Abstract
Gasification is one of the prominent and technically efficient technologies for converting solids like coal, biomass or solid waste into useful gas known as “syngas.” Several configurations are in use today among which entrained flow gasifiers have several advantages over other configurations. Presently research is more focused on micro-level modifications in the configurations which have a significant impact on overall performance of gasification. Scant, literature is available for comparison of slurry over dry form of feedstocks, especially with low-grade coals. Hence, present research aims to establish a concrete finding regarding the impacts of slurry versus the dry condition of coal on the overall performance of gasification. To achieve this goal, a two-dimensional computational fluid dynamic (CFD) model of downdraft gasifier was developed in commercial CFD software FLUENT for performing numerical simulations with indigenous coal feedstock. Rich oxidant conditions (95% oxygen and 5% nitrogen) were maintained in the gasifier for the gasification. The performance of gasification was measured by comparing efficiencies of gasification and the quality of syngas produced with different coal forms. As per simulation results, coal forms and operating conditions caused a significant effect on overall gasification performance. In syngas composition, H2 mol fraction reached at maximum, when the slurry form of coal was used for gasification. This effect is remarkable for generating hydrogen-rich fuel from lignite without consuming steam externally.
Graphic abstract
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ali R, Daut I, Taib S (2012) A review on existing and future energy sources for electrical power generation in Malaysia. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 16:4047–4055
Andrews-Speed P, Ma G, Shao B, Liao C (2005) Economic responses to the closure of small-scale coal mines in Chongqing. China Resour Policy 30:39–54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2004.12.002
Anukam A, Mamphweli S, Reddy P, Meyer E, Okoh O (2016) Pre-processing of sugarcane bagasse for gasification in a downdraft biomass gasifier system: A comprehensive review. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 66:775–801. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2016.08.046
Baruya P, Kessels J (2013) Coal prospects in Botswana, Mozambique, Zambia, Zimbabwe and Namibia. IEA Clean Coal Centre 20:103–115
Bockelie MJ, Denison, K. K., Chen, Z., Linjewile, T., Senior, C. L. and Sarofim, A. F. (2002) CFD modeling for entrained flow gasifiers in vision 21 systems. In: Proceedings of the 19th annual international Pittsburgh coal conference, pp 24–26
Çaha (2006) Energy Security of Turkey. In: International conference on human and economic resources, Izmir, Turkey
Cao Y, Fu L, Mofrad A (2019) Combined-gasification of biomass and municipal solid waste in a fluidized bed gasifier. J Energy Inst. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joei.2019.01.006
Chen C, Horio M, Kojima T (2000) Numerical simulation of entrained flow coal gasifiers. Part I: modeling of coal gasification in an entrained flow gasifier. Chem Eng Sci 55:3861–3874. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0009-2509(00)00030-0
Chen L, Yong SZ, Ghoniem AF (2012) Oxy-fuel combustion of pulverized coal: characterization, fundamentals, stabilization and CFD modeling. Prog Energy Combust Sci 38:156–214. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pecs.2011.09.003
Chikkatur AP, Sagar AD, Sankar TL (2009) Sustainable development of the Indian coal sector. Energy 34:942–953. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2008.12.014
Dhanavath KN, Bankupalli S, Bhargava SK, Parthasarathy R (2018) An experimental study to investigate the effect of torrefaction temperature on the kinetics of gas generation. J Environ Chem Eng 6:3332–3341. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jece.2018.05.016
Friedmann J, Upadhye R, Kong FM (2009) Prospects for underground coal gasification in carbon-constrained world. Energy Proc. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2009.02.274
GOP (2015) Vision 2025 - Pakistan. Panning Commission of Pakistan
Heidrich C, Feuerborn HJ, Weir A (2013) Coal combustion products: a global perspective. In: World of coal ash conference, pp 22–25
