Abstract
Fodder banks are important agroforestry technologies that improve access to off-season livestock feed among smallholder farmers. However, fodder banks also contribute to nutrient mining, through biomass transfer, and therefore their sustainably may be downplayed. In order to identify sustainable managemt options, the objective of this study was to determine the effect of management practices (spacing and pruning frequency) on forage yield and soil organic carbon (SOC) of two contrasting leguminous Calliandra calothyrsus Meissner and non-leguminous (Vernonia amygdalina Del) fodder shrubs. A field trial, with the two shrubs separately planted at different spacing (0.75 × 0.75 m and 1.0 × 1.0 m) and frequency of complete pruning (5- and 9-week interval), was established in a three-replicate randomized complete block design. Harvesting of fodder biomass was done for two consecutive years from the start of pruning. Total and aggregate SOC of the top soil (0–15 cm) and sub-soil (0.15–0.30 m) was assessed in four particle-size fractions. For both species, wider spacing significantly reduced (p = 0.037) forage biomass by approximately 20%. Pruning at 9-weeks produced more forage biomass for C. calothyrsus, but not for V. amygdalina. The size of the soil aggregates significantly increased (p = 0.027) by 8% in the 9-week compared to 5-week pruning frequency. Total organic carbon (TOC) in sub soil under C. calothyrsuswas 7% higher than that under V. amygdalina. Wider spacing and lower pruning frequency significantly increased OC in sub soil (p = 0.003) by 4% and 9%, respectively. Therefore, a spacing of 1.0 m combined with a pruning frequency of 9 weeks is optimum for forage and SOC. These results suggest that the sustainability of fodder banks can be achieved by optimizing pruning frequency and plant spacing. Therefore, proper management of fodder banks can contribute to climate-smart agriculture through increasing soil carbon sequestration and increased livestock productivity among stallholder farmers.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ayres E, Heath J, Possell M, Black HIJ, Kerstiens G, Bardgett RD (2004) Tree physiological responses to above-ground herbivory directly modify below-ground processes of soil carbon and N cycling. Ecol Lett 7:469–479. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1461-0248.2004.00604.x
Ayres E, Dromph KM, Cook R, Ostle N, Bardgett RD (2007) The influence of below-ground herbivory and defoliation of a legume on N transfer to neighbouring plants. Funct Ecol 21:256–263. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2435.2006.01227.x
Ba NX, Giang VD, Ngoan LD (2005) Ensiling mulberry foliage (Morus alba) and the nutritive value of mulberry foliage silage for goats in central Vietnam. Res. Rural Dev. 17:2
Barreto AC, Chaer GM, Fernandes MF (2012) Hedgerow pruning frequency effects on soil quality and maize productivity in alley cropping with Gliricidia sepium in Northeastern Brazil. Soil Till Res 120:112–120. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.still.2011.11.010
Carrillo Y, Jordan CF, Jacobsen KL, Mitchell KG, Raber P (2011) Shoot pruning of a hedgerow perennial legume alters the availability and temporal dynamics of root-derived N in a subtropical setting. Plant Soil 345:59–68. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-011-0760-8
Casper BB, Jackson RB (1997) Plant competition underground. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 28:545–570
Chapin FS, Bloom AJ, Field CB, Waring RH (1987) Plant responses to multiple environmental factors. BioScience 37:49–57
Chesney P, Vasquez N (2007) Dynamics of non-structural carbohydrate reserves in pruned Erythrina poeppigiana and Gliricidia sepium trees. Agrofor Syst 69:89–105
Eghball B, Maranville JW (1993) Root development and N influx of corn genotypes grown under combined drought and N stress. Agron J 85:147–152
Eissenstat DM, Yanai RD (1997) The ecology of root lifespan. Adv Ecol Res 27:1–60
Endale Y, Derero A, Argaw M, Muthuri C (2016) Farmland tree species diversity and spatial distribution pattern in semi-arid East Shewa, Ethiopia. For Trees Livelihoods. https://doi.org/10.1080/14728028.2016.1266971
Frankow-Lindberg BE, Dahlin AS (2013) N2 fixation, N transfer, and yield in grassland communities including a deep-rooted legume or non-legume species. Plant Soil 370:567–581. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-013-1650-z
Franzel S, Carsan S, Lukuyu B, Sinja J, Wambugu C (2014) Fodder trees for improving livestock productivity and smallholder livelihoods in Africa. Curr Opin Env Sust 6(1):98–103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2013.11.008
Gutteridge HM, Shelton HM (1994) Forage legumetrees in tropical agriculture. CAB International, Walling-ford
Haque I, Jutzi S and Neate PJH (eds) (1986) Potentials of forage legumes in farming systems of sub-Saharan Africa. In: Proceedings of a workshop held at ILCA, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia, 16–19 Sept 1985. ILCA, Addis Ababa
Heineman AM, Otieno HJO, Mengich EK, Amadalo BA (1997) Growth and yield of eight agroforestry tree species in line plantings in Western Kenya and their effect on maize yields and soil properties. Forest Ecol Manag 91:103–135
