Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Psychophysiological Responses to Medium Levels of Occupational Noise: An Exposure–Response Relationships

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Acoustics Australia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Medium noise levels are very common in work environments, and few studies have addressed their effects. This study aims to investigate the effects of real noise levels from four types of workplaces on psychophysiological responses. Thirty-one normal hearing male subjects were recruited. They were asked to judge the noise annoyance (NA) and noise-induced subjective load (NISL) of four occupational environments involved cognitive functions; closed office rooms (CO:57.8–65.2 dB(A), open-plan offices (OPO:65–71.8 dB(A), control rooms (CR:68.7–75 dB(A), and industrial noise (IN:75.5–81 dB(A). Meanwhile, the electrodermal activity (EDA), heart rate (HR), and respiration rate (RR) were monitored throughout the experiments. The saliva cortisol of subjects was also analyzed before and after each trial. The results were evaluated in the view of impact of noise and moderating factors using linear and mixed models, and a dose–response relationship was found for each response. The results showed that the NA were rated 26.5%, 39.5%, 53%, and 72.2%, in the CO, OPO, CR, and IN, respectively, and NISL increase in levels ≥ 65 dB(A)(OPO). In addition to subjective effects, the medium levels of occupational noise can significantly affect the physiological responses in view of the moderating factors. In total, the EDA and RR responses increased, whereas HR initially increased and then decreased. According to the regression models, it seems that medium levels of occupational noise have significant and linear effects on EDA, RR, and HR in levels ≥ 60 (CO), ≥ 65 (OPO), and ≥ 69 dB(A) (CR), respectively. Moreover, the levels range of 60–70 dB(A) (CO and OPO) can increase mean of cortisol level more than the levels range of 70–80 dB(A) (CR and IN).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Pedersen, E., Waye, K. P., and Ryberg J. B.: Response to occupational noise of medium levels at four types of work places. In: International Noise and Sustainability, pp. 1–8 (2010)

  2. Basner, M., Brink, M., Bristow, A., Kluizenaar, Y., Finegold, L., Hong, J., et al.: ICBEN review of research on the biological effects of noise 2011–2014. Noise Health 75(17), 57 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Basner, M., Babisch, W., Davis, A., Brink, M., Clark, C., Janssen, S., Stansfeld, S.: Auditory and non-auditory effects of noise on health. The Lancet 383(9925), 1325–1332 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Smith, A.: A review of the non-auditory effects of noise on health. Work Stress 5(1), 49–63 (1991)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Hua, H., Emilsson, M., Kähäri, K., Widén, S., Möller, C., Lyxell, B.: The impact of different background noises: effects on cognitive performance and perceived disturbance in employees with aided hearing impairment and normal hearing. J. Am. Acad. Audiol. 25(9), 859–868 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Walker, E.D., Brammer, A., Cherniack, Martin G., Francine, L., Cavallari, J.M.: Cardiovascular and stress responses to short-term noise exposures—a panel study in healthy males. Environ. Res. 10, 414–439 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Kjellberg, A., Landström, U.: Noise in the office: part II—the scientific basis (knowledge base) for the guide. Int. J. Ind. Ergon. 4, 401–427 (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Belojevic, G., et al.: Recent advances in research on non-auditory effects of community noise’. Srp. Arh. Celok. Lek. 144(1–2), 94–98 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Chang, L.-T., et al.: Short-term exposure to noise, fine particulate matter and nitrogen oxides on ambulatory blood pressure: a repeated-measure study. Environ. Res. 140, 634–640 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Volandri, G., Puccio, F.Di, Forte, P., Mattei, L.: Psychoacoustic analysis of power windows sounds: correlation between subjective and objective evaluations. Appl. Acoust. 134, 160–170 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Sim, C.S., Sung, J.H., Cheon, S.H., Lee, J.M., Lee, J.W., Lee, J.: The effects of different noise types on heart rate variability in men. Yonsei Med. J. 56(1), 235 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Zhu, S.K., Sakakibara, H., Yamada, S.: Combined effects of hand-arm vibration and noise on temporary threshold shifts of hearing in healthy subjects. Int. Arch. Occup. Environ. Health 69(6), 433–436 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Eriksson, C., Pershagen, G., Nilsson, M.: Biological mechanisms related to cardiovascular and metabolic effects by environmental noise. WHO Environmental Noise Guidelines for the European Region, pp. 1–19 (2018)

