Skip to main content
Log in

Don’t make me sick: investigating the incidence of cybersickness in commercial virtual reality headsets

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Virtual Reality Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The resurgence of interest in the use of virtual reality (VR) technology for research and entertainment purposes has led to an increase in concerns about human factor issues inherent in VR technology. One issue that has received a great deal of attention from researchers and end users is cybersickness, which refers to a constellation of unpleasant physiological symptoms, such as nausea and dizziness, experienced as result of exposure to a virtual environment. While cybersickness is not a new issue, it is expected to become even more prevalent with the recent proliferation of commercially available VR headsets, such as Oculus Rift and HTC Vive, underscoring the importance of investigating the prevalence of cybersickness while using these headsets. Accordingly, in two experiments, the current study examined whether cybersickness was a persistent issue in the state-of-the-art commercial-grade VR headsets and compared the incidence and severity of cybersickness across Oculus Rift CV1, HTC Vive and a desktop display. Consistent with prior work into head-mounted displays and cybersickness, results indicated that participants in the Oculus Rift CV1 and HTC Vive conditions experienced more severe cybersickness symptoms, when compared to those in the desktop display condition. Oculus Rift CV1 and HTC Vive did not significantly differ from each other and were comparable in the severity of cybersickness symptoms they induce. The current study demonstrated that cybersickness was still a prevalent human factor issue in such modern VR headsets as Oculus Rift and HTC Vive, highlighting the importance of devising strategies to mitigate cybersickness in VEs.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. As per one of the reviewer’s request, the data for VR conditions from Experiments 1 and 2 were combined to increase the statistical power of the pairwise comparison between the Oculus Rift CV1 and HTC Vive conditions with respect to the overall cybersickness levels invoked by these two HMDs. Results of the Mann–Whitney U test revealed no statistically significant differences in cybersickness levels between the Oculus Rift CV1 (n = 27, M = 65.52, SE = 8.78) and HTC Vive (n = 27, M = 67.74, SE = 10.66) conditions, U = 360, p = .95, indicating that the difference in cybersickness levels between the two HMD conditions remained nonsignificant when the data from Experiment 1 and 2 were combined.

References

  • Bos JE, Bles W, Groen EL (2008) A theory on visually induced motion sickness. Displays 29(2):47–57

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bos JE, de Vries SC, van Emmerik ML, Groen EL (2010) The effect of internal and external fields of view on visually induced motion sickness. Appl Ergonom 41(4):516–521

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boylan P, Kirwan GH, Rooney B (2017) Self-reported discomfort when using commercially targeted virtual reality equipment in discomfort distraction. Virtual Real 22(4):1–6

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis S, Nesbitt K, Nalivaiko E (2014) A systematic review of cybersickness. In: Proceedings of the 2014 conference on interactive entertainment, Newcastle

  • Davis S, Nesbitt K, Nalivaiko E (2015) Comparing the onset of cybersickness using the Oculus Rift and two virtual roller coasters. In: Proceedings of the 11th Australasian Conference on interactive entertainment (IE 2015), vol 27, p 30

  • Dennison MS, Wisti AZ, D’Zmura M (2016) Use of physiological signals to predict cybersickness. Displays 44:42–52

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Devolver Digital (2009) Serious Sam HD: The First Encounter. Steam. https://store.steampowered.com/app/41000/Serious_Sam_HD_The_First_Encounter/. Accessed 01 Aug 2018

  • Devolver Digital, Croteam (2017) Serious Sam VR: the first encounter. Steam. https://store.steampowered.com/app/552450/Serious_Sam_VR_The_First_Encounter/. Accessed 01 Aug 2018

  • Field A (2013) Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS statistics. Sage, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Kemeny A, George P, Mérienne F, Colombet F (2017) New vr navigation techniques to reduce cybersickness. Electron Imaging 3:48–53

    Google Scholar 

  • Kennedy RS, Lane NE, Berbaum KS, Lilienthal MG (1993) Simulator sickness questionnaire: an enhanced method for quantifying simulator sickness. Int J Aviat Psychol 3(3):203–220

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kennedy RS, Drexler J, Kennedy RC (2010) Research in visually induced motion sickness. Appl Ergonom 41(4):494–503

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim YY, Kim HJ, Kim EN, Ko HD, Kim HT (2005) Characteristic changes in the physiological components of cybersickness. Psychophysiology 42(5):616–625

