Abstract
Home-making is a complex manifold of social and environmental processes, where individuals and families cultivate, nurture and preserve inhabit their primary domestic space: their homes. Shedding light on home-making practices may help us understand how families and individuals prioritize needs and resources and negotiate aesthetic values and norms to transform a house into a meaningful physical and imaginary entity. To date, so far, most literature on home-making practices in self-build housing schemes has focused on the role of dwellers (mostly families) in shaping their built environment, with little attention to the internal dynamics of family cores in producing home-making practices, and how these dynamics are shaped by existing spatial constrains. We propose that home-making practices should be considered mutually adaptive processes, in the sense that house transformations are shaped by people’s own activities, capabilities, interests and skills, which are multiple and modify over time, and, in turn, these home-making practices are shaped by family dynamics and spatial constrains. The current study portrays home-making practices and house enlargements of fifteen Minimal Incremental Units built under Chile’s Programa de Vivienda Progresiva, a large state-funded incremental housing programme that operated from 1990 to 2002. A series of semi-structured interviews were carried out to residents to know their motivations for upgrading or transforming their houses, the use of indoor and outdoor spaces, among other aspects. People’s perceptions were analysed qualitatively, attending at four dimensions of interest: motivations behind incremental upgrades, socialisation practices within home space, habitability conditions of the houses and family composition and incremental needs over time. The main results show that home-making practices aim to accommodate social and intimate spheres, and that exterior spaces play a significant role in everyday life, regardless of harsh climatic conditions of certain zones of Chile. Further, domestic spaces were transformed to accommodate sewing workshops, auto-repairs premises or gardening shelters, thus customising the house by intricate and evolving dynamics. The resulting domestic environment, in turn, would shape new family dynamics, producing a holistic, synchronic whole called home.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Abdul Aziz, A., & Sani Ahmad, A. (2012). Home making in low-cost housing area. Procedia-social and Behavioral Sciences,49, 268–281.
Acioly, C. (2016). Overview—A paradigm shift in global housing strategy. In Growing Up!: The search for high-density multi-story incremental housing. A publication of the Global University Consotim Exploting Incremental Housing. SIGUs-MIT and TU Darmstadt (pp. 44–46).
Arellano, J. (1977). Elementos para una política de vivienda social. EURE,5(14), 47–66. (in Spanish).
Arriagada, C. (2004). Chile: Un siglo de políticas en vivienda y barrio. Santiago: MINVU.
Barquero, J. A., & Trejos, J. D. (2004). Tipos de hogar, ciclo de vida familiar y pobreza en Costa Rica 1987-2002. Población y salud en mesoamérica, 2(1).
Blunt, A., & Dowling, R. (2006). Home. Oxon: Routledge.
Boccagni, P., & Brighenti, A. M. (2017). Immigrants and home in the making: Thresholds of domesticity, commonality and publicness. Journal of Housing and the Built Environment,32, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10901-015-9487-9.
Brakarz, J., Greene, M., & Rojas, R. (2002). Ciudades para todos. Washington: Banco Interamericano de Desarrollo. Accessed from https://publications.iadb.org/bitstream/handle/11319/418/Ciudades%20para%20todos.pdf;sequence=2. Accessed June 6, 2019.
Cancellieri, A. (2017). Towards a progressive home-making: The ambivalence of migrants’ experience in a multicultural condominium. Journal Housing and the Built Environment,32, 49–63. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10901-015-9489-7.
Casey, E. (1993). Getting back into place: Toward a renewed understanding of the place-world. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Castillo, M., & Hidalgo, R. (Eds.). (2007). 1906/2006: Cien años de política de vivienda en Chile, 10. Santiago: Universidad Nacional Andrés Bello.
Dayaratne, R., & Kellett, P. (2008). Housing and home-making in low-income urban settlements: Sri Lanka and Colombia. Journal of Housing and the Built Environment,23(1), 53–70.
De Certeau, M. (1984). The practice of everyday life. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Ducci, M. E., Figueroa, O., & Greene, M. (1994). Evaluación de Resultados del Programa de Vivienda Progresiva modalidad Privada Primera Etapa, División Técnica de Estudio y Fomento Habitacional. Santiago: MINVU.
Ducci, M. E., & Greene, M. (1994). Evaluación de Consolidación Habitacional en Primeras Etapas SERVIU, Proyecto de Asistencia Técnica al Programa de Vivienda Progresiva. Santiago: MINVU.
Fadda, G. (1995). Programa de Vivienda Progresiva V región 1990–1994: la participación de sus actores. Revista INVI,10(24), 34–59. (in Spanish).
Fadda, G., & Ducci, M. E. (1993). Politicas de Desarrollo Urbano y Vivienda en Chile: Interrelaciones y Efectos. In H. Bravo & C Martinez (Eds.) Chile: 50 Años de Vivienda Social. 1943–1993, Universidad de Valparaíso, Valparaíso (in Spanish).
Ferguson, B., & Smets, P. (2010). Finance for incremental housing; current status and prospects for expansion. Habitat International,34(3), 288–298.
Garcia-Huidobro, F., Torres, D., & Tugas, N. (2011). The experimental housing project (PREVI), Lima: The making of a neighbourhood. Architectural Design,81(3), 26–31.
Gaspar, R. (2017). Cambia todo cambia. Un análisis configuracional de las viviendas incrementales en Chile (Master Thesis). Santiago: Pontificia Univesidad Católica de Chile.
