Abstract.
The threefold interest in architecture, biology and mathematics motivated us to examine and justify new architectural forms. We discuss some notions of rhythm: Euclidean, morphogenetic and morphologic. Contemporary relationships between structure and form are based on the generation of shape by technological processes, thus the resulting objects are restricted to their material expression. Here a phenomenological organisation of form and its continuity with the landscape arise out of the mathematical and architectural creativity. The use of the computer is applied from outside to inside instead from inside to outside; this means that we are dealing with the organisational processes via continuous methods instead of evolutionary processes given by computer simulations, known as genetic algorithms, where the resulting configurations are reduced to a matter of routine. The role of design as an aesthetic component innovates the theoretical framework of structural engineering to establish the architectural environments.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
About this article
Cite this article
Consiglieri, L., Consiglieri, V. Continuity versus Discretization. Nexus Netw J 11, 151–162 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00004-008-0086-x
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00004-008-0086-x