Skip to main content
Log in

Understanding the social adoption of smart TVs: the key role of product coolness

  • Long Paper
  • Published:
Universal Access in the Information Society Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study introduces a user adoption model for smart TVs and investigates how the components of the coolness concept contribute to user adoption in order to clarify the social diffusion of smart TVs. The results of a confirmatory factor analysis and structural equation modeling of a sample of more than 1100 people indicate that all components of coolness except subcultural appeal lead to users’ intentions to utilize smart TVs based on their positive attitude toward them. The results of this study validate the role of the components of the coolness concept as effective and appropriate motivations for the intention to use. The paper also presents the implications of the results and the accompanying limitations of the study.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Alam, I., Khusro, S., Naeem, M.: A review of smart TV: Past, present, and future. In: 2017 International Conference on Open Source Systems & Technologies (ICOSST), pp. 35–41. IEEE (2017, December)

  2. Anderson, J.C., Gerbing, D.W.: Structural equation modeling in practice: a review and recommended two-step approach. Psychol. Bull. 103(3), 411–423 (1988)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bloch, P.H., Brunel, F.F., Arnold, T.J.: Individual differences in the centrality of visual product aesthetics: concept and measurement. J. Consum. Res. 29(4), 551–565 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Bodine, K., Gemperle, F.: Effects of functionality on perceived comfort of wearables. In: Proceedings of the 7th IEEE International Symposium on Wearable Computers, p. 57. IEEE Computer Society (2003, October)

  5. Byrne, B.M.: Structural Equation Modeling with AMOS: Basic Concepts, Applications, and Programming. Routledge, London (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Chan, M., Estève, D., Escriba, C., Campo, E.: A review of smart homes—present state and future challenges. Comput. Methods Programs Biomed. 91(1), 55–81 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Colborne, G.: Simple and Usable Web, Mobile, and Interaction Design. New Riders, San Francisco (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Davcik, N.S.: The use and misuse of structural equation modeling in management research: a review and critique. J. Adv. Manag. Res. 11(1), 47–81 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Davis, F.D.: Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Q. 13(3), 319–340 (1989)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Davis, F.D., Bagozzi, R.P., Warshaw, P.R.: User acceptance of computer technology: a comparison of two theoretical models. Manag. Sci. 35(8), 982–1003 (1989)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Digital Times: Smart TV in China and Korea (2017). Retrieved from http://www.dt.co.kr/contents.html?article_no=2017033002100832816001

  12. Filieri, R., Chen, W., Lal Dey, B.: The importance of enhancing, maintaining and saving face in smartphone repurchase intentions of Chinese early adopters: an exploratory study. Inf. Technol. People 30(3), 629–652 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Franke, N., Schreier, M.: Product uniqueness as a driver of customer utility in mass customization. Mark. Lett. 19(2), 93–107 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Gerbing, D.W., Hamilton, J.G.: Viability of exploratory factor analysis as a precursor to confirmatory factor analysis. Struct. Equ. Model. Multidiscip. J. 3(1), 62–72 (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Hassenzahl, M., Tractinsky, N.: User experience—a research agenda. Behav. Inf. Technol. 25(2), 91–97 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Holbert, R.L., Stephenson, M.T.: Structural equation modeling in the communication sciences, 1995–2000. Hum. Commun. Res. 28(4), 531–551 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Im, S., Bhat, S., Lee, Y.: Consumer perceptions of product creativity, coolness, value and attitude. J. Bus. Res. 68(1), 166–172 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Keil, F.C.: Concepts, Kinds, and Cognitive Development. MIT Press, Cambridge (1992)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Kettanurak, V.N., Ramamurthy, K., Haseman, W.D.: User attitude as a mediator of learning performance improvement in an interactive multimedia environment: an empirical investigation of the degree of interactivity and learning styles. Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud. 54(4), 541–583 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Kim, K.J.: Round or square? How screen shape affects utilitarian and hedonic motivations for smartwatch adoption. Cyberpsychol. Behav. Soc. Netw. 19(12), 733–739 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Kim, K.J., Shin, D.H.: An acceptance model for smart watches: implications for the adoption of future wearable technology. Internet Res. 25(4), 527–541 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Kim, K.J., Shin, D.H., Park, E.: Can coolness predict technology adoption? Effects of perceived coolness on user acceptance of smartphones with curved screens. Cyberpsychol. Behav. Soc. Netw. 18(9), 528–533 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Kim, M., Park, J.: Demand forecasting and strategies for the successfully deployment of the smart TV in Korea. In: 2011 13th International Conference on Advanced Communication Technology (ICACT), pp. 1475–1478. IEEE (2011, February)

