Skip to main content
Log in

Seismic noise measures for underground gravitational wave detectors

  • Original Study
  • Published:
Acta Geodaetica et Geophysica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The site characterisation of future underground gravitational wave detectors is based on spectral properties of the low frequency seismic noise. The evaluation of the collected long term seismological data in the Mátra Gravitational and Geophysical Laboratory revealed some aspects that are not apparent in short term spectral noise characterisation. In this paper we survey the methodology. In particular, we argue that the spectral properties are best represented by percentiles of the data instead of the mode, because it is noisy, sensitive to the discretization and intrinsic averaging, therefore it is less suitable for a robust characterisation. The suitable cumulative measures are also scrutinized.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Global strategies for gravitational wave astronomy. Report from the Dawn IV workshop; Amsterdam August 30, 31 2018. https://dcc.ligo.org/public/0158/P1900028/004. April 22, 2019.

  2. Black Forest line is originally approximates from below the 10th percentiles of the acceleration PSD of the Black Forest site (ET Science Team 2011).

  3. See the manual of the instrument. http://www.guralp.com/documents/DAS-030-0120.pdf.

  4. Other instruments, the Trillium seismometer in Beker et al. (2015), work with 128 Hz sampling rate. Then the 128 s interval is convenient for fast Fourier calculation, but hourly or daily spectra require truncations.

  5. Beker originally defined \(sigma\_{ET}\) also to distinguish the distributions of PSDs. In this paper we do not want to explore this quantity but focus only to the rms.

  6. The planned detection length of GW signals could reach 1–10000 s. It could be reasonable to use a more suitable—less than the order of expected detection length—than the \(14\times 128\,\mathrm{{s}}\) averaging of Beker et al. (2015). Furthermore the STA makes the overlapping much easier to handle.

References

  • Abbott BP, Abbott R, Abbott TD, Abernathy MR, Acernese F, Ackley K, Adams C, Adams T, Addesso P, Adhikari RX et al (2016) Observation of gravitational waves from a binary black hole merger. Phys Rev Lett 116(6):061102

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barnaföldi GG, Bulik T, Cieslar M, Dávid E, Dobróka M, Fenyvesi E, Gráczer Z, Hamar G, Huba G, Kis Á, Kovács R, Lemperger I, Lévai P, Molnár J, Nagy D, Novák A, Oláh L, Pázmándi P, Piri D, Rosinska D, Somlai L, Starecki T, Suchenek M, Surányi G, Szalai S, Varga D, Vasúth M, Ván P, Vásárhelyi B, Wesztergom V, Wéber Z (2017) First report of long term measurements of the MGGL laboratory in the Mátra mountain range. Class Quantum Gravity 34(22):114001. arXiv: 1610.07630

  • Beker MG (2013) Low-frequency sensitivity of next generation gravitational wave detectors. Ph.D. thesis, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam

  • Beker MG, van den Brand JFJ, Rabeling DS (2015) Subterranean ground motion studies for the Einstein telescope. Class Quantum Gravity 32(2):025002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ET Science Team (2011) Einstein gravitational wave Telescope, Conceptual Design Study. Technical Report ET-0106C-10. http://www.et-gw.eu/etdsdocument

  • Fiorucci D, Harms J, Barsuglia M, Fiori I, Paoletti F (2018) Impact of infrasound atmospheric noise on gravity detectors used for astrophysical and geophysical applications. Phys Rev D 97(6):062003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harms J (2015) Terrestrial gravity fluctuations. Living Rev Relativ 18(1):3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peterson J (1993) Observations and modeling of seismic background noise. Open-File Report, USGS, RN:93-322

  • van den Brand JFJ, Beker MG, Doets M, Hennes E, Rabeling DS (2010) Einstein telescope site selection: seismic and gravity gradient noise. J Phy: Conf Ser 203:012076

    Google Scholar 

  • Ván P, et al. Long term measurements from Matra Gravitational and Geophysical Laboratory, under publication

Download references

Acknowledgements

The work was supported by the Grants National Research, Development and Innovation Office—NKFIH 116197(116375) NKFIH 124366(124508) and NKFIH 123815. The support of the PHAROS (CA16214) and G2net (CA17137) COST Actions is also acknowledged. The authors thank Géza Huba for the constant support and help, for Zoltán Zimborás and Jan Harms for important remarks. Also the help and support of the Nitrokémia Zrt and GEO-FABER Zrt. is greatly acknowledged.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to L. Ábel Somlai.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Somlai, L.Á., Gráczer, Z., Lévai, P. et al. Seismic noise measures for underground gravitational wave detectors. Acta Geod Geophys 54, 301–313 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40328-019-00257-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40328-019-00257-5

Keywords

Navigation