Skip to main content
Log in

Comparison of MetOp-A/-B GRAS radio occultation data processed by CDAAC and ROM

  • Original Article
  • Published:
GPS Solutions Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Both the Constellation Observing System for Meteorology, Ionosphere, and Climate (COSMIC) Data Analysis and Archival Center (CDAAC) and the European Radio Occultation Meteorology Satellite Application Facility (ROM) process the radio occultation data from the Global Navigation Satellite System Receiver for Atmospheric Sounding (GRAS) onboard the MetOp-A/-B satellites. CDAAC- and ROM-processed GRAS data from 2015 are compared here. A three-step sequential quality control (QC) procedure is applied to both CDAAC and ROM data. Another QC check on the vertical sampling interval of the bending angle is applied to ROM data, which has a varying vertical sampling interval that is much higher than the CDAAC’s constant 20 m vertical sampling interval and causes a significant number of outliers below 10 km. The mean of the fractional difference in bending angle between CDAAC and ROM is reduced from ± 0.4 to ± 0.2%, and the standard deviation of the fractional difference in bending angle between CDAAC and ROM is reduced from 3 to 2% after QC in the upper troposphere and lower stratosphere (UTLS). The mean differences in temperature and specific humidity derived by CDAAC and ROM are within ± 0.4 K and ± 0.02 g kg−1 in the UTLS, respectively. The mean fractional difference in refractivity retrievals between CDAAC and ROM is on the order of 0.05% in the UTLS, and 2% below and 0.4% above it. There is a significant latitudinal dependence of the mean fractional difference in refractivity retrievals in the lower troposphere (below 400 hPa). The mean fractional difference is the largest near 850 hPa at the equator (about 2.7%).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17
Fig. 18
Fig. 19

Similar content being viewed by others

References

Download references

Acknowledgements

The author was supported by the National Key R&D Program of China (Grant 2018YFC1507302), and the Mathematical Theories and Methods of Data Assimilation supported by the National Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 91730304).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Xiaolei Zou.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Xu, X., Zou, X. Comparison of MetOp-A/-B GRAS radio occultation data processed by CDAAC and ROM. GPS Solut 24, 34 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10291-019-0949-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10291-019-0949-5

Keywords

Navigation