Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Environmental Impact Assessment of Economic Activity: Problems of Modeling and Mapping

  • Published:
Geography and Natural Resources Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A theoretical framework for environmental impact assessment of economic activity is formulated by using methods of mathematical modeling and thematic mapping. Theoretically, environment is considered as a surface of variety (manifold), linking various factors and conditions. Tangential planes to the surface correspond to any natural systems (ecosystems), individual according to their connections with the environment (points of tangency). An example of the display of the environmental variety is provided by landscape-typological maps of a territory. The equation of the plane specifies connections of factor parameters of ecosystems by taking into account their shift relative to environmental coordinates of these reference points. Different types of systemic interpretations of these equations (types of models) are formed with various quantitative criteria for change of in environmental status, such as the measures of responsibility and effectiveness of decisions made. Environmental impact assessment methods generally estimate changes in the state of natural systems rather than the transformation of their environment. Therefore, methods of distinguishing relevant indicators and selecting the characteristic features of their controlled changes are suggested. The antisymmetry of variability and stability is naturally discernible from the factors and conditions of economic activity, which is demonstrated by modeling the impact of economic processes on the environmental status: an assessment was made of the influence of the size of gross regional product on amounts of atmospheric emissions of pollutants as well as of waste water discharges on human health. The findings can be used in developing methods of mathematical modeling of the relationships between the ecological, economic and social blocks of territorial systems in order to solve problems of thematic mapping and seek optimal solutions in the field of environmental management.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Environmental Impact Assessment: Principles and Procedures, R.E. Munn, Ed., SCOPE 5, 2nd Ed., Chichester: Wiley, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Vtorzhenie v Prirodnuyu Sredu: Otsenka Vozdeistviya. Osnovnay Polozheniaya (Intrusion Into the Natural Environment: Impact Assessment. Principles and Procedures), A.Yu. Reteyum, Ed., Moscow: Progress, 1983 [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  3. Lee, N., Environmental Impact Assessment: A Review, Appl. Geogr., 1983, vol. 3, issue 1, pp. 5–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Glasson, J., Therivel, R. and Chadwick, A., Introduction to Environmental Impact Assessment (Natural and Built Environment Series), 3rd Ed., London; New York: Routledge. Taylor & Francis Group, 2005.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  5. Maksimenko, Yu.L. and Gorkina, I.D., Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA). Manual for Practical Workers, Moscow: REFIA, 1999 [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  6. Dyakonov, K.N. and Doncheva, A.V., Ecological Projection and Examination: A Textbook for Universities, Moscow: Aspekt Press, 2002 [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  7. The National Environmental Policy Act of 1969. URL: https://www.fWs.gov/r9esnepa/RelatedLegislativeAuthoritiesZnepa1969.PDF (Accessed February 18, 2018).

  8. SNiP 1.02.01-85. On the Composition and Procedure of Developing, Reconciling and Approving the Designing Estimates for the Construction of Enterprises, Buildings and Facilities, Moscow: Gosstroi SSSR, 1985 [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  9. Bronevoi, V.A., Vasilyev, S.A., Petrov, V.P., Ryabenko, A.E., Shanaurin, D.G., and Yurkin, E.A., Requirements for the Conduct of EIA and the Development of Design Documentation: Methodological Guidelines for Customers, Builders and Developers of Documentation, Moscow: NIA-Priroda, 2006 [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  10. Environmental Impact Assessment: Practice and Participation, 3rd Ed., K.S. Hanna, Ed., Oxford; Toronto: Oxford Univ. Press, 2016.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Principles of Environmental Impact Assessment. Best Practice, International Association for Impact Assessment in Cooperation With Institute of Environmental Assessment, UK, 1999. URL: https://www.iaia.org/uploads/pdf/principlesEA_1.pdf (Accessed June 12, 2018).

  12. Environmental Impact Assessment and Ecological Examination, N.D. Sorokin, Ed., St. Petersburg: Integral, 2006 [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  13. Arnold, L. and Hanna, K., Best practices in Environmental Assessment: Case Studies and Application to Mining, Canadian International Resources and Development Institute (CIRDI) Report 2017-003, 2017. URL: http://ok-cear.sites.olt.ubc.ca/files/2018/01/Best-Practices-in-Environmental-Assessment.pdf (Accessed July 3, 2018).

  14. Morrison-Saunders, A. and Arts J., Learning From Experience: Emerging Trends in Environmental Impact Assessment Follow-up, Impact Assess. Proj. Apprais., 2005, vol. 23, issue 3, pp 170–174.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Gibson, R.B., Doelle, M. and Sinclair, A.J., Fulfilling the Promise: Basic Components of Next Generation Environmental Assessment, JELP, vol. 29, issue 1, pp. 257–283

  16. Bartlett, R.V. and Kurian, P.A., The Theory of Environmental Impact Assessment: Implicit Models of Policy Making, Policy & Politics, 1999, vol. 27, no. 4, pp. 415–433.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Moskvitina, M., GIS as a Tool for Environmental Impact Assessment: A Case Study of EIA Implementation for the Road Building Project in Strömstad, Sweden, Lunds Universitets Naturgeografiska Institution Seminarieuppsatser, Lund: Department of Physical Geography, Lund University Sölvegatan, 1999, no. 62.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Alkema, D., Geneletti, D., Cavallin, A., Van Asch, Th., Fabbri, A., Zanchi, A., De Amicis, M., Bonomi, T., De Francesch, F., Moltrer, A., and Tomasi, L., Integrated Datasets, GIS and 3-D System Analysis for Environmental Impact Assessment in a Large Alpine Valley North of Trento (Italy), Proc. Workshop “International Cooperation and Technology Transfer (February 2–5, 2000, Ljubljana), International Archives of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, vol. XXXIII, part B7, pp. 54–62.