Karl J, Pröll T (2018) Steam gasification of biomass in dual fluidized bed gasifiers: a review. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 98:64–78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2018.09.010
Kauchali S (2017) Development of sustainable coal to liquid processes: minimising process CO2 emissions. South Afr J Chem Eng 24:176–182. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sajce.2017.10.003
Kibria MA, Sripada P, Woo MW, Bhattacharya S (2019) Fate of a biomass particle during CO2 gasification: a mathematical model under entrained flow condition at high temperature. Energy 168:1045–1062. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2018.11.155
Kolb T, Aigner M, Kneer R, Müller M, Weber R, Djordjevic N (2016) Tackling the challenges in modelling entrained-flow gasification of low-grade feedstock. J Energy Inst 89:485–503. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joei.2015.07.007
Ku X, Wang J, Jin H, Lin J (2019) Effects of operating conditions and reactor structure on biomass entrained-flow gasification. Renew Energy 139:781–795. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2019.02.113
Magnussen BF, Hjertager BH (1977) On mathematical modeling of turbulent combustion with special emphasis on soot formation and combustion. Symp Combust 16:719–729. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0082-0784(77)80366-4
Mardoyan A, Braun P (2015) Analysis of Czech subsidies for solid biofuels. Int J Green Energy 12:405–408. https://doi.org/10.1080/15435075.2013.841163
Maroušek J, Hašková S, Zeman R, Váchal J, Vaníčková R (2014a) Assessing the implications of EU subsidy policy on renewable energy in Czech Republic. Clean Technol Environ Policy. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10098-014-0800-1
Maroušek J, Zeman R, Vaníčková R, Hašková S (2014b) New concept of urban green management. Clean Technol Environ Policy 16:1835–1838. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10098-014-0736-5
Maroušek J, Hašková S, Zeman R, Váchal J, Vaníčková R (2015) Processing of residues from biogas plants for energy purposes. Clean Technol Environ Policy 17:797–801. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10098-014-0866-9
Maroušek J, Stehel V, Vochozka M, Maroušková A, Kolář L (2018) Postponing of the intracellular disintegration step improves efficiency of phytomass processing. J Clean Prod 199:173–176. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.07.183
Mathur J (2001) Development of a modified dynamic energy and greenhouse gas reduction planning approach through the case of Indian power sector, Universität GH Essen
Munawer ME (2018) Human health and environmental impacts of coal combustion and post-combustion wastes. J Sustain Min 17:87–96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsm.2017.12.007
Naeem Nawaz SM, Alvi S (2018) Energy security for socio-economic and environmental sustainability in Pakistan. Heliyon 4:e00854. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2018.e00854
Nayyar Hussain Uqaili MKH, Gordhan Valasai (2015) Pakistan’s Energy
Ning S, Jia S, Ying H, Sun Y, Xu W, Yin H (2018) Hydrogen-rich syngas produced by catalytic steam gasification of corncob char. Biomass Bioenergy 117:131–136. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2018.07.003
Oh G, Ra HW, Yoon SM, Mun TY, Seo MW, Lee JG, Yoon SJ (2018) Gasification of coal water mixture in an entrained-flow gasifier: Effect of air and oxygen mixing ratio. Appl Therm Eng 129:657–664. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2017.10.055
Patankar S (1980) Numerical heat transfer and fluid flow. CRC Press, Boca Raton
Patra TK, Sheth PN (2015) Biomass gasification models for downdraft gasifier: A state-of-the-art review. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 50:583–593. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2015.05.012
Piatkowski N, Wieckert C, Weimer AW, Steinfeld A (2010) Solar-driven gasification of carbonaceous feedstock: a review. Energy Environ Sci. https://doi.org/10.1039/c0ee00312c
Pront-van Bommel S (2016) A reasonable price for electricity. J Consum Policy 39:141–158. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10603-015-9300-x
Rafique MM, Rehman S (2017) National energy scenario of Pakistan – Current status, future alternatives, and institutional infrastructure: an overview. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 69:156–167. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2016.11.057
