Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Evaluating the user interface and experience of VR in the electronic commerce environment: a hybrid approach

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Virtual Reality Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In recent years, to attract global manufacturers, media reporters, and consumer attention, a popular term in search engines has been virtual reality (VR). In addition to video, entertainment, education, and medical, VR can be used in electronic commerce (E-commerce). Currently, most E-commerce platforms present products using 2D images, text-based interface or animation. However, consumers want to know more about the products while online shopping and compare the product’s material, color, and other elements. Therefore, combining VR with E-commerce can improve the user’s shopping experience. This study will focus on the characteristics of VR and E-commerce. This feature can be used to interactively study UI and UX between users and designers to generate design criteria. Experimental design is carried out through the modified SEM-CPU method. Then, we use the think-aloud protocols, Questionnaire for User Interaction Satisfaction, and User Experience Questionnaire to understand the user’s thoughts on UI and UX. Moreover, this study uses focus group to interview experts to obtain expert opinions on VR E-commerce. Induction and integration of data is carried out to produce design criteria by experimental results. Finally, the Delphi method is utilized to validate and evaluate the practicability of the design criterion. Through the “UI and UX design criteria of VR” generated by this study, many important design elements can be proposed and assessed in VR E-commerce. In closing, this study provides design and development suggestions for VR developers to improve the positive influence of UX.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

(Lee et al. 2006)

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Acun V, Yilmazer S (2018) A grounded theory approach to investigate the perceived soundscape of open-plan offices. Appl Acoust 131:28–37

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cheng LK, Chieng MH, Chieng WH (2014) Measuring virtual experience in a three-dimensional virtual reality interactive simulator environment: a structural equation modeling approach. Virtual Real 18(3):173–188

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cofre JP, Moraga G, Rusu C, Mercado I, Inostroza R, Jimenez C (2012) Developing a touchscreen-based domotic tool for users with motor disabilities. In: 2012 Ninth international conference on paper presented at the information technology: new generations (ITNG)

  • Cooke L (2010) Assessing concurrent think-aloud protocol as a usability test method: a technical communication approach. IEEE Trans Prof Commun 53(3):202–215

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ercikan K, Arim R, Law D, Domene J, Gagnon F, Lacroix S (2010) Application of think aloud protocols for examining and confirming sources of differential item functioning identified by expert reviews. Educ Meas Issues Pract 29(2):24–35

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ericsson K, Simon H (1984) Protocol analysis: verbal reports as data. MIT Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Fox AR, Gordon LK, Heckenlively JR, Davis JL, Goldstein DA, Lowder CY, Smith WM (2016) Consensus on the diagnosis and management of nonparaneoplastic autoimmune retinopathy using a modified Delphi approach. Am J Ophthalmol 168:183–190

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Google Developers (2015) Google I/O 2015—designing for virtual reality. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Qwh1LBzz3AU&feature=youtu.be

  • Grewal D, Roggeveen AL, Nordfält J (2017) The future of retailing. J Retail 93(1):1–6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hasan B (2016) Perceived irritation in online shopping: the impact of website design characteristics. Comput Human Behav 54:224–230

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hasson F, Keeney S (2011) Enhancing rigour in the Delphi technique research. Technol Forecast Social Change 78(9):1695–1704

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haverila M (2013) Cell phone usage and broad feature preferences: a study among Finnish undergraduate students. Telemat Inform 30(2):177–188

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heiko A (2012) Consensus measurement in Delphi studies: review and implications for future quality assurance. Technol Forecast Soc Change 79(8):1525–1536

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hinderks A, Schrepp M, Thomaschewski J (2016) Welcome to the user experience questionnaire (UEQ) a questionnaire to measure the UX. http://www.ueq-online.org/

  • Ho L-W, Lie T-T, Leong PT, Clear T (2018) Developing offshore wind farm siting criteria by using an international Delphi method. Energy Policy 113:53–67

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • IKEA VR experience (2016). http://store.steampowered.com/app/447270/

  • Inostroza R, Rusu C, Roncagliolo S, Rusu V, Collazos CA (2016) Developing SMASH: a set of smartphone’s usability heuristics. Comput Stand Interface 43:40–52

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim J (1997) Toward the construction of customer interfaces for cyber shopping malls-HCI research for electronic commerce. Electron Mark 7(2):12–15

