Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Human Rhinovirus Inhibition Through Capsid “Canyon” Perturbation: Structural Insights into The Role of a Novel Benzothiophene Derivative

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Cell Biochemistry and Biophysics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The challenge in targeting human rhinoviruses (HRV) over the years has been attributed to the wide variety in HRV serotypes. Nonetheless, the search for therapeutic agents against HRV continues unabated. These efforts have been augmented by the recent discovery of the novel benzothiophene derivative shown to inhibit HRV viral replication. Bound to subtype HRV-B14, the compound showed similar inhibitory activity as Pleconaril, a known capsid inhibitor. However, the molecular and structural basis of this inhibition remains unclear. In this in silico report, residue interaction network analysis revealed that the binding of the benzothiophene derivative into the “canyon” region of the active site of HRV-B14 distorts its initially extensively networked and compact residue profile. This was characterized by fewer inter-residue hydrogen bonds, reduced van der Waals interactions, and increased residue flexibility. Interestingly, however, the binding of this benzothiophene derivative decreased the flexibility of the north-south wall around the canyon region possibly impeding the “breathing motion” of HRV-B14, hence its inhibition. Atomistic insights also revealed the cruciality of Tyr152 toward inhibitor binding at HRV-B14. This was justified by the amino acid’s high intermolecular interaction with both inhibitors. Findings provide important structural insights in the inhibitory activity the novel benzothiophene derivative, and reaffirm its promising potential as an alternative capsid inhibitor toward common cold therapy upon further experimental validation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Jacobs, S. E., Lamson, D. M., & St. George, K., et al. (2013). Human rhinoviruses. Clinical Microbiology Reviews, 26, 135–162.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Casanova, V., Sousa, F. H., & Stevens, C., et al. (2018). Antiviral therapeutic approaches for human rhinovirus infections. Future Virology, 13, 505–518.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Lewis-Rogers, N., Bendall, M. L., & Crandall, K. A. (2009). Phylogenetic relationships and molecular adaptation dynamics of human rhinoviruses. Molecular Biology and Evolution, 26, 969–981.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Reisdorph, N., Thomas, J. J., & Katpally, U., et al. (2003). Human rhinovirus capsid dynamics is controlled by canyon flexibility. Virology, 314, 34–44.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Panjwani, A., Strauss, M., & Chou, J. J., et al. (2014). Capsid protein VP4 of human rhinovirus induces membrane permeability by the formation of a size-selective multimeric pore. PLoS Pathogens, 10, 1–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Wang, L., & Smith, D. L. (2005). Capsid structure and dynamics of a human rhinovirus probed by hydrogen exchange mass spectrometry. Protein Science, 14, 1661–1672.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Kim, J., Jung, Y. K., & Kim, C. et al. (2017). A novel series of highly potent small molecule inhibitors of rhinovirus replication. Journal of Medicinal Chemistry, 60, 5472–5492.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Roy, A., & Post, C. B. (2012). Long-distance correlations of rhinovirus capsid dynamics contribute to uncoating and antiviral activity. Proceedings of National Academy of Sciences of USA, 109, 5271–5276.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Rotbart, H. A. (2000). Antiviral therapy for enteroviruses and rhinoviruses. Antiviral Chemical & Chemotherapy, 11, 261–271.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Kusumaningrum, S., Budianto, E., & Kosela, S., et al. (2014). The molecular docking of 1,4-naphthoquinone derivatives as inhibitors of Polo-like kinase 1 using Molegro Virtual Docker. Journal of Applied Pharmaceutical Science, 4, 47–53.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Pettersen, E. F., Goddard, T. D., & Huang, C. C., et al. (2004). UCSF Chimera—a visualization system for exploratory research and analysis. Journal of Computational Chemistry, 25, 1605–1612.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. ChemAxon. Marvin Sketch. 2013. https://www.chemaxon.com/products/marvin/.

  13. Hanwell, M. D., Curtis, D. E., & Lonie, D. C., et al. (2012). Avogadro: an advanced semantic chemical editor, visualization, and analysis platform. Journal of Cheminformatics, 4, 17.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Trott, O., & Olson, A. J. (2010). AutoDock Vina. Journal of Computational Chemistry, 31, 445–461.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Adcock, S. A., & McCammon, J. A. (2006). Molecular dynamics: survey of methods for simulating the activity of proteins. Chemical Reviews, 106, 1589–1615.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Agoni, C., Ramharack, P., & Soliman, M. E. S. (2018). Synergistic interplay of the co-administration of rifampin and newly developed anti-TB drug: could it be a promising new line of TB therapy? Combinatorial Chemistry & High Throughput Screening, 21, 453–460.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Agoni, C., Ramharack, P., & Soliman, M. (2018). Co-inhibition as a strategic therapeutic approach to overcome rifampin resistance in tuberculosis therapy: atomistic insights. Future Medicinal Chemistry, 10, 1665–1675.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Agoni, C., Ramharack, P., & Soliman, M. E. S. (2018). Allosteric inhibition induces an open WPD-loop: a new avenue towards glioblastoma therapy. RSC Advances, 8, 40187–40197.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Nair, P. C., & Miners, J. O. (2014). Molecular dynamics simulations: from structure function relationships to drug discovery. In Silico Pharmacology, 2, 1–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Abdullahi, M., Olotu, F. A., & Soliman, M. E. (2018). Solving the riddle: unraveling the mechanisms of blocking the binding of leukotoxin by therapeutic antagonists in periodontal diseases. Journal of Cellular Biochemistry, 119(11), 9364–9379.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Akher, F. B., Farrokhzadeh, A., & Olotu, F. A., et al. (2019). The irony of chirality- unveiling the distinct mechanistic binding and activities of 1-(3-(4-Amino-5-(7-methoxy-5-methylbenzo[b]thiophen-2-yl)-7H-pyrrolo[2,3-d)pyrimidin-7-yl)pyrrolidin-1-yl)prop-2-en-1-one enantiomers as irreversible covalent FGFR4. Organic and Biomolecular Chemistry, 17, 1176–1190.

