Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Assessment of Modern Roadways Using Non-destructive Geophysical Surveying Techniques

  • Published:
Surveys in Geophysics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The main purpose of modern roadways is to provide roadway users with both a comfortable and safe ride to their destinations. As such, they need pavements in good physical conditions to ensure safe and uninterrupted transportation of the public. During the previous decades, roadway engineers’ interests have shifted towards maintenance and rehabilitation of existing pavement structures, rather than the construction of new structures. Nevertheless, pavement condition assessment (PCA) remains imperative both during construction for quality assurance purposes and during roadways’ service life for efficient maintenance planning. Research and current practices have shifted towards a broadened utilization of advanced non-destructive testing systems that enable non-invasive PCA. The current investigation aims to provide a comprehensive overview of the geophysical methods available for modern roadways’ assessment. Geophysical surveying techniques including ground penetrating radar (GPR) and those based on stress waves theory can substantially improve PCA. They cover roadway applications including layer thicknesses determination, stiffness estimation of asphalt and concrete pavements, as well as the determination of physical properties, subsurface defects detection and most recently density monitoring. In particular, it is demonstrated that GPR can assist pavement engineers at all stages of PCA from the construction process through density control and compaction monitoring. Furthermore, throughout a roadway’s service life, GPR can be effectively incorporated as a supplementary tool for monitoring and evaluation within a pavement management system, contributing to optimizing roadways design and maintenance, preserving durable and sustainable structures, ensuring cost savings for road authorities and highway operators through enhanced decision-making processes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

(Ismail et al. 2012)

Fig. 2

(Huston et al. 2008)

Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

(Benedetto et al. 2017)

Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9

(Shangguan et al. 2016)

Fig. 10

(Plati and Loizos 2012)

Fig. 11

(Plati and Loizos 2012)

Fig. 12

(Leng and Al-Qadi 2014)

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ahmed MU, Tarefder RA, Arifuzzaman M (2018) Using portable seismic property analyzer (PSPA) to characterize thin asphalt sub-layer. Transportation research board 2018 annual meeting

  • Akkaya Y, Voigt T, Subramanian KV, Shah SP (2003) Nondestructive measurement of concrete strength gain by an ultrasonic wave reflection method. Mater Struct 36:507–514

    Google Scholar 

  • Al-Qadi IL, Lahouar S (2005a) Measuring layer thicknesses with GPR-theory to practice. Constr Build Mater 19(10):763–772

    Google Scholar 

  • Al-Qadi IL, Lahouar S (2005b) Measuring rebar cover depth in rigid pavements with ground-penetrating radar. Transp Res Rec J Transp Res Board 1907:81–85

    Google Scholar 

  • Al-Qadi IL, Lahouar S, Loulizi A (2001) In-situ measurements of hot-mix asphalt dielectric properties. NDT E Int 34:427–434

    Google Scholar 

  • Al-Qadi IL, Lahouar S, Loulizi A, Elseifi MA, Wilkes JA (2004) Effective approach to improve pavement drainage layers. J Transp Eng 130(5):658–664

    Google Scholar 

  • Al-Qadi IL, Lahouar S, Jiang K, MeGhee KK, Mokarem D (2005) Validation of ground penetration radar accuracy for estimating pavement layer thicknesses. In: Proceedings of the 84th annual meeting of the transportation research board, Washington, D.C., 2005, CD compendium

  • Al-Qadi IL, Leng Z, Lahaour S, Baek J (2010) In-place hot-mix asphalt density measurement using ground penetrating radar. Transp Res Rec J Transp Res Board 2152:19–27

    Google Scholar 

  • Azari H, Nazarian S (2017) Sensitivity of two stress wave-based methods for nondestructive evaluation of concrete slabs. J Infrastruct Syst 23(4):04017011

    Google Scholar 

  • Azari H, Nazarian S, Yuan D (2014) Assessing sensitivity of impact echo and ultrasonic surface waves methods for nondestructive evaluation of concrete structures. Constr Build Mater 71:384–391. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2014.08.056

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baili J, Lahouar S, Hergli M, Al-Qadi IL, Besbes K (2009) GPR signal de-noising by discrete wavelet transform. NDT E Int 42:696–703

    Google Scholar 

  • Benedetto A (2010) Water content evaluation in unsaturated soil using GPR signal analysis in the frequency domain. J Appl Geophys 71:26–35

    Google Scholar 

  • Benedetto A, Pajewski L (2015) Civil engineering applications of ground penetrating radar. Springer, Switzerland

    Google Scholar 

  • Benedetto A, Pensa S (2007) Indirect diagnosis of pavement structural damages using surface GPR reflection techniques. J Appl Geophys 62:107–123

    Google Scholar 

  • Benedetto F, Tosti F (2013) GPR spectral analysis for clay content evaluation by the frequency shift method. J Appl Geophys 97(2013):89–96

    Google Scholar 

  • Benedetto A, Benedetto F, Tosti F (2012) GPR applications for geotechnical stability of transportation infrastructures. Nondestruct Test Eval 27(3):253–262. https://doi.org/10.1080/10589759.2012.694884

