Skip to main content
Log in

Life history traits and host suitability of a gall-forming fly, Polymorphomyia basilica (Diptera: Tephritidae), for the biological control of Chromolaena odorata (Asteraceae) in South Africa

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Arthropod-Plant Interactions Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The tephritid Cecidochares connexa has been used to good effect as a biological control agent on the Asian/West African biotype of the invasive alien shrub Chromolaena odorata, but does not develop well on the different, southern African C. odorata biotype. A stem-galling tephritid fly, Polymorphomyia basilica, from the northern Caribbean islands, was considered as a potential biological control agent for C. odorata in South Africa. Life history traits and host range on 32 asteraceous plants were investigated in single-choice tests and using single pairs of adults in no-choice tests, under laboratory conditions. Positive biological characteristics of P. basilica include a high rate of increase, the production of several generations per year, long-lived and mobile adults, the ability of females to produce viable offspring without repeated mating, and the ability of adults to eclose from galls on dry stems. Use of a single pair of adults for no-choice tests proved to be efficient. Oviposition and larval development through to adulthood occurred on three other South American and on two South African species; for the latter, one was in the tribe Eupatorieae, closely related to C. odorata, and the other in the Astereae, less closely related to the weed, but both at a lower and slower rate. Females tended to retain their eggs under no-choice conditions in the presence of an unsuitable host, and to compensate by ovipositing at a higher rate when presented later with a C. odorata plant. The poor offspring survival on non-target plants tested in this study demonstrates the suitability of P. basilica for release in South Africa.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adair RJ (2005) The biology of Dasineura dielsi Rubsaamen (Diptera: Cecidomyiidae) in relation to the biological control of Acacia cyclops (Mimosaceae) in South Africa. Aust J Entomol 44:446–456

    Google Scholar 

  • Aigbedion-Atalor PO, Idemudia I, Witt ABR, Day MD (2019) First record of the impact of the parasitism of Cecidochares connexa (Diptera: Tephritidae) by a solitary larval ectoparasitoid in West Africa: Cause for concern? J Plant Dis Protect 126:93–95

    Google Scholar 

  • Aluja M, Norrbom A (eds) (2001) Fruit flies (Tephritidae) phylogeny and evolution of behaviour. CRC Press, Boca Raton, pp 1–987

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderberg AA, Baldwin BG, Bayer RG, Breitwieser J, Jeffrey C, Dillon MO, Eldenäs P, Funk V, Garcia-Jacas N, Hind DJN, Karis PO, Lack HW, Nesom G, Nordenstam B, Oberprieler CH, Panero JL, Watson LE (2007) The families and genera of vascular plants. Compositae. In: Kadereit JW, Jeffrey C (eds) Flowering plants, eudicots and asterales. Springer, Berlin, pp 61–588

    Google Scholar 

  • Balciunas J, Mehelis C (2010) Life history of Parafreutreta regalis (Diptera: Tephritidae): a candidate agent for biological control of Delairea odorata. Environ Entomol 39:114–120

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Biller A, Boppré M, Witte L, Hartmann T (1994) Pyrrolizidine alkaloids in Chromolaena odorata. Chemical and chemoecological aspects. Phytochemistry 35:615–619

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Briese DT (2005) Translating host-specificity test results into the real world: the need to harmonize the yin and yang of current testing procedures. Biol Control 35:208–214

    Google Scholar 

  • Buccellato L, Byrne MJ, Witkowski ETF (2012) Interactions between a stem gall fly and a leaf-spot pathogen in the biological control of Ageratina adenophora. Biol Control 61:222–229

    Google Scholar 

  • Crespi BJ, Carmean DA, Chapman TW (1997) Ecology and evolution of galling thrips and their allies. Annu Rev Entomol 45:51–71

    Google Scholar 

  • Cruz ZT, Muniappan R, Reddy GVP (2006) Establishment of Cecidochares connexa (Diptera: Tephritidae) in Guam and its effect on the growth of Chromolaena odorata (Asteraceae). Ann Entomol Soc Am 99:845–850

    Google Scholar 

  • Day MD, Bofeng I, Nabo I (2013) Successful biological control of Chromolaena odorata (Asteraceae) by the gall fly, Cecidochares connexa (Diptera: Tephritidae) in Papua New Guinea. In: Wu Y, Johnson T, Sing S, Raghu S, Wheeler G, Pratt P, Warner K, Center T, Goolsby J, Reurdon R (eds) Proceedings of the XIII international symposium for the biological control of weeds, USDA FHTET-2012-07, pp 400–408

