Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Motion of Photospheric Matter within the Active Region Site with Two Ellerman Bombs

  • SOLAR PHYSICS
  • Published:
Kinematics and Physics of Celestial Bodies Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Examination results for specific features of variation of line-of-sight plasma velocities in different photosphere layers of the NOAA 11024 active region (AR) under the influence of two evolving Ellerman bombs (EB-1 and EB-2) are presented. Spectroscopic data with high spatial and temporal resolution were obtained with the French–Italian THEMIS solar telescope on July 4, 2009. The observation time was 20 min. The AR was undergoing a sharp increase in activity on the day of observations, and the EBs evolved in the region of one of the three magnetic fluxes that were emerging at the time. The brightness of EB-1 decreased during observations, while EB-2 got brighter. The λ ≈ 630 nm spectral region, which includes Fraunhofer lines forming within a wide range of photospheric heights (neutral iron lines Fe I λ 630.15, 630.25, and 630.35 nm and titanium line Ti I λ 630.38 nm), was used. Changes in the velocity and direction of motion of matter in the region of Ellerman bombs and in their immediate vicinity at different photosphere levels and at different stages of EB evolution were determined and analyzed. It was found that upflows were predominant at all levels of the AR photosphere. At the same time, line-of-sight velocities Vlos and the amplitude of their oscillations decreased considerably in the region of EBs. Apparently, downward matter flows reduced the velocity of upward plasma motion. This suggests that small-scale downward flows induced by magnetic reconnections were superimposed onto the large-scale upward motion of plasma of the new magnetic flux. The profile shape of photospheric lines reinforces this conclusion. The profiles of strong lines had a red asymmetry. The matter velocity determined based on the shift of a prominent component in the red wing of the Fe I λ 630.35 nm line profiles was as high as 2 km/s. Such a Vlos distribution in the EB regions indicates that they consisted of several jets moving with different velocities in different directions. The line-of-sight velocity in the central part of EB-1 and EB-2 varied from –1 to 0 km/s and from –1 to 0.2 km/s in the upper photospheric layer and from –1.6 to –0.2 km/s and from –1.1 to 0.25 km/s in the lower layer of the photosphere, respectively. Vlos variations in the vicinity of these Ellerman bombs were oscillatory, and the interval between oscillations was ~5 min. The pattern of quasiperiodic Vlos oscillations was disturbed in the EB regions: they often occurred in antiphase. It may be concluded that the excitation caused by a pulsed energy release as a result of successive magnetic reconnections associated with the emergence of the new magnetic flux propagated from the EB-1 site along a magnetic loop and triggered the formation of EB-2, and the Ellerman bombs then evolved as a physically connected pair. The studied features of the line-of-sight velocity variation of chromospheric and photospheric matter indicate that during the evolved of EBs differently directed motions of matter there was: it moved upward in the lower chromospheric layer, while downward flows reduced the velocity of ascending plasma at the photospheric level. Magnetic reconnections occurring in the layer between the upper photosphere and the lower chromosphere, where the core of the Hα line was formed, could induce such a velocity distribution.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 3.
Fig. 4.
Fig. 5.
Fig. 6.
Fig. 7.
Fig. 8.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  1. E. A. Gurtovenko and R. I. Kostyk, Fraunhofer Spectrum and a System of Solar Oscillator Strengths (Naukova Dumka, Kiev, 1989) [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  2. A. N. Koval’, “On moustache-related motions,” Izv. Krym. Astrofiz. Obs. 32, 32–37 (1964).