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Benedetto F, Benedetto A, Tedeschi A (2014) A mobile android application for road and pavement inspection by GPR data processing. In: Proceedings of 15th international conference on ground penetrating radar-GPR 2014, pp 842–846

  • Benedetto A, Tosti F, Bianchini Ciampoli L, D’Amico F (2016) GPR applications across engineering and geosciences disciplines in Italy: a review. IEEE J Selected Top Appl Earth Observ Remote Sens 9(7):2952–2965

    Google Scholar 

  • Benedetto A, Tosti F, Bianchini Ciampoli L, D’Amico F (2017) An overview of ground-penetrating radar signal processing techniques for road inspections. Sig Process 132:201–209. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sigpro.2016.05.016

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bianchini Ciampoli L, D’Amico F, Calvi A, Benedetto F, Tosti F (2017) Signal processing for optimisation of low-powered GPR data with application in transportation engineering (roads and railways). In: Proceedings of the 10th international conference on the bearing capacity of roads, railways and airfields (BCRRA), Greece, pp 1553–1557

  • Boyko A, Funkhouser T (2011) Extracting roads from dense point clouds in large scale urban environment. ISPRS J Photogramm Remote Sens 666:2–12

    Google Scholar 

  • Cassidy NJ, Eddies R, Dods S (2011) Void detection beneath reinforced concrete sections: The practical application of ground-penetrating radar and ultrasonic techniques. J Appl Geophys 74(4):263–276

    Google Scholar 

  • Celaya M, Nazarian S (2007) Stripping detection in asphalt pavements with seismic methods. Transp Res Rec J Transp Res Board 2005:64–74. https://doi.org/10.3141/2005-08

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chew WC (1995) Waves and fields in inhomogeneous media. IEEE Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Cho MR, Joh SH, Kwon SA, Kang TH (2007) Nondestructive in-place strength profiling of concrete pavements by resonance search technique. Transportation research board 86th annual meeting

  • Commuri S, Mai AT, Zaman M (2011) Neural network-based intelligent compaction analyzer for estimating compaction quality of hot asphalt mixes. J Constr Eng Manag 137(9):634–644

    Google Scholar 

  • Cox MG, Siebert BRL (2006) The use of a Monte Carlo method for evaluating uncertainty and expanded uncertainty. Metrologia 434:178–188

    Google Scholar 

  • Daniels DJ (2004) Ground penetrating radar. The Institution of Electrical Engineers, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Dawson A (ed) (2008) Water in road structures. Nottingham Transportation Engineering Centre, University of Nottingham, Nottingham

    Google Scholar 

  • De Coster A, Van der Wielen A, Gregoire C, Lambot S (2018) Evaluation of pavement layer thicknesses using GPR: a comparison between full-wave inversion and the straight-ray method. Constr Build Mater 168:91–104

    Google Scholar 

  • Dennis N, Bennett K (2005) Development of testing protocol and correlations for resilient modulus of subgrade soils. Arkansas State Highway and Transportation Department, Little Rock

    Google Scholar 

  • Dera AA (2016) Assessment of highway condition using combined geophysical surveys. Ph.D. Dissertation, Missouri University of Science and Technology, Missouri

  • Dérobert X, Pajewski L (2018) TU1208 open database of radargrams: the dataset of the IFSTTAR geophysical test site. Remote Sens 10(4):530. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs10040530

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diamanti N, Redman D (2012) Field observations and numerical models of GPR response from vertical pavement cracks. J Appl Geophys 81:106–116. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jappgeo.2011.09.006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diamanti N, Redman D, Giannopoulos A (2010) A study of GPR vertical crack responses in pavement using field data and numerical modelling. In: 2010 13th international conference on ground penetrating radar, pp 1–6

  • Dong Z, Ye S, Gao Y, Fang G, Zhang X, Xue Z, Zhang T (2016) Rapid detection methods for asphalt pavement thicknesses and defects by a vehicle-mounted ground penetrating radar (GPR) system. Sensors 16:2067. https://doi.org/10.3390/s16122067

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dougherty ER (1994) Optimal mean-absolute-error filtering of gray-scale signals by the morphological hit-or-miss transform. J Math Imaging Vis 4(3):255–271

    Google Scholar 

  • Elbagalati O, Elseifi MA, Gaspard K, Zhang Z (2017) Implementation of the structural condition index into the Louisiana pavement management system based on rolling wheel deflectometer testing. In: Proceeding of transportation research board

  • Ellis TB (2008) A comparison of nondestructive testing backcalculation techniques for rigid and flexible pavements. An undergraduate thesis. The University of Arkansas

  • Evans RD (2009) Optimising ground penetrating radar GPR to assess pavements. PhD thesis. Loughborough University, Loughborough, UK

  • Fauchard C (2003) GPR performances for thickness calibration on road test sites. NDT E Int 36(2):67–75

