Skip to main content
Log in

A Review of Automatic Vehicle Following Systems

  • Review Article
  • Published:
Journal of the Indian Institute of Science Aims and scope

Abstract

There has been considerable interest recently in the development of connected and autonomous vehicles (CAVs). Automatic vehicle following capability is central for CAVs; in this article, we provide a review of the critical issues in the longitudinal control design for automatic vehicle following systems (AVFS) employed by CAVs. This expository review differs from others in providing a review of underlying methodologies for design of AVFS and the impact of AVFS on traffic mobility and safety.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Figure 1:
Figure 2:
Figure 3:
Figure 4:
Figure 5:
Figure 6:
Figure 7:
Figure 8:
Figure 9:
Figure 10:
Figure 11:
Figure 12:
Figure 13:
Figure 14:
Figure 15:
Figure 16:

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Brookings Institution (2019) Autonomous cars: Science, technology and policy. https://www.brookings.edu/events/autonomous-cars-science-technology-and-policy/, July 2019

  2. NHTSA-USDOT (2016) Automated driving systems: a vision for safety. https://www.nhtsa.gov/sites/nhtsa.dot.gov/files/documents/13069a-ads2.0_090617_v9a_tag.pdf

  3. Society of Automotive Engineers (2016) J3016: international taxonomy and definitions for terms related to driving automation systems for on-road motor vehicles. Technical report, SAE, Warrendale (2016)

  4. Lioris J, Pedarsani R, Tascikaraoglu FY (2017) Platoons of connected vehicles can double throughput in urban roads. Transp Res Part C Emerg Technol 77:292–305

    Google Scholar 

  5. Askari A, Farias DA, Kurzhansky AA, Varaiya P (2017) Effect of adaptive and cooperative adaptive cruise control on throughput of signalized arterials. In: Proceeding of 2017 American Control Conference

  6. Hedrick JK, McMahon DH, Swaroop D (1993) Vehicle modeling and control for automated highway systems. Technical Report UCB-ITS-PRR-93-24, California PATH

  7. Kotwicki AJ (1982) Dynamic models for torque converter equipped vehicles. Technical Report 820393, SAE

  8. Fagerström J (2016) Longitudinal control of a heavy-duty vehicle. Master’s thesis, KTH, School of Electrical Engineering (EES)

  9. Yanakiev D, Kannellakopoulos I (1996) Speed tracking and vehicle follower control design for heavy-duty vehicles. Veh Syst Dyn 25(4):251–276

    Google Scholar 

  10. Kao M, Moskwa JJ (1995) Turbocharged diesel engine modeling for nonlinear engine control and state estimation. J Dyn Syst Meas Control 117(1):20–30 03

    Google Scholar 

  11. Cho D, Hedrick JK (1989) Automotive Powertrain modeling for control. J Dyn Syst Meas Control 111(4):568–576 12

    Google Scholar 

  12. Subramanian SC, Darbha S, Rajagopal KR (2004) Modeling the pneumatic subsystem of an S-cam air brake system. J Dyn Syst Meas Control 126(1):36–46 04

    Google Scholar 

  13. Christian Gerdes J, Karl Hedrick J (1999) Brake system modeling for simulation and control. J Dyn Syst Meas Control 121(3):496–503 09

    Google Scholar 

  14. Ploeg J, Scheepers BTM, van Nunen E, van de Wouw N, Nijmeijer H (2011) Design and experimental evaluation of cooperative adaptive cruise control. In: 2011 14th International IEEE conference on intelligent transportation systems (ITSC), pp 260–265 (2011)

  15. Sheikholeslam S, Desoer CA (1990) Longitudinal control of a platoon of vehicles. In: 1990 American control conference, pp 291–296 (1990)

  16. Bender JG, Fenton RE (1969) A study of automatic car following. IEEE Trans Veh Technol 18(3):134–140

    Google Scholar 

  17. Takasaki GM, Fenton RE (1976) On vehicle longitudinal dynamics—identification and control. In: 26th IEEE vehicular technology conference, vol 26, pp 16–20

  18. Swaroop DVAHG (1994) String stability of interconnected systems: an application to platooning in automated highway systems. PhD thesis, University of California, Berkeley

  19. Hedrick JK, Swaroop D (1994) Dynamic coupling in vehicles under automatic control. Veh Syst Dyn 23(sup1):209–220

    Google Scholar 

  20. Swaroop D, Hedrick JK (1996) String stability of interconnected systems. IEEE Trans Autom Control 41(3):349–357

    Google Scholar 

  21. Gazis DC, Herman R, Rothery RW (1961) Nonlinear follow-the-leader models of traffic flow. Oper Res 9(4):545–567

    Google Scholar 

  22. Chandler RE, Herman R, Montroll EW (1958) Traffic dynamics: studies in car following. Oper Res 6(2):165–184

    Google Scholar 

  23. Ge JI, Orosz G (2014) Dynamics of connected vehicle systems with delayed acceleration feedback. Transp Res Part C Emerg Technol 46:46–64

