Abstract
In this study, simultaneous production of ammonia and methyl ethyl ketone (MEK) in a multi tubular thermally coupled reactor is presented. Based on this new configuration, the released heat from the ammonia synthesis reaction as an extremely exothermic reaction in the inner tube is employed to supply the required heat for the endothermic 2-butanol dehydrogenation reaction in the outer tube. MEK and hydrogen are produced by the dehydrogenation reaction of 2-butanol and the produced hydrogen is used to supply 30.72% of the required hydrogen for the ammonia synthesis. Furthermore, in spite of the conventional ammonia synthesis and 2-butanol dehydrogenation plants, interstage coolers and furnace are not required for the proposed configuration. Therefore, operational costs, energy consumption and furnace emissions like CO, CO2 and NOx are significantly decreased. It should be also stressed that the multi-objective optimization is employed to enhance the performance of the reactor with the aid of maximizing the summation of the production rate and yield for each side of the reactor. Besides, the effect of the main process parameters variation on the reactor performance has been studied.
Similar content being viewed by others
Abbreviations
- a i :
-
Activity of component i
- \( {A}_c^{Exo} \) :
-
Cross-section area of inner tube, m2
- \( {A}_c^{Endo} \) :
-
Cross-section area of outer tube, m2
- A i :
-
Inside area of inner tube, m2
- A o :
-
Outside area of inner tube, m2
- \( {C}_{P_{N_2}} \),\( {C}_{P_{H_2}} \),\( {C}_{P_{NH_3}} \) :
-
Specific heat capacity of nitrogen, hydrogen and ammonia, kJ kmol−1 K−1
- \( {C}_{P_j}^0 \) :
-
Heat capacity of component j in endothermic side, J kmol−1 K−1
- C P :
-
Specific heat of the gas at constant pressure, J mol−1
- \( {C}_{P_{mix}}^{Endo} \) :
-
Specific heat of gas mixture in endothermic side, kJ kmol−1 K−1
- \( {C}_{P_{mix}}^{Exo} \) :
-
Specific heat of gas mixture in exothermic side, kJ kmol−1 K−1
- C :
-
Rate constant
- d p :
-
Particle diameter, m
- D o :
-
Tube outside diameter, m
- D i :
-
Tube inside diameter, m
- f i :
-
Fugacity of component i, atm
- F i :
-
Molar flow rate of component i in exothermic side, kmol hr.−1
- F j :
-
Molar flow rate of component j in endothermic side, kmol hr.−1
- Fi i :
-
Fugacity coefficient of component i
- h :
-
Heat transfer coefficient between fluid phase and reactor wall, W m−2 K−1
- ΔH Exo :
-
Heat of reaction in exothermic side, kJ kmol−1
- ΔH Endo :
-
Heat of reaction in endothermic side, kJ kmol−1
- K a :
-
Equilibrium constant of reaction
- K A :
-
Adsorption equilibrium constant for 2-butanol
- K :
-
Chemical equilibrium constant
- K AK :
-
Rate constant
- K w :
-
Thermal conductivity of reactor wall, W m−1 K−1
- K f :
-
Fluid thermal conductivity, W m−1 K−1
- L :
-
Reactor length, m
- m :
-
Number of components in endothermic side
- m Exo :
-
Mass flow rate of the feed in exothermic side, kg hr.−1
- m Endo :
-
Mass flow rate of the feed in endothermic side, kg hr.−1
- M Exo :
-
Mean molecular weight in the flow in exothermic side, kg kmol−1
- M Endo :
-
Mean molecular weight in the flow in endothermic side, kg kmol−1
- n :
-
Number of components in exothermic side
- P :
-
Total pressure, atm
- \( {P}_{A_i} \) :
-
Partial pressure of 2-butanol at interface, atm
- \( {P}_{K_i} \) :
-
Partial pressure of MEK at interface, atm
- \( {P}_{H_i} \) :
-
Partial pressure of hydrogen at interface, atm
- R A :
-
2-butanol dehydrogenation reaction rate, lbmol ft.−2 h−1
- \( {R}_{NH_3} \) :
-
Ammonia synthesis reaction rate, kmol m−3 h−1
- R g :
-
Gas constant, J mol−1 K−1
- r i :
-
Inside tube radius, m
- T Exo :
-
Temperature of exothermic reaction side, K
- T Endo :
-
Temperature of endothermic reaction side, K
- u Exo :
-
Axial velocity in exothermic side, m s−1
- u Endo :
-
Axial velocity in endothermic side, m s−1
- u g :
-
Velocity of gas phase, m s−1
- U :
-
Overall heat transfer coefficient, W m−2 K−1
- X :
-
Conversion of nitrogen
- y i :
-
Mole fraction of component i
- Z :
-
Axial reactor coordinate, m
- Exo, Endo :
-