    Google Scholar 

  • Fauchard C, Derobert X, Cariou J, Cote P (2003) GPR performances for thickness calibration on road test sites. NDT E Int 36:67–75

    Google Scholar 

  • Fontul S, Paixao A, Solla M, Pajewski L (2018) Railway track condition assessment at network level by frequency domain analysis of GPR data. Remote Sens 10:559. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs10040559

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Forte E, Pipan M (2017) Review of multi-offset GPR applications: data acquisition, processing and analysis. Sig Process 132:210–220

    Google Scholar 

  • Forte E, Dossi M, Pipan M, Colucci RR (2014) Velocity analysis from common offset GPR data inversion: theory and application to synthetic and real data. Geophys J Int 197(3):1471–1483

    Google Scholar 

  • Freeme CR (1978) The application of ultrasonic test methods to the determination of elastic moduli of pavement materials. Environ Eng Geosci xv(1):63–83

    Google Scholar 

  • Furuya H, Tsukimoto Y, Koseki H, Mansell T, Gallivan V, Uchiyama K (2010) Innovative QC/QA compaction method for HMA pavement using intelligent compaction (IC) technology. In: 11th international conference on asphalt pavements, Nagoya, Japan

  • Giannopoulos A (2005) Modelling ground penetrating radar by GprMax. Constr Build Mater 19(10):755–762

    Google Scholar 

  • Girot D, Benoist JM, Godart JF (1985) Utilisation d’un radar impulsionnel pour l’_etude des structures de chauss_ees. Bull Liaison Pts Ch 1985:71–76

    Google Scholar 

  • Goel A (2018) Subsurface utility and interlayer debonding assessment using spectral analysis of surface waves method for asphalt pavements: initial findings. Transportation research board 2018 annual meeting

  • Grote K, Hubbard S, Harvey J, Rubin Y (2005) Evaluation of infiltration in layered pavements using surface GPR reflection techniques. J Appl Geophys 57(2):129–153

    Google Scholar 

  • Gucunski N, Krstic V (1996). Backcalculation of pavement profiles from spectral analysis-of-surface-waves test by neural networks using individual receiver spacing approach. Transportation research record, 1996

  • Gucunski N, Slabaugh GG, Wang Z, Fang T, Maher A (2008) Impact echo data from bridge deck testing: visualization and interpretation. Transp Res Rec J Transp Res Board 2050(2008):111–121. https://doi.org/10.3141/2050-11

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hassan AMT, Jones SW (2012) Non-destructive testing of ultra-high performance fibre reinforced concrete (UHPFRC): a feasibility study for using ultrasonic and resonant frequency testing techniques. Constr Build Mater 35:361–367. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2012.04.047

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoegh K, Khazanovich L, Yu HT (2011) Ultrasonic tomography technique for evaluation concrete pavements. Transp Res Rec J Transp Res Board 2232:85–94

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoegh K, Khazanovich L, Maser K, Tran N (2012) Evaluation of an ultrasonic technique for detecting delamination in asphalt pavements. Transportation research board 91st annual meeting

  • Hoegh K, Khazanovich L, Worel BJ, Yu T (2013) Subsurface joint deterioration detection: a MnROAD blind test comparison of ultrasound array technology with conventional nondestructive methods. Transportation research board 92nd annual meeting

  • Hoegh K, Khazanovich L, Yu T (2014) Ultrasonic tomography for evaluation of concrete pavements. Transp Res Rec J Transp Res Board 2232:85

    Google Scholar 

  • Huang YH (2004) Pavement analysis and design, 2nd edn. Pearson Education Inc., Upper Saddle River, p 2004

    Google Scholar 

  • Huston D, Cui J, Burns D, Gucunski N, Maher A, Jalinoos F (2008) Multisensor and automated measurement of bridge deck condition. https://doi.org/10.1201/9781439828441.ch74

  • Icenogle P, Kabir MS (2013) Evaluation of non-destructive technologies for construction quality control of HMA and PCC pavements in Louisiana. Publication FHWA/LA.12/493, Louisiana Department of Transportation and Development

  • In CW, Kim JY, Kurtis KE, Jacobs LJ (2009) Characterization of ultrasonic Rayleigh surface waves in asphaltic concrete. NDT E Int 42(7):610–617

    Google Scholar 

  • Ismail MA, Samsudin AR, Rafek AG, Nayan AM (2012) Road pavement stiffness determination using SASW method. UNIMAS E J Civil Eng 3:9–16

    Google Scholar 

  • Jia X, Zhao M, Buzza M, Di Y, Lee J (2017) A geometrical investigation on the generalized lp/lq norm for blind deconvolution. Signal Process 134:63–69

    Google Scholar 

  • Jin J (2010) Theory and computation of electromagnetic fields. Wiley, Hoboken

    Google Scholar 

  • Jol HM (2009) Ground penetrating radar: theory and applications. Elsevier, Amsterdam

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones R, Gatfield EN (1955) Testing concrete by an ultrasonic pulse technique. H.M. Stationery Off, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Joyce RP (1985) Rapid nondestructive delamination detection. Final Report No. FHWA/RD-85/051. Federal Highway Administration, Washington, D.C.

