Skip to main content
Log in

Physical Modelling of Axial Compressive Bearing Capacity of Instrumented Piles in Oil-Contaminated Sandy Soil

  • Research Paper
  • Published:
Iranian Journal of Science and Technology, Transactions of Civil Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Oil and its derivatives such as gasoline, gasoil and ‎kerosene are the main sources of energy in the transport and industry sectors, and also the most common ‎soil contaminants. Oil contamination of the soils as a serious geoenvironmental problem not only affects soil quality ‎but also changes its geotechnical properties. Any changes in the geotechnical properties of the soils affect the axial bearing capacity of pile. The main objective of the current study is to determine the effects of various concentrations of different oil ‎products, as well as different soil relative densities, and thickness of the contaminated sand layer on the load–displacement (axial compressive) behaviour of two ‎instrumented, close-ended steel pipe piles with different diameters and slenderness ratios implemented in an oil-contaminated sandy soil through physical modelling. Tests results were compared with the CFEM ‎analytical method of calculating pile axial bearing capacities. Results showed that increasing the percentage of the oil in the soil reduces the values of net total, toe and shaft bearing ‎capacity of the pile. The type of the oil had a remarkable effect on the bearing capacities of the pile. The higher the kinematic ‎viscosity, the lower the amount of bearing capacities. ‎Comparing the measured and predicted values of bearing capacity based on modified CFEM ‎method concluded that, although a good agreement can be seen between the results of shaft capacity, the ‎CFEM method with modified bearing capacity factors could not predict the effects of oil contamination ‎on the toe bearing capacities of piles precisely.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abioye P (2011) Biological remediation of hydrocarbon and heavy metals contaminated soil. In: Pascucci S (ed) Soil contamination. InTech, Rijeka, pp 127–142

    Google Scholar 

  • Aiban SA (1998) The effect of temperature on the engineering properties of oil-contaminated sands. Environ Int 24(1/2):153–161

    Google Scholar 

  • Al-Mhaidib AI, Edil TB (1998) Model tests for uplift resistance of piles in sand. Geotech Test J 21(3):213–221

    Google Scholar 

  • Al-Sanad HA, Ismael NF (1997) Aging effects on oil-contaminated Kuwaiti sand. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 123(3):290–293

    Google Scholar 

  • Al-Sanad HA, Eid WK, Ismael NF (1995) Geotechnical properties of oil-contaminated Kuwaiti sand. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 121(5):407–412

    Google Scholar 

  • ASTM D1143 (2007) Standard test methods for deep foundations under static axial compressive load. Annual Books of ASTM Standards

  • ASTM D3080 (1999) Standard test method for direct shear test of soils under consolidated drained conditions. Annual Books of ASTM Standards

  • ASTM D422 (1999) Standard test method for particle size analysis of soils. Annual Books of ASTM Standards

  • ASTM D854 (1999) Standard test method for specific gravity of soils. Annual Books of ASTM Standards

  • ASTM D4253 (2006) Standard test methods for maximum index density and unit weight of soils using a vibratory table. Annual Books of ASTM Standards

  • ASTM D4254 (2006) Standard test methods for minimum index density and unit weight of soils and calculation of relative density. Annual Books of ASTM Standards

  • ASTM D2487 (2011) Standard practice for classification of soils for engineering purposes (unified soil classification system). Annual Books of ASTM Standards

  • Bagriacik B, Demir A, Laman M, Ok B, Sarici T (2013) An investigation of uplift behavior of vertical piles embedded in reinforced sand under inclined loads. In: Proceedings of 2nd international Balkans conference on challenges of civil engineering, BCCCE, Tirana, Albania, pp 825–831

  • Bałachowski L (2017) Physical modelling of geotechnical structures in ports and offshore. Polish Marit Res 24:4–9

    Google Scholar 

  • Been K, Jefferies MG, Crooks JHA, Rothenburg L (1987) The cone penetration test in sands Part II General inference of state. Géotechnique 37(3):285–299

    Google Scholar 

  • Bekki R, Canou J, Tali B, Dupla JC, Bouafia A (2013) Evolution of local friction along a model pile shaft in a calibration chamber for a large number of loading cycles. Comptes Rendus Mechanique 341:499–507