    Google Scholar 

  24. Swaroop D, Hedrick JK, Choi SB (2001) Direct adaptive longitudinal control of vehicle platoons. IEEE Trans Veh Technol 50(1):150–161

    Google Scholar 

  25. Darbha S, Pagilla PR (2010) Limitations of employing undirected information flow graphs for the maintenance of rigid formations for heterogeneous vehicles. Int J Eng Sci 48(11):1164–1178

    Google Scholar 

  26. Chu K (1974) Decentralized control of high-speed vehicular strings. Transp Sci 8(4):361–384

    Google Scholar 

  27. Ploeg J, van de Wouw N, Nijmeijer H (2014) Lp string stability of cascaded systems: application to vehicle platooning. IEEE Trans Control Syst Technol 22(2):786–793

    Google Scholar 

  28. Besselink B, Knorn S (2018) Scalable input-to-state stability for performance analysis of large-scale networks. IEEE Control Syst Lett 2(3):507–512

    Google Scholar 

  29. Seiler P, Pant A, Hedrick K (2004) Disturbance propagation in vehicle strings. IEEE Trans Autom Control 49(10):1835–1842

    Google Scholar 

  30. Yadlapalli SK, Darbha S, Rajagopal KR (2006) Information flow and its relation to stability of the motion of vehicles in a rigid formation. IEEE Trans Autom Control 51(8):1315–1319

    Google Scholar 

  31. Yadlapalli Sai Krishna, Darbha S, Rajagopal KR (2005) Information flow and its relation to the stability of the motion of vehicles in a rigid formation. In: Proceedings of the 2005, American Control Conference, vol 3, pp 1853–1858

  32. Fenton RE, Mayhan RJ (1991) Automated highway studies at the ohio state university—an overview. IEEE Trans Veh Technol 40(1):100–113

    Google Scholar 

  33. Peppard L (1974) String stability of relative-motion PID vehicle control systems. IEEE Trans Autom Control 19(5):579–581

    Google Scholar 

  34. Garrard WL, Caudill RJ, Kornhauser AL, MacKinnon D, Brown SJ (1978) State-of-the-art of longitudinal control of automated guideway transit vehicles. J Adv Transp 12(2):35–67 1

    Google Scholar 

  35. Ioannou PA, Chien CC (1993) Autonomous intelligent cruise control. IEEE Trans Veh Technol 42(4):657–672

    Google Scholar 

  36. Desoer CA, Vidyasagar M (1975) Feedback systems: input–output properties. Classics in Applied Mathematics. Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics, Philadelphia

  37. Boyd S, Doyle J (1987) Comparison of peak and rms gains for discrete-time systems. Syst Control Lett 9(1):1–6

    Google Scholar 

  38. Darbha S (2002) A note about the stability of a string of LTI systems. J Dyn Syst Meas Control 124(3):472–475 07

    Google Scholar 

  39. Vegamoor V, Darbha S (2019) Time headway reduction in CACC platoons with imperfect communication. IEEE Transactions on ITS (submitted)

  40. Corless M, Zhu G, Skelton R (1989) Improved robustness bounds using covariance matrices. In: Proceedings of the 28th IEEE conference on decision and control, vol 3, pp 2667–2672

  41. Darbha S, Hedrick JK (1999) Constant spacing strategies for platooning in automated highway systems. ASME J Dyn Syst Meas Control 121:462–470

    Google Scholar 

  42. Fax JA, Murray RM (2004) Information flow and cooperative control of vehicle formations. IEEE Trans Autom Control 49(9):1465–1476

    Google Scholar 

  43. Melzer SM, Kuo BC (1971) Optimal regulation of systems described by a countably infinite number of objects. Automatica 7(3):359–366

    Google Scholar 

  44. Sebek M, Hurak Z (2011) 2-D polynomial approach to control of leader following vehicular platoons. IFAC Proceedings Volumes, 18th IFAC World Congress 44(1):6017–6022

    Google Scholar 

  45. Firooznia A, Ploeg J, van de Wouw N, Zwart H (2017) Co-design of controller and communication topology for vehicular platooning. IEEE Trans Intell Transp Syst 18(10):2728–2739

    Google Scholar 

  46. Kamen E (1985) Multidimensional systems theory: progress, directions, and open problems in multidimensional systems, edited by N.K. Bose with contributions by J.P. Guiver [and others], chapter 3. Mathematics and its applications. D. Reidel