  24. Kim, S.Y., Lee, S.H., Hwang, H.S.: A study of the factors affecting user acceptance of smart TVs. J. Korea Acad. Ind. Coop. Soc. 14(4), 1652–1662 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Kim, K.J., Sundar, S.S.: Does screen size matter for smartphones? Utilitarian and hedonic effects of screen size on smartphone adoption. Cyberpsychol. Behav. Soc. Netw. 17(7), 466–473 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Kline, R.B.: Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modeling. Guilford Publications, New York (2015)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  27. Korunka, C., Hoonakker, P.: The Impact of ICT on Quality of Working Life. Springer, Dordrecht (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  28. Kwon, S.J., Park, E., Kim, K.J.: What drives successful social networking services? A comparative analysis of user acceptance of Facebook and Twitter. Soc. Sci. J. 51(4), 534–544 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  29. Leron, U., Hazzan, O.: Intuitive vs analytical thinking: four perspectives. Educ. Stud. Math. 71(3), 263–278 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  30. Lin, C., Ha, L.: Subculture, critical mass, and technology use. J. Comput. Inf. Syst. 50(3), 72–80 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  31. Mitomo, H., Fuke, H., Bohlin, E. (eds.): The Smart Revolution Towards the Sustainable Digital Society: Beyond the Era of Convergence. Edward Elgar Publishing, Cheltenham (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  32. Park, E., Baek, S., Ohm, J., Chang, H.J.: Determinants of player acceptance of mobile social network games: an application of extended technology acceptance model. Telemat. Inform. 31(1), 3–15 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  33. Park, E., Cho, Y., Han, J., Kwon, S.J.: Comprehensive approaches to user acceptance of Internet of Things in a smart home environment. IEEE Internet Things J. 4(6), 2342–2350 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  34. Park, E., Kim, K.J.: User acceptance of long-term evolution (LTE) services: an application of extended technology acceptance model. Program 47(2), 188–205 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  35. Park, E., Kim, K.J.: An integrated adoption model of mobile cloud services: exploration of key determinants and extension of technology acceptance model. Telemat. Inform. 31(3), 376–385 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  36. Park, E., Kim, S., Kim, Y., Kwon, S.J.: Smart home services as the next mainstream of the ICT industry: determinants of the adoption of smart home services. Univ. Access Inf. Soc. 17(1), 175–190 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  37. Park, E., Ohm, J.: Factors influencing users’ employment of mobile map services. Telematics Inform. 31(2), 253–265 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  38. Park, J.H., Kim, M.K.: Factors influencing the low usage of smart TV services by the terminal buyers in Korea. Telematics Inform. 33(4), 1130–1140 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  39. Rahman, K.: “Wow! It’s cool”: the meaning of coolness in marketing. Mark. Intell. Plan. 31(6), 620–638 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  40. Scaife, M., Rogers, Y.: External cognition: how do graphical representations work? Int. J. Hum Comput Stud. 45(2), 185–213 (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  41. Shang, R.A., Chen, Y.C., Shen, L.: Extrinsic versus intrinsic motivations for consumers to shop on-line. Inf. Manag. 42(3), 401–413 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  42. Shin, D.H., Hwang, Y., Choo, H.: Smart TV: are they really smart in interacting with people? Understanding the interactivity of Korean Smart TV. Behav. Inf. Technol. 32(2), 156–172 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  43. Sundar, S.S., Kim, J.: Interactivity and persuasion: influencing attitudes with information and involvement. J. Interact. Advert. 5(2), 5–18 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  44. Sundar, S.S., Tamul, D.J., Wu, M.: Capturing “cool”: measures for assessing coolness of technological products. Int. J. Hum Comput Stud. 72(2), 169–180 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  45. Tractinsky, N., Cokhavi, A., Kirschenbaum, M., Sharfi, T.: Evaluating the consistency of immediate aesthetic perceptions of web pages. Int. J. Hum Comput Stud. 64(11), 1071–1083 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  46. Tractinsky, N., Shoval-Katz, A., Ikar, D.: What is beautiful is usable. Interact. Comput. 13(2), 127–145 (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  47. Venkatesh, V., Morris, M.G., Davis, G.B., Davis, F.D.: User acceptance of information technology: toward a unified view. MIS Q. 27(3), 425–478 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  48. Woodson, W.E., Tillman, B., Tillman, P.: Human Factors Design Handbook: Information and Guidelines for the Design of Systems, Facilities, Equipment, and Products for Human Use. McGraw-Hill, New York (1992)

    Google Scholar 

  49. Yu, E., Hong, A., Hwang, J.: A socio-technical analysis of factors affecting the adoption of smart TV in Korea. Comput. Hum. Behav. 61, 89–102 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  50. Zhou, T.: Understanding online community user participation: a social influence perspective. Internet Res. 21(1), 67–81 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  51. Zhou, K.Z., Nakamoto, K.: How do enhanced and unique features affect new product preference? The moderating role of product familiarity. J. Acad. Mark. Sci. 35(1), 53–62 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research was supported by the MSIT (Ministry of Science and ICT), Korea, under the National Program for Excellence in SW supervised by the IITP (Institute for Information and communications Technology Promotion) (2015-0-00914) and by the National Research Foundation of Korea grant funded by the Korean government (NRF-2017R1C1B5017437).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Eunil Park.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Park, E. Understanding the social adoption of smart TVs: the key role of product coolness. Univ Access Inf Soc 19, 595–602 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10209-019-00652-3

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10209-019-00652-3

Keywords

Navigation