Skip to main content
Log in

Risk reduction measures of large wood accumulations at bridges

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Environmental Fluid Mechanics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Bridges with and without piers are prone to large wood (LW) accumulations during floods, possibly resulting in an upstream backwater rise, local scour, or destabilization of the structure. To reduce the flood hazard, measures are required that decrease the accumulation probability p of LW. This paper presents a literature review on existing measures to reduce p at bridges. In addition, a series of flume experiments was conducted to examine structural measures at bridge piers regarding their accumulation risk reduction effect. The objective was to test the efficiency of (1) LW fins and (2) bottom sills including various configurations. The resulting p was then compared to the setup without measures. The tested configurations of a LW fin did not decrease p. Bottom sills, in contrast, are a promising measure to reduce p for a defined range of boundary conditions. The installed sills lead to enhanced turbulence and increased surface waves. The best results to reduce p were obtained with two consecutive sills, leading to an average reduction of p by 30%. In contrast to retaining LW with retention structures, LW can be safely guided downstream, thereby preserving its relevant ecological role in rivers. However, the efficiency of bottom sills strongly depends on the approach flow and the sediment transport conditions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

(adapted from [10, 23])

Fig. 3

(not drawn to scale; adapted from [2])

Fig. 4

(not drawn to scale; adapted from [12])

Fig. 5

(adapted from [10])

Fig. 6
Fig. 7

(adapted from [10])

Fig. 8

(adapted from [22])

Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bezzola G, Hegg C (2007) Ereignisanalyse Hochwasser 2005, Teil 1—Prozesse, Schäden und erste Einordnung (‘Analysis of 2005 flood, part 1: processes, damages and classification’). Technical report 0707, Bundesamt für Umwelt BAFU, Eidgenössische Forschungsanstalt WSL (in German)

  2. Bradley J, Richards D, Bahner C (2005) Debris control structures: evaluation and countermeasures. US Dept, Transportation. Technical report No. FHWA-IF-04-016, Federal Highway Administration, Washington, DC, USA

  3. BWG (2001) Hochwasserschutz an Fliessgewässern. Technical report, Bundesamt für Wasser und Geologie (in German)

  4. Franzetti S, Radice A, Rabitti M, Rossi G (2011) Hydraulic design and preliminary performance evaluation of countermeasure against debris accumulation and resulting local pier scour on river Po in Italy. J Hydraul Eng 137(5):615–620. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)HY.1943-7900.0000340

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Furlan P, Pfister M, Matos J, Amado C, Schleiss AJ (2018) Experimental repetitions and blockage of large stems at ogee crested spillways with piers. J Hydraul Res. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221686.2018.1478897

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Hartlieb A, Bezzola GR (2000) Ein Überblick zur Schwemmholzproblematik (‘An overview of problems related to large wood’). Wasser Energie Luft 92(1):2 (in German)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Heller V (2011) Scale effects in physical hydraulic engineering models. J Hydraul Res 49(3):293–306

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Hughes SA (1993) Physical models and laboratory techniques in coastal engineering, vol 7. World Scientific, Singapore

    Book  Google Scholar 

  9. Keller EA, Swanson FJ (1979) Effects of large organic material on channel form and fluvial processes. Earth Surf Process 4(4):361–380. https://doi.org/10.1002/esp.3290040406

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Lange D, Bezzola GR (2006) Schwemmholz: Probleme und Lösungsansätze (‘Large wood: problems and approach methods’). Technical report 188, Versuchsanstalt für Wasserbau, Hydrologie und Glaziologie (VAW), ETH Zurich, Switzerland (in German)

  11. Lucía A, Comiti F, Borga M, Cavalli M, Marchi L (2015) Dynamics of large wood during a flash flood in two mountain catchments. Nat Hazards Earth Syst Sci 15(8):1741–1755. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-15-1741-2015

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Lyn D, Cooper T, Yi Y, Sinha R, Rao A (2003) Debris accumulation at bridge crossings: laboratory and field studies. Joint Transportation Research Program, p 48

  13. Perham RE (1987) Floating debris control: a literature review. Technical report REMR-HY-3, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Washington, DC, USA