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim K, Rosenthal MZ, Zielinski DJ, Brady R (2014) Effects of virtual environment platforms on emotional responses. Comput Methods Programs Biomed 113(3):882–893

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim J, Chung CY, Nakamura S, Palmisano S, Khuu SK (2015) The Oculus Rift: a cost-effective tool for studying visual-vestibular interactions in self-motion perception. Front Psychol 6(248):1–7

    Google Scholar 

  • Kunos Simulazioni (2014) Assetto Corsa. Steam. https://store.steampowered.com/app/244210/Assetto_Corsa/. Accessed 02 May 2019

  • LaViola JJ Jr (2000) A discussion of cybersickness in virtual environments. ACM SIGCHI Bull 32(1):47–56

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu CL, Uang ST (2011) Effects of presence on causing cybersickness in the elderly within a 3D virtual store. In: International conference on human-computer interaction, Berlin

  • McCauley ME, Sharkey TJ (1992) Cybersickness: perception of self-motion in virtual environments. Presence Teleoper Virtual Environ 1(3):311–318

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moss JD, Muth ER (2011) Characteristics of head-mounted displays and their effects on simulator sickness. Hum Factors 53(3):308–319

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oculus Rift (n. d.) Oculus Rift. https://developer.oculus.com/rift/. Accessed 04 Nov 2018

  • Oman CM (1990) Motion sickness: a synthesis and evaluation of the sensory conflict theory. Can J Physiol Pharmacol 68(2):294–303

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Palmisano S, Mursic R, Kim J (2017) Vection and cybersickness generated by head-and-display motion in the Oculus Rift. Displays 46:1–8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reason JT (1969) Motion sickness—some theoretical considerations. Int J Man Mach Stud 1(1):21–38

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reason JT (1978) Motion sickness adaptation: a neural mismatch model. J R Soc Med 71(11):819–829

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rebenitsch L, Owen C (2016) Review on cybersickness in applications and visual displays. Virtual Real. 20(2):101–125

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Riccio GE, Stoffregen TA (1991) An ecological theory of motion sickness and postural instability. Ecol Psychol 3(3):195–240

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Serge SR, Moss JD (2015) simulator sickness and the Oculus Rift: a first look. In: Proceedings of the human factors and ergonomics society annual meeting, Los Angeles

  • Sharples S, Cobb S, Moody A, Wilson JR (2008) Virtual reality induced symptoms and effects (VRISE): comparison of head mounted display (HMD):desktop and projection display systems. Displays 29(2):58–69

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stanney KM, Kennedy RS (1997) The psychometrics of cybersickness. Commun ACM 40(8):66–68

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stein J (2015) Virtual reality is about to change the world. http://time.com/3987022/why-virtual-reality-is-about-to-change-the-world/. Accessed 01 Aug 2018

  • Stoffregen TA, Smart LJ Jr (1998) Postural instability precedes motion sickness. Brain Res Bull 47(5):437–448

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sutherland IE (1968) A head-mounted three dimensional display. In: Proceedings of the December 9–11, 1968, fall joint computer conference, Part I, Boston

  • Treisman M (1977) Motion sickness: an evolutionary hypothesis. Science 197(4302):493–495

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Treleaven J, Battershill J, Cole D, Fadelli C, Freestone S, Lang K, Sarig-Bahat H (2015) Simulator sickness incidence and susceptibility during neck motion-controlled virtual reality tasks. Virtual Reality 19(3–4):267–275

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • VIVE (2018) VIVE VR System. https://www.vive.com/us/product/vive-virtual-reality-system/. Accessed 04 Nov 2018

  • Walker AD, Muth ER, Switzer FS, Hoover A (2010) Head movements and simulator sickness generated by a virtual environment. Aviat Space Environ Med 81(10):929–934

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Young SD, Adelstein BD, Ellis SR (2006) Demand characteristics of a questionnaire used to assess motion sickness in a virtual environment. In IEEE Virtual Reality Conference (VR 2006). pp 97–102. https://doi.org/10.1109/VR.2006.44

Download references

Acknowledgements

The author would like to thank VR First for providing the VR equipment used in the study. The author would also like to thank the anonymous reviewers for their comprehensive reviews.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Caglar Yildirim.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Yildirim, C. Don’t make me sick: investigating the incidence of cybersickness in commercial virtual reality headsets. Virtual Reality 24, 231–239 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10055-019-00401-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10055-019-00401-0

Keywords

Navigation