Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Spatial Organization of Innovation in the Oil Equipment Manufacturing Industry: Case of Dongying, China

  • Published:
Chinese Geographical Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

As innovation and technological change have become increasingly important for the competitiveness and sustainable growth of firms, cooperative innovation is now crucial for traditional industries in the context of globalization. This paper proposes a framework for analyzing the spatial pattern of cooperative innovation for traditional industries in developing countries. Based on in-depth interviews with 35 firms in the oil equipment manufacturing industry in Dongying City, China, this study argues that different firms in the innovation pyramid have various innovation activity preferences and spatial patterns. Firms with high innovation abilities tend to cooperate with various partners that are geographically dispersed and continuously expanding, while firms with inferior abilities usually cooperate with nearby fixed partners. Due to the differences in innovation environment and actor locations, firms tend to make different choices regarding innovation types and models, which highlight the importance of personnel training and basic scientific research at the global scale and practical product research and development at the national scale. Additionally, talent flow is the most important way to realize relationships for firm innovation activity.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Asheim B T, Coenen L, 2005. Knowledge bases and regional innovation systems: comparing Nordic clusters. Research Policy, 34(8): 1173–1190. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2005.03.013

    Google Scholar 

  • Asheim B T, 2007. Differentiated knowledge bases and varieties of regional innovation systems. Innovation, 20(3): 223–241. doi: 10.1080/13511610701722846

    Google Scholar 

  • Bathelt H, Malmberg A, Maskell P, 2004. Clusters and knowledge: local buzz, global pipelines and the process of knowledge creation. Progress in Human Geography, 28(1): 31–56. doi: 10.1191/0309132504ph469oa

    Google Scholar 

  • Bathelt H, Zeng G, 2014. The development of trade fair ecologies in China: case studies from Chengdu and Shanghai. Environment & Planning A: Economy and Space, 46(3): 511–530. doi: 10.1068/a45661

    Google Scholar 

  • Binz C, Truffer B, 2017. Global innovation systems—a conceptual framework for innovation dynamics in transnational contexts. Research Policy, 46(7): 1284–1298. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2017.05.012

    Google Scholar 

  • Boschma R A, Wenting R, 2007. The spatial evolution of the British automobile industry: does location matter? Industrial & Corporate Change, 16(2): 213–238. doi: 10.1093/icc/dtm004

    Google Scholar 

  • Cao Y Z, Qian Y Y, Weingast B R, 1999. From federalism, Chinese style to privatization, Chinese style. Economics of Transition, 7(1): 103–131. doi: 10.1111/1468-0351.00006

    Google Scholar 

  • Capello R, 1999. SME clustering and factor productivity: a milieu production function model. European Planning Studies, 7(6): 719–735. doi: 10.1080/09654319908720550

    Google Scholar 

  • Caragliu A, Nijkamp P, 2016. Space and knowledge spillovers in European regions: the impact of different forms of proximity on spatial knowledge diffusion. Journal of Economic Geography, 16(3): 749–774. doi: 10.1093/jeg/lbv042

    Google Scholar 

  • Cheng J, Bennett D, 2007. Success strategies in the Chinese chemical industry: a survey and case study investigations. Journal of Chinese Economic & Business Studies, 5(2): 91–112. doi: 10.1080/14765280701362232

    Google Scholar 

  • Chesbrough H, Vanhaverbeke W, West J, 2006. Open Innovation: Researching a New Paradigm. Oxford: Oxford UniversityPress.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chesbrough H, Brunswicker S, 2013. Managing Open Innovation in Large Firms. Survey Report.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chesbrough H, 2017. The future of open innovation: IRI medal address. Research-Technology Management, 60(6): 29–35. doi: 10.1080/08956308.2017.1373048

    Google Scholar 

  • China Machinery Industry Yearbook Editorial Committee, China Petroleum and Chemical Industry Association, 2015. China Petroleum & Petrochemical Equipment Industry Yearbook 2014. Beijing: China Machine Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coombs R, Harvey M, Tether B S, 2003. Analysing distributed processes of provision and innovation. Industrial & Corporate Change, 12(6): 1125–1155. doi: 10.1093/icc/12.6.1125

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooper J D, 1972. The sources of innovation. Psychopharmacology Bulletin, 8(2): 50–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dicken P, 2004. Geographers and ‘globalization’: (yet) another missed boat? Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 29(1): 5–26. doi: 10.1111/j.0020-2754.2004.00111.x

    Google Scholar 

  • Du J S, Leten B, Vanhaverbeke W, 2014. Managing open innovation projects with science-based and market-based partners. Research Policy, 43(5): 828–840. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2013. 12.008

