Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Efficiency of constructed wetlands in treating E. coli bacteria present in livestock wastewater

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Constructed wetlands are artificial wetland units, designed for adopting the principle of natural wetlands for purifying wastewater. Well-designed and well-constructed wetlands play an important role not only in reduction in organic compound/impurities, but also in coliform reduction in wastewater. The three small laboratory-scale units were control, Typha and plant species design based on USEPA procedure. The plant species are watered for a few days to promote their stable growth. Then, the three wetland units were seeded with livestock wastewater from a nearby cattle farm. Qualitative analysis by polymerase chain reaction and quantitative analysis are carried out by doing microbial culture in selective medium of MacConkey agar. The E. coli load is monitored before and after treatment in all the three units with different trials. It is found to be at a higher level in Typha unit after 24 h than in mixed and control units. The sample from the bottom of the constructed wetland unit is withdrawn and cultured for five days, and the bacterial load is found to be 9 × 104. Meanwhile, considerable reduction is observed in the Typha wetland unit after 5 days, and the bacterial load is 4 × 102. Mixed species wetland shows excellent treatment efficiency, and the bacterial load (E. coli) is very less after 5 days. It is evident from the study that constructed wetlands are effective in the treatment of E. coli bacteria wetland plants which are used for treatment.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adrados BÁ, Sánchez OL, Arias CA, Becares EL, Garrido LA, Mas JO, Brix HA, Morató JO (2014) Microbial communities from different types of natural wastewater treatment systems: vertical and horizontal flow constructed wetlands and biofilters. Water Res 55:304–312

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ahn C, Gillevet PM, Sikaroodi M (2007) Molecular characterization of microbial communities in treatment microcosm wetlands as influenced by macrophytes and phosphorus loading. Ecol Indic 7(4):852–863

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aibin K, Honghan YY (2009) Treatment of livestock wastewater by three step series constructed rapid infiltration system. Chin J Environ Eng 3:020

    Google Scholar 

  • Akpor OB, Otohinoyi DA, Olaolu TD, Aderiye BI (2014) Pollutants in wastewater effluents: impacts and remediation processes. Int J Environ Res Earth Sci 3(3):50–59

    Google Scholar 

  • Almeida C, Tiago BR, Pedro S, Paulo B, Ramiro N, de Rodrigo Proença O (2018) Water quantity and quality under future climate and societal scenarios: a basin-wide approach applied to the Sorraia River, Portugal. Water 10(9):1186

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson J, Kallner Bastviken S, Tonderski KS (2005) Free water surface wetlands for wastewater treatment in Sweden nitrogen and phosphorus removal. Water Sci Technol 51(9):39–46

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Angassa K, Leta S, Mulat W, Kloos H, Meers E (2018) Organic matter and nutrient removal performance of horizontal subsurface flow constructed wetlands planted with Phragmite karka and Vetiveria zizanioide for treating municipal wastewater. Environ Processes 5(1):115–130

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • APHA, AWWA, WPCF (2005) Standard methods for examination of water and wastewater. 21th edn. APHA, AWWA, WPCR, New York, p 1

  • Ashraf S, Afzal M, Naveed M, Shahid M, Ahmad Zahir Z (2018) Endophytic bacteria enhance remediation of tannery effluent in constructed wetlands vegetated with Leptochloa fusca. Int J Phytoremed 20(2):121–128

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Babatunde AO, Miranda-CasoLuengo R, Imtiaz M, Zhao YQ, Meijer WG (2016) Performance assessment and microbial diversity of two pilot scale multi-stage sub-surface flow constructed wetland systems. J Environ Sci 46:38–46

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bezbaruah AN, Zhang TC (2005) Quantification of oxygen release by bulrush (Scirpus validus) roots in a constructed treatment wetland. Biotechnol Bioeng 89(3):308–318

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bitton G (2005) Wastewater microbiology. Wiley, Hoboken