  • Jurado MC, Shokouhi P, Celaya M, Nazarian S (2018) Experimental ultrasonic method to quantifying anisotropic properties in asphalt concrete pavement. Transportation research board 2018 annual meeting

  • Kelley EJ (1999) Soil moisture effects in pavement systems. M.S. thesis, Ohio University, Athens

  • Khazonovich L, Velasquez R, Nesvijski EG (2005) Evaluation of top–down cracks in asphalt pavements by using a self-calibrating ultrasonic technique. Transp Res Rec 1940:63–68

    Google Scholar 

  • Krysinki L, Sudyka J (2013) GPR abilities in investigation of the pavement transversal cracks. J Appl Geophys 97:27–36

    Google Scholar 

  • Lahouar S, Al-Qadi IL (2008) Automatic detection of multiple pavement layers from GPR data. NDT E Int 41(2):69–81

    Google Scholar 

  • Lahouar S, Al-Qadi IL, Loulizi A, Clark TM, Lee DT (2002) Approach to determining in situ dielectric constant of pavements: development and implementation at interstate 81 in Virginia. Transp Res Rec J Transp Res Board 1806:81–87

    Google Scholar 

  • Lai WWL, Dérobert X, Annan P (2018) A review of ground penetrating radar application in civil engineering: a 30-year journey from locating and testing to imaging and diagnosis. NDT E Int 96(2018):58–78

    Google Scholar 

  • Le Bastard C, Baltazart V, Wang Y, Saillard J (2007) Thin-pavement thickness estimation using GPR with high-resolution and super resolution methods. IEEE Trans Geosci Remote Sens 45(8):2511–2519

    Google Scholar 

  • Le Bastard C, Wang Y, Baltazart V, Derobert X (2014) Time delay and permittivity estimation by ground-penetrating radar with support vector regression. IEEE Geosci Remote Sens Lett 11(4):873–877

    Google Scholar 

  • Leng Z (2011) Prediction of in-situ asphalt mixture density using ground penetrating radar: theoretical development and field verification (Doctoral Dissertation). University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana

    Google Scholar 

  • Leng Z, Al-Qadi IL (2011) Flexible pavement quality assurance using ground penetrating radar. First ASCE T&DI Congress, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  • Leng Z, Al-Qadi IL (2014) An innovative method for measuring pavement dielectric constant using the extended CMP method with two air-coupled GPR systems. NDT E Int 66(2014):90–98

    Google Scholar 

  • Leng Z, Al-Qadi IL, Lahouar S (2011) Development and validation for in situ asphalt mixture density prediction model. NDT E Int 44:369–375

    Google Scholar 

  • Leng Z, Al-Qadi IL, Shangguan P (2012) Field application of ground penetrating radar for asphalt mixture density measurement: a case study of Illinois Route 72 overlay. Transp Res Rec J Transp Res Board 2304:133–141

    Google Scholar 

  • Li M, Anderson N, Sneed L, Torgashov E (2016a) Condition assessment of concrete pavements using both ground penetrating radar and stress-wave based techniques. J Appl Geophys 135:297–308

    Google Scholar 

  • Li M, Anderson NL, Sneed HL, Kang X (2016b) An assessment of concrete over asphalt pavement using both the ultrasonic surface wave and impact echo techniques. J Environ Eng Geophys 21(4):137–149. https://doi.org/10.2113/JEEG21.4.137

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lin JM, Sansalone M (1997) A procedure for determining P-wave speed in concrete for use in impact-echo testing using a Rayleigh wave speed measurement technique. In: Pessiki S, Olson L (eds) Innovations in nondestructive testing, SP-168. American Concrete Institute, Farmington Hills, pp 137–165

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu H, Sato M (2014) In-situ measurement of pavement thickness and dielectric permittivity by GPR using an antenna array. NDT E Int 64:65–71

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu H, Deng F, Han F, Xia Y, Huo Liu Q, Sato M (2017) Time-frequency analysis of air-coupled GPR data for identification of delamination between pavement layers. Constr Build Mater 154(2017):1207–1215

    Google Scholar 

  • Loizos A, Plati C (2007a) Accuracy of pavement thicknesses estimation using different ground penetrating radar analysis approaches. NDT E Int 40:147–157

    Google Scholar 

  • Loizos A, Plati C (2007b) Accuracy of ground penetrating radar horn-antenna technique for sensing pavement subsurface. IEEE Sens J 7(5):842–850

    Google Scholar 

  • Loizos A, Plati C (2007c) Ground penetrating radar as an engineering diagnostic tool for foamed asphalt treated pavement layers. Int J Pavement Eng 8(2):147–155

    Google Scholar 

  • Loizos A, Papavasiliou V, Plati C (2012) Investigating in situ stress-dependent behavior of foamed asphalt-treated pavement materials. Road Mater Pavement Des 13(4):678–690. https://doi.org/10.1080/14680629.2012.742628

