Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Theoretical and empirical studies on essence-based adaptive software engineering

  • Published:
Information Technology and Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The OMG Essence standard was published as the kernel for software engineering methods in 2014. We show that the Essence view of software engineering is reminiscent of a nondeterministic, multidimensional finite state machine, and that the Essence lends support to a semi-Markov decision process model of software engineering which, in practice, facilitates a goal-driven adaptive software engineering. We develop an activity-state mapping algorithm and a goal-activity cover algorithm based on the Essence, which can help automate the health monitoring of project states and the adaptive planning of project activities in a software engineering project. Practical applications of the model and algorithms are illustrated. Benefits to software practitioners of the proposed approach are measured through statistical experiments.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Park JS, Jacobson I, Myburgh B, Johnson P, McMahon PE (2014) SEMAT yesterday, today and tomorrow. In: SEMAT. http://semat.org/news

  2. Object Management Group (2015) Essence—kernel and language for software engineering methods, version 1.1. http://www.omg.org/spec/Essence/1.1/

  3. Osterweil LJ (1987) Software processes are software too. In: IEEE international conference on software engineering

  4. Humphrey WS, Kellner MI (1989) Software process modeling: principles of entity process models. Software Engineering Institute, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh

    Book  Google Scholar 

  5. Ovio M, Basili VR (1992) Representing software engineering models: the TAME goal oriented approach. IEEE Trans Softw Eng 18(10):886–898

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Bhuta J, Boehm B, Meyers S (2005) Process elements: components of software process architectures. In: International conference on unifying the software process spectrum

  7. Rombach D (2006) Integrated software process and product lines. In: Unifying the software process spectrum. Lecture notes in computer science, vol 3840. Springer, pp 83–90

  8. ISO/IEC 24744 (2007) Software engineering-metamodel for development methodologies. ISO/IEC JTC 1/SC 7

  9. Gonzalez-Perez C, Henderson-Sellers B (2008) Metamodeling for software engineering. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  10. Object Management Group (2008) Software & systems process engineering meta-model specification (SPEM) version 2.0. http://www.omg.org/spec/SPEM/2.0/

  11. Sutherland J, Schwaber K (2014) The scrum guide. http://www.scrumguides.org/

  12. Flowler M (2005) The new methodology. http://martinfowler.com/articles/newMethodology.html

  13. Highsmith JA (2000) Adaptive software development: a collaborative approach to managing complex systems. Dorset House, New York

    Google Scholar 

  14. Poppendieck M, Poppendieck T (2003) Lean software development: an agile toolkit. Addison-Wesley, London

    Google Scholar 

  15. Henderson-Sellers B, Ralyté J (2010) Situational method engineering: state-of-the-art review. J Univ Comput Sci 16(3):424–478

    Google Scholar 

  16. Harman M, Burke E, Clark JA, Yao X (2012) Dynamic adaptive search based software engineering. In: International symposium on empirical software engineering and measurement

  17. Jacobson I, Ng P, McMahon PE, Spence I, Lidman S (2012) The essence of software engineering: the SEMAT kernel. Commun ACM 55(12):42–49

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Jacobson I, Ng P, McMahon PE, Spence I, Lidman S (2013) The essence of software engineering: applying the SEMAT kernel. Addison-Wesley, London

    Google Scholar 

  19. Jacobson I, Spence I, Ng P (2013) Agile and SEMAT-perfect partners. Commun ACM 56(11):53–59

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Jacobson I, Ng P, Spence I, McMahon PE (2014) Major-league SEMAT—why should an executive care? Commun ACM 57(4):44–50

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Jacobson I, Seidewitz E (2014) A new software engineering. Commun ACM 57(12):36–41

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. McMahon PE (2014) 15 Fundamentals for higher performance in software development. Leanpub, Vancouver

    Google Scholar 

  23. Park JS, McMahon PE, Myburgh B (2016) Scrum powered by essence. ACM SIGSOFT Softw Eng Note 41(1):1–8. http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=2853088

  24. Park JS (2013) Essence kernel-based enterprise method architecture. In: Essence information day. OMG, Berlin. http://www.omg.org/news/meetings/tc/berlin-13/special-events/essence-pdfs/S5-Park.pdf