Hess HD, Tiemann TT, Noto F, Franzel S, Lascano C, Kreuzer M (2006) The effects of cultivation site on forage quality of Calliandra calothyrsus var. Patulul Agroforest Syst 68:209–220
Hove L, Franzel S, Moyo PS (2003a) Farmer experiences in the production and utilisation of fodder trees in Zimbabwe: constraints and opportunities for increased adoption. Trop Grasslands 37:279–283
Hove L, Ndlovu L, Sibanda S (2003b) The effects of drying temperature on chemical composition and nutritive value of some tropical fodder shrubs. Agroforest Syst 59:231–241
Jensen ES, Hauggaard-Nielsen H (2003) How can increased use of biological N2 fixation in agriculture benefit the environment? Plant Soil 252:177–186
Jiang W, Wang K, Wu Q, Dong S, Liu P, Zhang J (2013) Effects of narrow plant spacing on root distribution and physiological N use efficiency in summer maize. Crop J 1:77–83
Kaschuk G, Kuyper TW, Leffelaar PA, Hungria M, Giller KE (2009) Are the rates of photosynthesis stimulated by the carbon sink strength of rhizobial and arbuscular mycorrhizal symbioses? Soil Biol Biochem 41:1233–1244
Lose SJ, Hilger TH, Leihner DE, Kroschel J (2003) Cassava, maize and tree root development as affected by various agroforestry and cropping systems in Bénin, West Africa. Agric Ecosyst Environ 100:137–151. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-8809(03)00182-8
Mapiye C, Foti R, Chikumba N, Poshiwa X, Mwale M, Chivuraise C, Mupangwa JF (2006) Constraints to adoption of forage and browse legumes by smallholder dairy farmers in Zimbabwe. Livestock Res Rural Dev 18:175
Mutonyi S, Fungo B (2011) Patterns of agroforestry practices among small-holder farmers in the Lake Victoria Crescent Zone (LVCAEZ) of Uganda. Res J Appl Sci 6(4):251–257
Niether W, Schneidewind U, Fuchs M, Schneider M, Armengot L (2019) Below- and aboveground production in cocoa monocultures and agroforestry systems. Sci Total Environ 657:558–567. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.12.050
Nygren P, Campos A (1995) Effect of foliage pruning on fine root biomass of Erythrina poeppigiana (Fabaceae). In: Sinoquet H, Cruz P (eds) Ecophysiology of Tropical Intercropping. INRA, Paris, pp 295–302
Nygren P, Ramirez C (1993) Production and turnover of N2 fixing nodules in relation to foliage development in periodically pruned Erythrina poeppigiana (Leguminosae) trees. For Ecol Manag 73:59–73
Nygren P, Rarnirez C (1995) Production and turnover of N2 fixing nodules in relation to foliage development in periodically pruned Erythrina poeppigianu (Leguminosae) trees. For Ecol Manag 73:59–73
Paterson RT, Karanja GM, Roothaert R, Nyaata Z, Kariuki IW (1998) A review of tree fodder production and utilization within smallholder agroforestry systems in Kenya. Agrofor Syst 41:181–199
Pirhofer-Walzl K, Rasmussen J, Høgh-Jensen H, Eriksen J, Søegaard K, Rasmussen J (2012) N transfer from forage legumes to nine neighbouring plants in a multi-species grassland. Plant Soil 350:71–84. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-011-0882-z
Strock CF, de la Riva LM, Lynch JP (2018) Reduction in root secondary growth as a strategy for phosphorus acquisition. Plant Physiol 176:691–703
Thilakarathna MS, Papadopoulos YA, Rodd AV (2016a) N fixation and transfer of red clover genotypes under legume–grass forage-based production systems. Cycl Agroecosyst, Nutr. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10705-016-9802-1
Thilakarathna MS, McElroy MS, Chapagain T, Papadopoulos YA, Raizada MN (2016b) Belowground N transfer from legumes to non-legumes under managed herbaceous cropping systems: a review. Agron Sustain Dev 36:58. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13593-016-0396-4
Vance CP, Heichel GH, Barnes DK, Bryan JW, Johnson LE (1979) N fixation, nodule development, and vegetative regrowth of alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.) following harvest. Plant Physiol 64:1–8. https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.64.1.1
Verchot LV, Dutaur L, Shepherd KD, Albrecht A (2011) Organic matter stabilization in soil aggregates: understanding the biogeochemical mechanisms that determine the fate of carbon inputs in soils. Geoderma 161(3–4):182–193. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2010.12.017
Wambugu C, Place F, Franzel S (2011) Research, development and scaling up the adoption of fodder shrub innovations in East Africa. Int J Agric Sustain 9:100–109
Wang Z, Bi Y, Jiang B, Zhakypbek Y, Peng S, Liu W, Liu H (2016) Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi enhance soil carbon sequestration in the coalfields, northwest China. Sci Rep 6:34336. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep34336
Acknowledgement
This study was funded by Government of Uganda under the Agricultural Technology and Agribusiness Advisory Services (ATAAS) project, with support from The World Bank.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Electronic supplementary material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Fungo, B., Buyinza, J., Sekatuba, J. et al. Forage biomass and soil aggregate carbon under fodder banks with contrasting management regimes. Agroforest Syst 94, 1023–1035 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10457-019-00473-6
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10457-019-00473-6