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Braskerud BC (2002) Factors affecting phosphorus retention in small constructed wetlands treating agricultural non-point source pollution. Ecol Eng 19(1):41–61

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carballeira T, Ruiz I, Soto M (2017) Aerobic and anaerobic biodegradability of accumulated solids in horizontal subsurface flow constructed wetlands. Int Biodeterior Biodegradation 119:396–404

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Davis AP, Shokouhian M, Sharma H, Minami C (2005) Water quality improvement through bioretention media: nitrogen and phosphorus removal. Water Environ Res 78(3):284–293

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • EPR (Environment Protection Rules) (1986) [Schedule-VI] General standards for discharge of environmental. Pollutants PART-A: effluents

  • Fan J, Liang S, Zhang B, Zhang J (2013) Enhanced organics and nitrogen removal in batch-operated vertical flow constructed wetlands by combination of intermittent aeration and step feeding strategy. Environ Sci Pollut Res 20(4):2448–2455

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Faulwetter JL, Gagnon V, Sundberg C, Chazarenc F, Burr MD, Brisson J, Stein OR (2009) Microbial processes influencing performance of treatment wetlands: a review. Ecol Eng 35(6):987–1004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fernandes JP, Almeida CMR, Pereira AC, Ribeiro IL, Reis I, Carvalho P, Mucha AP (2015) Microbial community dynamics associated with veterinary antibiotics removal in constructed wetlands microcosms. Bioresour Technol 182:26–33

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Fountoulakis MS, Terzakis S, Chatzinotas A, Brix H, Kalogerakis N, Manios T (2009) Pilot-scale comparison of constructed wetlands operated under high hydraulic loading rates and attached biofilm reactors for domestic wastewater treatment. Sci Total Environ 407(8):2996–3003

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Greenway M (2005) The role of constructed wetlands in secondary effluent treatment and water reuse in subtropical and arid Australia. Ecol Eng 25(5):501–509

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gupta KK, Aneja KR, Rana D (2016) Current status of cow dung as a bioresource for sustainable development. Bioresour Bioprocess 3(1):28

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hira GS (2009) Water management in northern states and the food security of India. J Crop Improv 23(9):136–157

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hsu CB, Hsieh HL, Yang L, Wu SH, Chang JS, Hsiao SC, Su HC, Yeh CH, Ho YS, Lin HJ (2011) Biodiversity of constructed wetlands for wastewater treatment. Ecol Eng 37(10):1533–1545

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huang X, Sillanpää M, Gjessing ET, Peräniemi S, Vogt RD (2010) Environmental impact of mining activities on the surface water quality in Tibet: Gyama valley. Sci Total Environ 408(19):4177–4184

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Huang X, Zheng J, Liu C, Liu L, Liu Y, Fan H, Zhang T (2017) Performance and bacterial community dynamics of vertical flow constructed wetlands during the treatment of antibiotics-enriched swine wastewater. Chem Eng J 316:727–735

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ibekwe AM, Grieve CM, Lyon SR (2003) Characterization of microbial communities and composition in constructed dairy wetland wastewater effluent. Appl Environ Microbiol 69(9):5060–5069

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kjellin J, Hallin S, Wörman A (2007) Spatial variations in denitrification activity in wetland sediments explained by hydrology and denitrifying community structure. Water Res 41(20):4710–4720

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Knight RL, Payne VW, Borer RE, Clarke RA, Pries JH (2000) Constructed wetlands for livestock wastewater management. Ecol Eng 15(1):41–55

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li PENG (2005) The prducing and damaging of environmental pollution from feces of livestock and poultry. Ecol Domest Animal vol 4

  • Li X, Zhang M, Liu F, Chen L, Li Y, Li Y, Xiao R, Wu J (2018) Seasonality distribution of the abundance and activity of nitrification and denitrification microorganisms in sediments of surface flow constructed wetlands planted with Myriophyllum elatinoides during swine wastewater treatment. Bioresour Technol 248:89–97