    Google Scholar 

  • Feldman M P, 1994. The Geography of Innovation. Dordrecht: Springer. doi: 10.1007/978-94-017-3333-5

    Google Scholar 

  • Feldman M P, Audretsch D B, 1999. Innovation in cities: science-based diversity, specialization and localized competition. European Economic Review, 43(2): 409–429. doi: 10.1016/S0014-2921(98)00047-6

    Google Scholar 

  • Granovetter M S, 1973. The strength of weak ties. American Journal of Sociology, 78(6): 1360–1380. doi: 10.1086/225469

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall P, 2000. Creative cities and economic development. Urban Studies, 37(4): 639–649. doi: 10.1080/00420980050003946

    Google Scholar 

  • Huston L, Sakkab N, 2006. Connect and develop: inside Procter & Gamble’s new model for innovation. Harvard Business Review, 84(3): 58–66. Retrieved from: https://hbr.org/2006/03/connect-and-develop-inside-procter-gambles-new-model-for-innovation

    Google Scholar 

  • Jaffe A B, Trajtenberg M, Henderson R, 1993. Geographic localization of knowledge spillovers as evidenced by patent citations. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 108(3): 577–598. doi: 10.2307/2118401

    Google Scholar 

  • Jiang Y G, Chun W D, Yang Y, 2018. The effects of external relations network on low-carbon technology innovation: based on the study of knowledge absorptive capacity. Sustainability, 10(2): 155. doi:10.3390/su10010155

    Google Scholar 

  • Kleinknecht A, Poot T P, 1992. Do regions matter for R&D? Regional Studies, 26(3): 221–232. doi: 10.1080/003434092 12331346921

    Google Scholar 

  • Kline S J, Rosenberg N, 1986. An overview of innovation. In: Landau R, Rosenberg N (eds). The Positive Sum Strategy. Washington, DC: National Academy of Sciences, 275–306.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liefner I, Hennemann S, Xin L, 2006. Cooperation in the innovation process in developing countries: empirical evidence from Zhongguancun, Beijing. Environment & Planning A: Economy and Space, 38(1): 111–130. doi: 10.1068/a37343

    Google Scholar 

  • Liefner I, Brömer C, Zeng G, 2012. Knowledge absorption of optical technology companies in Shanghai, Pudong: successes, barriers and structural impediments. Applied Geography, 32(1): 171–184. doi: 10.1016/j.apgeog.2011.01.012

    Google Scholar 

  • Lin Lan, 2016. Innovation dynamics and spatial response of heavy-chemical industry: rethinking the cluster innovation. Acta Geographica Sinica, 71(8): 1400–1415. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Lorenzen M, Mudambi R, 2013. Clusters, connectivity and catch-up: Bollywood and Bangalore in the global economy. Journal of Economic Geography, 13(3): 501–534. doi: 10.1093/jeg/lbs017

    Google Scholar 

  • Lundvall B, Johnson B, 1994. The learning economy. Journal of Industry Studies, 1(2): 23–42. doi: 10.1080/1366271940000 0002

    Google Scholar 

  • Lyu G Q, 2016. The Structure of Innovation Networks of China’ Equipment Manufacturing Industry. Shanghai: East China Normal University, 2–15. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Malecki E J, 1979. Agglomeration and intra-firm linkage in R&D location in the United States. Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie, 70(6): 322–331. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-663.1979.tb01895.x

    Google Scholar 

  • Malmberg A, Maskell P, 2002. The elusive concept of localization economies: towards a knowledge-based theory of spatial clustering. Environment & Planning A: Economy and Space, 34(3): 429–449. doi: 10.1068/a3457

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin R, Moodysson J, 2013. Comparing knowledge bases: on the geography and organization of knowledge sourcing in the regional innovation system of Scania, Sweden. European Urban & Regional Studies, 20(2): 170–187. doi: 10.1177/096977 6411427326

    Google Scholar 

  • Miguelez E, Moreno R, 2018. Relatedness, external linkages and regional innovation in Europe. Regional Studies, 52(5): 688–701. doi: 10.1080/00343404.2017.1360478

    Google Scholar 

  • Paci R, Usai S, 1999. Externalities, knowledge spillovers and the spatial distribution of innovation. GeoJournal, 49(4): 381–390. doi: 10.1023/A:1007192313098

    Google Scholar 

  • Perri A, 2015. Innovation and the Multinational Firm: Perspectives on Foreign Subsidiaries and Host Locations. London: Palgrave Pivot.