    Google Scholar 

  3. R. I. Kostyk and N. G. Shchukina, “Five-minute oscillations and the fine structure of the solar photosphere. I,” Kinematika Fiz. Nebesnykh Tel 15, 25–37 (1999).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  4. R. I. Kostyk and N. G. Shchukina, “Five-minute oscillations and the fine structure of the solar photosphere. II,” Kinematika Fiz. Nebesnykh Tel 15, 135–144 (1999).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  5. R. I. Kostyk and N. G. Shchukina, “Fine structure of convective motions in the solar photosphere: Observations and theory,” Astron. Rep. 48, 769–780 (2004).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  6. M. N. Pasechnik, “Plasma motions in the solar loop of emerging magnetic flux,” Kinematics Phys. Celestial Bodies 30, 161–172 (2014).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  7. M. N. Pasechnik, “Spectral study of a pair of Ellerman bombs,” Kinematics Phys. Celestial Bodies 32, 55–69 (2016).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  8. M. N. Pasechnik, “Spectral study of Ellerman bombs. Photosphere,” Kinematics Phys. Celestial Bodies 34, 68–81 (2018).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  9. A. B. Severnyi, “Some results of the study of nonstationary processes on the Sun,” Astron. Zh. 34, 684–693 (1957).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  10. V. Archontis and A. W. Hood, “Formation of Ellerman bombs due to 3D flux emergence,” Astron. Astrophys. 508, 1469–1483 (2009).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  11. A. Berlicki and P. Heinzel, “Observations and NLTE modeling of Ellerman bombs,” Astron. Astrophys. 567, A110 (2014).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  12. A. Berlicki, P. Heinzel, and E. H. Avrett, “Photometric analysis of Ellerman bombs,” Mem. Soc. Astron. Ital. 81, 646–652 (2010).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  13. J. Chae, Y.-J. Moon, and S.-Y. Park, “Observational test of chromospheric magnetic reconnection,” J. Korean Astron. Soc. 36 (S1), S13–S20 (2003).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. F. Ellerman, “Solar hydrogen "bombs”,” Astrophys. J. 46, 298–301 (1917).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  15. A. J. Engell, M. Siarkowski, and M. Gryciuk, et al., “Flares and their underlying magnetic complexity,” Astrophys. J. 726, 12–20 (2011).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  16. C. Fang, Y. H. Tang, Z. Xu, et al., “Spectral analysis of Ellerman bombs,” Astrophys. J. 643, 1325–1336 (2006).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  17. M. K. Georgoulis, D. M. Rust, P. N. Bernasconi, et al., “Statistics, morphology, and energetics of Ellerman bomb,” Astrophys. J. 575, 506–528 (2002).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  18. V. M. Grigor’ev, L. V. Ermakova, and A. I. Khlystova, “The dynamics of photospheric line-of-sight velocities in emerging active regions,” Astron. Rep. 55, 163–173 (2011).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  19. S. L. Guglielmino, L. R. Bellot Rubio, F. Zuccarello, et al., “Multiwavelength observations of small-scale reconnection events triggered by magnetic flux emergence in the solar atmosphere,” Astrophys. J. 724, 1083–1098 (2010).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  20. Yu. Hashimoto, R. Kitai, K. Ichimoto, et al., “Internal fine structure of Ellerman bombs,” Publ. Astron. Soc. Jpn. 62, 879–891 (2010).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  21. M. Herlender and A. Berlicki, “Multi-wavelength analysis of Ellerman bomb light curves,” Cent. Eur. Astrophys. Bull. 35, 181–186 (2011).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  22. R. Kitai, “On the mass motions and the atmospheric states of moustaches,” Sol. Phys. 87, 135–154 (1983).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  23. R. Kitai, “Ellerman bomb as a manifestation of chromospheric fine scale activity,” in Proc. 5th Hinode Science Meeting, Cambridge, MA, Oct. 10–14, 2011, Ed. by L. Golub, I. De Moortel, and T. Shimizu (Astron. Soc. Pac., San Francisco, CA, 2012), in Ser.: ASP Conference Series, Vol. 456, p. 81.

