google Scholar 

  • Cai GX, Freney JR, Humphreys E, Simpson JR (1988) Use of surface films to reduce ammonia volatilization from flooded rice fields. Aust J Agr Res 39:177–186

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Camara BS, Camara F, Berthe A, Oswald A (2013) Micro-dosing of fertilizer: a technology for farmers’ needs and resources. Int J Agric Sci 3:387–399

    Google Scholar 

  • Demisie W (2018) Fertilizer microdosing technology in sorghum, millet and maize production at small-scale level in Africa: A review. Int J Adv Sci Res Dev 5:39–49

    Google Scholar 

  • Farris PW, Bendle NT, Pfeifer PE, Reibstein DJ (2010) Marketing metrics: the definitive guide to measuring marketing performance, 2nd edn. Pearson Education, Inc., Upper Saddle River, p 414

    Google Scholar 

  • Gaihre YK, Singh U, Islam SMM, Huda A, Islam MR, Satter MA, Sanabria J, Islam MdR, Shah AL (2015) Impacts of urea deep placement on nitrous oxide and nitric oxide emissions from rice fields in Bangladesh. Geoderma 260:370–379

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gallaher RN, Weldon CO, Futral JG (1975) An aluminum block digester for plant and soil analysis. Soil Sci Soc Am Proc 39:803–806

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gee GW, Bauder JW (1986) Particle-size analysis. In: Klute A (ed) Methods of soil analysis: Part 1, 2nd edn. ASA and SSSA, Madison, pp 383–411

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayashi K, Abdoulaye T, Gerard B, Bationo A (2007) Evaluation of application timing in fertilizer micro-dosing technology on millet production in Niger, West Africa. Nutr Cycl Agroecosyst 80:257–265

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Huda A, Gaihre YK, Islam MR, Singh U, Islam MdR, Sanabria J, Satter MA, Afroz H, Halder A, Jahiruddin M (2016) Floodwater ammonium, nitrogen use efficiency and rice yields with fertilizer deep placement and alternate wetting and drying under tipple rice cropping systems. Nutr Cycl Agroecosyst 104:53–66

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • IFDC (International Fertilizer Development Center) (2007). Mitigating poverty and environmental degradation through nutrient management in South Asia. IFDC Report, March 2007. International Fertilizer Development Centre

  • IFDC (International Fertilizer Development Center) (2013) Fertilizer deep placement. IFDC solutions. IFDC, muscle shoals, AL 35662 USA, p 6. http://issuu.com/ifdcinfo/docs/fdp_8pg_final_web?e=1773260/1756718

  • IFDC (International Fertilizer Development Center) (2015) IFDC Quarterly Magazine 40(4). http://ifdc.org/ifdc-magazine

  • Ion V, Dicu G, Dumbravă M, Temocico G, Alecu IN, Băşa AG, State D (2015) Harvest index at maize in different growing conditions. Rom Biotechnol Lett 20:10951–10960

    Google Scholar 

  • Islam MSh, Rahman F, Hossain ATMS (2011) Effects of NPK briquette on rice (Oryza sativa) in tidal flooded ecosystem. The Agriculturists 9:37–43

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Issahaku A, Campion BB, Edziyie R (2016) Rainfall and temperature changes and variability in the Upper East Region of Ghana. Earth Space Sci 3:284–294

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ISSS/ISRIC/FAO (1998) World Reference Base for Soil Resources. World Soil Resources Report 84, FAO, Rome

  • Johansson E, Haby L, Prieto-Linde ML, Svensson SE (2013) Influence of fertilizer placement on yield and protein composition in spring malting barley. J Soil Sci Plant Nutr 13:895–904

    Google Scholar 

  • Kapoor V, Singh U, Patil SK, Magre H, Shrivastava LK, Mishra VN, Das RO, Samadhiya VK, Sanabria J, Diamond R (2008) Rice growth, grain yield and floodwater nutrient dynamics as affected by nutrient placement method and rate. Agron J 100:526–536

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Keeney DR, Nelson DW (1982) Nitrogen–inorganic forms. In: Page AL (ed) Methods of soil analysis: Part 2, 2nd edn. ASA and SSSA, Madison, pp 643–698

    Google Scholar 

  • Littell RC, Milliken GA, Stroup WW, Wolfinger RD (1996) SAS system for mixed models. SAS Institute, Cary

    Google Scholar 

  • Miah MAM, Gaihre YK, Hunter G, Singh U, Hossain SA (2016) Fertilizer deep placement increases rice production: evidence from farmers’ fields in southern Bangladesh. Agron J 108:1–8