    Google Scholar 

  • Powell W W, White D R, Koput K W et al., 2005. Network dynamics and field evolution: the growth of interorganizational collaboration in the life sciences. American Journal of Sociology, 110(4): 1132–1205. doi: 10.1086/421508

    Google Scholar 

  • Rutten R, 2003. Knowledge and Innovation in Regional Indus-try—An Entrepreneurial Coalition. London: Routledge. doi: 10.4324/9780203987803

    Google Scholar 

  • Scherngell T, Hu Y J, 2011. Collaborative knowledge production in China: regional evidence from a gravity model approach. Regional Studies, 45(6): 755–772. doi: 10.1080/00343401003 713373

    Google Scholar 

  • Schuldt N, Bathelt H, 2011. International trade fairs and global buzz. Part II: practices of global buzz. European Planning Studies, 19. 1–22. doi: 10.1080/09654313.2011.530390

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott A, 2002. A new map of Hollywood: the production and distribution of American motion pictures. Regional Studies, 36(9): 957–975. doi: 10.1080/0034340022000022215

    Google Scholar 

  • Segelod E, Jordan G, 2004. The use and importance of external sources of knowledge in the software development process. R&D Management, 34(3): 239–252. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9310.2004.00336.x

    Google Scholar 

  • Si Yuefang, Zeng Gang, Cao Xianzhong et al., 2016. Research progress of glocal innovation networks. Progress in Geography, 35(5): 600–609. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Sternberg R, 2000. Innovation networks and regional development. Evidence from the European Regional Innovation survey (ERIS): theoretical concepts, methodological approach, empirical basis and introduction to the theme issue. European Planning Studies, 8(4): 389–407. doi: 10.1080/713666420

    Google Scholar 

  • Teirlinck P, Spithoven A, 2008. The spatial organization of innovation: open innovation, external knowledge relations and urban structure. Regional Studies, 42(5): 689–704. doi: 10.1080/00343400701543694

    Google Scholar 

  • Trippl M, Tödtling F, Lengauer L, 2009. Knowledge sourcing beyond buzz and pipelines: evidence from the Vienna software sector. Economic Geography, 85(4): 443–462. doi: 10.1111/j.1944-8287.2009.01047.x

    Google Scholar 

  • Tsang D, 2005. Growth of indigenous entrepreneurial software firms in cities. Technovation, 25(11): 1331–1336. doi: 10.1016/j.technovation.2004.03.011

    Google Scholar 

  • Veugelers R, Cassiman B, 1999. Make and buy in innovation strategies: evidence from Belgian manufacturing firms. Research Policy, 28(1): 63–80. doi: 10.1016/S0048-7333(98) 00106-1

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang C C, Lin G C S, 2013. Dynamics of innovation in a globalizing China: regional environment, inter-firm relations and firm attributes. Journal of Economic Geography, 13(3): 397–418. doi: 10.1093/jeg/lbs019

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang Qiuyu, Lyu Guoqing, Zeng Gang, 2015. Spatial analysis of innovation network about the endogenous industrial cluster: an empirical analysis on Dongying. Economic Geography, 35(6): 102–108. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Wei Y H D, Liefner I, Miao C H, 2011. Network configurations and R&D activities of the ICT industry in Suzhou municipality, China. Geoforum, 42(4): 484–495. doi: 10.1016/j.geoforum.2011.03.005

    Google Scholar 

  • Wen Hu, Yang Youren, Hou Junjun, 2007. Study of embedded-ness and FDI-driven industrial cluster—Case of Pudong IC industrial cluster. Economic Geography, 27(5): 741–746. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Weterings A B R, Boschma R, 2006. The impact of geography on the innovative productivity of software firms in the Netherlands. In: Cooke P, Piccaluga A (eds.). Regional Development in the Knowledge Economy. London and New York: Routledge, 63–83.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. The Center for Modern Chinese City Studies, East China Normal University, Shanghai, 200062, China

    Qiuyu Wang & Gang Zeng

Authors
  1. Qiuyu Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Gang Zeng
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gang Zeng.

Additional information

Foundation item: Under the auspices of National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 41901158), China Postdoctoral Science Foundation (No. 2019M651428), Humanities and Social Sciences Research Planning Fund from Ministry of Education of China (No. 19YJC790138), The Soft Science Research Program of Shanghai Science and Technology development Commission (No. 19692102400)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wang, Q., Zeng, G. Spatial Organization of Innovation in the Oil Equipment Manufacturing Industry: Case of Dongying, China. Chin. Geogr. Sci. 30, 324–339 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11769-019-1092-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11769-019-1092-5

Keywords

Search

Navigation