  19. Symbaluk, M.D., Testing Landscape Modeling Approaches for Environmental Impact Assessment of Mining Land Use on Grizzly Bears (Ursus arctos horribilis) in the Foothills Region of West Central Alberta, Master of Science Thesis, Victoria: Royal Roads University, 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Models of Natural Resource Management, V.I. Gurman, Ed., Moscow: Nauka, 1981 [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  21. The Ecological-Economic Development Strategy for a Region: Mathematical Modeling and System Analysis as Exemplified by the Baikal Region, V.V. Bufal and V.I. Gurman, Eds., Novosibirsk: Nauka, 1990 [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  22. Modeling and Management of Processes of Regional Development, S.N. Vasilyev, Ed., Moscow: Fizmatgiz, 2001 [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  23. Environmental Impact Assessment, 2018. URL: https://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki (Accessed June 8, 2018) [in Russian].

  24. Matveev, A.V. and Kotov, V.P., Environmental Impact Assessment and Ecological Examination, St. Petersburg: Izd. Sankt-Peterb. Gumanitar. Univ. Profsoyuzov, 2004 [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  25. Sedov, V.V., The Fundamentals of Economic Theory. Questions of Ecologically Sustainable Development of the Economy, Chelyabinsk: Izd. Chelyab. Univ., 2005 [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  26. Chernyavskaya, N.V., The Need and Possibility for Internalization of Ecological Externalities, Vestn. Chelyab. Univ., 2008, no. 29(130), issue 16, pp. 25–32 [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  27. Sklyanova, I.P. and Cherkashin, A.K., Quantitative Evaluation of the Demographic Response to Changes in Living Conditions in Monotowns, Region: Ekonomika i Sotsiologiya, 2015, no. 4, pp. 179–197 [in Russian].

  28. Cherkashin, A.K., Geographical Environment and Territorial Organization of the Arctic, Geogr. Prir. Resur., 2015, no. 4, pp. 81–89 [in Russian].

  29. Krivonozhko, V.E. and Lychev, A.V., Analysis of the Activity of Complex Socio-Economic Systems, Moscow: Izd. Mosk. Univ., 2010 [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  30. Krivonozhko, V.E., Propovoi, A.I., Sen’kov, R.V., Rodchenkov, I.V., and Anokhin, P.M., Analysis of the Effectiveness of Functioning of Complex Systems, Avtomatizatsiya Proektirovaniya, 1999, no. 1, pp. 2–7 [in Russian].

  31. Cherkashin, A.K. and Krasnoshtanova, N.E., Risk Assessment Models for Natural-Technical Systems, Geogr. Prir. Resur., 2014, no. 2, pp. 149–160 [in Russian].

  32. Khil’mi, G.F., The Fundamentals of the Biosphere Physics, Leningrad: Nauka, 1966 [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  33. Galeev, E.M. and Tikhomirov, V.M., Optimization: Theory, Examples, Problems, Moscow: Editorial URSS, 2000 [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  34. Cherkashin, A.K., Theory, Models and Methods for Analysis of the Territorial Organization of Society, Regional’nye Issledovaniya, 2016, no. 1(51), pp. 23–36 [in Russian].

  35. Cherkashin, A.K., Mathematical Bases for Knowledge Synthesis in Interdisciplinary Research Into Socio-Economic Phenomena, Zhurn. Ekonom. Teorii, 2017, no. 3, pp. 108–124 [in Russian].

  36. Rund, H., The Differential Geometry of Finsler Spaces, Berlin-Göttingen-Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag OHG, 1959.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  37. Cherkashin, A.K. and Myadzelets, A.V., Reconstructing a Nonlinear Dependence of the Quality of Life on the Socioeconomic Potential of Siberia’s Regions, Geogr. Prir. Resur., 2014, no. 4, pp. 122–130 [in Russian].

  38. Kalmykova, L.B., Influence of Socio-Economic Processes of a Region on the State of Environment, Statistika i Ekonomika, 2013, no. 5, pp. 158–162 [in Russian].

  39. Cherkashin, A.K. and Solodyankina, S.V., Functional Geography as a Direction of Theoretical Research and Modeling, Geogr. Prir. Resur., 2018, no. 2, pp. 181–190 [in Russian].

  40. Grossman, G.M. and Krueger, A.B., Economic Growth and the Environment, Q. J. Econ., 1995, vol. 110, no. 2, pp. 353–377.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Shkiperova, G.T., The Environmental Kuznets Curve as a Tool for Investigating the Regional Development, Ekonomicheskii Analiz: Teoriya i Praktika, 2013, vol. 12, issue 19, pp. 8–16 [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. V. B. Sochava Institute of Geography, Siberian Branch, Russian Academy of Sciences, Irkutsk, 664033, Russia

    A. K. Cherkashin

Authors
  1. A. K. Cherkashin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to A. K. Cherkashin.

Additional information

Russian Text © The Author(s), 2019, published in Geografiya i Prirodnye Resursy, 2019, Vol. 40, No. 3, pp. 5–15.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Cherkashin, A.K. Environmental Impact Assessment of Economic Activity: Problems of Modeling and Mapping. Geogr. Nat. Resour. 40, 195–204 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1134/S1875372819030016

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S1875372819030016

Keywords

Search

Navigation