Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Quality management in research: management process of the laboratories of Moroccan faculties of sciences and techniques

  • Practitioner's Report
  • Published:
Accreditation and Quality Assurance Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The implementation of a quality management system including management tools in the industrial sector has several advantages. In this perspective, can we use quality management tools to improve the performance of scientific research in Morocco and reduce the gap noticed in this field between the latter and the industrialized countries? To evaluate the level of application of good quality management practices related to scientific research in Morocco, a questionnaire was established and administered to the research laboratories managers of the faculties of sciences and techniques at the national level. Further to this study, it turns out that the good quality management practices related to the laboratory management and research management are applied by a percentage of the laboratories varies between 8 % and 75 %. Regarding the perspectives related to the quality management, 96 % of the laboratories managers declared important or very important the implementation of a quality management system in the laboratory. However, only 17 % have a certification (according to ISO 9001) and/or an accreditation (according to ISO/IEC 17025) project for the next 3 years, considering that the lack of financial means and staff involvement are the first two obstacles for the implementation of such projects. In short, the implementation of good quality management practices in research has several advantages and requires first of all training in the specific standards linked to this area. It also requires the sensitization of managers to the appropriate tools for managing research that can be used and whose purpose is the continuous improvement in the activities.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

References

  1. Kerak E, Outaki M, Mardhy A, Ennaji M (2014) The quality of scientific research in Morocco: critical analysis and proposal of actions of improvement. Eur J Sci Res 122:312–326

    Google Scholar 

  2. Hullihen K, Fitzsimmons V, Fisch MR (2009) Establishing an ISO/IEC 17025 compliant laboratory at a university. Int J Mod Eng 10:55–64

    Google Scholar 

  3. Wood LV, Mccamey DA (1993) Implementing total quality in R&D. Res Technol Manag. https://doi.org/10.1080/08956308.1993.11670914

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Petit JC (1999) The quality approach and fundamental research: Working towards a constructive alliance (Part I). Accred Qual Assur. https://doi.org/10.1007/s007690050368

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Groupe de Travail Français “Qualité en Recherche” (1997) Guide expérimental de la qualité en recherche. http://www.utc.fr/qualiterecherche/referentiels/doc_referentiels/Guide_97/Guide_Experimental_QR_97.htm. Accessed 11 Jan 2014

  6. FD X50-550 (2001) Research quality approach: general principles and recommendations. AFNOR, La Plaine Saint Denis

    Google Scholar 

  7. FD X50-551 (2003) Research-sector quality—recommendations for organizing and conducting a research activity in project mode, particularly with the framework of a network. AFNOR, La Plaine Saint Denis

    Google Scholar 

  8. GA X50-552 (2004) Quality management systems—implementation guide for ISO 9001 within research units—specificities of the research activity and implementation examples from ISO 9001. AFNOR, La Plaine Saint Denis

    Google Scholar 

  9. NF X 50-553 (2014) Management of research activities. AFNOR, La Plaine Saint Denis

    Google Scholar 

  10. ISO 9001 (2008) Quality management systems—requirements. ISO, Geneva

    Google Scholar 

  11. ISO/IEC 17025 (2005) General requirements for the competence of testing and calibration laboratories. ISO, Geneva

    Google Scholar 

  12. FD X50-176 (2017) Management tools—process management—implementation guide. AFNOR, La Plaine Saint Denis

    Google Scholar 

  13. Outaki M, Mardhy A, Kerak E (2014) Proposition of a tool for measure and evaluation of quality in scientific research. Int J Sci Res 3:1013–1016

    Google Scholar 

  14. Wei T, Ying C, Oksana B (2014) Internal consistency: do we really know what it is and how to assess it? J Psychol Behav Sci 2:205–220

    Google Scholar 

  15. George D, Mallery P (2003) SPSS for Windows step by step. Allyn & Bacon, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  16. ISO/IEC 17025 (2017) General requirements for the competence of testing and calibration laboratories. ISO, Geneva

    Google Scholar 

  17. ISO 9001 (2015) Quality management systems—requirements. ISO, Geneva

    Google Scholar 

  18. Putri NT, Retha F, Sha N, Yusof RM (2016) Design of quality system documentation in hydrotiller production unit as improvement of quality management system in small and medium enterprise. Int J Prod Qual Manag. https://doi.org/10.1504/ijpqm.2016.078019

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Vermaercke P (2000) Sense and nonsense of quality assurance in an R&D environment. Accred Qual Assur. https://doi.org/10.1007/s007690050002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Roberts GW (1991) Managing research quality. Res Technol Manag. https://doi.org/10.1080/08956308.1991.11670714

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Krapp M (2001) Quality assurance in research and development: an insoluble dilemma? Fresenius’ J Anal Chem. https://doi.org/10.1007/s002160100986

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. ISO 9004 (2018) Quality management—quality of an organization—guidance to achieve sustained success. ISO, Geneva

    Google Scholar 

  23. Barouch G (2010) Elaborer des objectifs et un tableau de bord de suivi: voici les modes d’emploi!. Livres à Vivre, Issy-les-Moulineaux