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Loizos A, Plati C, Cliatt B, Gkyrtis K (2017) Effectiveness of spectral analysis of surface waves (SASW) method for pavement evaluation. In: Proceedings of the 10th international conference on the bearing capacity of roads, railways and airfields (BCRRA), Greece, pp 631–636

  • Lorenzo H, Rial FI, Pereira M, Solla M (2011) A full non-metallic trailer for GPR road surveys. J Appl Geophys 75:490–497. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jappgeo.2011.07.021

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Loulizi A, Al-Qadi IL, Lahouar S (2003) Optimization of ground-penetrating radar data to predict layer thicknesses in flexible pavements. J Transp Eng 129(1):93–99

    Google Scholar 

  • Lu Y, Cao Y, McDaniel JG, Wang ML (2015) Fast inversion of air-coupled spectral analysis of surface waves (SASW) method using in situ particle displacement. ISPRS Int J Geo-Inf 4:2619–2637

    Google Scholar 

  • Marecos V, Fontul S, Antunes ML, Solla M (2017) Evaluation of a highway pavement using non-destructive tests: falling weight deflectometer and ground penetrating radar. Constr Build Mater 154:1164–1172. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.07.034

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maser KR (1994) Ground penetrating radar surveys to characterize pavement layer thickness variations at GPS sites. Strategic Highway Research Program, National Research Council SHRP-P-397, National Academy of Science, Washington, D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maser KR (1996) Condition assessment of transportation infrastructure using ground-penetrating radar. J Infrastruct Syst 2(2):94–101

    Google Scholar 

  • Maser KR, Scullion T (1991) Automated pavement subsurface profiling using radar: case studies of four experimental field sites, transportation research record. J Transp Res Board 1344:148–154

    Google Scholar 

  • Maser KR, Scullion T (1992) Automated pavement subsurface profiling using radar: case studies of four experimental field sites. Transp Res Rec 1992:148–154

    Google Scholar 

  • Maser KR, Holland TJ, Roberts R, Popovics J (2006) NDE methods for quality assurance of new pavement thickness. Int J Pavement Eng 7(1):1–10

    Google Scholar 

  • Maser K, Puccinelli J, Amestoy JK (2012) Accuracy of ground penetrating radar asphalt thickness data and its impact on pavement rehabilitation design. Transportation research board annual meeting, Washington, USA

  • Mesher D, Dawley C, Pulles B (1996) A comprehensive radar hardware, interpretation software and survey methodology paradigm for bridge deck assessment. In: Proceedings of the 6th international conference on ground penetrating radar, pp 353–358

  • Mooney MA, Miller GA, The SY, Bong W (2000) Importance of invasive measures in assessment of existing pavements. J Perform Constr Facil 14(4):149–154

    Google Scholar 

  • Morcous G, Erdogmus E (2009) Use of ground penetrating radar for construction quality assurance of concrete pavement. Nebraska Department of Roads, University of Nebraska, Lincoln

    Google Scholar 

  • Morey RM (1998) Ground penetrating radar for evaluating subsurface conditions for transportation facilities, NCHRP synthesis 255. National Academy Press, Washington, D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nazarian S, Desai MR (1993) Automated surface wave method: field testing. J Geotech Eng 119(7):1094–1111

    Google Scholar 

  • Nazarian S, Stokoe K II (1983) Evaluation of modulus and thickness of pavements systems by SASW method. Center for Transportation Research, The University of Texas, Austin

    Google Scholar 

  • Nazarian S, Baker MR, Crain K (1993) Development and testing of a seismic pavement analyzer. Report SHRP-H-375. Strategic highway research program. National Research Council, Washington, D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nazarian S, Abdallah I, Yuan D, Ke L (1999) Design modulus values using seismic data collection. The University of Texas at El Paso, El Paso

    Google Scholar 

  • Nazarian S, Yuan D, Tandon V, Arellano M (2005) Quality management of flexible pavement layers with seismic methods. Center for Transportation Infrastructure Systems, The University of Texas, El Paso

    Google Scholar 

  • Nazarian S, Tandon V, Yuan D (2006) Mechanistic quality management of asphalt concrete layers with seismic methods. American Society for Testing and Materials, West Conshohocken

    Google Scholar 

  • Nazzal MD, Sargand S, Powers D, Morrison EP, Al-Rawashdeh A (2011) Evaluation of fine graded polymer asphalt mixture produced using foamed warm mix asphalt technology. In: Proceedings of 2nd international warm-mix conference, Missouri

  • Newnham L, Goodier A (2000) Using neural networks to interpret sub-surface radar imagery of reinforced concrete. In: Proceedings of GPR 2000, University of Queensland, Australia

  • Nobes DC (1999) Geophysical surveys of burial sites: a case study of the Oaro urupa. Geophysics 64(2):357–367

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD-Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (2013) Understanding the value of transport infrastructure: guidelines for macro-level measurement of spending and assets. The International Transport Forum, Task Force Report 2013.

