Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Wide area monitoring and protection of microgrid with DGs using modular artificial neural networks

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Neural Computing and Applications Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The prominence of incorporating the renewable energy resources in a power system via microgrids has increased in the recent years, which impose a caution on conventional protection schemes. Protection schemes proposed earlier use local measurements, but fault classification for selective phase tripping using wide area measurements for microgrid has not been reported so far. This paper presents a wide area monitoring and protection of microgrid with distributed generations (DGs) using modular artificial neural networks (MANNs) for the fault detection and classification without affecting the relays in non-faulty or healthy sections of the microgrid. The distinct characteristics of the microgrid sort the proposed methodology into two stages. In stage 1, ANN 1 is developed to identify the operating mode of microgrid, whether it is operating in grid-connected mode (GCM) or islanded mode (IM). In stage 2, there are two MANNs corresponding to GCM and IM. Each MANNs consists of three separate ANNs for fault detection, classification, and section identification. A standard IEC 61850-7-420 microgrid with DGs (wind and photovoltaic) penetration is modeled in MATLAB/Simulink. The three-phase voltages and currents are measured with time synchronization considering the microphasor measurement units located at each bus. The extensive study includes different simulation scenarios such as shunt faults, high impedance fault, and dynamic situations like connection/disconnection of DGs/distribution lines. The results confirm the efficacy of the proposed methodology.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

IEC:

International electrotechnical commission

DG:

Distributed generation

MANN:

Modular artificial neural network

GCM:

Grid-connected mode

IM:

Islanded mode

μPMU:

Microphasor measurement unit

HIF:

High impedance fault

PCC:

Point of common coupling

T i :

Fault inception instant

T d :

Fault detection instant

T r :

Response time

PV:

Photovoltaic

References

  1. Mahat P, Chen Z, Bak-Jensen B, Bak CL (2011) A simple adaptive overcurrent protection of distribution systems with distributed generation. IEEE Trans Smart Grid 2(3):428–437. https://doi.org/10.1109/TSG.2011.2149550

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Tumilty RM, Brucoli M, Burt GM, Green TC (2006) Approaches to network protection for inverter dominated electrical distribution systems. In: Proceedings third IET international conference power electronics, machines and drives, April 2006, pp 622–626. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1049/cp:20060183

  3. Al-Nasseri H, Redfern MA, Li F (2006) A voltage based protection for micro-grids containing power electronic converters. In: Power engineering society general meeting, 2006, IEEE. IEEE, pp 7. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1109/pes.2006.1709423

  4. Brahma SM, Girgis AA (2004) Development of adaptive protection scheme for distribution systems with high penetration of distributed generation. IEEE Trans Power Deliv 19(1):56–63. https://doi.org/10.1109/TPWRD.2003.820204

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Nikkhajoei H, Lasseter RH (2007) Microgrid protection. In: Power engineering society general meeting, 2007, IEEE. IEEE, pp 1–6. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1109/pes.2007.385805

  6. Sortomme E, Venkata SS, Mitra J (2010) Microgrid protection using communication-assisted digital relays. IEEE Trans Power Deliv 25(4):2789–2796. https://doi.org/10.1109/TPWRD.2009.2035810

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Zeineldin HH, El-Saadany EF, Salama MMA (2006) Distributed generation micro-grid operation: control and protection. In: Power systems conference: advanced metering, protection, control, communication, and distributed resources, 2006. PS’06. IEEE, pp 105–111. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1109/psamp.2006.285379

  8. Kar S, Samantaray SR (2014) Time-frequency transform-based differential scheme for microgrid protection. IET Gener Transm Distrib 8(2):310–320. https://doi.org/10.1049/iet-gtd.2013.0180

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Gururani A, Mohanty SR, Mohanta JC (2016) Microgrid protection using Hilbert–Huang transform based-differential scheme. IET Gener Transm Distrib 10(15):3707–3716. https://doi.org/10.1049/iet-gtd.2015.1563

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Mishra DP, Samantaray SR, Joos G (2016) A combined wavelet and data-mining based intelligent protection scheme for microgrid. IEEE Trans Smart Grid 7(5):2295–2304. https://doi.org/10.1109/TSG.2015.2487501

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Zamani MA, Sidhu TS, Yazdani A (2011) A protection strategy and microprocessor-based relay for low-voltage microgrids. IEEE Trans Power Deliv 26(3):1873–1883. https://doi.org/10.1109/TPWRD.2011.2120628

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Hooshyar A, El-Saadany EF, Sanaye-Pasand M (2016) Fault type classification in microgrids including photovoltaic DGs. IEEE Trans Smart Grid 7(5):2218–2229. https://doi.org/10.1109/TSG.2015.2451675

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Ustun TS, Ozansoy C, Zayegh A (2012) Modeling of a centralized microgrid protection system and distributed energy resources according to IEC 61850-7-420. IEEE Trans Power Syst 27(3):1560–1567. https://doi.org/10.1109/TPWRS.2012.2185072

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Tengdin J, Westfall R, Stephan K (1996) High impedance fault detection technology. Rep PSRC Work Group D 15:1996

    Google Scholar 

  15. Zanjani MGM, Karegar HK, Niaki HA et al (2013) High impedance fault detection of distribution network by phasor measurement units. Smart Grid Renew Energy 4(3):297–305. https://doi.org/10.4236/sgre.2013.43036

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Von Meier A, Culler D, McEachern A, Arghandeh R (2014) Micro-synchrophasors for distribution systems. In: Innovative smart grid technologies conference (ISGT), 2014 IEEE PES. IEEE, pp 1–5 Doi: https://doi.org/10.1109/isgt.2014.6816509

  17. Lee JD, Lee SJ, Bae JH, Kwon DY (2013) The PMU interface using IEC 61850. In: 2013 international conference on ICT convergence (ICTC). IEEE, pp 1125–1128 Doi: https://doi.org/10.1109/ictc.2013.6675573

  18. Brearley BJ, Prabu RR (2017) A review on issues and approaches for microgrid protection. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 67:988–997. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2016.09.047

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Hosseini SA, Abyaneh HA, Sadeghi SHH, Razavi F, Nasiri A (2016) An overview of microgrid protection methods and the factors involved. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 64:174–186. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2016.05.089

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Koley E, Verma K, Ghosh S (2017) A modular neuro-wavelet based non-unit protection scheme for zone identification and fault location in six-phase transmission line. Neural Computing and Applications. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-016-2566-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mohammad Pazoki.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Chaitanya, B.K., Yadav, A. & Pazoki, M. Wide area monitoring and protection of microgrid with DGs using modular artificial neural networks. Neural Comput & Applic 32, 2125–2139 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-018-3750-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-018-3750-4

Keywords

Navigation