    Google Scholar 

  • Bica AVD, Prezzi M, Seo H, Salgado R, Kim D (2013) Instrumentation and axial load testing of displacement piles. In: Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers, Geotechnical Engineering

  • Canadian Foundation Engineering Manual, CFEM (2006) Canadian Geotechnical Society, 4th edn. Vancouver, BC

    Google Scholar 

  • Chattopadhyay BC, Pise PJ (1986) Uplift capacity of piles in sand. J Geotech Eng 112(9):888–904

    Google Scholar 

  • Chew SJ, Lee CY (2010) Simple shear behavior of palm biodiesel contaminated soil. ARPN J Eng Appl Sci 5(12):6–9

    Google Scholar 

  • Cook EE, Puri VK, Shin EC (1992) Geotechnical characteristics of crude oil-contaminated sands. In: Proceedings of 2nd international offshore and polar engineering conference. San Francisco, USA, pp 384–387

  • Cooke RW, Price G (1973) Strains and displacements around friction piles. In: Proceedings of 8th international conference on soil mechanics and foundation engineering, Moscow, former USSR

  • Das BM (1983) A procedure for estimation of uplift capacity of rough piles. J Soils Found 23(3):122–126

    Google Scholar 

  • Das N, Chandran P (2011) Microbial degradation of petroleum hydrocarbon contaminants: an overview. Biotechnology Research International. Article ID 941810. https://doi.org/10.4061/2011/941810

  • Das BM, Seeley GR, Pfeifle TW (1977) Pullout resistance of rough rigid piles in granular soils. J Soils Found 17(3):72–77

    Google Scholar 

  • Dash BK, Pise PJ (2003) Effect of compressive load on uplift capacity of model piles. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 129(11):987–992

    Google Scholar 

  • Evgin E, Das BM (1992) Mechanical behavior of an oil-contaminated sand. In: Usmen A (ed) Environmental geotechnology proceedings. Mediterranean conference. Balkema Publishers, Rotterdam, pp 101–108

    Google Scholar 

  • Gaaver KE (2013) Uplift capacity of single piles and pile groups embedded in cohesionless soil. Alex Eng J 52:365–372

    Google Scholar 

  • Ghaly AM (2001) Strength remediation of oil-contaminated sands. In: Proceedings of the 17th international conference on solid waste technology and management, PA, USA

  • Ghazavi M, Alimardani Lavasan A (2006) Bearing capacity of tapered and step-tapered piles subjected to axial compressive loading. In: 7th International conference on coasts, ports and marine structures. Tehran, Iran

  • Hu L, Pu J (2004) Testing and modeling of soil-structure interface. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 130(8):851–860

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson K (2005) Load-deformation behavior of foundations under vertical and oblique loads. Ph.D. thesis. School of engineering. James Cook University

  • Karimi AH, Eslami A, Zarrabi M, Khazaei J (2017) Study of pile behavior by improvement of confining soils using frustum confining vessel. Sci Iran Trans A Civil Eng 24(4):1874–1882

    Google Scholar 

  • Karkush MO, Abdul Kareem MS (2015) Behavior of pile foundation subjected to cyclic lateral loading in contaminated soils. J Civil Eng Res 5(6):144–150

    Google Scholar 

  • Karkush MO, Abdul Kareem MS (2016a) Behavior of pile group subjected to cyclic lateral loading in contaminated soils. Int J GEOMATE 10(21):1943–1949

    Google Scholar 

  • Karkush MO, Abdul Kareem MS (2016b) Impacts of soil contamination on the response of piles foundation under a combination of loading. Eng Technol Appl Sci Res 6(1):917–922

    Google Scholar 

  • Kermani M, Ebadi T (2012) The effect of oil contamination on the geotechnical properties of fine-grained soils. Soil Sedim Contam 21:655–671

    Google Scholar 

  • Khamehchiyan M, Charkhabi AH, Tajik M (2007) Effects of crude oil contamination on geotechnical properties of clayey and sandy soils. Eng Geol 89:220–229

    Google Scholar 

  • Khazaei J, Eslami A (2016) Geotechnical behavior of helical piles via physical modeling by Frustum Confining Vessel (FCV). Int J Geogr Geol 5(9):167–181

    Google Scholar 

  • Kishida H (1963) Stress distribution by model piles in sand. Soils Found 4(1):1–23