  • Olhoeft GR (2000) Document maximizing the information return from ground penetrating radar. J Appl Geophys 43(2–4):175–187

    Google Scholar 

  • Olhoeft GR, Smith III SS (2000). Automatic processing and modeling of GPR data for pavement thickness and properties. In: 8th International conference on ground penetrating radar: international society for optics and photonics, pp 188–193

  • Owe M, Jeu R, Walker J (2001) A methodology for surface soil moisture and vegetation optical depth retrieval using the microwave polarization difference index. IEEE Trans Geosci Remote Sens 39(8):1643–1654

    Google Scholar 

  • Pajewski L, Tosti F, Kusayanagi W (2015) Chapter 2: antennas for GPR systems. In: Benedetto A, Pajewski L (eds) Civil engineering applications of ground penetrating radar (Springer Trans. Civil Environ. Eng. Book Series). Springer International Publishing, Berlin, pp 41–67

    Google Scholar 

  • Papavasiliou V, Loizos A (2013) Field performance and fatigue characteristics of recycled pavement materials treated with foamed asphalt. Constr Build Mater 48:677–684

    Google Scholar 

  • Pipan M, Forte E, Dal-Moro G, Sugan M, Finetti I (2003) Multifold ground-penetrating radar and resistivity to study the stratigraphy of shallow unconsolidated sediments. Lead Edge 22:876–881

    Google Scholar 

  • Pitonak M, Filipovsky J (2016) GPR application-non-destructive technology for verification of thicknesses of newly paved roads in Slovakia. Proc Eng 153:537–549. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2016.08.184

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Plati C, Loizos A (2012) Using ground-penetrating radar for assessing the structural needs of asphalt pavements. Nondestruct Test Eval 27(3):273–284. https://doi.org/10.1080/10589759.2012.695784

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Plati C, Loizos A (2013) Estimation of in situ density and moisture content in HMA pavements based on GPR trace reflection amplitude using different frequencies. J Appl Geophys 97(2013):3–10

    Google Scholar 

  • Plati C, Loizos A, Papavasiliou V, Kaltsounis A (2010) Investigating In situ properties of recycled asphalt pavement with foamed asphalt as base stabilizer. Adv Civil Eng 2010:565924

    Google Scholar 

  • Plati C, Georgiou P, Loizos A (2014) Use of infrared thermography for assessing HMA paving and compaction. Transp Res Part C Emerg Technol 46:192–208

    Google Scholar 

  • Plati C, Georgiou P, Loizos A (2016) A comprehensive approach for the assessment of HMA compactability using GPR technique. Near Surface Geophys 14(2):117–126

    Google Scholar 

  • Plati C, Georgouli K, Cliatt B, Loizos A (2017) Incorporation of GPR data into genetic algorithms for assessing recycled pavements. Constr Build Mater 154:1263–1271

    Google Scholar 

  • Plati C, Georgiou P, Loizos A (2018) Influence of GPR antenna frequency in moisture determination of asphalt pavements. In: Proceedings of the 41st international conference on telecommunications and signal processing (TSP), pp 162–165

  • Popovics JS, Rose JL (1994) A survey of developments in ultrasonic NDE of concrete. IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control UFFC 41:140

    Google Scholar 

  • Puente I, Gonzalez-Jorge H, Riveiro B, Arias P (2013) Accuracy verification of the Lynx mobile mapper system. Opt Laser Technol 45:578–586

    Google Scholar 

  • Rainwater NR, Zuo G, Drumm EC, Wright WC, Yoder RE (2001) In situ measurement and empirical modelling of base infiltration in highway pavement systems. Transp Res Rec J Transp Res Board 1772:143–150

    Google Scholar 

  • Rege R, Godio A (2012) Multimodal inversion of guided waves in georadar data. J Appl Geophys 81:68–75

    Google Scholar 

  • Rhazi J, Dous O, Ballivy G, Laurens S, Balayssac JP (2003) Non-destructive health evaluation of concrete bridge decks by GPR and half-cell potential techniques. In: International symposium on non-destructive testing in civil engineering, CD-ROM, Berlin, Germany

  • Riad SM (1986) The deconvolution problem: an overview. IEEE Trans Geosci Remote Sens 74(1):82–85

    Google Scholar 

  • Rister BW, Graves RC (2008) Investigation of the extended use of ground penetrating radar GPR for measuring in situ material quality characteristics. Kentucky Transportation Center, College of Engineering, University of Kentucky, Kentucky

    Google Scholar 

  • Rix G, Stokoe K II, Roesset J (1991) Experimental study of factors affecting the SASW method. The University of Texas, Austin

    Google Scholar 

  • Roberts R, Petroy D (1996) Semi-automatic processing of GPR data collected over pavement. In: Proceedings of 6th GPR, pp 347–352

  • Saarenketo T (1997) Using ground-penetrating radar and dielectric probe measurements in pavement density quality control. Transp Res Rec J Transp Res Board 1575:34–41