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • MOFA (Ministry of Food and Agriculture) (2011) Agriculture in Ghana: facts and figures. Statistics, Research and Information Directorate (SRID). http://mofa.gov.gh/site/wp-content/uploads/2011/04/mofa_facts_and_figures.pdf

  • Nkebiwe PM, Weinmann M, Bar-Tal A, Muller T (2016) Fertilizer placement to improve crop nutrients acquisition and yield: a review and meta-analysis. Field Crops Res 196:389–401

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pagani A, Echeverria HE, Andrade FH, Sainz Rozas HR (2012) Effects of nitrogen and sulfur application on grain yield, nutrient accumulation and harvest indexes in maize. J Plant Nutr 35:1080–1097

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Prinčič A, Mahne I, Megušar F, Paul EA, Tiedje JM (1998) Effects of pH and oxygen and ammonium concentrations on the community structure of nitrifying bacteria from wastewater. Appl Environ Microbiol 64:3584–3590

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rochette P, Angers DA, Chantigny MH, Gasser M, MacDonald JD, Pelster DE, Bertrand N (2013) Ammonia volatilization and nitrogen retention: how deep to incorporate urea? J Environ Qual 42:1635–1642

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • SAS Institute Inc (2018) Base SAS® 9.4 Utilities: Reference. Cary, NC: SAS Institute Inc

  • Shen Y, Peng S (2017) Exploring the trends in nitrogen input and nitrogen use efficiency for agricultural sustainability. Sustainability 9:1905. https://doi.org/10.3390/su9101905

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sumner ME, Miller PW (1996) Cation exchange capacity, and exchange coefficients. In: Sparks DL (ed) Methods of soil analysis: Part 2: chemical properties, 3rd edn. ASA, SSSA, CSSA, Madison

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas W (1996) Soil pH and soil acidity. In: Sparks DL (ed) Methods of soil analysis: Part 3. SSSA Book Ser 5. SSSA, Madison, pp 475–490

    Google Scholar 

  • Walkley A, Black LA (1934) An examination of methods for determining soil organic matter and a proposed modification of the chromic acid titration method. Soil Sci 37:29–38

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wang HH, Hegazy AM, Jiang X, Hu ZY, Lu J, Mu J, Zhang XR, Zhu XQ (2016) Suppression of ammonia volatilization from rice-wheat rotation fields amended with controlled release urea and urea. Agron J 39:177–186

    Google Scholar 

  • Winings JH, Yin X, Agyin-Birikorang S, Singh U, Sanabria J, Savoy JH, Allen FL, Saxton AM (2017) Agronomic effectiveness of an organically enhanced nitrogen fertilizer. Nutr Cycl Agroecosyst 108:149–161

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wnuk A, Górny AG, Bocianowski J, Kozak M (2013) Visualizing harvest index in crops. Commun Biometry Crop Sci 8:48–59

    Google Scholar 

  • Yao Y, Zhang M, Tiana Y, Zhaoc M, Zhanga B, Zhaoa M, Zenga K, Yin B (2018) Urea deep placement for minimizing NH3 loss in an intensive rice cropping system. Field Crops Res 218:254–266

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yin XH, McClure MA (2013) Relationship of corn yield, biomass, 851 and leaf nitrogen with normalized difference vegetation index and plant height. Agron J 105:1005–1016

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yoseftabar S (2013) Effect of nitrogen management on panicle structure and yield in rice (Oryza sativa L.). Int J Agric Crop Sci 5:1224–1227

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Funding for this work was provided by United States Agency for International Development’s Feed the Future Soil Fertility Technology Adoption, Policy Reform and Knowledge Management Project through the International Fertilizer Development Center (IFDC). We thank Mr. Emmanuel K.M. Vorleto of Savanna Agricultural Research Institute (SARI) Soil Lab and Dr. Sammy Afful of Ghana Atomic Energy Commission (GAEC) analytical lab for soil and plant tissue analyses. We also wish to express our deep appreciation to Mrs. Lauren Johnson, Courtney Greene and Julie Kohler of IFDC Headquarters for their reviews and constructive criticisms.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sampson Agyin-Birikorang.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 12 kb)

Supplementary material 2 (PDF 225 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Agyin-Birikorang, S., Tindjina, I., Adu-Gyamfi, R. et al. Agronomic effectiveness of urea deep placement technology for upland maize production. Nutr Cycl Agroecosyst 116, 179–193 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10705-019-10039-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10705-019-10039-8

Keywords

Navigation