    Google Scholar 

  • Kraft LMJ (1991) Performance of axially loaded pipe piles in sand. J Geotech Eng 117(2):272–296

    Google Scholar 

  • Kulhawy FH, Peterson MS (1979) Behavior of sand and concrete interfaces. In: Proceedings of the 6th Pan American conference on soil mechanics and foundation engineering, Brazil. 2, pp 225–230

  • Kvenvolden KA, Cooper CK (2003) Natural seepage of crude oil into the marine environment. Geo-Mar Lett 23:140–146

    Google Scholar 

  • Levacher DR, Sieffert J (1984) Tests on model tension piles. J Geotech Eng 110(12):1735–1748

    Google Scholar 

  • Livneh B, El Nagger MH (2008) Axial testing and numerical modelling of square shaft helical piles under compressive and tensile loading. Can Geotech J 45:1142–1155

    Google Scholar 

  • Lorincz J (1984) Effect of infiltrating hydrocarbons on the soil shear strength. Akad Kiado 175–181

  • Lukas RG, Gnaedinger RJ (1972) Settlement due to chemical attack of soils. In: Proceedings of ASCE specialty conference on performance of earth and earth supported structures, Purdue University, Lafayette, Indiana, USA, pp 1087–1104

  • Meyerhof GG (1959) Compaction of sands and bearing capacity of cohesionless soils. J Soil Mech Found Div ASCE 85(6):1–29

    Google Scholar 

  • Mohammadi A, Ebadi T, Eslami A (2017) Shear strength behavior of crude oil-contaminated sand-concrete interface. Geomech Eng 12(2):211–221

    Google Scholar 

  • Mohammadi A, Ebadi T, Ahmadi M (2018) Effect of bentonite addition on geotechnical properties of oil-contaminated sandy soil. J Civil Eng Constr 7(4):153–162

    Google Scholar 

  • Mohammadi A, Ebadi T, Eslami A, van der Zee, SEATM (2019) Axial compressive bearing capacity of piles in oil contaminated sandy soil using FCV. Mar Georesour Geotechnol 37(2):164–179

    Google Scholar 

  • Nasehi SA, Uromeihy A, Nikudel MR, Morsali A (2016) Influence of gas oil contamination on geotechnical properties of fine and coarse-grained soils. Geotech Geol Eng 34(1):333–345

    Google Scholar 

  • Nasr AMA (2009) Experimental and theoretical studies for the behaviour of strip footing on oil-contaminated sand. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 135(12):162–174

    Google Scholar 

  • Nasr AMA (2013) Uplift behavior of vertical piles embedded in oil-contaminated sand. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 139(1):162–174

    Google Scholar 

  • Nasr AMA (2015) Behaviour of strip footing on oil-contaminated sand slope. Int J Phys Model Geotech 16(3):134–151

    Google Scholar 

  • Paikowsky SG, Player CM, Connors PJ (1995) A dual interface apparatus for testing unrestricted friction of soil along solid surfaces. Geotech Test J 18(2):168–193

    Google Scholar 

  • Puri VK (2000) Geotechnical aspects of oil-contaminated sands. Soil Sedim Contam 9(4):359–374

    Google Scholar 

  • Puri VK, Das BM, Cook EE, Shin EC (1994) Geotechnical properties of crude oil-contaminated sand. Analysis of soil contaminated with petroleum constituents. ASTM STP 1221, Tracey A. O’Shay and Keith B. Hoddinott, Eds. American Society for Testing Materials, Philadelphia

  • Rahman ZA, Hamzah U, Ahmad N (2010) Geotechnical characteristics of oil-contaminated granitic and metasedimentary soils. Asian J Appl Sci 3(4):237–249

    Google Scholar 

  • Rahman ZA, Hamzah U, Ahmad N (2011) Engineering geological properties of Oil-contaminated granitic and metasedimentary soils. Sains Malays 40(4):293–300

    Google Scholar 

  • Randolph MF, Wroth CP (1978) Analysis of deformation of vertical loaded piles. J Geotech Eng 104(GT12):1465–1488

    Google Scholar 

  • Ratnaweera P, Meegoda JN (2006) Shear strength and stress-strain behaviour of contaminated soils. Geotech Test J 29(2):133–140