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Kuniavsky M (2010) Smart things: ubiquitous computing user experience design. Elsevier, Amsterdam

    Google Scholar 

  • Laurel B, Mountford SJ (1990) The art of human–computer interface design. Addison-Wesley, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee W, Benbasat I (2003) Designing an electronic commerce interface: attention and product memory as elicited by web design. Electron Commer Res Appl 2(3):240–253

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee SM, Katerattanakul P, Hong S (2005) Framework for user perception of effective e-tail web sites. J Electron Commer Organ 3(1):13–34

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee YS, Hong SW, Smith-Jackson TL, Nussbaum MA, Tomioka K (2006) Systematic evaluation methodology for cell phone user interfaces. Interact Comput 18(2):304–325

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lin C-C (2013) Exploring the relationship between technology acceptance model and usability test. Inf Technol Manag 14(3):243–255

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Loureiro SMC, Guerreiro J, Eloy S, Langaro D, Panchapakesan P (2018) Understanding the use of virtual reality in marketing: a text mining-based review. J Bus Res 100:514–530. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2018.10.055

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lundgrén-Laine H, Salanterä S (2010) Think-aloud technique and protocol analysis in clinical decision-making research. Qual Health Res 20(4):565–575

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martínez-Navarro J, Bigné E, Guixeres J, Alcañiz M, Torrecilla C (2018) The influence of virtual reality in E-commerce. J Bus Res 10:45–56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2018.10.054

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nunnally JC, Bernstein IH (1994) Psychometric theory, 3rd edn. McGraw-Hill, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Oculus (2018) Introduction to best practices. https://developer.oculus.com/design/latest/concepts/book-bp/

  • Paes D, Arantes E, Irizarry J (2017) Immersive environment for improving the understanding of architectural 3D models: comparing user spatial perception between immersive and traditional virtual reality systems. Autom Constr 84:292–303

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paré G, Cameron AF, Poba-Nzaou P, Templier M (2013) A systematic assessment of rigor in information systems ranking-type Delphi studies. Inf Manag 50(5):207–217

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pottier P, Hardouin JB, Hodges BD, Pistorius MA, Connault J, Durant C, Planchon B (2010) Exploring how students think: a new method combining think-aloud and concept mapping protocols. Med Educ 44(9):926–935

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schnack A, Wright MJ, Holdershaw JL (2019) Immersive virtual reality technology in a three-dimensional virtual simulated store: investigating telepresence and usability. Food Res Int 117:40–49

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stewart DW, Shamdasani PN (2014) Focus groups: theory and practice, vol 20. Sage publications, Thousand Oaks

    Google Scholar 

  • Sun HM, Li SP, Zhu YQ, Hsiao B (2015) The effect of user’s perceived presence and promotion focus on usability for interacting in virtual environments. Appl Ergon 50:126–132

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Kerrebroeck H, Brengman M, Willems K (2017) When brands come to life: experimental research on the vividness effect of Virtual Reality in transformational marketing communications. Virtual Real 21(4):177–191

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wu Y, Chen SC, Lin IC (2018) Elucidating the impact of critical determinants on purchase decision in virtual reality products by analytic hierarchy process approach. Virtual Real 23:187–195. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10055-018-0373-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

Funding was provided by Ministry of Science and Technology, Taiwan (MOST 106-2221-E-327-022 and MOST 107-2410-H-992-011).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Information Management, National Kaohsiung University of Science and Technology, No. 1, University Rd., Yanchao Dist., Kaohsiung City, 824, Taiwan

    Kuo-Wei Su, Shih-Chih Chen & Ching-I Hsieh

  2. Department of Industrial Engineering and Management, Ming Chi University of Technology, No. 84, Gungjuan Rd., Taishan Dist., New Taipei City, 24301, Taiwan

    Po-Hung Lin

Authors
  1. Kuo-Wei Su
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Shih-Chih Chen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Po-Hung Lin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Ching-I Hsieh
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Shih-Chih Chen.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Su, KW., Chen, SC., Lin, PH. et al. Evaluating the user interface and experience of VR in the electronic commerce environment: a hybrid approach. Virtual Reality 24, 241–254 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10055-019-00394-w

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10055-019-00394-w

Keywords

Search

Navigation