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Liu L, Liu C, Zheng J, Huang X, Wang Z, Liu Y, Zhu G (2013) Elimination of veterinary antibiotics and antibiotic resistance genes from swine wastewater in the vertical flow constructed wetlands. Chemosphere 91(8):1088–1093

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lu H, Wang X, Zhang K, Xu Y, Zhou L, Li G (2014) Identification and nematicidal activity of bacteria isolated from cow dung. Ann Microbiol 64(1):407–411

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Meng P, Pei H, Hu W, Shao Y, Li Z (2014) How to increase microbial degradation in constructed wetlands: influencing factors and improvement measures. Bioresour Technol 157:316–326

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Molle P, Prost-Boucle S, Lienard A (2008) Potential for total nitrogen removal by combining vertical flow and horizontal flow constructed wetlands: a full-scale experiment study. Ecol Eng 34(1):23–29

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MWRGI (Ministry of Water Resources, Government of India) (2007) District ground water brochure—Kancheepuram district (PDF) (Report). Ministry of water resources, Government of India. Retrieved 30 Sept 2012

  • Ouellet-Plamondon C, Chazarenc F, Comeau Y, Brisson J (2006) Artificial aeration to increase pollutant removal efficiency of constructed wetlands in cold climate. Ecol Eng 27(3):258–264

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • PCI (Population Census India (web)) (2001) “Kanchipuram: census 2011”. Ministry of home affairs. Retrieved 26 June 2012

  • Prasanna K, Sudarsan JS, Nithiyanantham S (2017) Wastewater treatment using combined biological and constructed wetland techniques in paper mills. Sustain Water Resour Manag 3(2):1–9

    Google Scholar 

  • Prathap MG, Sudarsan JS, Mukhopadhyay M, Reymond DJ, Nithiyanantham S (2015) Constructed wetland-an easy and cost-effective alternative for the treatment of leachate. Int J Energy Technol Policy 11(4):371–379

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rijsberman FR (2006) Water scarcity, fact or fiction? Agric Waste Manag 80(1–3):5–22

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sawaittayothin V, Polprasert C (2007) Nitrogen mass balance and microbial analysis of constructed wetlands treating municipal landfill leachate. Bioresour Technol 98(3):565–570

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sawant AA, Hegde NV, Straley BA, Donaldson SC, Love BC, Knabel SJ, Jayarao BM (2007) Antimicrobial-resistant enteric bacteria from dairy cattle. Appl Environ Microbiol 73(1):156–163

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Shanks OC, Santo Domingo JW, Lu J, Kelty CA, Graham JE (2007) Identification of bacterial DNA markers for the detection of human fecal pollution in water. Appl Environ Microbiol 73(8):2416–2422

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Stottmeister U, Wiebner A, Kuschk P, Kappelmeyer U, Kästner M, Bederski O, Moormann H (2003) Effects of plants and microorganisms in constructed wetlands for wastewater treatment. Biotechnol Adv 22(1):93–117

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sudarsan JS, Roy RL, Baskar G, Deeptha VT, Nithiyanantham S (2015) Domestic wastewater treatment performance using constructed wetland. Sustain Water Resour Manag 1(2):89–96

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taheripour F, Hertel TW, Gopalakrishnan BN, Sahin S, Escurra JJ (2015) Agricultural production, irrigation, climate change, and water scarcity in India. In: 2015 AAEA & WAEA joint annual meeting, vol 2628

  • Tak BY, Tak B, Young J, Yong J, Young Yoon H, Gil H (2015) Optimization of color and COD removal from livestock wastewater by electrocoagulation process: application of box-behnken design (BBD). J Ind Eng Chem 25:307–315

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Thornton PK (2010) Livestock production: recent trends, future prospects. Philos Trans R Soc B Biol Sci 365(1554):2853–2867