    Google Scholar 

  • Saarenketo T (2006) Electrical properties of road materials and subgrade soils and the use of ground penetrating radar in traffic infrastructure surveys, Ph.D. dissertation, Faculty of Science, Department of Geosciences, University of Oulu

  • Saarenketo T (2009) NDT transportation. In: Jol HM (ed) Ground penetrating radar: theory applications. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 395–444

    Google Scholar 

  • Saarenketo T, Roimela P (1998) Ground penetrating radar technique in asphalt pavement density quality control. In: 7th International conference on ground penetrating radar, Lawrence, Kansas

  • Saarenketo T, Scullion T (1994) Ground penetrating radar applications on roads and highways, Research report. Texas Transportation Institute, College Station

    Google Scholar 

  • Saarenketo T, Scullion T (2000) Road evaluation with ground penetrating radar. J Appl Geophys 43:119–138

    Google Scholar 

  • Sansalone M, Carino NJ (1986) Impact-echo: a method for flaw detection in concrete using transient stress waves. NBSIR 86-3452, National Bureau of Standards, Available from NTIS, Springfield, VA, 22161, PB #87-104444/AS

  • Schmidt R (1986) Multiple emitter location and signal parameter estimation. IEEE Trans Antennas Propag 34(3):276–280

    Google Scholar 

  • Scullion T (1997) Applications of ground coupled GPR to pavement evaluation. Texas Transportation Institute, the Texas A & M University System, College Station

    Google Scholar 

  • Sebesta S, Scullion T (2007) Infrared imaging and ground-penetrating radar as quality assurance tools for hot mix paving in Texas. J Assoc Asphalt Paving Technol 76:1–39

    Google Scholar 

  • Shangguan P, Al-Qadi IL (2015) Calibration of FDTD simulation of GPR signal for asphalt pavement compaction monitoring. IEEE Trans Geosci Remote Sens 53(3):1538–1548

    Google Scholar 

  • Shangguan P, Al-Qadi IL, Leng Z, Schmitt R, Faheen A (2013) Innovative approach for asphalt pavement compaction monitoring using ground penetrating radar. Transp Res Rec J Transp Res Board 2425:79–87

    Google Scholar 

  • Shangguan P, Al-Qadi IL, Coenen A, Zhao S (2016) Algorithm development for the application of ground-penetrating radar on asphalt pavement compaction monitoring. Int J Pavement Eng 17(3):189–200. https://doi.org/10.1080/10298436.2014.973027

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shokouhi P, Wostmann J, Schneider G, Milmann B, Taffe A, Wiggenhauser H (2011) Nondestructive detection of delamination in concrete slabs. Transp Res Rec J Transp Res Board 2251:103–113

    Google Scholar 

  • Simun M, Rukavina T (2009) Criteria for longitudinal evenness of asphalt pavement driving surfaces. Gradjevinar 6112:1143–1152

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith KD, Bruinsma JE, Wade MJ, Chatti K, Vandenbossche JM, Yu HT (2017) Using falling weight deflectometer data with mechanistic-empirical design and analysis, volume I: final report. Report No. FHWA-HRT-16-009. Federal Highway Administration, McLean, VA

  • Solla M, Gonzalez-Jorge H, Lorenzo H, Arias P (2013) Uncertainty evaluation of the 1 GHz GPR antenna for the estimation of concrete asphalt thickness. Measurement 46:3032–3040. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.measurement.2013.06.022

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Solla M, Lagüela S, Gonzalez-Jorge H, Arias P (2014) Approach to identify cracking in asphalt pavement using GPR and infrared thermographic methods: preliminary findings. NDT E Int 62:55–65

    Google Scholar 

  • Steyn WJ, Sadjik E (2007) Application of the portable pavement seismic analyser (PSPA) for pavement analysis. In: Proceedings of the 26th Southern African transport conference (SATC 2007), pp 294–304

  • Stroup-Gardiner M, Law M, Nesmith C (2000) Using infrared thermography to detect and measure segregation in hot mix asphalt pavements. Int J Pavement Eng 1(4):265–284

    Google Scholar 

  • Stryk J, Matula R, Pospisil K (2013) Possibilities of ground penetrating radar usage within acceptance tests of rigid pavements. J Appl Geophys 97:11–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jappgeo.2013.06.013

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Subramaniam KV, Mohsen JP, Shaw CK, Shah SP (2002) Ultrasonic technique for monitoring concrete strength gain at early age. ACI Mater J 99:458–462

    Google Scholar 

  • Sun M, Le Bastard C, Pinel N, Wang Y, Li J, Pan J, Yu Z (2017) Estimation of time delay and interface roughness by GPR using modified MUSIC. Signal Process 132:272–283. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sigpro.2016.05.029

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tamrakar P, Nazarian S (2018) Assessment of moisture effects on road bases. Transportation research board 2018 annual meeting

  • Tarefder RA, Ahmed MU (2016) Optimal use of falling weight deflectometer and ground penetrating radar. Publication NM12SP-01. New Mexico Department of Transportation, Santa Fe