  22. Wang J., Wang W., & Kollman P. A., et al. Antechamber, an accessory software package for molecular mechanical calculations correspondence to. Journal of American Chemical Society, 222, U403.

  23. Piovesan, D., Minervini, G., & Tosatto, S. (2016). The RING 2.0 web server for high quality residue interaction networks. Nucleic Acids Research, 44, W367–W374.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Shannon, P., Markiel, A., & Owen, O., et al. (2003). Cytoscape: a software environment for integrated models of biomolecular interaction networks. Genome Research, 13, 2498–2504.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Doncheva, N. T., Klein, K., & Domingues, F. S., et al. (2011). Analyzing and visualizing residue networks of protein structures. Trends in Biochemical Sciences, 36, 179–182.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Assenov, Y., Ramírez, F., & Schelhorn, S. E. S. E., et al. (2008). Computing topological parameters of biological networks. Bioinformatics, 24, 282–284.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Ylilauri, M., & Pentikäinen, O. T. (2013). MMGBSA as a tool to understand the binding affinities of filamin-peptide interactions. Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling, 53, 2626–2633.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Phelps, D. K., Speelman, B., & Post, C. B. (2000). Theoretical studies of viral capsid proteins. Current Opinion in Structural Biology, 10, 170–173.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Phelps, D. K., & Post, C. B. (2009). Molecular dynamics investigation of the effect of an antiviral compound on human rhinovirus. Protein Science, 8, 2281–2289.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Amitai, G., Shemesh, A., & Sitbon, E., et al. (2004). Network analysis of protein structures identifies functional residuesJournal of Molecular Biology, 344, 1135–1146.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Vishveshwara, S., Ghosh, A., & Hansia, P. (2009). Intra and inter-molecular communications through protein structure network. Current Protein and Peptide Science, 10, 146–160.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. del Sol, A., Fujihashi, H., & Amoros, D., et al. (2006). Residues crucial for maintaining short paths in network communication mediate signaling in proteins. Molecular Systems Biology, 2, 2006.0019.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. Moonsamy, S., Bhakat, S., & Walker, R. C., et al. (2016). Single active site mutation causes serious resistance of HIV reverse transcriptase to lamivudine: insight from multiple molecular dynamics simulations. Cell Biochemistry and Biophysics, 74, 35–48.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Ndagi, U., Mhlongo, N. N., & Soliman, M. E. (2017). The impact of Thr91 mutation on c-Src resistance to UM-164: molecular dynamics study revealed a new opportunity for drug design. Molecular BioSystems, 13, 1157–1171.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Yan, W., Zhou, J., & Sun, M., et al. (2014). The construction of an amino acid network for understanding protein structure and function. Amino Acids., 46, 1419–1439.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Xue, W., Jin, X., & Ning, L., et al. (2012). Exploring the molecular mechanism of cross-resistance to HIV-1 integrase strand transfer inhibitors by molecular dynamics simulation and residue interaction network analysis. Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling, 53, 210–222.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Cournia, Z., Allen, B., & Sherman, W. (2017). Relative binding free energy calculations in drug discovery: recent advances and practical considerations. Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling, 5, 2911–2937.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Zhang, Y., Simpson, A. A., & Ledford, R. M., et al. (2004). Structural and virological studies of the stages of virus replication that are affected by antirhinovirus compounds. Journal of Virology, 78, 11061–11069.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors appreciate the College of Health Sciences, University of KwaZulu-Natal for financial and infrastructural support while we also thank the Center for High-Performance Computing (CHPC, www.chpc.ac.za) Cape-Town, South Africa for providing computational resources.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mahmoud E. S. Soliman.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Agoni, C., Ramharack, P., Munsamy, G. et al. Human Rhinovirus Inhibition Through Capsid “Canyon” Perturbation: Structural Insights into The Role of a Novel Benzothiophene Derivative. Cell Biochem Biophys 78, 3–13 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12013-019-00896-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12013-019-00896-z

Keywords

Navigation