  24. N. N. Kondrashova, M. N. Pasechnik, S. N. Chornogor, et al., “Atmosphere dynamics of the active region NOAA 11024,” Sol. Phys. 284, 499–513 (2013).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  25. H. Kozu, R. Kitai, D. H. Brooks, et al., “Horizontal and vertical flow structure in emerging flux regions,” Publ. Astron. Soc. Jpn. 58, 407–421 (2006).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  26. H. Kurokawa, I. Kawaguchi, Y. Funakoshi, et al., “Morphological and evolutional features of Ellerman bombs,” Sol. Phys. 79, 77–84 (1982).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  27. B. W. Lites, A. Skumanich, and V. Martinez Pillet, “Vector magnetic fields of emerging solar flux I. Properties at the site of emergence,” Astron. Astrophys. 333, 1053–1068 (1998).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  28. T. Matsumoto, R. Kitai, K. Shibata, et al., “Height dependence of gas flows in an Ellerman bomb,” Publ. Astron. Soc. Jpn. 60, 95–102 (2008).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  29. T. Matsumoto, R. Kitai, K. Shibata, et al., “Cooperative observation of Ellerman bombs between the Solar Optical Telescope aboard Hinode and Hida/Domeless Solar Telescope,” Publ. Astron. Soc. Jpn. 60, 577–585 (2008).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  30. S. J. Nelson, J. G. Doyle, R. Erdélyi, et al., “Statistical analysis of small Ellerman bomb events,” Sol. Phys. 283, 307–323 (2013).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  31. C. J. Nelson, S. Shelyag, M. Masthioudakis, et al., “Ellerman bombs — Evidence for magnetic reconnection in the lower solar atmosphere,” Astrophys. J. 779, 125–135 (2013).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  32. E. Pariat, B. Schmieder, A. Berlicki, et al., “Spectrophotometric analysis of Ellerman bombs in the Ca II, Hα, and UV range,” Astron. Astrophys. 473, 279– 289 (2007).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  33. J. Qiu, M. D. Ding, H. Wang, et al., “Ultraviolet and Hα emission in Ellerman bombs,” Astrophys. J. 544, LI57–LI61 (2000).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. R. Rezaei and C. Beck, “Multiwavelength spectropolarimetric observations of an Ellerman bomb,” Astron. Astrophys. 582, A104 (2015).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  35. R. J. Rutten, “Hα features with hot onsets I. Ellerman bombs,” Astron. Astrophys. 590, 124–137 (2016).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  36. H. Socas-Navarro, V. Martinez Pillet, D. Elmore, et al., “Spectro-polarimetric observations and non-LTE modeling of Ellerman bombs,” Sol. Phys. 235, 75–86 (2006).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  37. G. Valori, L. M. Green, P. Demouli, et al., “Nonlinear force-free extrapolation of emerging flux with a global twist and serpantine fine structures,” Sol. Phys. 278, 73–97 (2012).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  38. G. J. M. Vissers, L. H. M. Rouppe van der Voort, and R. J. Rutten, “Ellerman bombs at high resolution. II. Triggering, visibility, and effect on upper atmosphere,” Astrophys. J. 774, 32–46 (2013).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  39. H. Watanabe, R. Kitai, K. Okamoto, et al., “Spectropolarimetric observation of an emerging flux region: Triggering mechanisms of Ellerman bombs,” Astrophys. J. 684, 736–746 (2008).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  40. H. Watanabe, G. Vissers, R. Kitai, et al., “Ellerman bombs at high resolution: 1. Morphological evidence for photospheric reconnection,” Astrophys. J. 736, 71–83 (2011).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  41. Th. G. Zachariadis, C. E. Alissandrakis, and G. Banos, “Observations of Ellerman bombs in Hα,” Sol. Phys. 108, 227–236 (1987).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

Download references

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

I thank E.V. Khomenko and R.I. Kostyk for providing the THEMIS observational data and processing software.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Main Astronomical Observatory, National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine, 03143, Kyiv, Ukraine

    M. N. Pasechnik

Authors
  1. M. N. Pasechnik
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to M. N. Pasechnik.

Additional information

Translated by D. Safin

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Pasechnik, M.N. Motion of Photospheric Matter within the Active Region Site with Two Ellerman Bombs. Kinemat. Phys. Celest. Bodies 35, 55–69 (2019). https://doi.org/10.3103/S0884591319020053

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.3103/S0884591319020053

Keywords:

Search

Navigation