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinsky EI, Morrison CF (1964) Sand displacement and compaction around model friction piles. Can Geotech J 1(2):81–93

    Google Scholar 

  • Salgado R, Mitchell JK, Jamiolkowski M (1998) Calibration chamber size effects on penetration resistance in sand. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng ASCE 124(9):878–888

    Google Scholar 

  • Sedran G (1999) Experimental and analytical study of a Frustum Confining Vessel. Doctoral Thesis, McMaster University

  • Shaheen ET (2011) Effect of crude oil products on the geotechnical properties of sandy soil. Master Thesis, American University of Sharjah

  • Sherif MA, Burrous CM (1969) Temperature effects on the unconfined shear strength of saturated cohesive soil. Highw Res Board Spec Rep 103:267–272

    Google Scholar 

  • Shin EC, Das BM (2001) Bearing capacity of unsaturated oil-contaminated sand. Int J Offshore Polar Eng 11(3):220–227

    Google Scholar 

  • Shin EC, Lee JB, Das BM (1999) Bearing capacity of a model scale footing on crude oil-contaminated sand. Geotech Geol Eng 17(2):123–132

    Google Scholar 

  • Shin EC, Omar MT, Tahmaz AA, Das BM (2002) Shear strength and hydraulic conductivity of oil-contaminated sand. In: Proceedings of the 4th international congress on environmental geotechnics, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, pp 11–15

  • Sim YL, Lee CY (2012) Some geotechnical properties of palm biodiesel contaminated mining sand and weathered granite soil. Int J Adv Sci Eng Technol Res (IJASETR) 1(4):1–8

    Google Scholar 

  • Subba Rao KS, Allam MM, Robinson RG (1998) Interfacial friction between sands and solid surface interfaces. Proc Inst Civil Eng 131:75–82

    Google Scholar 

  • Sulaeman A, Ling FNL, Sajiharjo M (2014) Modelling of clay behaviour in pile loading test using one-gravity small-scale physical model. International Integrated Engineering Summit (IIES 2014), 1-4 December 2014, Universiti Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia, Johor

  • Tiwari B, Ajmera B, Kaya G (2010) Shear strength reduction at soil structure interface. In: Proceeding of GeoFlorida 2010: advances in analysis, modeling and design foundation engineering design problems, Orlando, FL, USA, pp 1747–1756

  • Tomlinson MJ (1994) Pile design and construction practice, 4th edn. View Point Publication, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Uesugi M, Kishida H (1986) Influential factors of between steel and dry sands. Soils Found 26(2):33–46

    Google Scholar 

  • Uesugi M, Kishida H, Tsubakihara Y (1990) Friction between dry sand and concrete under monotonic and repeated loading. Soils Found 30(1):115–128

    Google Scholar 

  • United States Environmental Protection Agency, USEPA (1986) Pump-and-treat groundwater remediation: a guide for decision makers and practitioners. EPA/625/R-95/005. Office of Research and Development, Washington, USA

  • Vesic AS (1970) Tests on instrumented piles, Ogeechee River site. J Soil Mech Found Div 96(SM2):561–584

    Google Scholar 

  • Yin ZZ, Zhu H, Xu GH (1995) A study of deformation in the interface between soil and concrete. Comput Geotech 17:75–92

    Google Scholar 

  • Zare M, Eslami A (2014) Study of deep foundation performances by frustum confining vessel (FCV). Int J Civil Eng Trans B Geotech Eng 12(4):271–280

    Google Scholar 

  • Zarrabi M, Eslami A (2016) Behavior of piles under different installation effects by physical modeling. Int J Geomech 16:04016014

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This project was financially supported by Iran National Science Foundation (INSF) under a comprehensive program, project No. 94004730. The authors also thank Mr. Arash Aliasghar and Mr. Mohammadali Olanj for their assistance in implementing the tests.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Taghi Ebadi.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Mohammadi, A., Ebadi, T. & Boroomand, M.R. Physical Modelling of Axial Compressive Bearing Capacity of Instrumented Piles in Oil-Contaminated Sandy Soil. Iran J Sci Technol Trans Civ Eng 44, 695–714 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40996-019-00279-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40996-019-00279-7

Keywords

Navigation