Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Sustainable Urban Mobility: What Can Be Done to Achieve It?

  • Review Article
  • Published:
Journal of the Indian Institute of Science Aims and scope

Abstract

The harmonious development of cities is a key problem of our times. Is it possible to have sustainable urban areas that enhance rather than diminish the standard of living of their inhabitants? To better understand the issues behind this question, we begin by defining sustainability and the factors that should be associated with a sustainable urban development. We then consider urban mobility, focusing on one of its major challenges: vehicle congestion. With a view to devising possible solutions to the congestion challenge, we characterize it using basic tools from the field of traffic management and engineering. This reveals that, as with many other problems, apparently common sense solutions do not work, and in particular that congestion cannot be solved by road infrastructure construction alone. In this context, we also discuss two paradoxes that reinforce the idea that “obvious” solutions do not work, and outline certain phenomena suggesting that the worst enemy of urban sustainability is the indiscriminate use of private cars in congested scenarios. We then argue that urban development and mobility are wicked problems in organized complexity and, as such, do not have completely satisfactory solutions. In this light we propose what we believe has become the most consensual solution among specialists: a stick and carrot approach. The stick is a policy such as road pricing that charges for using cars in urban areas during congested periods, while the carrot consists of a good public transport system. Finally, we caution that this approach is unlikely to be implemented unless there is a political champion who is prepared to lead longer-term strategies that can capture the enthusiasm of the citizenry.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Figure 1:
Figure 2:
Figure 3:
Figure 4:
Figure 5:
Figure 6:
Figure 7:
Figure 8:
Figure 9:

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Note, however, that in 1976, Caracas had the worst traffic jams in Latin America even though the city’s mayor had replaced all signalized intersections with grade separations.

  2. See, for example, the notable column by Chilean sociologist Domingo Moreno, in which he analyses an article that appeared in a Santiago daily attacking those of us who propose the use of bicycles as a sustainable transport mode worthy of government support (https://medium.com/@domingomoreno/las-falacias-de-poduje-8f8d7d60ecca).

References

  1. Ampt ES, Ortúzar J. de D (2004) On best practice in continuous large-scale mobility surveys. Transport Rev 24:337–363

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Basso LJ, Silva HE, Riquelme I (2017) Urban road congestion management: capacity investments and pricing policies. 13th International Conference of the Western Economic Association International, June 3–6, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Santiago

  3. Braess D, Nagurney A, Wakolbinger T (2005) On a paradox of traffic planning. Transport Sci 39:446–450

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Brundtlandt Report (1987) Our Common Future. Report of the World Commission on Environment and Development, UN Doc. A/42/427, Washington, D.C

  5. Burford G, Hoover E, Velasco I, Janoušková S, Jimenez A, Piggot G, Podger D, Harder MK (2013) Bringing the “missing pillar” into sustainable development goals: towards intersubjective values-based indicators sustainability. Sustainability 5:3035–3059

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Campoli J (2012) Made for walking: density and neighbourhood form. Lincoln Institute of Land Policy, Washington

    Google Scholar 

  7. Cantillo V, Ortúzar J. de D (2014) Restricting the use of cars by license plate numbers: a misguided urban transport policy. Dyna 81:75–82

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. CEDEUS (2017) Centro de Desarrollo Urbano Sustentable (www.cedeus.cl), Santiago (in Spanish)

  9. CEDEUS-MINVU (2018) Sustentabilidad a escala de barrio: re-visitando el programa “quiero mi barrio”. Ministerio de Vivienda y Urbanismo, Santiago (in Spanish)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Cervero R, Kockelman K (1997) Travel demand and the 3Ds: density, diversity and design. Transp Res Part D Transport Environ 2:199–219

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. De Lisio A (1999) Desarrollo sustentable: opciones y limitaciones para América Latina y el Caribe. Revista Cuadernos del Cendes 16:1–23 (in Spanish)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Downs A (1962) The law of peak-hour expressway congestion. Traffic Quarterly 16:393–409