    Google Scholar 

  24. FD X 50-171 (2000) Système de management de la qualité. Indicateurs et tableaux de bord, AFNOR, La Plaine Saint Denis

    Google Scholar 

  25. Kalender ZT, Vayvay Ö (2016) The fifth pillar of the balanced scorecard: sustainability. Proc Soc Behav Sci. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2016.11.027

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Ferreira ADC (2017) How managers use the balanced scorecard to support strategy implementation and formulation processes. Tékhne. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tekhne.2017.04.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Chatelain-Ponroy S, Sponem S (2009) Culture du résultat et pilotage par les indicateurs dans le secteur public. Bernard Pras (coord.). Management: enjeux de demain, Vuibert 163–171. https://halshs.archives-ouvertes.fr/halshs-00460649/document. Accessed 15 May 2017

  28. Pierre S (2013) Méthode de sélection et de priorisation dans le cadre de la gestion de portefeuille de projets. https://www.usherbrooke.ca/cefti/fileadmin/sites/cefti/documents/Essais/Essai_Sandra_Pierre_Methode_de_selection_et_de_priorisation_cc_-1.pdf. Accessed 11 May 2017

  29. Michel C (1994) Peut-on manager la recherche et l’innovation? Politiques et management public 12:11–16. Administrer les savoirs: leur production, leur transmission, leur application, leur contrôle - Actes du Sixième Colloque International, Genève - 25/26 mars 1993. http://www.persee.fr/docAsPDF/pomap_0758-1726_1994_num_12_2_3157.pdf. Accessed 03 Apr 2017

  30. Zapata-García D, Llauradó M, Rauret G (2007) Experience of implementing ISO 17025 for the accreditation of a university testing laboratory. Accred Qual Assur. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00769-007-0274-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Rodima A, Vilbaste M, Saks O et al (2005) ISO 17025 quality system in a university environment. Accred Qual Assur. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00769-005-0011-x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Mathur-De Vré R (2000) The scope and limitations of a QA system in research. Accred Qual Assur. https://doi.org/10.1007/s007690050001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Grochau IH, Ferreira CA, Ferreira JZ et al (2010) Implementation of a quality management system in university test laboratories: a brief review and new proposals. Accred Qual Assur. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00769-010-0713-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Cammann K, Kleiböhmer W (1998) Need for quality management in research and development. Accred Qual Assur. https://doi.org/10.1007/s007690050273

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Fiehe S, Wagner G, Schlanstein P et al (2014) Implementation of quality management in early stages of research and development projects at a university. Biomed Tech (Berl). https://doi.org/10.1515/bmt-2013-0085

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. De Nadai Fernandes EA, Bacchi MA, Tagliaferro FS et al (2006) Quality system implementation in a Brazilian university laboratory. Accred Qual Assur. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00769-005-0061-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Miller R (1994) Quality in research: an empirical study. Technovation. https://doi.org/10.1016/0166-4972(94)90017-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Horine JE, Hailey WA (1995) Challenges to successful quality management implementation in higher education institutions. Innov High Educ. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf01228324

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Davidson JM, Pruden AL (1996) Quality deployment in R&D organizations. Res Technol Manag. https://doi.org/10.1080/08956308.1996.11671037

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. CNRS, Réseau qualité en recherche s.d. Enquête sur les démarches qualité. http://qualite-en-recherche.cnrs.fr/IMG/pdf/2016-02-20_Rapport_Enquete_QeR_2014_VF2.pdf. Accessed 31 July 2017

  41. Longin P, Denet H (2008) Construisez votre qualité: toutes les clés pour une démarche qualité gagnante. L’USINE NOUVELLE, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  42. Henri J, Sanders P, Lelievre H et al (2009) Implementation and assessment of the quality management system in research in a laboratory of the French Food Safety Agency: application to PhD student work. Accred Qual Assur. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00769-009-0505-z

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Laboratory of Virology, Microbiology and Quality/Ecotoxicology and Biodiversity, Faculty of Sciences and Techniques Mohammedia, University Hassan II Casablanca, PO Box 146, Yasmina, Mohammedia, Morocco

    Meriem Outaki & Ebrahim Kerak

  2. Laboratory of Engineering and Materials (LIMAT), Faculty of Sciences Ben M’Sik, University Hassan II Casablanca, BP 7955, 20660, Casablanca, Morocco

    Said Gmouh

  3. Laboratory of Analytical Chemistry and Physical Chemistry of Materials, Faculty of Sciences Ben M’Sik, University Hassan II Casablanca, BP 7955, 20660, Casablanca, Morocco

    Fathallaah Bazi

Authors
  1. Meriem Outaki
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Said Gmouh
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Fathallaah Bazi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Ebrahim Kerak
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Meriem Outaki.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

Authors have no conflict of interest to declare.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Outaki, M., Gmouh, S., Bazi, F. et al. Quality management in research: management process of the laboratories of Moroccan faculties of sciences and techniques. Accred Qual Assur 24, 395–404 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00769-019-01396-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00769-019-01396-6

Keywords

Search

Navigation