  • Dennill GB, Donelly D (1991) Biological control of Acacia longifolia and related weed species (Fabaceae) in South Africa. Agric Ecosyst Environ 37:115–135

    Google Scholar 

  • Department of Environmental Affairs (2014a) Government Notice. R. 598. National Environmental Management: Biodiversity Act (10/2004): Alien and Invasive Species Regulations, 2014. Government Gazette vol. 590, No. 37885, Pretoria, 1 August 2014. (Regulation Gazette No. 10244)

  • Department of Environmental Affairs (2014b) Government Notice. 599. National Environmental Management: Biodiversity Act (10/2004): Alien and Invasive Species List, 2014. Government Gazette vol. 590, No. 37886, Pretoria, 1 August 2014

  • Diaz R, Manrique V, Munyaneza JE, Sengoda VG, Adkins S, Hendricks K, Roberts PD, Overholt WA (2015) Host specificity and examination for plant pathogens reveals that the gall-inducing psyllid Calophya latiforceps is safe to release for biological control of Brazilian peppertree. Entomol Exp Appl 154:1–14

    Google Scholar 

  • Dodson G, George SB (1986) Examination of two morphs of gall-forming Aciurina (Diptera: Tephritidae): ecological and genetic evidence for species. Biol J Linn Soc 29:63–79

    Google Scholar 

  • Dube N, Zachariades C, Munyai TC, Uyi OO (2017) Laboratory studies on the biology and host range of Dichrorampha odorata (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae), a biological control agent for Chromolaena odorata (Asteraceae). Biocontrol Sci Technol 27:222–236

    Google Scholar 

  • Elsharkawy E, Alshathly M, Mohamed H (2014) Anti-inflammatory and chemical composition of two plants family Asteraceae growing in Saudi Arabia. J Chem Chem En 8:157–162

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Fay PA, Hartnett DC, Knapp AK (1996) Plant tolerance of gall-insect and gall-insect performance. Ecology 77:521–532

    Google Scholar 

  • Fernandes GW, Carneiro MAA, Lara ACF, Allain LR, Andrade GI, Juliao GR, Reis TR, Silva IM (1996) Galling insects on neotropical species of Baccharis (Asteraceae). Trop Zool 9:315–332

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedberg A (1984) Gall Tephritidae (Diptera). In: Ananthakrishnan TN (ed) Biology of gall insects. Arnold, London, pp 129–167

    Google Scholar 

  • Funk VA, Susanna A, Stuessy TF, Bayer RJ (eds) (2009) Systematics evolution and biogeography of compositae. International Association for Plant Taxonomy, Vienna

    Google Scholar 

  • Gassmann A, Clerck-Floate De, Sing S, Tosevski I, Miltrovic M, Krstic O (2014) Biology and host specificity of Rhinusa pilosa, a recommended biological control agent of Linaria vulgaris. Biocontrol 59:473–483

    Google Scholar 

  • Goolsby JA, Makinson J, Purcell M (2000) Seasonal phenology of the gall-making fly Fergusonina sp. (Diptera: Fergusoninidae) and its implications for biological control of Melaleuca quinquenervia. Aust J Entomol 39:336–343

    Google Scholar 

  • Gripenberg S, Morrien E, Cudmore A, Salminen J, Roslin T (2007) Resource selection by female moths in a heterogeneous environment: what is a poor girl to do? J Anim Ecol 76:854–885

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Harris P, Shorthouse D (1996) Effectiveness of gall inducers in weed biological control. Can Entomol 128:1021–1055

    Google Scholar 

  • Hartmann T (2009) Pyrrolizidine alkaloids: the successful adoption of a plant chemical defense. In: Conner WE (ed) Tiger moths and woolly bears. Behavior, ecology and evolution of the Arctiidae. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 55–81

    Google Scholar 

  • Hartmann T, Dierich B (1998) Chemical diversity and variation of pyrrolizidine alkaloids of the senecionine type: biological need or coincidence? Planta 206:443–451

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Headrick DH, Goeden RD (1998) The biology of nonfrugivorous Tephritid fruit flies. Annu Rev Entomol 43:217–241

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Jaenike J (1990) Host specialization in phytophagous insects. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 21:243–273

    Google Scholar 

  • Korytkowski CA (1971) A new cecidogenus species of the genus Polymorphomyia Snow (Diptera: Tephritidae). Proc Entomol Soc Wash 73:446–448

