Abstract
Ionospheric anomalies have been shown to occur a few days before several large earthquakes. The published works normally address examples limited in time (a single event or few of them) or space (a particular geographic area), so that a clear method based on these anomalies which consistently yields the place and magnitude of the forthcoming earthquake, anytime and anywhere on earth, has not been presented so far. The current research is aimed at prediction of large earthquakes, that is with magnitude Mw 7 or higher. It uses as data bank all significant earthquakes occurred worldwide in the period from January 1, 2011 to December 31, 2018. The first purpose of the research is to improve the use of ionospheric anomalies in the form of TEC grids for earthquake prediction. A space–time TEC variation estimator especially designed for earthquake prediction will show the advantages with respect to the use of simple TEC values. Further, taking advantage of the well-known predictive abilities of the Gutenberg–Richter law’s b-value, a combined estimator based on both TEC anomalies and b-values will be designed and shown to improve prediction performance even more.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Abordán A, Szabó NP (2018) Metropolis algorithm driven factor analysis for lithological characterization of shallow marine sediments. Acta Geod Geophys 53:189–199. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40328-017-0210-z
Akhoondzadeh M, Saradjian MR (2011) TEC variations analysis concerning Haiti (January 12, 2010) and Samoa (September 29, 2009) earthquakes. Adv Space Res 47(1):94–104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2010.07.024
Asencio-Cortés G, Morales-Esteban A, Shang X, Martínez-Álvarez F (2018) Earthquake prediction in California using regression algorithms and cloud-based big data infrastructure. Comput Geosci 115:198–210. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cageo.2017.10.011
Baselga S (2018) Fibonacci lattices for the evaluation and optimization of map projections. Comput Geosci 117:1–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cageo.2018.04.012
Baselga S (2019) TestGrids: evaluating and optimizing map projections. J Surv Eng 144(3):04019004
Berényi KA, Barta V, Kis Á (2018) Midlatitude ionospheric F2-layer response to eruptive solar events-caused geomagnetic disturbances over Hungary during the maximum of the solar cycle 24: a case study. Adv Space Res 61(5):1230–1243. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2017.12.021
Biswas A, Sharma SP (2017) Interpretation of self-potential anomaly over 2-D inclined thick sheet structures and analysis of uncertainty using very fast simulated annealing global optimization. Acta Geod Geophys 52:439–455. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40328-016-0176-2
Borgohain JM, Borah K, Biswas R, Bora DK (2018) Seismic b-value anomalies prior to the 3rd January 2016, Mw = 6.7 Manipur earthquake of northeast India. J Asian Earth Sci 154:42–48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jseaes.2017.12.013
Buonsanto M (1999) Ionospheric storms—a review. Space Sci Rev 88:563–601. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005107532631
Buskirk RE, Frohlich CL, Latham GV (1981) Unusual animal behavior before earthquakes: a review of possible sensory mechanisms. Rev Geophys 19:247–270. https://doi.org/10.1029/RG019i002p00247
Dobrovolsky IR, Zubkov SI, Myachkin VI (1979) Estimation of the size of earthquake preparation zones. Pure appl Geophys 117:1025–1044. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00876083
Dogan U, Ergintav S, Skone S, Arslan N, Oz D (2011) Monitoring of the ionosphere TEC variations during the 17th August 1999 Izmit earthquake using GPS data. Earth Planets Space 63(12):1183–1192. https://doi.org/10.5047/eps.2011.07.020
Florido E, Martínez-Álvarez F, Morales-Esteban A, Reyes J, Aznarte-Mellado JL (2015) Detecting precursory patterns to enhance earthquake prediction in Chile. Comput Geosci 76:112–120. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cageo.2014.12.002
Florido E, Asencio-Cortés G, Aznarte JL, Rubio-Escudero C, Martínez-Álvarez F (2018) A novel tree-based algorithm to discover seismic patterns in earthquake catalogs. Comput Geosci 115:96–104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cageo.2018.03.005
Freund FT, Kulahci IG, Cyr G, Ling J, Winnick M, Tregloan-Reed J, Freund MM (2009) Air ionization at rock surfaces and pre-earthquake signals. J Atmos Sol Terr Phys 71(17–18):1824–1834. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jastp.2009.07.013
Gopinath S, Prince PR (2018) Nonextensive and distance-based entropy analysis on the influence of sunspot variability in magnetospheric dynamics. Acta Geod Geophys 53:639–659. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40328-018-0235-y
Grant RA, Halliday T (2010) Predicting the unpredictable; evidence of pre-seismic anticipatory behaviour in the common toad. J Zool 281:263–271. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7998.2010.00700.x
Grant RA, Halliday T, Balderer WP, Leuenberger F, Newcomer M, Cyr G, Freund FT (2011) Ground water chemistry changes before major earthquakes and possible effects on animals. Int J Environ Res Public Health 8:1936–1956. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph8061936