Exothermic and endothermic reaction sides
- i :
-
Numerator for component in exothermic side
- j :
-
Numerator for component in endothermic side
- μ :
-
Fluid viscosity, pa sec
- ρ:
-
Density, kg m−3
- φ s :
-
Sphericity
- η :
-
Effectiveness factor
- ν i :
-
Stoichiometric coefficient of component i in exothermic side
- ν j :
-
Stoichiometric coefficient of component j in endothermic side
References
Ammonia AM (2006) Ullmann's encyclopedia of industrial chemistry. Wiley-VCH, Weinheim
Carvalho EP, Borges C, Andrade D, Yuan JY, Ravagnani MA (2014) Modeling and optimization of an ammonia reactor using a penalty-like method. Appl Math Comput 237:330–339
Peng P, Cheng Y, Hatzenbeller R, Addy M, Zhou N, Schiappacasse C et al (2017) Ru-based multifunctional mesoporous catalyst for low-pressure and non-thermal plasma synthesis of ammonia. Int J Hydrog Energy 42(30):19056–19066
Shimoda N, Kimura Y, Kobayashi Y, Kubota J, Satokawa S (2017) Ammonia synthesis over yttrium-doped barium zirconate and cerate-based perovskite-type oxide supported ruthenium catalysts. Int J Hydrog Energy 42(50):29745–29755
Nikačević N, Jovanović M, Petkovska M (2011) Enhanced ammonia synthesis in multifunctional reactor with in situ adsorption. Chem Eng Res Des 89(4):398–404
Humphreys J, Lan R, Du D, Xu W, Tao S (2018) Promotion effect of proton-conducting oxide BaZr0.1Ce0.7Y0.2O3−δ on the catalytic activity of Ni towards ammonia synthesis from hydrogen and nitrogen. Int J Hydrog Energy 43(37):17726–17736
Aziz M, Putranto A, Biddinika MK, Wijayanta AT (2017) Energy-saving combination of N2 production, NH3 synthesis, and power generation. Int J Hydrog Energy 42(44):27174–27183
Azarhoosh MJ, Farivar F, Ale EH (2014) Simulation and optimization of a horizontal ammonia synthesis reactor using genetic algorithm. RSC Adv 4(26):13419–13429
Kolios G, Frauhammer J, Eigenberger G (2000) Autothermal fixed-bed reactor concepts. Chem Eng Sci 55(24):5945–5967
Babu BV, Angira R (2005) Optimal design of an auto-thermal ammonia synthesis reactor. Comput Chem Eng 29(5):1041–1045
Neier W, Strehlke G (2002) 2-Butanone. Ullmann's encyclopedia of industrial chemistry. 6 ed: Wiley
Bai G, Wang Y, Li F, Zhao Z, Chen G, Li N et al (2013) Influence of acid–base properties of the support on copper-based catalysts for catalytic dehydrogenation of 2-butanol. Catal Lett 143(1):101–107
Fang D, Ren W, Liu Z, Xu X, Xu L, Lü H et al (2009) Synthesis and applications of mesoporous cu-Zn-Al2O3 catalyst for dehydrogenation of 2-butanol. J Nat Gas Chem 18(2):179–182
Yang J, Zeng T, Cai D, Li L, Tang W, Hong R et al (2016) Supported ionic liquids as green catalyst for 2-butanol synthesis from transesterification of sec-butyl acetate. Asia Pac J Chem Eng 11(6):901–909
Liu Z, Huo W, Ma H, Qiao K (2006) Development and commercial application of methyl-ethyl-ketone production technology. Chin J Chem Eng 14(5):676–684
Keuler JN, Lorenzen L (2002) The dehydrogenation of 2-butanol in a Pd–ag membrane reactor. J Membr Sci 202(1–2):17–26
Ravi S, Raghunathan T (1988) Dehydrogenation of butan-2-ol on zinc oxide catalyst: a continuous stirred tank reactor study. Ind Eng Chem Res 27(11):2050–2055
Keuler J, Lorenzen L, Miachon S (2001) The dehydrogenation of 2-butanol over copper-based catalysts: optimising catalyst composition and determining kinetic parameters. Appl Catal A Gen 218(1–2):171–180
Wang Z, Ma H, Zhu W, Wang G (2002) Characterization of cu-ZnO-Cr2O3/SiO2 catalysts and application to dehydrogenation of 2-butanol to 2-butanone. React Kinet Catal Lett 76(2):271–279
Geravand E, Shariatinia Z, Yaripour F, Sahebdelfar S (2015) Copper-based nanocatalysts for 2-butanol dehydrogenation: screening and optimization of preparation parameters by response surface methodology. Korean J Chem Eng 32(12):2418–2428
Chen J, Yan L, Song W, Xu D (2017) Methane steam reforming thermally coupled with catalytic combustion in catalytic microreactors for hydrogen production. Int J Hydrog Energy 42(1):664–680
Nimkar SC, Mewada RK, Rosen MA (2017) Exergy and exergoeconomic analyses of thermally coupled reactors for methanol synthesis. Int J Hydrog Energy 42(47):28113–28127