    Google Scholar 

  • Li XW, Jiang HX, Zhang XC, Shelton AM, Fheng JN (2014) Post-mating interactions and their effects on fitness of female and male Echinothrips americanus (Thysanoptera: Thripidae), a new pest in China. PLoS ONE 9:e87725

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Machado CA, Jousselin E, Kjellberg F, Compton SG, Herre EA (2001) Phylogenetic relationships, historical biogeography and evolution of fig-pollinating wasps. Proc R Soc 268:685–694

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • McConnachie AJ (2015) Host range tests cast doubt on the suitability of Epiblema strenuana as a biological control agent for Parthenium hysterophorus in Africa. Biocontrol 60:1–9

    Google Scholar 

  • McConnachie AJ, Retief E, Henderson L, McKay F (2011) The initiation of a biological control programme against pompom weed, Campuloclinium macrocephalum (Less.) DC. (Asteraceae), in South Africa. Afr Entomol 19:258–268

    Google Scholar 

  • McFadyen REC, De Chenon RD, Sipayung A (2003) Biology and host specificity of the chromolaena stem gall fly, Cecidochares connexa (Macquart) (Diptera: Tephridae). Aust J Entomol 42:294–297

    Google Scholar 

  • Morris MJ (1991) The use of plant pathogens for biological weed control in South Africa. Agric Ecosyst Environ 37:239–255

    Google Scholar 

  • Mukwevho L, Olckers T, Simelane DO (2017) Establishment, dispersal and impact of the flower-galling Aceria lantanae (Acari: Trombidiformes: Eriophyidae) on Lantana camara. Biol Control 107:33–40

    Google Scholar 

  • Muniappan R, McFadyen RE (2005) Gall-inducing arthropods used in the biological control of weeds. In: Raman A, Schaefer CW, Withes TM (eds) Biology, ecology and evolution of gall-inducing arthropods, vol 2. Science Publishers, Enfield, pp 709–730

    Google Scholar 

  • Nqayi SB (2019) Climatic suitability of Dichrorampha odorata Brown and Zachariades (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae), a shoot-boring moth for the biological control of Chromolaena odorata (L.) R.M. King and H. Robinson (Asteraceae) in South Africa. Unpublished MSc. dissertation Rhodes University, Grahamstown, South Africa

  • Omokhua GO, McGaw LJ, Chukwujekwu JC, Finnie JF, van Staden J (2017) A comparison of the antimicrobial activity and in vitro toxicity of a medicinally useful biotype of invasive Chromolaena odorata (Asteraceae) with a biotype not used in traditional medicine. S Afr J Bot 108:200–208

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Paterson ID, Akpabey F (2014) The spread of Cecidochares connexa (Tephritidae) in West Africa. Chromolaena odorata Newsletter 19:1–3

    Google Scholar 

  • Paterson ID, Zachariades C (2013) ISSRs indicate that Chromolaena odorata invading southern Africa originates in Jamaica or Cuba. Biol Control 66:132–139

    Google Scholar 

  • Peschken DP (1979) Host specificity testing and suitability of Tephritis dilacerata (Dip.: Tephritidae): a candidate for the biological control of perennial sow-thistle (Sonchus arvensis) (Compositae) in Canada. Entomophaga 24:455–461

    Google Scholar 

  • Peschken DP, Harris P (1975) Host specificity and biology of Urophora cardui (Diptera: Tephritidae), a biocontrol agent for Canada thistle (Cirsium arvense). Can Entomol 107:1101–1110

    Google Scholar 

  • Price PW, Fernandes GW, Waring GL (1987) Adaptive nature of insect galls. Forum: Environ Entomol 16:15–24

    Google Scholar 

  • Retief E (2002) The tribe Eupatorieae (Asteraceae) in southern Africa. In: Zachariades C, Muniappan R, Strathie LW (eds) Proceedings of the V international workshop on biological control and management of Chromolaena odorata, ARC-PPRI, Pretoria, South Africa, pp 81–89

  • Rigsby CM, Muilenburg VL, Tarpeu T, Herms DA, Cipollini DF (2014) Oviposition preferences of Agrilus planipennis (Coleoptera: Buprestidae) for different ash species support the mother knows best hypothesis. Ann Entomol Soc Am 107:773–781

    Google Scholar 

  • Sagliocco JL, Sheppard A, Hoskig J, Hodge P, Paynter Q, Gourlay H, Ireson J (2011) Host specificity testing, release and successful establishment of the broom gall mite (Aceria genistae) in Australia and New Zealand for the biological control of broom (Cytisus scoparius). In: Proceedings of the XIII international symposium on the biological control of weeds, Hawaai, USA, pp 409–416

