Abstract
In this study, response surface methodology and desirability function approach (DFA) were used to optimise the vulcanisation process of elastomeric bearings to obtain better quality products. For this purpose, compressive stiffness and vertical deflection under maximum load were determined as response variables with a target at 198 kN/mm and 3.46 mm, respectively, in accordance with customer’s request. Time, temperature and pressure were considered as control variables of the process. Experimental combinations were determined using Box–Behnken design and two repetitions were made in each combination. The experimental design was randomised for removing bias and other uncontrollable sources of extraneous variation. As a result of the statistical analysis, linear, quadratic, and interaction effects of factors on response variables were obtained. For simultaneous optimisation of multiple responses, the DFA was used and optimum factor levels were obtained. Finally, the optimum conditions were verified by confirmation experiments.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ulu KN, Huneau B, Verron E, Béranger AS, Heuillet P (2017) True stress controlled fatigue life experiments for elastomers. Int J Fatigue 104:171–182. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2017.07.007
Nıgız FU, Unlu D, Hilmioglu N (2017) Carbon black loaded composite poly (dimethyl siloxane) membrane preparation and application for hazardous chemical removal from water. Acta Phys Pol A 132:693–696. https://doi.org/10.12693/APhysPolA.132.693
Syed MB, Patisson L, Curtido M, Slee B, Diaz S (2014) The challenging requirements of the ITER anti seismic bearings. Nucl Eng Des 269:212–216. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nucengdes.2013.08.032
Osgooei PM, Konstantinidis D, Tait MJ (2016) Variation of the vertical stiffness of strip-shaped fiber-reinforced elastomeric isolators under lateral loading. Compos Struct 144:177–184. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2016.01.089
Tsai HC (2006) Compression stiffness of circular bearings of laminated elastic material interleaving with flexible reinforcements. Int J Solids Struct 43:3484–3497. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2005.05.012
EN 1337-3 (2005) Structural bearing part 3—elastomeric bearings. Association Francaise de Normalisation (AFNOR—French Standard Institute), France
Nasir M, Teh GK (1988) The effects of various types of crosslinks on the physical properties of natural rubber. Eur Polym J 24(8):733–736. https://doi.org/10.1016/0014-3057(88)90007-9
Zaimova D, Bayraktar E, Miskioglu I (2016) Design and manufacturing of new elastomeric composites: mechanical properties, chemical and physical analysis. Compos B Eng 105:203–210. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2016.05.061
Flory PJ, Rabjohn N, Shaffer MC (1949) Dependence of elastic properties of vulcanized rubber on the degree of cross linking. J Polym Sci Banner 4(3):225–245. https://doi.org/10.1002/pol.1949.120040301
Yavari S, Malakahmad A, Sapari NB, Yavari S (2017) Sorption properties optimization of agricultural wastes-derived biochars using response surface methodology. Process Saf Environ Prot 109:509–519. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psep.2017.05.002
Tang X, Luo J, Liu F (2017) Aerodynamic shape optimization of a transonic fan by an adjoint-response surface method. Aerosp Sci Technol 68:26–36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ast.2017.05.005
Tiryaki AE, Kozan R, Adar NG (2015) Prediction of sheet drawing characteristics with square drawbead elements using response surface methodology. Acta Phys Pol A 128:344–347. https://doi.org/10.12693/APhysPolA.128.B-344
Boyaci AI, Hatipoğlu T, Balci E (2017) Drilling process optimization by using fuzzy-based multi-response surface methodology. Adv Prod Eng Manag 12:163–172. https://doi.org/10.14743/apem2017.2.248
Özsoy N, Özsoy M, Mimaroğlu A (2017) Taguchi approach to tribological behaviour of chopped carbon fiber-reinforced epoxy composite materials. Acta Phys Pol A 132:846–848. https://doi.org/10.12693/APhysPolA.132.846
Assarzadeh S, Ghoreishi M (2015) Mathematical modeling and optimization of the electro-discharge machining (EDM) parameters on tungsten carbide composite: combining response surface methodology and desirability function technique. Sci Iran B 22(2):539–560
Derringer G, Suich R (1980) Simultaneous optimization of several response variables. J Qual Technol 12:214–219
Salmasnia A, Ameri E, Ghorbanian A, Mokhtari H (2017) A multi-objective multi-state degraded system to optimize maintenance/repair costs and system availability. Sci Iran 24(1):355–363. https://doi.org/10.24200/sci.2017.4039
Costa NR, Lourenço J, Pereira ZL (2011) Desirability function approach: a review and performance evaluation in adverse conditions. Chemom Intell Lab Syst 107:234–244. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemolab.2011.04.004
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors have no conflict of interest.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Boyacı, A.İ., Baynal, K. Optimisation of elastomeric bearings’ vulcanisation process using response surface methodology and desirability function approach. J Rubber Res 22, 187–193 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s42464-019-00027-6
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s42464-019-00027-6