  14. Rimböck A (2003) Schwemmholzrückhalt in Wildbächen: Grundlagen zu Planung und Berechnung von Seilnetzsperren (‘Large wood retention in mountain torrents’). Ph.D. thesis, Versuchsanstalt Obernach, TU Munich, Germany (in German)

  15. Ruiz-Villanueva V, Badoux A, Boes RM, Rickenmann D, Rickli C, Schalko I, Schmocker L, Schwarz M, Steeb N, Stoffel M, Weitbrecht V (2016) Large wood research in Swiss watercourses. In: Proceeding of 8th river flow congress 2016. CRC Press, pp 2307–2314

  16. Ruiz-Villanueva V, Badoux A, Rickenmann D, Böckli M, Schläfli S, Steeb N, Stoffel M, Rickli C (2018) Impacts of a large flood along a mountain river basin: unravelling the geomorphic response and large wood budget in the upper Emme River (Switzerland). Earth Surf Dyn Discuss. https://doi.org/10.5194/esurf-2018-44

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. SCD (2017) Floating debris at reservoir dam spillways. Technical report, Swiss Committee on Dams

  18. Schalko I (2017) Large wood accumulation probability at a single bridge pier. In: 37th IAHR world congress, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia. https://doi.org/10.3929/ethz-b-000185312

  19. Schalko I (2018) Modeling hazards related to large wood in rivers. Ph.D. thesis, Versuchsanstalt für Wasserbau, Hydrologie und Glaziologie (VAW), ETH Zurich, Switzerland. https://doi.org/10.3929/ethz-b-000293084

  20. Schalko I, Schmocker L, Weitbrecht V, Boes RM (2018) Backwater rise due to large wood accumulations. J Hydraul Eng 144(9):04018056. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)HY.1943-7900.0001501

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Schalko I, Schmocker L, Weitbrecht V, Boes RM (2019) Laboratory study on wood accumulation probability at bridge piers. J Hydraul Res. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221686.2019.1625820

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Schmocker L, Hager WH (2011) Probability of drift blockage at bridge decks. J Hydraul Eng 137(4):470–479. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)HY.1943-7900.0000319

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Schmocker L, Weitbrecht V (2013) Driftwood: risk analysis and engineering measures. J Hydraul Eng 139(7):683–695. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)HY.1943-7900.0000728

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Schneider KJ (ed) (2001) Bautabellen für Ingenieure: mit Berechnungshinweisen und Beispielen (‘Construction tables for engineers’), 14th edn, no. 40 in Werner-Ingenieur-Texte, Werner, Düsseldorf, Germany (in German)

  25. Steeb N, Rickenmann D, Badoux A, Rickli C, Waldner P (2017) Large wood recruitment processes and transported volumes in Swiss mountain streams during the extreme flood of August 2005. Geomorphology 279:112–127. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2016.10.011

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. VAW (1991) Umleitstollen Campo Vallemagia (‘Sediment bypass tunnel Campo Callemaggia’). Technical report 940, Versuchsanstalt für Wasserbau, Hydrologie und Glaziologie (VAW), ETH Zurich, Switzerland (in German)

  27. Wallerstein N, Thorne CR, Abt S (1996) Debris control at hydraulic structures, contract modification: management of woody debris in natural channels and at hydraulic structures. Technical report, Vicksburg, MS, USA

  28. Werdenberg N, Mende M, Sindelar C (2014) Instream river training: fundamentals and practical example. In: Schleiss A, de Cesare G, Franca M, Pfister M (eds) River flow 2014. CRC Press, Boca Raton, pp 1571–1577. https://doi.org/10.1201/b17133-208

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  29. Wohl E, Bledsoe BP, Fausch KD, Kramer N, Bestgen KR, Gooseff MN (2016) Management of large wood in streams: an overview and proposed framework for hazard evaluation. JAWRA 52(2):315–335. https://doi.org/10.1111/1752-1688.12388

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The first author is financially supported by the Swiss Federal Office for the Environment (FOEN) within the WoodFlow project, grant 15.0018.PJ / O192-0202.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Isabella Schalko.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

I. Schalko: formerly VAW, ETH Zurich.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Schalko, I., Schmocker, L., Weitbrecht, V. et al. Risk reduction measures of large wood accumulations at bridges. Environ Fluid Mech 20, 485–502 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10652-019-09719-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10652-019-09719-4

Keywords

Navigation