Skip to main content
Log in

An impact analysis of the surface-cloud damping effect on TOA reflectivity using A 3D radiative transfer model

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Meteorology and Atmospheric Physics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The I3RC Community Monte Carlo model of three-dimensional (3D) radiative transfer (I3RC-CM) was improved by specifying surfaces with a widely used bidirectional reflectance model known as the RPV (Rahman-Pinty-Verstraete). The surface-cloud damping effect on top-of-atmosphere (TOA) reflectivity (hereafter, the damping effect) is evaluated as the atmospheric attenuation of incoming shortwave radiation on its way down to the surface and shortwave radiation reflected at the surface that is transmitted back to the TOA. A series of simulations were performed using the improved I3RC-CM to investigate this effect over different land covers, in which the land covers are characterized by the 3 RPV parameters: the intensity of surface reflectance, the anisotropy of the surface, and the asymmetry parameter. The damping effect is greatly affected by the land cover, especially the intensity of surface reflectance. The intensity of surface reflectance can lead to an approximate deviation of 0.40 in the damping effect, while the influence of the asymmetry parameter and the surface anisotropy on the damping effect is less than 0.10. The damping effect strengthens as the surface reflectance intensity and asymmetry parameter increase, but slightly weakens as the surface anisotropy increases. The land cover change has a stronger impact on the damping effect at the absorbing wavelengths than at the non-absorbing wavelengths due to the cloud absorption, particularly at 2.13 µm, but the cloud absorption offers only a partial explanation for the differences in damping effect changes with values less 0.10.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Barker HW, Davies JA (1992) Solar radiative fluxes for broken cloud fields above reflecting surfaces. J Atmos Sci 49:749–761

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cahalan RF, Oreopoulos L, Marshak A et al (2005) THE I3RC: Bringing together the most advanced radiative transfer tools for cloudy atmospheres. Bull Am Meteorol Soc 86:1275–1293

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen Y, Hall A, Liou KN (2006) Application of three-dimensional solar radiative transfer to mountains. J Geophys Res 111:D21111

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chiu JC, Marshak A, Wiscombe W (2004) The effect of surface heterogeneity on cloud absorption estimates. Geophys Res Lett 31:L15105

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cornet C, Labonnote LC, Szczap F (2010) Three-dimensional polarized Monte Carlo atmospheric radiative transfer model (3DMCPOL): 3D effects on polarized visible reflectances of a cirrus cloud. J Quant Spectrosc Radiat Transf 111:174–186

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Donohoe A, Battisti DS (2011) Atmospheric and surface contributions to TOA reflectivity. J Climate 24:4402–4418

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Engelsen O, Pinty B, Verstraete MM, Martonchik JV (1996) Parametric bidirectional reflectance factor models: Evaluation, improvements and applications. European Reports, 16426 EN, Space Application Institute: Italy.

  • Gimeno García S, Trautmann T, Venema V (2012) Reduction of radiation biases by incorporating the missing cloud variability via downscaling techniques: a study using the 3-D MoCaRT model. Atmos Meas Tech Discuss 5:2261–2276

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gu Y, Liou KN, Lee WL, Leung LR (2012) Simulating 3-D radiative transfer effects over the Sierra Nevada Mountains using WRF. Atmos Chem Phys 12:9965–9976

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hall A (2004) The role of surface albedo feedback in climate. J Climate 17:1550–1568

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Helbig N, Löwe H, Lehning M (2009) Radiosity approach for the surface radiation balance in complex terrain. J Atmos Sci 66:2900–2912

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee WL, Liou KN, Hall A (2011) Parameterization of solar fluxes over mountain surfaces for applicationto climate models. J Geophys Res 116:D01101

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee WL, Liou KN, Wang CC (2013) Impact of 3-D topography on surface radiation budget over the Tibetan Plateau. Theor Appl Climatol 113:95–103

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li Z, Cribb MC, Trishchenko AP (2002) Impact of surface inhomogeneity on solar radiative transfer under overcast conditions. J Geophys Res Atmos 107:D16

    Google Scholar 

  • Liou KN, Gu Y, Leung LR, Lee WL, Fovell RG (2013) A WRF simulation of the impact of 3-D radiative transfer on surface hydrology over the Rocky Mountains and Sierra Nevada. Atmos Chem Phys 13:11709–11721

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liou KN, Lee W, Hall A (2007) Radiative transfer in mountains: application to the Tibetan Plateau. Geophys Res Lett 34:L23809

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mayer B, Hoch SW, Whiteman CD (2010) Validating the mystic three dimensional radiative transfer model with observations from the complex topography of Arizona’s Meteor Crater. Atmos Chem Phys 10:8685–8696

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moeng CH, Cotton WR, Stevens B et al (1996) Simulation of a stratocumulus-topped planetary boundary layer: Intercomparison among different numerical codes. Bull Am Meteorol Soc 77:261–278

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pincus R, Evans KF (2009) Computational cost and accuracy in calculating three-dimensional radiative transfer: Results for new implementations of Monte Carlo and SHDOM. J Atmos Sci 66:3131–3146

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Qian C (2016) Impact of land use/land cover change on changes in surface solar radiation in eastern China since the reform and opening up. Theor Appl Climatol 123:131–139

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Qu X, Hall A (2005) Surface contribution to planetary albedo variability in cryosphere Regions. J Climate 18:5239–5252

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rahman H, Verstraete MM, Pinty B (1993a) Coupled surface-atmosphere reflectance (CSAR) model 1. Model description and inversion on synthetic data. J Geophys Res 98:20779–20789

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rahman H, Pinty B, Verstraete MM (1993b) Coupled surface-atmosphere reflectance (CSAR) model 2. Semiempirical surface model usable with NOAA advanced very high resolution radiometer data. J Geophys Res 98:20791–20801

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang LD, Lü DR, He Q (2015) The impact of surface properties on downward surface shortwave radiation over the Tibetan Plateau. Adv Atmos Sci 32:759–771

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang Z, Cui S, Yang J, Gao H, Liu C, Zhang Z (2017) A novel hybrid scattering order-dependent variance reduction method for Monte Carlo simulations of radiative transfer in cloudy atmosphere. J Quant Spectrosc Radiat Transf 189:283–302

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wielicki BA, Cess RD, King MD, Randall DA, Harrison EF (1995) Mission to planet Earth-Role of clouds and radiation in climate. Bull Am Meteorol Soc 76:2125–2153

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang F, Wu K, Liu P, Jing X, Li J (2017) Accounting for Gaussian quadrature in four-stream radiative transfer algorithms. J Quant Spectrosc Radiat Transf 192:1–13

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang F, Yan JR, Li J, Wu K, Iwabuchi H, Shi YN (2018) A new radiative transfer method for solar radiation in a vertically internally inhomogeneous medium. J Atmos Sci 75:41–55

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors wish to acknowledge I3RC who provided the code of the I3RC-CM model. This research was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (41575023) and China Scholarship Council (201708440525).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Leidi Wang.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no potential conflict of interest.

Additional information

Responsible Editor: S.-W. Kim.

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wang, L., Lü, D. & Zhang, W. An impact analysis of the surface-cloud damping effect on TOA reflectivity using A 3D radiative transfer model. Meteorol Atmos Phys 132, 809–818 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00703-019-00719-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00703-019-00719-z

Navigation