    Google Scholar 

  13. Duranton G, Turner M (2011) The fundamental law of road congestion: evidence from the US. Am Econ Rev 101:2616–2652

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Harding T (2014) Common sense fallacy. (https://yandoo.wordpress.com/2014/12/28/common-sense-fallacy/). Accessed 20 June 2019

  15. Hensher DA, Bliemer M (2014) What type of road pricing scheme might appeal to politicians? Viewpoints on the challenge in gaining the citizen and public servant vote by staging reform. Transp Res Part A Policy Pr 61:227–237

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. International Union for Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources (1980) World conservation strategy: living resource conservation for sustainable development. Gland, Switzerland

    Google Scholar 

  17. Jacobs J (1961) The death and life of great American cities. Random House, New York

    Google Scholar 

  18. Kimber RM, McDonald M, Hounsell N (1985) Passenger car units in saturation flows: concept, definition, derivation. Transp Research Part B Methodol 19:39–61

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Littig B, Griessler E (2005) Social sustainability: a catchword between political pragmatism and social theory. Int J Sustain Dev 8:65–79

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Miller E (2018) Viewpoint: integrated urban modelling—past, present and future. J Transport Land Use 11:387–399

    Google Scholar 

  21. Ministry of Transport (1963) Traffic in towns: a study of the long term problems of traffic in urban areas. Report of the Steering Group and Working Group appointed by the Minister of Transport, London, UK

  22. Mogridge MJH, Holden DJ, Bird J, Terzis GC (1987) The Downs–Thomson paradox and the transportation planning process. Int J Transport Econ 14:283–311

    Google Scholar 

  23. Ortúzar J. de D, Bascuñán R, Salata A, Rizzi LI (2018) Assessing the potential acceptability of road pricing in Santiago. Transp Res Part A Policy Pr (under review)

  24. Ortúzar J. de D, Willumsen LG (2011) Modelling transport. Wiley, Chichester

    Book  Google Scholar 

  25. Rittel HWJ, Webber MM (1973) Dilemmas in a general theory of planning. Policy Sci 4:155–169

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Rizzi LI, de la Maza C (2017) The external costs of private versus public road transport in the Metropolitan Area of Santiago, Chile. Transp Res Part A Policy Pr 98:123–140

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Schrank D, Eisele B, Lomax T, Bak J (2015) 2015 urban mobility scorecard. The Texas A&M Transportation Institute, College Station, Texas

    Google Scholar 

  28. Smart Growth America (2015) Safer streets, stronger economies: complete street project outcomes from across the country. Smart Growth America, Washington

    Google Scholar 

  29. Spangenberg JH, Omann I, Hinterberger F (2002) Sustainable growth criteria: minimum benchmarks and scenarios for employment and the environment. Ecol Econ 42:429–443

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Thomson JM (1977) Great cities and their traffic. Gollancz, London

    Google Scholar 

  31. Walters AA (1961) The theory and measurement of private and social costs of highway congestion. Econometrica 29:676–699

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Wilson P (2015) Urban sustainability theory and practice. Routledge, London

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

I would like to thank Margarita Greene and Juan Carlos Muñoz for their ideas and their constructive criticisms of the first draft of this article. Thanks are also due to Abdul R. Pinjari and an unknown referee for their useful comments. Finally, I am grateful for the support received for this research from CONICYT PIA/BASAL AFB180003, the Centre for Sustainable Urban Development—CEDEUS (CONICYT/FONDAP/15110020) and the BRT + Centre of Excellence (www.brt.cl), financed by the Volvo Research and Educational Foundations.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Juan de Dios Ortúzar.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ortúzar, J.d. Sustainable Urban Mobility: What Can Be Done to Achieve It?. J Indian Inst Sci 99, 683–693 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s41745-019-00130-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s41745-019-00130-y

Navigation