Abstract
During the last 21 year period from 1996–2016, the total value of imports of rubber and rubber products grew at a rate of 17.66% compared to 14.18% growth rate in the value of exports. As a result of higher growth in imports and lower growth in exports, in the last 10 years, external trade in this segment had shown negative balance of trade consistently. In 2016–2017, the country had a negative balance of trade of US$ 414.76 million dollars. The broad objective of the present study is to identify products groups with comparative advantages in the global market. The study used methods such as Revealed Comparative Advantage, Revealed Symmetric Comparative Advantage and concentration ratio to analyse the comparative advantage of all the 17 rubber and rubber product groups (four digit level) under chapter 40 of the harmonised system nomenclature. Data from world integrated trade solution (WITS) during the period 1996–2016 are used for the analysis. Our results showed that despite a comparative disadvantage of the rubber sector at the aggregate level in the world market, the three product groups, viz, reclaimed rubber (HS 4003), inner tubes, of rubber (HS 4013), and hygienic or pharmaceutical articles (including teats) (HS 4014), exhibited comparative advantage consistently throughout the 21 year period. The two major product groups, viz., new pneumatic tyres of rubber (HS 4011) and other articles of vulcanised rubber other than hard rubber (HS 4016), which accounted for 68.68% of the total value of exports from the sector showed varied trends.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
The equation for the curve is: y = b*m^x.
References
Joseph J, George KT (2016) India’s trade liberalisation initiatives and trends in balance of trade under the regional trade agreements: the case of rubber and rubber products. Rubber Sci 29(3):238–245
ASI (2017) Annual Survey of Industries. Ministry of Statistics and Programme Implementation, Government of India
DGCIS (2017) Export Import Data Bank, Directorate General of Commercial Intelligence and Statistics, Ministry of commerce and Industry, Government of India
WITS (2017) World integrate trade solutions. World Bank, Washington
George KT (2015) Transcending the regional trappings of natural rubber cultivation and challenges of evolving a national rubber policy in India. Working paper, ER/8, Rubber Research Institute of India, Kottayam, India
Joseph J, George KT (2015) Revealed comparative advantage and decomposition of export growth: case of India’s selected rubber products. Econ Polit Week L(42):72–76
Joseph J, George KT, Joseph T (2006) Trends in India’s external trade in rubber and rubber products: an inter-temporal analysis. Foreign Trade Rev Q J Indian Inst Foreign Trade 40(4):3–24
Joseph J, George KT (2016) Asean-India free trade agreement And India’s balance of trade in rubber and rubber products: a preliminary assessment. Rubber Sci 29(1):1–6
George KT, Joseph J (2014) Rubber and rubber products tariffs and protection in the ASEAN-India agreement. Econ Polit Week XLIX 1:22–25
George KT, Joseph J, Jacob J (2003) Global trade and Tariff policy on rubber and rubber products under the WTO regime: a preliminary assessment. Working paper, Rubber Research Institute of India, Kottayam, India
Mohanakumar S, George KT (1999) Indian rubber products manufacturing industry: evolutionary dynamics and structural dimensions. Monograph, Rubber Research Institute of India, Kottayam
Nag B, Chatterjee R (2009) Bilateral trade and investment between india and china: measuring relative competitiveness in each other’s market. Foreign Trade Rev Q J Indian Inst Foreign Trade 44(2):33–58
Batra A, Khan Z (2005) Revealed comparative advantage: an analysis for India and China. Working Paper No 168, Indian Council for Research on International Economic Relations, New Delhi
Balassa B (1965) Trade liberalization and ‘revealed’ comparative advantage. The Manchester School of Economic and Social Studies 33:99–123
Dalum B, Laursen K, Villumsen G (1998) Structural change in OECD export specialization patterns: de-specialization and ‘stickiness’. Int Rev Appl Econ 12(3):423–443
Shinoj P, Matur VC (2008) Comparative advantage of india in agricultural exports vis-á-vis Asia: a post-reforms analysis. Agric Econ Res Rev 21:60–66
Erlat G, Akyuz O (2001) Country concentration of Turkish exports and imports over time Economics Web Institute. http://www.economicswebinstitute.org/essays/conexp.htm
IRSG (2017) Rubber statistical bulletin. IRSG Singapore 72:1–3
Rubber Board (2017) Indian rubber statistics, vol 38. The Rubber Board, Kottayam, p 12
Acknowledgements
The authors are grateful to Dr. Tharian George K, former Joint Director, Economics Division, Rubber Research Institute of India for his valuable comments and suggestions of an earlier version of the paper.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Appendix
Appendix
See Table 5.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Joseph, J., Hari, K.S. Comparative advantage and export performance of India’s rubber sector: an exploratory analysis. J Rubber Res 22, 109–117 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s42464-019-00022-x
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s42464-019-00022-x