Skip to main content
Log in

80th Anniversary of Pure and Applied Geophysics: A Bibliometric Overview

  • Published:
Pure and Applied Geophysics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Pure and Applied Geophysics (PAGEOPH) is one of the leading journals in the field of geophysics. The first issue was published in 1939; thus, the journal is celebrating its 80th anniversary in 2018. The aim of this paper is to provide a complete lifetime overview of the academic structure of the journal using bibliometric indicators. This analysis includes key factors such as the most cited articles, leading authors, originating institutions and countries, publication and citation structures, and the most commonly used keywords. The bibliometric data used to conduct this analysis comes from the Scopus database. Additionally, the visualization of similarities (VOS)viewer software is used to create a graphic map of some of the bibliometric results. The graphical analysis uses co-citation, bibliographic coupling and co-occurrence of keywords. The results indicate that PAGEOPH is a leading journal in the areas in which it is indexed, with publications from a wide range of authors, institutions, and countries around the world.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alonso, S., Cabrerizo, F. J., Herrera-Viedma, E., & Herrera, F. (2009). H-index: a review focused on its variants, computation, and standarization for different scientific fields. Journal of Informetrics,3(4), 273–289.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aydinoglu, A. U., & Taskin, Z. (2018). Origins of life research: a bibliometric approach. Origins of Life and Evolution of Biospheres,48(1), 55–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ding, Y., Rousseau, R., & Wolfram, D. (2014). Measuring scholarly impact: methods and practice. Berlin: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Fischer, J. P., Wininger, A. E., Scofield, D. C., Tucker, A., Kacena-Merrell, E. J., Whipple, E. C., et al. (2018). Historical analysis of bibliometric trends in the journal of pediatric orthopaedics with a particular focus on sex. Journal of Pediatric Orthopaedics,38(3), E168–E171.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ganbat, T., Chong, H. Y., Liao, P. C., & Wu, Y. D. (2018). A bibliometric review on risk management and building information modeling for international construction. Advances in Civil Engineering. https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/8351679.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hirsch, J. E. (2005). An index to quantify an individual’s scientific research output. Proceedings of the National academy of Sciences of the United States of America,102(46), 16569–16572.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huang, Q. F., & Lu, Y. Q. (2018). Urban heat island research from 1991 to 2015: a bibliometric analysis. Theoretical and Applied Climatology,131(3–4), 1055–1067.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kessler, M. M. (1963). Bibliographic coupling between scientific papers. American Documentation,14(1), 10–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Köseoglu, M. A., Rahimi, R., Okumus, F., & Liu, J. (2016). Bibliometric studies in tourism. Annals of Tourism Research,61, 180–198.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li, Y. Q., Li, J., & Xie, S. D. (2017). Bibliometric analysis: global research trends in biogenic volatile organic compounds during 1991–2014. Environmental Earth Sciences,76, 11. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-016-6328-4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martinez-Lopez, F. J., Merigó, J. M., Valenzuela-Fernandez, L., & Nicolas, C. (2018). Fifty years of the European journal of marketing: a bibliometric analysis. European Journal of Marketing,52(1–2), 439–468.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martyn, J. (1964). Bibliographic coupling. Journal of Documentation,20(4), 236.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Merigó, J. M., & Yang, J. B. (2017). Accounting research: a bibliometric analysis. Australian Accounting Review,27(1), 71–100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, B. (2009). Editorial. Pure and Applied Geophysics,166, 1909–1911.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, B. (2014). Editorial. Pure and Applied Geophysics,171, 1597–1598.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mulet-Forteza, C., Martorell-Cunill, O., Merigó, J., Genovart-Balaguer, J., & Mauleon-Mendez, E. (2018). Twenty five years of the journal of travel & tourism marketing: a bibliometric ranking. Journal of Travel & Tourism Marketing,35(9), 1201–1221.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Okal, E. A. (1989). Editorial. Pure and Applied Geophysics,130(1), 1–3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perna, S., Peroni, G., Miccono, A., Riva, A., Morazzoni, P., Allegrini, P., et al. (2016). Multidimensional effects of soy isoflavone by food or supplements in menopause women: a systematic review and bibliometric analysis. Natural Product Communications,11(11), 1733–1740.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pritchard, A. (1969). Statistical bibliography or bibliometrics? Journal of Documentation,25, 348–349.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sinkovics, N. (2016). Enhancing the foundations for theorizing through bibliometric mapping. International Marketing Review,33(3), 327–350.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Small, H. (1973). Co-citation in the scientific literature: a new measure of the relationship between two documents. Journal of the American Society for Information Science,24(4), 265–269.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Svensson, G. (2010). SSCI and its impact factors: a ‘prisoner’s dilemma’? European Journal of Marketing,44(1–2), 23–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tang, Y. L., Xin, H. J., Yang, F., & Long, X. (2018). A historical review and bibliometric analysis of nanoparticles toxicity on algae. Journal of Nanoparticle Research,20(4), 92. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11051-018-4196-4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tur-Porcar, A., Mas-Tur, A., Merigó, J. M., Roig-Tierno, N., & Watt, J. (2018). A bibliometric history of the journal of psychology between 1936 and 2015. Journal of Psychology,152(4), 199–225. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223980.2018.1440516.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Eck, N. J., & Waltman, L. (2010). Software survey: vOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping. Scientometrics,84(2), 523–538.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Velasco-Munoz, J. F., Aznar-Sanchez, J. A., Belmonte-Urena, L. J., & Lopez-Serrano, M. J. (2018). Advances in water use efficiency in agriculture: a bibliometric analysis. Water,10(4), 377. https://doi.org/10.3390/w10040377.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, P., Zhu, F. W., Song, H. Y., & Hou, J. H. (2018). A Bibliometric Retrospective of the journal Eurasia journal of mathematics, science and technology education between 2012 and 2017. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics Science and Technology Education,14(3), 765–775.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yuan, Y., Gretzel, U., & Tseng, Y. (2015). Revealing the nature of contemporary tourism research: extracting common subject areas through bibliographic coupling. International Journal of Tourism Research,17(5), 417–431.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zare, F., Elsawah, S., Iwanaga, T., Jakeman, A. J., & Pierce, S. A. (2017). Integrated water assessment and modelling: a bibliometric analysis of trends in the water resource sector. Journal of Hydrology,552, 765–778.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, Q., Lu, Q. B., Zhong, D. P., & Ye, X. T. (2018). The pattern of policy change on disaster management in china: a bibliometric analysis of policy documents, 1949–2016. International Journal of Disaster Risk Science,9(1), 55–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zupic, I., & Cater, T. (2015). Bibliometric methods in management and organization. Organizational Research Methods,18(3), 429–472.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors wish to express their gratitude to Alexander B. Rabinovich, Carla F. Braitenberg, Renata Dmowska and Clemens Heine for their valuable comments made during the revision process of this work. We are also grateful to all the members of “GBL, antes GBV, en origen GBM”, group by their support during the elaboration of this work.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Carles Mulet-Forteza.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Mulet-Forteza, C., Socias Salvá, A., Monserrat, S. et al. 80th Anniversary of Pure and Applied Geophysics: A Bibliometric Overview. Pure Appl. Geophys. 177, 531–570 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00024-019-02328-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00024-019-02328-8

Keywords

Navigation