Rakhshi A, Wiltowski T (2017) A framework for devolatilization breakdown in entrained flow gasification modeling. Fuel 187:173–179. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2016.09.036
Rehman SA, Cai Y, Fazal R, Walasai GD, Mirjat NH (2017) An integrated energy modelling and formulation of national energy policies. In: Proceedings of the 14th international conference on sustainable energy technologies
Silaen A (2004) Simulation of coal gasification process inside a two-stage gasifier
Silaen A, Wang T (2010) Effect of turbulence and devolatilization models on coal gasification simulation in an entrained-flow gasifier. Int J Heat Mass Transf 53:2074–2091. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2009.12.047
Silaen A, Wang T (2012) Investigation of the coal gasification process under various operating conditions inside a two-stage entrained flow gasifier. J Therm Sci Eng Appl. . https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4005603
Slezak A, Kuhlman JM, Shadle LJ, Spenik J, Shi S (2010) CFD simulation of entrained-flow coal gasification: coal particle density/sizefraction effects. Powder Technol 203:98–108. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.powtec.2010.03.029
Speight JG (2019) 6-History of gas processing. In: Speight JG (ed) Natural Gas, Second Edition edn. Gulf Professional Publishing, Boston, pp 189–218. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-809570-6.00006-0
Sutardi T, Paul MC, Karimi N (2019) Investigation of coal particle gasification processes with application leading to underground coal gasification. Fuel 237:1186–1202. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2018.10.058
Thengane SK, Gupta A, Mahajani SM (2019) Co-gasification of high ash biomass and high ash coal in downdraft gasifier. Bioresour Technol 273:159–168. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2018.11.007
Tirpak D, Adams H (2008) Bilateral and multilateral financial assistance for the energy sector of developing countries. Climate Policy 8:135–151
Troiano M, Montagnaro F, Solimene R, Salatino P (2018) Modelling entrained-flow slagging gasification of solid fuels with near-wall particle segregation. Chem Eng J. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2018.09.123
Unar IN, Wang L, Pathan AG, Mahar RB, Li R, Uqaili MA (2014) Numerical simulations for the coal/oxidant distribution effects between two-stages for multi opposite burners (MOB) gasifier. Energy Convers Manag 86:670–682. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2014.06.028
Wakeel M, Chen B, Jahangir S (2016) Overview of energy portfolio in Pakistan. Energy Proc 88:71–75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2016.06.024
Wang S, Mulligan CN (2006) Occurrence of arsenic contamination in Canada: sources, behavior and distribution. Sci Total Environ 366(2–3):701–721
WebBook NC (visited september 2018) NIST Standard Reference Database Number 69
Widjaya ER, Chen G, Bowtell L, Hills C (2018) Gasification of non-woody biomass: A literature review. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 89:184–193. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2018.03.023
Zhou Z, Chen L, Guo L, Qian B, Wang Z, Cen K (2017) Computational modeling of oxy-coal combustion with intrinsic heterogeneous char reaction models. Fuel Process Technol 161:169–181. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuproc.2017.03.009
Żogała A (2014) Equilibrium simulations of coal gasification—factors affecting syngas composition. J Sustain Min 13:30–38. https://doi.org/10.7424/jsm140205
Zubek K, Czerski G, Porada S (2018) Determination of optimal temperature and amount of catalysts based on alkali and alkaline earth metals for steam gasification process of bituminous coal. Thermochim Acta 665:60–69. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tca.2018.05.006
Acknowledgements
Authors are highly thankful to Mehran University of Engineering and Technology and Dawood University of Engineering and Technology for providing facilities for this research work.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Unar, I.N., Maitlo, G., Soomro, S.A. et al. Impacts of slurry and dry forms of low-rank coal (lignite) on quality of syngas produced. Clean Techn Environ Policy 22, 613–625 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10098-019-01804-y
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10098-019-01804-y