  14. Elmenhorst, E.M., et al.: Effects of nocturnal aircraft noise on cognitive performance in the following morning: dose-response relationships in laboratory and field’. Int. Arch. Occup. Environ. Health 83(7), 743–751 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Abbasi, A.M., Motamedzade, M., Aliabadi, M., Golmohammadi, R., Tapak, L.: Study of the physiological and mental health effects caused by exposure to low-frequency noise in a simulated control room. Build. Acoust. 25(3), 233–248 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Notbohm, G., Schmook, R., Schwarze, S., Angerer, P.: Patterns of physiological and affective responses to vehicle pass-by noises. Noise Health 15(66), 355 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Li, Z.-G., Di, G.-Q., Li, J.: Relationship between electroencephalogram variation and subjective annoyance under noise exposure’. Appl. Acoust. 75(1), 37–42 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Miedema, H.M.E., Vos, H.: Noise sensitivity and reactions to noise and other environmental conditions. J Acoust Soc Am 113(3), 1492–1504 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. ISO/NP TS 15666: Acoustics,—Assessment of Noise Annoyance by Means of Social and Socio-Acoustic Surveys. International Organization for Standardization, Geneva (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Hart, S.G., Staveland, L.E.: Development of NASA-TLX (Task Load Index): results of empirical and theoretical research. Adv. Psychol. 52, 139–183 (1988)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Edmonds, W.A., Tenenbaum, G.: Case Studies in Applied Psychophysiology: Neurofeedback and Biofeedback Treatments for Advances in Human Performance. Wiley, Hoboken (2011)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  22. Ekehammar, B.: Weinstein’S noise sensitivity scale: reliability and construct validity. Percept. Mot. Skills 70(1), 129 (1990)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Beck, Aaron T., Epstein, Norman, Brown, Gary, Steer, Robert A.: An inventory for measuring clinical anxiety: psychometric properties. J. Consult. Clin. Psychol. 56(6), 893 (1988)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Montazeri, A., Harirchi, A.M., Shariati, M., Garmaroudi, G., Ebadi, M., Fateh, A.: Health and quality of life outcomes | full text|the 12-item general health questionnaire (GHQ-12): translation and validation study of the Iranian version. Health Qual. Life Outcomes 1(66), 1–4 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Buysse, D.J., Reynolds, C.F., Monk, T.H., Berman, S.R., Kupfer, D.J.: The Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index: a new instrument for psychiatric practice and research. Psychiatry Res. 28(2), 193–213 (1989)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Core Team, R (ed.): A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing, vol. 2. R Foundation, Vienna (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Darvishi, E., Maleki, A., Giahi, O., Akbarzadeh, A.: Subjective mental workload and its correlation with musculoskeletal disorders in bank staff. J Manip. Physiol. Ther. 39(6), 420 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Golmohammadi, R., Aliabadi, M., Nezami, T.: An experimental study of acoustic comfort in open space banks based on speech intelligibility and noise annoyance measures. Arch. Acoust. 42(2), 333–347 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Ali, S.A.: Industrial noise levels and annoyance in Egypt. Appl. Acoust. 72(4), 221–225 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Fouladi, D.B., Nassiri, P., Monazzam, E.M., Farahani, S., Hassanzadeh, G., Hoseini, M.: Industrial noise exposure and salivary cortisol in blue collar industrial workers. Noise Health 14(59), 184 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Zhang, L., Kang, J., Luo, H., Zhong, B.: Drivers’ physiological response and emotional evaluation in the noisy environment of the control cabin of a shield tunneling machine. Appl. Acoust. 138, 1–8 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Shafiee Motlagh, M., Faradmal, J., Aliabadi, M., Golmohammadi, R., Ranjbar, A.: Empirical study of room acoustic conditions and neurophysiologic strain in staff working in special open-plan bank offices. Acoust. Aust. 46(3), 329–338 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Park, S.H., Lee, P.J.: Effects of floor impact noise on psychophysiological responses. Build. Environ. 116, 173–181 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Gomez, P., Danuser, B.: Affective and physiological responses to environmental noises and music. Int. J. Psychophysiol. 53(2), 91–103 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Lang, P.J., Bradley, M.M., Cuthbert, B.N.: Motivated attention: affect, activation, and action. Atten. Orient. Sens. Mot. Process. 97, 135 (1997)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Center of Excellence for Occupational Health, School of Public Health and Research Center for Health Sciences, Hamadan University of Medical Sciences, Hamadan, Iran

    Ebrahim Darvishi & Rostam Golmohammadi

  2. Modeling of Noncommunicable Diseases Research Center and Department of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, School of Public Health, Hamadan University of Medical Sciences, Hamadan, Iran

    Javad Faradmal

  3. Department of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, Hamadan University of Medical Sciences, Hamadan, Iran

    Jalal Poorolajal

  4. Center of Excellence for Occupational Health, Occupational Health and Safety Research Center, School of Public Health, Hamadan University of Medical Sciences, Hamadan, Iran

    Mohsen Aliabadi

Authors
  1. Ebrahim Darvishi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Rostam Golmohammadi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Javad Faradmal
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Jalal Poorolajal
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Mohsen Aliabadi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rostam Golmohammadi.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Darvishi, E., Golmohammadi, R., Faradmal, J. et al. Psychophysiological Responses to Medium Levels of Occupational Noise: An Exposure–Response Relationships. Acoust Aust 47, 217–228 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40857-019-00159-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40857-019-00159-0

Keywords

Search

Navigation