Karimi M, Rahimpour MR, Rafiei R, Shariati A, Iranshahi D (2016) Improving thermal efficiency and increasing production rate in the double moving beds thermally coupled reactors by using differential evolution (DE) technique. Appl Therm Eng 94:543–558
Iranshahi D, Saeedi R, Azizi K, Nategh M (2017) A novel integrated thermally coupled moving bed reactors for naphtha reforming process with hydrodealkylation of toluene. Appl Therm Eng 112:1040–1056
Izurieta EM, Borio DO, Pedernera MN, López E (2017) Parallel plates reactor simulation: ethanol steam reforming thermally coupled with ethanol combustion. Int J Hydrog Energy 42(30):18794–18804
Chen J, Yan L, Song W, Xu D (2018) Comparisons between methane and methanol steam reforming in thermally integrated microchannel reactors for hydrogen production: a computational fluid dynamics study. Int J Hydrog Energy 43(31):14710–14728
Wiranarongkorn K, Authayanun S, Assabumrungrat S, Arpornwichanop A (2016) Analysis of thermally coupling steam and tri-reforming processes for the production of hydrogen from bio-oil. Int J Hydrog Energy 41(41):18370–18379
Patel KS, Sunol AK (2007) Modeling and simulation of methane steam reforming in a thermally coupled membrane reactor. Int J Hydrog Energy 32(13):2344–2358
Ramaswamy R, Ramachandran P, Duduković M (2008) Coupling exothermic and endothermic reactions in adiabatic reactors. Chem Eng Sci 63(6):1654–1667
Saeedi R, Iranshahi D (2017) Multi-objective optimization of thermally coupled reactor of CCR naphtha reforming in presence of SO2 oxidation to boost the gasoline octane number and hydrogen. Fuel 206:580–592
Elnashaie SS, Abashar ME, Al-Ubaid AS (1988) Simulation and optimization of an industrial ammonia reactor. Ind Eng Chem Res 27(11):2015–2022
Ludwig EE (2011) Applied process design for chemical and petrochemical plants. 4 ed: Elsevier Science
Perona JJ, Thodos G (1957) Reaction kinetic studies: catalytic dehydrogenation of sec-butyl alcohol to methyl ethyl ketone. AICHE J 3(2):230–235
Dyson D, Simon J (1968) Kinetic expression with diffusion correction for ammonia synthesis on industrial catalyst. Ind Eng Chem Fundam 7(4):605–610
Rase HF (1977) Chemical reactor design for process plants: case studies and design data. Wiley, New York
Olsson H (2013) Advanced process integration aspects of tubular reactors: Department of Energy and Environment. Chalmers University of Technology
Fogler HS (2006) Elements of chemical reaction engineering. 4 ed: Prentice Hall PTR
Green DW, Perry RH (2007) Perry's chemical Engineers' handbook. Eighth Edition, McGraw-Hill Education
Ergun S, Orning AA (1949) Fluid flow through randomly packed columns and fluidized beds. Ind Eng Chem 41(6):1179–1184
Holman JP (2009) Heat transfer. 10 ed: McGraw-Hill Education
Wen D, Ding Y (2006) Heat transfer of gas flow through a packed bed. Chem Eng Sci 61(11):3532–3542
Shah M (1967) Control simulation in ammonia production. Ind Eng Chem 59(1):72–83
Gaines LD (1977) Optimal temperatures for ammonia synthesis converters. Ind Eng Chem Process Des Dev 16(3):381–389
Amirabadi S, Kabiri S, Vakili R, Iranshahi D, Rahimpour MR (2013) Differential evolution strategy for optimization of hydrogen production via coupling of methylcyclohexane dehydrogenation reaction and methanol synthesis process in a thermally coupled double membrane reactor. Ind Eng Chem Res 52(4):1508–1522
Konak A, Coit DW, Smith AE (2006) Multi-objective optimization using genetic algorithms: a tutorial. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 91(9):992–1007
Deckwer W-D, Field RW (1992) Bubble column reactors, vol 200. Wiley, New York
Cybulski A, Moulijn JA (2005) Structured catalysts and reactors2nd edn. CRC press, Boca Raton
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Ghani, R., Iranshahi, D. A new reactor concept for the combined production of ammonia and methyl ethyl ketone. J Flow Chem 9, 43–57 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s41981-018-00029-2
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s41981-018-00029-2