Skip to main content
Log in

Does the orchid Luisia teres attract its male chafer pollinators (Scarabaeidae: Protaetia pryeri pryeri) by sexual deception?

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Chemoecology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The epiphytic orchid Luisia teres (Asparagales: Orchidaceae) releases floral scent that attracts males of the cupreous polished chafer Protaetia pryeri pryeri (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae) for pollination. We analyzed this floral scent to identify the attractant(s). When various flower parts were extracted with diethyl ether and assayed, male chafers were attracted to the extract of petals but not to that of sepals or lips. The petal extracts were chromatographed on silica gel column and the activity was found in ether and methanol fractions. Gas chromatography/mass spectrometry (GC/MS) analyses and subsequent NMR analyses revealed that both active fractions contained 2,3-dihydroxypropyl isovalerate (2,3-DHPiV) as a major compound. Natural 2,3-DHPiV showed identical retention time to that of synthetic (R)-enantiomer in subsequent HPLC analyses using a chiral column, while (S)-enantiomer was not detected. The amount of this compound was ca. 5 µg/flower. In field tests performed in Okinawa, Japan, males of P. pryeri pryeri were observed to fly around and land on a cotton ball impregnated with synthetic (R)-2,3-DHPiV, but no male was attracted to the (S)-enantiomer or the racemic mixture. Thus, the chemical attractant released from the flower was identified to be (R)-2,3-DHPiV. 2,3-DHPiV was also found in a volatile sample collected from the virgin females by GC/MS analyses using achiral column, while this compound did not occur in males. Because of the difficulty in HPLC detection of a small amount of 2,3-DHPiV, the chirality remains to be determined. Nevertheless, these results strongly suggest that the flowers of L. teres release the same compound as females of its pollinator P. pryeri pryeri, indicating that the flower of this orchid chemically mimics the female sex pheromone.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Arakaki N, Yasuda K, Kanayama S, Jitsuno S, Oike M, Wakamura S (2016) Attraction of males of the cupreous polished chafer Protaetia pryeri pryeri (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae) for pollination by an epiphytic orchid Luisia teres (Asparagales: Orchidaceae). Appl Entomol Zool 51:241–246

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bergström G (1978) Role of volatile chemicals in Ophrys—Pollinator interactions. In: Herborne JP (ed) Aspects of plant and animal coevolution. Academic Press, London, pp 207–231

    Google Scholar 

  • Bohman B, Flematti GR, Barrow RA, Pickersky E, Peakall R (2016) Pollination by sexual deception—it takes chemistry to work. Curr Opin Plant Biol 32:37–46

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cozzolino S, Wildmer A (2005) Orchid diversity: an evolutionary consequence of deception? Trends Ecol Evol 20:487–493

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dafni A (1984) Mimicry and deception in pollination. Ann Rev Ecol Syst 15:259–278

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Endress PK (1994) Diversity and evolutionary biology of tropical flowers. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, p 511

    Google Scholar 

  • Gaskett AC (2011) Orchid pollination by sexual deception: pollinator perspectives. Biol Rev 86:33–75

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gilchrist PG, Schuette H (1931) Monoglycerides of the lower fatty acids. J Am Chem Soc 53:3480–3484

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Knudsen JT, Eriksson R, Gershenzon J, Ståhl B (2006) Diversity and distribution of floral scent. Bot Rev 72(1):1–120

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kováts E (1965) Gas chromatographic characterization of organic substances in the retention index system. Adv Chromatogr 1:229–247

    Google Scholar 

  • Kullenberg B, Bergstöm G (1976) Hymenoptera Aculeata males as pollinators of Ophrys orchids. Zool Scripta 5:13–23

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nilsson L (1992) Orchid pollination biology. Trends Ecol Evol 7:255–259

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pedersen HӔ, Watthana S, Kocyan A, Srimuang K (2013) Pollination biology of Luisia curtisii (Orchidaceae): indications of deceptive system operated by beetles. Plant Syst Evol 299:177–185

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schiestl FP, Ayasse M, Paulus HF, Löfstedt C, Hansson BS, Ibarra F, Francket W (1999) Orchid pollination by sexual swindle. Nature 399:421–422

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Seidenfaden G (1971) Notes on the genus Luisia. Dan Bot Ark 27:1–101

    Google Scholar 

  • Sokal RR, Rohlf FJ (2012) Biometry, the principles and practice of statistics in biological research, 4th edn. WH Freeman and Company, New York, p 937

    Google Scholar 

  • Suerbaev KA, Zhaksylykova GZ, Appazov NO (2013) Synthesis of biological active esters of the isovaleric acid by isobutylene hydroalkoxycarbonylation. J Pet Environ Biotechnol 4:164. https://doi.org/10.4172/2157-7463.1000164

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Yadav JS, Raghavendra S, Satyanarayana M, Balanarsaiah E (2005) Phosphomolybdic acid supported on silica gel: an efficient, mild and reusable catalyst for the chemoselective hydrolysis of acetonides. Synlett 16:2461–2464

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank Seiji Tanaka of National Agriculture and Food Research Organization, National Institute of Agro-biological Sciences for critical comments on the manuscript, Harukazu Fukami of KUAS for invaluable suggestion for chemical analyses and Masayuki Shimatani of Okinawa Prefectural Agricultural Research Center for assistance in chemical analysis. Thanks are also due to Sumika Tanizawa, Yuka Iketani and Aoi Kawamura, and Shuma Wake of undergraduate students at KGU for assistance in GC/MS analyses, syntheses of candidate compounds, and in the field experiments, respectively. We also thank Ikuko Maeda of the Advanced Analysis Center, NARO, for the measurement of NMR spectra.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sadao Wakamura.

Additional information

Handling Editor: Marko Rohlfs.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wakamura, S., Arakaki, N., Moriyama, D. et al. Does the orchid Luisia teres attract its male chafer pollinators (Scarabaeidae: Protaetia pryeri pryeri) by sexual deception?. Chemoecology 30, 49–57 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00049-019-00297-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00049-019-00297-x

Keywords

Navigation