Skip to main content
Log in

The “Fake-News” Phenomenon and Transformation of Information Strategies in the Digital Society

  • Published:
Scientific and Technical Information Processing Aims and scope

Abstract—

In this article, series of questions related to the conceptual basis for studying the characteristics of the emergence and evolution of the “fake news” phenomenon are proposed. An analysis is made of the transformation of information strategies and political communications in a digital society and the relationship of fake news with interpretations of social traumatic events are fixed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Mediatization can be understood as modifying (distorting) the facts of reality and giving them mediated meanings that arise during fabrication of imaginary images in the process of collecting, processing (filtering) and transmitting information data [20, p. 84].

  2. A way to build a framework of communication, characterized by an underlined decorative effect and features of a mass entertainment illusion. The term was introduced by B.A. Ouspensky [25, p. 206].

REFERENCES

  1. Gilyarevskii, R.S., Informatsionnaya sfera: Krat. entsikloped. slov. (Information Sphere: Brief Encyclopedic Dictionary), St. Petersburg: Professiya, 2016.

  2. Amarasingam, A., The Stewart/Colbert Effect: Essays on the Real Impacts of Fake News, Jefferson, North Carolina–London: McFarland & Company, Inc., Publishers, 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Hunt, A. and Gentzkow, M., Social media and fake news in the 2016 election, J. Econ. Perspect., 2017, no. 31, pp. 211–236.

  4. The science of fake news. Addressing fake news requires a multidisciplinary effort, Science, 2018, vol. 359, pp. 1094–1096.

  5. Issers, O.S., Media fakes: Between truth and mystification, Kommun. Issled., 2014, no. 2, pp. 112–123.

  6. Sukhodolov, A.P. and Bychkova, A.M., Fake news as a phenomenon of modern media space: The concept, types, purpose, and countermeasures, Vopr. Teor. Prakt. Zh., 2017, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 143–169.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Dubrovskii, D.I., Obman. Filosofsko-psikhologicheskii analiz (Deception. Philosophical and Psychological Analysis), Moscow: Kanon + ROOI Reabilitatsiya, 2010.

  8. "Politika postpravdy" i populizm (Post-Truth Policy and Populism), Popova, O.V., Ed., St. Petersburg: Skifiya-print, 2018.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Byelonogov, G.G. and Gilyarevskii, R.S., Another treatise on the epistomological status of the concept of “information,” Autom. Doc. Math. Linguist., 2010, vol. 44, no. 1, pp. 38–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Merton, R., Self-Fulfilling Prophecy (Thomas’s Theorem). http://socioline.ru/pages/r-mertonsamoispolnyayuscheesya-prorochestvo-teorema-tomasa. Accessed February 8, 2019.

  11. Kastel’s, M., Vlast’ kommunikatsii (The Power of Communication), Moscow: Dom Vyssh. Shk. Ekon., 2016.

  12. Rudenkin, D. and Loginov, A., Ideology in the society of the late modernity: Disappearance or transformation, Sotsiol. Obozr., 2018, no. 3, pp. 197–220.

  13. Miletskii, V.P. and Pimenov, N.P., Politiko-sotsiologicheskoe izmerenie sotsiodinamiki politicheskikh kommunikatsii v sovremennoi Rossii (The Political and Sociological Dimension of the Sociodynamics of Political Communications in Modern Russia), St. Petersburg: SPbGETU LETI, 2017.

  14. Lazarsfeld, P.F., Berelson, B., and Gaudet, H., The People’s Choice: How the Voter Makes up His Mind in a Presidential Campaign, New York: Columbia University Press, 1948.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Festinger, L., A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance, Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 1957.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Katz, E., Blumler, J.G., and Gurevitch, M., Utilization of mass communication by the individual, in The Uses of Mass Communications: Current Perspectives on Gratifications Research, Beverly Hills, CA: Sage, 1974, pp. 19–32.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Gerbner, G., Mass media and human communication theory, in Human Communication Theory, New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston, 1967, pp. 40–60.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Gerbner, G., Toward a general model of communication, Audio-Visual Commun. Rev., 1956, vol. 4, pp. 171–199.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Shaw, D.L. and McCombs, M.E., The Emergence of American Political Issues: The Agenda-Setting Function of the Press, St. Paul, MN: West, 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Zemlyanova, L.M., Mediatization of culture and comparativism in modern communicationism, Vestn. Mosk. Univ., Ser. 10, Zh., 2002, no. 5, pp. 83–97.

  21. Hjarvard, S., The mediatization of society: A theory of the media as agents of social and cultural change, Nordicom Rev., 2008, vol. 29, no. 2, pp. 105–134.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Zhizhek, S., Cyberspace, or the unbearable closure of being, Iskusst. Kino, 1998, no. 1, pp. 125–137.

  23. Voinova, E., Mediatized political communication: A way of media policy distortion or a way to organize discourse?, Vestn. Mosk. Univ., Ser. 10, Zh., 2006, no. 6, pp. 6–10.

  24. Modern trends in the development of the symbolic space of politics and the concept of ideology: Discussion materials, Polis, 2004, no. 4, pp. 28–52.

  25. Uspenskii, B.A., Semiotika iskusstva (Semiotics of Art), Moscow: Shk. Yazyki Russ. Kul’t., 1995.

  26. Rusakova, O.F. and Rusakov, V.M., PR-Diskurs: Teoretiko-metodologicheskii analiz (PR Discourse: Theoretical and Methodological Analysis), Yekaterinburg: Ural. Otdel. Ross. Akad. Nauk, Inst. Mezhdunar. Svyazei, 2008.

  27. Cultural Trauma and Collective Identity, Berkeley–Los Angeles–London: University of California Press, 2004.

  28. Lacan, J., Séminaires, Book I: Les écrits techniques de Freud (Seuil, 1975).

  29. Smelser, N.J., Psychological trauma and cultural trauma, in Cultural Trauma and Collective Identity, Alexander, J.C., Ed., University of California Press, 2014; Toshchenko, Zh.T., Trauma as a specific variant in the development of global civilization (polemical notes), Sovremennye global’nye vyzovy i natsional’nye interesy: XV mezhdunarodnye Likhachevskie nauchnye chteniya (Modern Global Challenges and National Interests: XV International Likhachev Scientific Readings), St. Petersburg, 2015.

  30. Aierman, R., Cultural trauma and collective memory, Nov. Liter. Obozr., 2016, no. 5, pp. 42–54.

  31. Shtompka, P., Social change as a trauma, Sotsiol. Issled., 2001, no. 1, pp. 6–16.

  32. Alexander, J., Cultural trauma and collective identity, Sotsiol. Zh., 2012, no. 3, pp. 5–40.

  33. Vosoughi, S., Roy, D., and Aral, S., The spread of true and false news online, Science, 2018, vol. 359, pp. 1146–1151.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Chudinov, A.P., Discursive characteristics of political communication, Polit. Lingvist., 2012, no. 2, pp. 53–59.

Download references

Funding

This study was carried out in accordance with a grant of the Russian Science Foundation (project No. 19-18-00115)

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to A. V. Aleinikov, V. P. Miletskiy, N. P. Pimenov or A. I. Strebkov.

Ethics declarations

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Translated by S. Avodkova

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Aleinikov, A.V., Miletskiy, V.P., Pimenov, N.P. et al. The “Fake-News” Phenomenon and Transformation of Information Strategies in the Digital Society. Sci. Tech. Inf. Proc. 46, 117–122 (2019). https://doi.org/10.3103/S0147688219020126

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.3103/S0147688219020126

Keywords:

Navigation