Skip to main content
Log in

Optimisation of elastomeric bearings’ vulcanisation process using response surface methodology and desirability function approach

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Rubber Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this study, response surface methodology and desirability function approach (DFA) were used to optimise the vulcanisation process of elastomeric bearings to obtain better quality products. For this purpose, compressive stiffness and vertical deflection under maximum load were determined as response variables with a target at 198 kN/mm and 3.46 mm, respectively, in accordance with customer’s request. Time, temperature and pressure were considered as control variables of the process. Experimental combinations were determined using Box–Behnken design and two repetitions were made in each combination. The experimental design was randomised for removing bias and other uncontrollable sources of extraneous variation. As a result of the statistical analysis, linear, quadratic, and interaction effects of factors on response variables were obtained. For simultaneous optimisation of multiple responses, the DFA was used and optimum factor levels were obtained. Finally, the optimum conditions were verified by confirmation experiments.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ulu KN, Huneau B, Verron E, Béranger AS, Heuillet P (2017) True stress controlled fatigue life experiments for elastomers. Int J Fatigue 104:171–182. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2017.07.007

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Nıgız FU, Unlu D, Hilmioglu N (2017) Carbon black loaded composite poly (dimethyl siloxane) membrane preparation and application for hazardous chemical removal from water. Acta Phys Pol A 132:693–696. https://doi.org/10.12693/APhysPolA.132.693

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Syed MB, Patisson L, Curtido M, Slee B, Diaz S (2014) The challenging requirements of the ITER anti seismic bearings. Nucl Eng Des 269:212–216. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nucengdes.2013.08.032

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Osgooei PM, Konstantinidis D, Tait MJ (2016) Variation of the vertical stiffness of strip-shaped fiber-reinforced elastomeric isolators under lateral loading. Compos Struct 144:177–184. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2016.01.089

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Tsai HC (2006) Compression stiffness of circular bearings of laminated elastic material interleaving with flexible reinforcements. Int J Solids Struct 43:3484–3497. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2005.05.012

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. EN 1337-3 (2005) Structural bearing part 3—elastomeric bearings. Association Francaise de Normalisation (AFNOR—French Standard Institute), France

  7. Nasir M, Teh GK (1988) The effects of various types of crosslinks on the physical properties of natural rubber. Eur Polym J 24(8):733–736. https://doi.org/10.1016/0014-3057(88)90007-9

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Zaimova D, Bayraktar E, Miskioglu I (2016) Design and manufacturing of new elastomeric composites: mechanical properties, chemical and physical analysis. Compos B Eng 105:203–210. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2016.05.061

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Flory PJ, Rabjohn N, Shaffer MC (1949) Dependence of elastic properties of vulcanized rubber on the degree of cross linking. J Polym Sci Banner 4(3):225–245. https://doi.org/10.1002/pol.1949.120040301

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Yavari S, Malakahmad A, Sapari NB, Yavari S (2017) Sorption properties optimization of agricultural wastes-derived biochars using response surface methodology. Process Saf Environ Prot 109:509–519. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psep.2017.05.002

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Tang X, Luo J, Liu F (2017) Aerodynamic shape optimization of a transonic fan by an adjoint-response surface method. Aerosp Sci Technol 68:26–36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ast.2017.05.005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Tiryaki AE, Kozan R, Adar NG (2015) Prediction of sheet drawing characteristics with square drawbead elements using response surface methodology. Acta Phys Pol A 128:344–347. https://doi.org/10.12693/APhysPolA.128.B-344

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Boyaci AI, Hatipoğlu T, Balci E (2017) Drilling process optimization by using fuzzy-based multi-response surface methodology. Adv Prod Eng Manag 12:163–172. https://doi.org/10.14743/apem2017.2.248

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Özsoy N, Özsoy M, Mimaroğlu A (2017) Taguchi approach to tribological behaviour of chopped carbon fiber-reinforced epoxy composite materials. Acta Phys Pol A 132:846–848. https://doi.org/10.12693/APhysPolA.132.846

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Assarzadeh S, Ghoreishi M (2015) Mathematical modeling and optimization of the electro-discharge machining (EDM) parameters on tungsten carbide composite: combining response surface methodology and desirability function technique. Sci Iran B 22(2):539–560

    Google Scholar 

  16. Derringer G, Suich R (1980) Simultaneous optimization of several response variables. J Qual Technol 12:214–219

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Salmasnia A, Ameri E, Ghorbanian A, Mokhtari H (2017) A multi-objective multi-state degraded system to optimize maintenance/repair costs and system availability. Sci Iran 24(1):355–363. https://doi.org/10.24200/sci.2017.4039

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Costa NR, Lourenço J, Pereira ZL (2011) Desirability function approach: a review and performance evaluation in adverse conditions. Chemom Intell Lab Syst 107:234–244. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemolab.2011.04.004

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ali İhsan Boyacı.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Boyacı, A.İ., Baynal, K. Optimisation of elastomeric bearings’ vulcanisation process using response surface methodology and desirability function approach. J Rubber Res 22, 187–193 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s42464-019-00027-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s42464-019-00027-6

Keywords

Navigation