    Google Scholar 

  • Tigdemir M, Kalyoncuoglu SF, Kalyoncuoglu UY (2004) Application of ultrasonic method in asphalt concrete testing for fatigue life estimation. NDT E Int 37(8):597–602

    Google Scholar 

  • Tosti F, Patriarca C, Slob E, Benedetto A, Lambot S (2013) Clay content evaluation in soils through GPR signal processing. J Appl Geophys 97(2013):69–80

    Google Scholar 

  • Tosti F, Adabi S, Pajewski L, Schettini G, Benedetto A (2014) Large-scale analysis of dielectric and mechanical properties of pavement using GPR and LFWD. In: Proceedings of 15th international conference on ground penetrating radar-GPR 2014, pp 868–873

  • Tosti F, Benedetto A, Bianchini Ciampoli L, Calvi A, D’ Amico F (2016) Prediction of rutting evolution in flexible pavement life cycle at the road network scale using an air-launched ground-penetrating radar system. In: 16th International conference of ground penetrating radar (GPR)

  • Tosti F, Alani AM, Benedetto A, Bianchini Ciampoli L, Brancadoro MG, Pajewski (2017) A comparative investigation of the pavement layer dielectrics by FDTD modelling and reflection amplitude GPR data. In: Proceedings of the 10th international conference on the bearing capacity of roads, railways and airfields (BCRRA), Greece, pp 1545–1551

  • Tosti F, Bianchini Ciampoli L, D’Amico F, Alani AM, Benedetto A (2018) An experimental-based model for the assessment of the mechanical properties of road pavements using ground-penetrating radar. Constr Build Mater 165:966–974

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner G (1992 June) Propagation deconvolution. In: Proceedings of the 4th international conference on ground penetrating radar, pp 85–93

  • Tykhonv AN, Arsenin VY (1978) Solution of ill-posed problems. Math Comput 32(144):1320–1322

    Google Scholar 

  • Underwood S, Kim YR (2003) Determination of depth of surface cracks in asphalt pavements. Transp Res Rec 1853:143–149

    Google Scholar 

  • Varela-Gonzalez M, Solla M, Martínez-Sanchez J, Arias P (2014) A semi-automatic processing and visualisation tool for ground-penetrating radar pavement thickness data. Autom Constr 45:42–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2014.05.004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Venmans AAM, van de Ven R, Kollen J (2016) Rapid and non-intrusive measurements of moisture in road constructions using passive microwave radiometry and GPR-full scale test. Proc Eng 143:1244–1251. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2016.06.111

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang ZJ, Zhao P, Ai T, Yang GY, Wang Q (2011) Microwave absorbing characteristics of asphalt mixes with carbonyl iron powder. Prog ElectromagnRes M 19:197–208

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang S, Zhao S, Al-Qadi IL (2018) Continuous real-time monitoring of flexible pavement layer density and thickness using ground penetrating radar. NDT E Int 100(2018):48–54

    Google Scholar 

  • Xu X, Peng S, Xia Y, Ji W (2014) The development of a multi-channel GPR system for roadbed damage detection. Microelectron J 45(11):1542–1555. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mejo.2014.09.004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yang B, Fang L, Li Q, Li J (2012) Automated extraction of road markings from mobile LiDAR point clouds. Photogramm Eng Remote Sens 784:331–338

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang JK, Yan W, Cui DM (2016) Concrete condition assessment using impact-echo method and extreme learning machines. Sensors 16:447. https://doi.org/10.3390/s16040447

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhao S, Al-Qadi IL (2016) Development of an analytic approach utilizing the extended common midpoint method to estimate asphalt pavement thickness with 3-D ground-penetrating radar. NDT E Int 78:29–36

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhao S, Al-Qadi IL (2018) Super-resolution of 3-D GPR signals to estimate thin asphalt overlay thickness using the XCMP method. IEEE Trans Geosci Remote Sens 99:1–9

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhao S, Shangguan P, Al-Qadi IL (2015) Application of regularized deconvolution technique for predicting pavement thin layer thicknesses from ground penetrating radar data. NDT E Int 73:1–7

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhao S, Al-Qadi IL, Wang S (2018) Prediction of thin asphalt concrete overlay thickness and density using nonlinear optimization of GPR data. NDT E Int 100:20–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ndteint.2018.08.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zofka A, Sudyka J, Sybilski D (2017) Assessment of pavement structures at traffic speed. In: Proceedings of the 10th international conference on the bearing capacity of roads, railways and airfields (BCRRA), Greece, pp 585–588

  • Zou Q, Cao Y, Li Q, Mao Q, Wang S (2012) CrackTree: Automatic crack detection from pavement images. Pattern Recogn Lett 33:227–238

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Christina Plati.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Plati, C., Loizos, A. & Gkyrtis, K. Assessment of Modern Roadways Using Non-destructive Geophysical Surveying Techniques. Surv Geophys 41, 395–430 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10712-019-09518-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10712-019-09518-y

Keywords

Navigation