  47. Lakshmikantham V, Leela S, Martynyuk AA (2015) Inequalities. Springer International Publishing, pp 1–66 Cham

    Google Scholar 

  48. Gazis DC, Herman R, Potts RB (1959) Car-following theory of steady-state traffic flow. Oper Res 7(4):499–505

    Google Scholar 

  49. Greenberg H (1959) An analysis of traffic flow. Oper Res 7(1):79–85

    Google Scholar 

  50. Darbha S, Rajagopal KR (1999) Intelligent cruise control systems and traffic flow stability. Transp Res Part C Emerg Technol 7(6):329–352

    Google Scholar 

  51. Swaroop D, Huandra R (1998) Intelligent cruise control system design based on a traffic flow specification. Veh Syst Dyn 30(5):319–344

    Google Scholar 

  52. Santhanakrishnan K, Rajamani R (2000) On spacing policies for highway vehicle automation. Proc Am Control Conf 3:1509–1513 12

    Google Scholar 

  53. Zhou J, Peng H (2005) Range policy of adaptive cruise control vehicles for improved flow stability and string stability. IEEE Trans Intell Transp Syst 6(2):229–237

    Google Scholar 

  54. Caudill RJ, Garrard WL (1977) Vehicle-follower longitudinal control for automated transit vehicles. J Dyn Syst Meas Control 99(4):241–248 12

    Google Scholar 

  55. Khatir ME, Davison EJ (2004) Decentralized control of a large platoon of vehicles using non-identical controllers. In: Proceedings of the 2004 American control conference, vol 3, pp 2769–2776

  56. Swaroop D, Hedrick JK, Chien CC, Ioannou P (1994) A comparision of spacing and headway control laws for automatically controlled vehicles. Veh Syst Dyn 23(1):597–625

    Google Scholar 

  57. Konduri S, Pagilla PR, Darbha S (2017) Vehicle platooning with multiple vehicle look-ahead information. IFAC-Papers OnLine, 20th IFAC World Congress 50(1):5768–5773

    Google Scholar 

  58. Konduri S, Darbha S, Pagilla PR (2019) Vehicle platooning with constant spacing strategies and multiple vehicle look ahead information (submitted)

  59. Shladover SE (1978) Longitudinal control of automated guideway transit vehicles within platoons. J Dyn Syst Meas Control 100(4):302–310 12

    Google Scholar 

  60. Shladover SE (1991) Longitudinal control of automotive vehicles in close-formation platoons. J Dyn Syst Meas Control 113(2):231–241

    Google Scholar 

  61. Han-Shue T, Rajamani R, Wei-Bin Z (1998) Demonstration of an automated highway platoon system. In: Proceedings of the 1998 American control conference. ACC (IEEE Cat. No.98CH36207), vol 3, pp 1823–1827 (1998)

  62. Sai Krishna Y (2005) On the information flow required for the scalability of the stability of motion of approximately rigid formation. Master’s thesis, Department of Mechanical Engineering, College Station

  63. Darbha S, Pagilla PR (2010) Limitations of employing undirected information flow graphs for the maintenance of rigid formations for heterogeneous vehicles. Int J Eng Sci 48(11):1164–1178. Special Issue in Honor of K.R. Rajagopal

    Google Scholar 

  64. Barooah P, Hespanha JP (2005) Error amplification and disturbance propagation in vehicle strings with decentralized linear control. In: Proceedings of the 44th IEEE conference on decision and control, pp 4964–4969

  65. Zheng Y, Li SE, Li K, Ren W (2018) Platooning of connected vehicles with undirected topologies: robustness analysis and distributed h-infinity controller synthesis. IEEE Trans Intell Transp Syst 19(5):1353–1364

    Google Scholar 

  66. Tegling E, Bamieh B, Sandberg H (2019) Localized high-order consensus destabilizes large-scale networks. In: 2019 American control conference (ACC), pp 760–765

  67. Tegling E, Middleton RH, Seron MM (2019) Scalability and fragility in bounded-degree consensus networks

  68. Pipes LA (1953) An operational analysis of traffic dynamics. J Appl Phys 24(3):274–281

    Google Scholar 

  69. Rajamani R, Shladover SE (2001) An experimental comparative study of autonomous and co-operative vehicle-follower control systems. Transp Res Part C Emerg Technol 9(1):15–31

    Google Scholar 

  70. Milans V, Shladover SE, Spring J, Nowakowski C, Kawazoe H, Nakamura M (2014) Cooperative adaptive cruise control in real traffic situations. IEEE Trans Intell Transp Syst 15(1):296–305