  25. Park JS (2014) Essence-based adaptive software engineering, pre-conference tutorial. In: 4th international conference on emerging applications of information technology (EAIT). Indian Statistical Institute, Kolkata, India

  26. Park JS (2015) Essence-powered scrum: a generic approach to describing practices using essence kernel and language. In: Essence-in-practice conference. OMG, Berlin. http://www.omg.org/news/meetings/tc/berlin-15/special-events/essence-presentations/park.pdf

  27. Park JS (2015) Software engineering in the context of business systems. In: Jacobson I, Lawson H (eds) Software engineering in the systems context. College Publications, London. ISBN 978-1-84890-176-6

    Google Scholar 

  28. Wikipedia (2014) Set cover problem

  29. Chvatal V (1979) A greedy heuristic for the set covering problem. Math Oper Res 4:233–235

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Park JS (2015) Essence-based goal-driven adaptive software engineering. In: IEEE/ACM 4th SEMAT workshop on general theory of software engineering (GTSE), international conference on software engineering, Florence, Italy, pp 33–38. http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=2820176

  31. Knox ST (1993) Modeling the cost of software quality. Digital Equipment Corporation, Acton

    Google Scholar 

  32. Perkins-Golomb B (2013) Applying SEMAT concepts at Munich Re: perspective reflections. In: Essence information day. OMG, Berlin. http://www.omg.org/news/meetings/tc/berlin-13/special-events/essence-pdfs/S6_Burkhard.pdf

  33. Pike J (2014) Munich Re and Essence—kernel and language for software engineering methods: a case study. OMG. http://www.omg.org/news/whitepapers/

  34. Cunningham D (2013) Enabling Fujitsu’s industrialized delivery of application services. In: Essence information day. OMG, Berlin. http://www.omg.org/news/meetings/tc/berlin-13/special-events/essence-pdfs/S7-Cunningham.pdf

  35. Elvesæter B, Benguria G, Ilieva S (2013) A comparison of the essence 1.0 and SPEM 2.0 specifications for software engineering methods. In: Workshop on process-based approaches to model-driven engineering, Montpellier, France

  36. Péraire C, Sedano T (2014) State-based monitoring and goal-driven project steering: field study of the SEMAT Essence framework. In: International conference on software engineering, Hyderabad, India, 2014

  37. Ivar Jacobson International (2014) Asian telecommunications equipment vendor successfully achieves rapid and sustainable agile transformation. http://www.ivarjacobson.com/

  38. SEMAT (2014) Google Switzerland explored Essence. http://semat.org/news

  39. Jang J (2015) Essencia—an open source Essence-support tool. In: 23rd IFIP World Computer Congress SEMAT Essence conference, Daejeon, Korea. http://www.wcc-2015.org/SEMAT_Essence_Conference.php

  40. Essencia open source project. https://github.com/TheOpenCloudEngine/essencia

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the Institute for Information & Communications Technology Promotion (IITP) grant funded by the Korea government (MSIP) (No. B0101-16-1272, Development of Device Collaborative Giga-Level Smart Cloudlet Technology).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Industrial and Systems Engineering Department, Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology, 291 Daehak-Ro, Yuseong-Gu, Daejeon, 34141, Korea

    June Sung Park

  2. Computer Science Department, Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology, 291 Daehak-Ro, Yuseong-Gu, Daejeon, 34141, Korea

    June Sung Park

  3. uEngine Solutions, 4F Shinhan Bldg., 722 Nonhyeon-Ro, Gangnam-Gu, Seoul, 06051, Korea

    Jinyoung Jang

  4. 2e Consulting, #1710 KnK Digital Tower, 220 Yeongsin-Ro, Yeongdeungpo-Gu, Seoul, 07228, Korea

    Eunjung Lee

Authors
  1. June Sung Park
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Jinyoung Jang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Eunjung Lee
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to June Sung Park.

Additional information

Dr. Park serves as President of SEMAT, Inc. (http://semat.org), and Chair of Essence 1.2 Revision Task Force in OMG.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Park, J.S., Jang, J. & Lee, E. Theoretical and empirical studies on essence-based adaptive software engineering. Inf Technol Manag 19, 37–49 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10799-016-0273-5

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10799-016-0273-5

Keywords

Search

Navigation