Gattoni, G., Goethert, R., & Chavez, R. (2011). Self-help housing and incremental housing: A discussion on the likely directions for future housing policy. Washington, D.C.: Inter-American Development Bank.
Gilbert, A. (2001). Housing in Latin America (Working Paper Series I-7U). Washington: Inter-American Development Bank.
Greene, M. (1993). La gestión gubernamental en el sector vivienda y urbanismo: 1991-1992. Santiago: Corporación de Promoción Universitaria. (in Spanish).
Greene, M., & González, E. (2004). El programa de vivienda progresiva en Chile 1990–2002. Santiago: Inter-American Development Bank Publication. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/254421544_El_programa_de_vivienda_progresiva_en_Chile_1990-2002. Accessed June 6, 2019.
Greene, M., & Rojas, E. (2008). Incremental construction: A strategy to facilitate access to housing. Environment & Urbanization,20(1), 89–108.
Harper, C., Portugal, V., & Shaikley, L. (2013). Incremental expansion: examining User-initiated transformations in government Housing in Manaus. In A. Garland (Ed.) Innovation in urban development: Incremental housing, big data, and gender. Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars (pp. 7–33). Available from https://www.wilsoncenter.org/publication/innovation-urban-development-incremental-housing-big-data-and-gender-0. Accessed June 6, 2019.
Hillier, B. (1996). Space is the machine. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Kellett, P., & Tipple, G. (2000). The home as workplace: A study of income-generating activities within the domestic setting. Environment and Urbanization,12(1), 203–213.
Kellett, P., Toro, A., & Haramoto, E. (1994). Cambios iniciados por los habitantes y transformaciones en la vivienda social: teoría y práctica en el contexto chileno. Revista INVI,9(21), 3–16. (in Spanish).
Manzo, L. (2003). Beyond house and haven: Toward a revisioning of emotional relationships with places. Journal of Environmental Psychology,23, 47–61.
Massey, D. (1992). A place called home. New Formations,17, 3–15.
McFarlane, C. (2011). The city as assemblage: Dwelling and urban space. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space,29(4), 649–671.
Mercado, O. (1977). El problema habitacional en Chile. Evolución a partir del año 1952. Escuela de Arquitectura, Universidad Católica de Chile, Santiago.
Morgan, D. (2011). Rethinking family practices. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Murray, C., & Clapham, D. (2015). Housing policies in Latin America: Overview of the four largest economies. International Journal of Housing Policy,15(3), 347–364.
Napier, M. (1998). Core housing and residents’ impacts: Personal experiences of incremental growth in two South African settlements. Third World Planning Review,20(4), 391–417.
Napier, M. (2002). Core housing, enablement and urban poverty. The consolidation paths of households living in two South African settlements. Boston Spa: British Library, British Thesis Service.
Ossul-Vermehren, I. (2018). Lo político de hacer hogar: una mirada de género a la vivienda autoconstruida. Revista INVI,33(93), 9–51.
Parra, C. (2007). Vivienda Progresiva, un programa del sector público que se potenció en el hábitat rural chileno. Revista INVI,22(59), 151–167. (in Spanish).
Pérez, A. (2011). Experiencia chilena en vivienda social. 1980–1995. Revista INVI,13(35), 3–87. (in Spanish).
Relph, E. (1976). Place and placelessness. London: Pion.
Saldaña, J. (2015). The coding manual for qualitative researchers. Los Angeles: Sage.
Seamon, D. (2018). Life takes Place; Phenomenology, lifeworlds and place making. Abingdon: Routledge.
Sepúlveda, O. (1996). El Programa de Viviendas Progresivas en áreas rurales. Revista INVI,11(29), 49–78.
Strassmann, W. P. (1986). Types of neighbourhood and home-basedenterprises: Evidence from Lima, Peru, Urban Studies No 23, pp. 485–500.
Teles, R., & Stumpf, M. (2013). Ampliaciones en viviendas sociales—Estudio de caso en Ivoti—Brasil. Revista Ingeniería de Construcción,28(3), 237–250. (in Spanish).
Tipple, G., & Ameen, S. (1999). User initiated extension activity in Bangladesh: “building slums” or area improvement? Environment and Urbanization,11(1), 165–183.
Turner, J. (1972). Housing as a verb. In J. Turner & R. Fichter (Eds.), Freedom to build: Dweller control of the housing process (pp. 148–175). New York: Macmillan.
Turner, J. (1977). Housing by people towards autonomy in building environments. New York: Pantheon Books.
Turner, J. (1978). Housing in three dimensions: Terms of reference for the housing question redefined. World Development,6(9), 1135–1145.
Wagemann, E. (2017). Need for adaptation: Transformation of temporary houses. Disasters,41(4), 828–851.
Wakely, P., & Riley, E. (2011). The case for incremental housing. Cities Alliance Policy Research and Working Papers Series No. 1 Accessed from: http://web.mit.edu/incrementalhousing/articlesPhotographs/pdfs/Case-for-Incremental-Housing.pdf. Accessed June 6, 2019.
Acknowledgements
We are grateful to the Centre for Sustainable Urban Development, CEDEUS (FONDAP Project 15110020) and to Fondecyt No. 1171232 for having partially financed this work.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Mora, R., Greene, M., Gaspar, R. et al. Exploring the mutual adaptive process of home-making and incremental upgrades in the context of Chile’s Progressive Housing Programme (1994–2016). J Hous and the Built Environ 35, 243–264 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10901-019-09677-9
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10901-019-09677-9