    Google Scholar 

  71. Naus G, Vugts R, Ploeg J, Molengraft Rvd, Steinbuch M (2010) Cooperative adaptive cruise control, design and experiments. In: Proceedings of the 2010 American control conference, pp 6145–6150

  72. Ploeg J, Serrarens AFA, Heijenk GJ (2011) Connect and drive: design and evaluation of cooperative adaptive cruise control for congestion reduction. J Mod Transp 19(3):207–213

    Google Scholar 

  73. Darbha S, Konduri S, Pagilla PR (2017) Effects of v2v communication on time headway for autonomous vehicles. In: 2017 American control conference (ACC), pp 2002–2007

  74. Darbha S, Konduri S, Pagilla PR (2019) Benefits of V2V communication for autonomous and connected vehicles. IEEE Trans Intell Transp Syst 20(5):1954–1963

    Google Scholar 

  75. Konduri S, Pagilla P, Darbha S (2017) Vehicle platooning with multiple vehicle look-ahead information. In: Proceedings of the IFAC world congress

  76. Rajamani R, Zhu C (2002) Semi-autonomous adaptive cruise control systems. IEEE Trans Veh Technol 51(5):1186–1192

    Google Scholar 

  77. PID stabilization of first-order systems with time delay. Birkhäuser, Boston, pp 161–190 (2005)

  78. Bian Y, Zheng Y, Ren W, Li SE, Wang J, Li K (2019) Reducing time headway for platooning of connected vehicles via V2V communication. Transp Res Part C Emerg Technol 102:87–105

    Google Scholar 

  79. Vegamoor VK, Kalathil D, Rathinam S, Darbha S (2019) Reducing time headway in homogeneous CACC vehicle platoons in the presence of packet drops. In: 2019 18th European control conference (ECC), pp 3159–3164

  80. Shaw E, Hedrick JK (2007) String stability analysis for heterogeneous vehicle strings. In: 2007 American control conference, pp 3118–3125

  81. Zheng Y, Li SE, Li K, Borrelli F, Hedrick JK (2017) Distributed model predictive control for heterogeneous vehicle platoons under unidirectional topologies. IEEE Trans Control Syst Technol 25(3):899–910

    Google Scholar 

  82. Wang C, Nijmeijer H (2015) String stable heterogeneous vehicle platoon using cooperative adaptive cruise control. In: IEEE conference on intelligent transportation systems, proceedings, ITSC, vol 2015, pp 1977–1982. Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE)

  83. Wang M, Li H, Gao J, Huang Z, Li B, van Arem B (2017) String stability of heterogeneous platoons with non-connected automated vehicles. In: 2017 IEEE 20th international conference on intelligent transportation systems (ITSC), pp 1–8

  84. Rodonyi G (2019) Heterogeneous string stability of unidirectionally interconnected mimo lti systems. Automatica 103:354–362

    Google Scholar 

  85. Monteil J, Russo G, Shorten R (2019) On \(L_{\infty }\) string stability of nonlinear bidirectional asymmetric heterogeneous platoon systems. Automatica 105:198–205

    Google Scholar 

  86. Ankem M (2019) String stability of vehicle platoons with heterogeneity in time headway. Master’s thesis, Department of Mechanical Engineering, College Station

  87. Lighthill MJ, Whitham GB (1955) On kinematic waves II: a theory of traffic flow on long crowded roads. Proc R Soc Lond Ser A Math Phys Sci 229(1178):317–345

    Google Scholar 

  88. Richards PI (1956) Shock waves on the highway. Oper Res 4(1):42–51

    Google Scholar 

  89. Chapman S, Cowling TG (1970) The mathematical theory of non-uniform gases. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  90. Prigogine I, Andrews FC (1960) A Boltzmann-like approach for traffic flow. Oper Res 8(6):789–797

    Google Scholar 

  91. Darbha S, Rajagopal KR (2002) Limit of a collection of dynamical systems: an application to modeling the flow of traffic. Math Models Methods Appl Sci 12(10):1381–1399

    Google Scholar 

  92. Darbha S, Choi W (2012) A methodology for assessing the benefits of coordination on the safety of vehicles. J Intell Transp Syst 16(2):70–81

    Google Scholar 

  93. Darbha S, Rajagopal KR (2013) A methodology to assess the safety of automatically controlled vehicles. Int J Adv Eng Sci Appl Math 5(2):87–93

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was partially supported by the United States Department of Transportation through Grant number 693JJ31945042 and the Mays Innovation Research Center at Texas A&M University.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Swaroop Darbha.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Vegamoor, V.K., Darbha, S. & Rajagopal, K.R. A Review of Automatic Vehicle Following Systems. J Indian Inst Sci 99, 567–587 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s41745-019-00143-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s41745-019-00143-7

Keywords

Navigation