Skip to main content
Log in

Cellulose and microcrystalline cellulose from rice straw and banana plant waste: preparation and characterization

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Cellulose Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

As part of continuing efforts to prepare cellulose and microcrystalline cellulose (MCC) from renewable biomass resources, rice straw and banana plant waste were used as the available agricultural biomass wastes in Egypt. The cellulose materials were obtained in the first step from rice straw and banana plant waste after chemical treatment, mainly applying alkaline-acid or acid-alkaline pulping which was followed by hypochlorite bleaching method. The results indicate a higher α-cellulose content, 66.2 %, in case of acid-alkaline treatment for rice straw compared to 64.7 % in case of alkaline-acid treatment. A low degree of polymerization, 17, was obtained for the cellulose resulting from acid–alkaline treatment for banana plant waste indicating an oligomer and not a polymer, while it reached 178 in case of the cellulose resulting from alkaline–acid treatment for the rice straw. MCC was then obtained by enzymatic treatment of the resulting cellulose. The resulting MCC show an average diameter ranging from 7.6 to 3.6 μm compared to 25.8 μm for the Avicel PH101. On the other hand, the morphological structure was investigated by scanning electron microscopy indicating a smooth surface for the resulting cellulose, while it indicates that the length and the diameter appeared to be affected by the duration of enzyme treatment for the preparation of MCC. Moreover, the morphological shape of the enzyme treated fibers starts to be the same as the Avicel PH101 which means different shapes of MCC can be reached by the enzyme treatment. Furthermore, Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy was used to indicate characteristic absorption bands of the constituents and the crystallinity was evaluated by X-ray diffraction measurements and by iodine absorption technique. The reported crystallinity values were between 34.8 and 82.4 %, for the resulting cellulose and MCC, and the degree of crystallinity ranged between 88.8 and 96.3 % dependent on the X-ray methods and experimental iodine absorption method.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

MCC:

Microcrystalline cellulose

DP:

Degree of polymerization

NCC:

Nanocrystalline cellulose

FT-IR:

Fourier transform infrared

SEM:

Scanning electron microscopy

XRD:

X-ray diffraction

DC:

Degree of crystallinity

DSC:

Differential scanning calorimetry

References

  • Agblevor FA, Ibrahim MM, El-Zawawy WK (2007) Coupled acid and enzyme mediated production of microcrystalline cellulose from corn cob and cotton gin waste. Cellulose 14:247–256

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Alemdar A, Sain M (2008) Isolation and characterization of nanofibres from agricultural residues—wheat straw and soy hulls. Bioresour Technol 99(6):1664–1671

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Azubuike CPC, Okhamafe AO, Falodun A (2011) Some pharmacopoeial and diluent-binder properties of maize cob-derived from α-cellulose in selected tablet formulations. J Chem Pharm Res 3(3):481–488

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ballesteros I, Negro MJ, Oliva JM, Cabanas A, Manzanares P, Ballesteros M (2006) Ethanol production from steam-explosion pretreated wheat straw. Appl Biochem Biotechnol 129(132):496–508

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bansal P, Hall M, Realff MJ, Lee JH, Bommarius AS (2010) Multivariate statistical analysis of X-ray data from cellulose: a new method to determine degree of crystallinity and predict hydrolysis rates. Bioresour Technol 101:4461–4471

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bertran MS, Dale BE (1986) Determination of cellulose accessibility by differential scanning calorimetry. J Appl Polym Sci 32:4241–4253

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chen HZ, Liu L (2007) Unpolluted fractionation of wheat straw by steam explosion and ethanol extraction. Bioresour Technol 98:666–676

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ciolacu D, Ciolacu F, Popa V (2011) Amorphous cellulose—structure and characterization. Cellulose Chem Technol 45(1–2):13–21

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hsu T-A (1996) Pretreatment of biomass. In: Wyman CE (ed) Handbook on Bioethanol, Production and Utilization. Taylor & Francis, Washington, DC, pp 179–212

    Google Scholar 

  • Huber GW, Iborra S, Corma A (2006) Synthesis of transportation fuels from biomass—chemistry, catalysts and engineering. Chem Rev 106:4044–4099

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ibrahim MM, El-Zawawy WK (2004) Preparation, characterization, and properties of fast-responding bulk hydrogel and treated bleached banana pulp. Polym Adv Technol 15:275–283

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ibrahim MM, Agblevor FA, El-Zawawy WK (2010a) Isolation and characterization of cellulose and lignin from steam-exploded lignocellulosic biomass. BioResources 5(1):397–418