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tian T, Tam NF, Zan Q, Cheung SG, Shin PK, Wong YS, Chen Z (2017) Performance and bacterial community structure of a 10-year old constructed mangrove wetland. Mar Pollut Bull 124(2):1096–1105

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Toet S, Van Logtestijn RS, Kampf R, Schreijer M, Verhoeven JT (2005) The effect of hydraulic retention time on the removal of pollutants from sewage treatment plant effluent in a surface-flow wetland system. Wetlands 25(2):375–391

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • USEPA (2000) Constructed wetland treatment of municipal wastewater. United States (US) Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Office of Research and Development, Cincinnati

    Google Scholar 

  • Vacca G, Wand H, Nikolausz M, Kuschk P, Kästner M (2005) Effect of plants and filter materials on bacteria removal in pilot-scale constructed wetlands. Water Res 39(7):1361–1373

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Veldkamp TIE, Eisner S, Wada Y, Aerts JCJH, Ward PJ (2015) Sensitivity of water scarcity events to ENSO-driven climate variability at the global scale. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci 19:4081–4098

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vymazal J (2007) Removal of nutrients in various types of constructed wetlands. Sci Total Environ 380(1–3):48–65

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Vymazal J (2011) Plants used in constructed wetlands with horizontal subsurface flow: a review. Hydrobiologia 674(1):133–156

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wu Y, Li T, Yang L (2012) Mechanisms of removing pollutants from aqueous solutions by microorganisms and their aggregates: a review. Bioresour Technol 107:10–18

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wu S, Kuschk P, Brix H, Vymazal J, Dong R (2014) Development of constructed wetlands in performance intensifications for wastewater treatment: a nitrogen and organic matter targeted review. Water Res 57:40–55

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wu H, Zhang J, Ngo HH, Guo W, Hu Z, Liang S, Fan J, Liu H (2015) A review on the sustainability of constructed wetlands for wastewater treatment: design and operation. Bioresour Technol 175:594–601

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wu Y, Han R, Yang X, Fang X, Chen X, Yang D, Zhang R (2016) Correlating microbial community with physicochemical indices and structures of a full-scale integrated constructed wetland system. Appl Microbio Biotechnol 100(15):6917–6926

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang CB, Wang J, Liu WL, Zhu SX, Ge HL, Chang SX, Ge Y (2010) Effects of plant diversity on microbial biomass and community metabolic profiles in a full-scale constructed wetland. Ecol Eng 36(1):62–68

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhao Y, Liu B, Zhang W, Hu C, An S (2010) Effects of plant and influent C: N: P ratio on microbial diversity in pilot-scale constructed wetlands. Ecol Eng 36(4):441–449

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors are grateful to acknowledge the management, SRM University, Chennai, India, for providing necessary facility to complete this work.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, SRMIST, Kattankulathur, Kanchipuram District, Tamil Nadu, 603 203, India

    R. J. Rajan

  2. School of Construction Management (SOCM), NICMAR Pune, Balewadi, Pune, 411045, India

    J. S. Sudarsan

  3. Post Graduate and Research Department of Physics, Thiru. Vi. Kalyanasundaram Govt Arts & Science College, Thiruvarur, Tamilnadu, 610003, India

    S. Nithiyanantham

  4. Department of Biotechnology and Biochemical Engineering, SCT College of Engineering, NH 66, CTO Colony, Papanamcode, Thiruvananthapuram, Kerala, 695018, India

    R. J. Rajan

Authors
  1. R. J. Rajan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. J. S. Sudarsan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. S. Nithiyanantham
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to S. Nithiyanantham.

Additional information

Editorial responsibility: M. Abbaspour.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Rajan, R.J., Sudarsan, J.S. & Nithiyanantham, S. Efficiency of constructed wetlands in treating E. coli bacteria present in livestock wastewater. Int. J. Environ. Sci. Technol. 17, 2153–2162 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13762-019-02481-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13762-019-02481-6

Keywords

Search

Navigation