  • Shao X, Li Q, Lin L, He T (2018) On the origin and genetic variability of the two invasive biotypes of Chromolaena odorata. Biol Invasions 20:2033–2046

    Google Scholar 

  • Shorthouse JD, Wool D, Raman A (2005) Gall inducing insects—nature’s most sophisticated herbivores. Basic Appl Ecol 6:407–411

    Google Scholar 

  • Stone NG, Schonrogge K (2003) The adaptive significance of insect gall morphology. Trends Ecol Evol 18:512–522

    Google Scholar 

  • Subbotin SA, Krall EL, Riley IT, Chizhov VN, Staelens A, De Loose M, Moens M (2004) Evolution of gall-forming plant parasitic nematodes (Tylenchida: Anguinidae) and their relationships with hosts as inferred from internal transcribed spacer sequences of nuclear ribosomal DNA. Mol Phylogen Evol 30:226–235

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • te Beest M, Elschot K, Olf H, Etienne RS (2013) Invasion success in a marginal habitat: An experimental test of competitive ability and drought tolerance in Chromolaena odorata. PLoS ONE 8:e68274

    Google Scholar 

  • van Klinken RD (2000) Host specificity testing: why do we do it and how we can do it better. In: Spencer NR (ed) Proceedings of the X international symposium on biological control of weeds, Montana State University, Bozeman, Montana, USA, pp 54–68

  • Waldbauer GP (1968) The consumption and utilization of food by insects. Adv Insect Physiol 5:229–288

    Google Scholar 

  • Wapshere AJ (1974) A strategy for evaluating the safety of organisms for biological weed control. Ann Appl Biol 70:201–211

    Google Scholar 

  • Winston RL, Schwarzländer M, Hinz HL, Day MD, Cock MJW, Julien MH (2014) Biological control of weeds: a world catalogue of agents and their target weeds, 5th edn. USDA Forest Service Publication FHTET-2014-04, Morgantown

    Google Scholar 

  • Woodburn TL (1993) Host specificity testing, release and establishment of Urophora solstitialis (L.) (Diptera: Tephritidae), a potential biological control agent for Carduus nutans L., in Australia. Biocontrol Sci Technol 3:419–426

    Google Scholar 

  • Zachariades C, Strathie-Korrûbel LW, Kluge RL (1999) The South African programme on the biological control of Chromolaena odorata (L) King and Robinson (Asteraceae) using insects. Afr Entomol Memoir 1:89–102

    Google Scholar 

  • Zachariades C, Strathie L, Delgado O, Retief E (2007) Pre-release research on biocontrol agents for chromolaena in South Africa. In: Lai PY, Reddy GVP, Muniappan R (eds) Proceedings of the VII international workshop on biological control and management of Chromolaena odorata and Mikania micrantha, National Pingtung University of Science and Technology, Pingtung, Taiwan, Republic of China, pp 68–80

  • Zachariades C, Strathie LW, Retief E, Dube N (2011) Progress towards the biological control of Chromolaena odorata (L.) R.M. King & H. Rob (Asteraceae) in South Africa. Afr Entomol 19:282–302

    Google Scholar 

  • Zachariades C, Uyi O, Dube N, Strathie LW, Muir D, Conlong DE, Assefa Y (2016) Biological control of Chromolaena odorata: Pareuchaetes insulata spreads its wings. Proc S Afr Sug Technol Ass 81:291–306

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The Department of Environmental Affairs: Natural Resource Management Programmes of South Africa is thanked for funding of the current research, together with the KwaZulu-Natal Department of Agriculture and Rural Development and the Agricultural Research Council. The National Environment and Planning Agency of Jamaica is thanked for collection and export permits for P. basilica, and the University of the West Indies, Mona, in expediting fieldwork. The Department of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries of South Africa is thanked for issuing an import permit for P. basilica. Sthembiso Dlomo is thanked for culture maintenance; ARC-PHP interns Nompumelelo Gumede, Pearl Mhlongo and Nduduzo Ndlovu for assisting with trials whilst the first author was away; ARC-PHP Cedara staff as a whole for watering during weekends and holidays.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nontembeko Dube.

Additional information

Communicated by Livy Williams.

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Dube, N., Zachariades, C., Uyi, O. et al. Life history traits and host suitability of a gall-forming fly, Polymorphomyia basilica (Diptera: Tephritidae), for the biological control of Chromolaena odorata (Asteraceae) in South Africa. Arthropod-Plant Interactions 14, 237–250 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11829-019-09731-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11829-019-09731-x

Keywords

Navigation