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ibrahim MM, El-Zawawy WK, Nassar MA (2010b) Synthesis and characterization of polyvinyl alcohol/nanospherical cellulose particle films. Carbohydr Polym 79:694–699

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jahan MS, Saeed A, He Z, Ni Y (2011) Jute as raw material for the preparation of microcrystalline cellulose. Cellulose 18:451–459

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kim TH, Lee YY (2006) Fractionation of corn stover by hot-water and aqueous ammonia treatment. Bioresour Technol 97:224–232

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kortschagin MW, Sokolowa NM, Schikanowa IA (1991) Laboratory Methods for the Chemical Technology of Textiles. Leginisdat, Moscow

    Google Scholar 

  • Lange J-P (2007) Lignocellulose conversion: an introduction to chemistry, process and economics. Biofuels Bioprod Bioref 1:39–48

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Laser M, Schulman D, Allen SG, Lichwa J, Antal MJ, Lynd LR (2002) A comparison of liquid hot water and steam pretreatments of sugar cane bagasse for bioconversion to ethanol. Bioresour Technol 81:33–44

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lee SY, Mohan DJ, Kang IA, Doh GH, Lee S, Han SK (2009) Nanocellulose reinforced PVA composite films: effects of acid treatment and filler loading. Fibers Polym 10(1):77–82

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • McMillan JD (1994) Pretreatment of lignocellulosic biomass. In: Himmel ME, Baker JO, Overend RP (eds) Enzymatic Conversion of Biomass for Fuels Production, ACS Symp Ser ACS 566. Washington, DC, pp 292–324

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Moran JI, Alvarez VA, Cyras VP, Vazquez A (2008) Extraction of cellulose and preparation of nanocellulose from sisal fibers. Cellulose 15(1):149–159

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Negro MJ, Manzanares P, Ballesteros I, Oliva JM, Cabanas A, Ballesteros M (2003) Hydrothermal pretreatment conditions to enhance ethanol production from poplar biomass. Appl Biochem Biotechnol 105:87–100

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nichols JB (1954) X-Ray and infrared studies on the extent of crystallization of polymers. J Appl Phys 25(7):840–847

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ramos LP (2003) The chemistry involved in the steam treatment of lignocellulosic materials. Quim Nova 26:863–871

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Segal LC, Martin AE, Conrad CM (1959) An empirical method for estimating the degree of crystallinity of native cellulose using X-ray diffractometer. Textile Res J 29:786–794

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Terbojevich M, Cosani A, Camilot M, Focher B (1995) Solution studies of cellulose tricarbanilates obtained in homogeneous phase. J Appl Polym Sci 55(12):1663–1671

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Terinte N, Ibbett R, Schuster KC (2011) Overview on native cellulose and microcrystalline cellulose i structure studied by x-ray diffraction (WAXD): comparison between measurement techniques. Lenzinger Berichte 89:118–131

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Teymouri F, Laureano-Perez L, Alizadeh H, Dale BE (2005) Optimization of the ammonia fiber explosion (AFEX) treatment parameters for enzymatic hydrolysis of corn stover. Bioresour Technol 96:2014–2018

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Um BH, Karim MN, Henk LL (2003) Effect of sulfuric and phosphoric acid pretreatments on enzymatic hydrolysis of corn stover. Appl Biochem Biotechnol 105:115–125

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Virtanen T, Tervala L, Svedström K, Torkkeli M, Kotelnikova N, Andersson S, Knaapila K, Maunu SL, Serimaa R (2012) A physico-chemical characterisation of new raw materials for microcrystalline cellulose manufacturing. Cellulose 19:219–235

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wang H, Li H, Lu Y (2009) Preparation and characterization of micro- and nano-fibrils from jute. Fibers Polym 10(4):442–445

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Xiong R, Zhang X, Tian D, Zhou Z, Lu C (2012) Comparing microcrystalline with spherical nanocrystalline cellulose from waste cotton fabrics. Cellulose 19:1189–1198

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors acknowledge the Science and Technology Development Fund (STDF) (Egypt) and the International Bureau of the Federal Ministry of Education and Research (Germany) for funding the project entitled: Conversion of agriculture waste products into cellulosic products of industrial significance (ID: 624).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Maha M. Ibrahim.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ibrahim, M.M., El-Zawawy, W.K., Jüttke, Y. et al. Cellulose and microcrystalline cellulose from rice straw and banana plant waste: preparation and characterization. Cellulose 20, 2403–2416 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-013-9992-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-013-9992-5

Keywords

Navigation