Guo J, Yu H, Li W, Liu X, Kong Q, Zhao C (2017) Total electron content anomalies before Mw 6.0 + earthquakes in the seismic zone of southwest China between 2001 and 2013. J Test Eval 45(1):131–139. https://doi.org/10.1520/JTE20160032
International GNSS Service (2019) IGS products. https://www.igs.org/products. Accessed 5 May 2019
Kane RP (2005) Ionospheric foF2 anomalies during some intense geomagnetic storms. Ann Geophys 23:2487–2499. https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-23-2487-2005
Kulhanek O, Persson L, Nuannin P (2018) Variations of b-values preceding large earthquakes in the shallow subduction zones of Cocos and Nazca plates. J South Am Earth Sci 82:207–214. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsames.2018.01.005
Lin JW (2010) Ionospheric total electron content (TEC) anomalies associated with earthquakes through Karhunen–Loéve Transform (KLT). Terr Atmos Ocean Sci 21(2):253–265. https://doi.org/10.3319/TAO.2009.06.11.01(T)
Lin JW (2011) Latitude-time total electron content anomalies as precursors to Japan’s large earthquakes associated with principal component analysis. Int J Geophys. https://doi.org/10.1155/2011/763527
Liu JY, Chen YI, Chuo YJ, Chen CS (2006) A statistical investigation of preearthquake ionospheric anomaly. J Geophys Res 111:A05304. https://doi.org/10.1029/2005JA011333
Liu JY, Chen YI, Chen CH, Liu CY, Chen CY, Nishihashi M, Li JZ, Xia YQ, Oyama KI, Hattori K, Lin CH (2009) Seismoionospheric GPS total electron content anomalies observed before the 12 May 2008 Mw7.9 Wenchuan earthquake. J Geophys Res 114:A04320. https://doi.org/10.1029/2008JA013698
Nuannin P, Kulhanek O, Persson L (2005) Spatial and temporal b value anomalies preceding the devastating off coast of NW Sumatra earthquake of December 26, 2004. Geophys Res Lett 32:L11307. https://doi.org/10.1029/2005GL022679
Pardalos PM, Romeijn HE (eds) (2002) Handbook of global optimization, vols. 1 & 2. Kluwer, Dordretch
Paul B, De BK, Guha A (2018) Latitudinal variation of F-region ionospheric response during three strongest geomagnetic storms of 2015. Acta Geod Geophys 53:579–606. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40328-018-0221-4
Pulinets S, Boyarchuk K (2004) Ionospheric precursors of earthquakes. Springer, Berlin
Pulinets SA, Legen’ka AD, Gaivoronskaya TV, Depuev VKh (2003) Main phenomenological features of ionospheric precursors of strong earthquakes. J Atmos Sol Terr Phys 65:1337–1347. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jastp.2003.07.011
Reyes J, Morales-Esteban A, Martínez-Álvarez F (2013) Neural networks to predict earthquakes in Chile. Appl Soft Comput 13:1314–1328. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2012.10.014
Şentürk E, Çepni MS (2018a) A statistical analysis of seismo ionospheric TEC anomalies before 63 Mw ≥ 5.0 earthquakes in Turkey during 2003–2016. Acta Geophys 66:1495–1507. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11600-018-0214-2
Şentürk E, Çepni MS (2018b) Ionospheric temporal variations over the region of Turkey: a study based on long-time TEC observations. Acta Geod Geophys 53:623–637. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40328-018-0233-0
Şentürk E, Çepni MS (2019) Performance of different weighting and surface fitting techniques on station-wise TEC calculation and modified sine weighting supported by the sun effect. J Spat Sci 64(2):209–220. https://doi.org/10.1080/14498596.2017.1417169
Şentürk E, Livaoğlu H, Çepni MS (2019) A comprehensive analysis of ionospheric anomalies before the mw 7.1 Van earthquake on 23 October 2011. J Navig 72(3):702–720. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0373463318000826
Shiuly A, Roy N (2018) A generalized VS–N correlation using various regression analysis and genetic algorithm. Acta Geod Geophys 53:479–502. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40328-018-0220-5
U.S. Geological Survey (2019) Earthquake catalog. https://earthquake.usgs.gov/earthquakes/search/. Accessed 5 May 2019
Warwick JW, Stoker C, Meyer TR (1982) Radio emission associated with rock fracture: possible application to the Great Chilean Earthquake of May 22, 1960. J Geophys Res Solid Earth 87:2851–2859. https://doi.org/10.1029/JB087iB04p02851
Yao Y, Chen P, Wu H, Zhang S, Peng W (2012) Analysis of ionospheric anomalies before the 2011 M w 9.0 Japan earthquake. Chin Sci Bull 57(5):500–510. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11434-011-4851-y
Zakharenkova IE, Shagimuratov II, Krankowski A (2007a) Features of the ionosphere behavior before the Kythira 2006 earthquake. Acta Geophys 55(4):524–534. https://doi.org/10.2478/s11600-007-0031-5
Zakharenkova IE, Shagimuratov II, Krankowski A, Lagovsky AF (2007b) Precursory phenomena observed in the total electron content measurements before great Hokkaido earthquake of September 25, 2003 (M = 8.3). Stud Geophys Geod 51(2):267–278. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11200-007-0014-7
Acknowledgements
The author is sincerely thankful to the editor and two anonymous reviewers for their detailed comments and suggestions that helped to considerably improve the manuscript.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Baselga, S. A combined estimator using TEC and b-value for large earthquake prediction. Acta Geod Geophys 55, 63–82 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40328-019-00281-5
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40328-019-00281-5