Abstract
In spite of extensive experimental and numerical investigations on steel shear walls, many ambiguities regarding the behavior of these walls still exist. One of these unknown characteristics, which have been less researched, is the effect of cracks on system behavior. Experimental studies have reported fracture on the corner of Steel Plate Shear Walls (SPSW) during testing. Therefore, the present paper deals with seismic performance of cracked SPSW in linear and nonlinear zones. The extended finite element method based on cohesive crack approach is used in Finite Element (FE) modeling. FE results indicated that small initial crack does not have considerable effect on the behavior of SPSW. Since SPSW is ruptured due to crack with long length, it cannot be utilized as a lateral resisting system in high seismic zone although long initial crack does not have a considerable effect on R-factor. Moreover, the horizontal crack is more effective than vertical crack. In addition, a method for predicting the trend of the load–displacement diagram has been proposed. The obtained results show a high convergence of the proposed approach with the results of the finite element method.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Alinia MM, Dastfan M (2006) Behaviour of thin steel plate shear walls regarding frame members. J Constr Steel Res 62:730–738
American Institute of Steel Construction-AISC (2006) Design guide 20: steel plate shear walls. Chicago
Astaneh-Asl A (2000) Seismic behavior and design, of steel plate shear walls. Steel tips report: Structural Steel Educational Council (CA)
Behbahanifard M, Grondin G, Elwi EA (2003) Experimental and numerical investigation of steel plate shear wall. University of Alberta, Report No. 254
Berman JW, Bruneau M (2005) Experimental study of light-gauge steel plate shear walls. J Struct Eng 131:259–267
Bonora N (2006) A nonlinear CDM model for ductile failure. Eng Fract Mech 58:11–28
Broujerdian V, Ghamari A, Ghadami A (2016) An investigation into crack and its growth on the seismic behavior of steel shear walls. Thin-Walled Struct 101:205–212
Broujerdian V, Shayanfar MA, Ghamari A (2017) Corner crack effect on steel plate shear wall. Civ Eng Infrastruct J 5:311–317
Driver RG, Kulak GL, Kennedy DJL, Elwi AE (1998) Cyclic tests of four-story steel plate shear wall. J Struct Eng ASCE 124:112–120
Dubina D, Dinu F (2014) Experimental evaluation of dual frame structures with thin-walled steel panels. Thin-Walled Struct 78:57–69
Gholipour M, Alinia MM (2016) Behavior of multi-story code-designed steel plate shear wall structures regarding bay width. J Constr Steel Res 122:40–56
Guendel M, Hoffmeister B, Feldmann M (2011) Experimental and numerical investigations on steel shear walls for seismic retrofitting. In: Proceedings of the 8th international conference on structural dynamics, EURODYN
Guz AN, Dyshel M (2001) Fracture and buckling of thin panels with edge crack in tension. Theor Appl Fract Mech 36:57–60
Hatami F, Ghamari A, Rahai A (2012) Investigating the properties of steel shear walls reinforced with Carbon Fiber Polymers (CFRP). J Constr Steel Res 70:36–42
Hatami F, Ghamari A, Hatami A (2014) Effect of fiber angle on LYP steel shear walls behavior. J Cent South Univ 21:768–774. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11771-014-2000-x
Hosseinzadeh L, Emami F, Mofid M (2017) Experimental investigation on the behavior of corrugated steel shear wall subjected to the different angle of trapezoidal plate. Struct Des Tall Spec Build 26(17):35–45. https://doi.org/10.1002/tal.1390
Jalali SA, Banazadeh M (2016) Computer-based evaluation of design methods used for a steel plate shear wall system. Struct Des Tall Spec Build 25:904–925
Jiang L, Zheng H, Hu Y (2017) Experimental seismic performance of steel- and composite steel-panel wall strengthened steel frames. Arch Civ Mech Eng 17:520–524
Kharrazi M, Prion H, Ventura CE (2008) Implementation of M-PFI method in design of steel plate walls. J Constr Steel Res 64:465–479
Lanhui G, Rongb Q, Quc B, Liud J (2017) Testing of steel plate shear walls with composite columns and infill plates connected to beams only. Eng Struct 136:165–179
Lin C, Tsai K, Lin Y, Wang K, Qu B, Bruneau M (2007) Full scale steel plate shear wall: NCREE/MCEER phase I tests. In: Proceeding of the 9th Canadian conference on earthquake engineering, Ottawa, Canada
Lv Y, Li ZX, Lu G (2017) Shear capacity prediction of steel plate shear walls with precompression from columns. Struct Des Tall Spec Build 26:e1375
Riks E, Rankin C, Bargon F (1992) Buckling behaviour of a central crack in a plate under tension. Eng Fract Mech 43:529–548
Sabouri-Ghomi S, Kharrazi M, Azizi S, Sajadi R (2008) Buckling behavior improvement of steel plate shear wall systems. Struct Des Tall Spec Build 17:823–837
Shaw D, Huang Y (1990) Buckling behaviour of a central cracked thin plate under tension. Eng Fract Mech 35:1019–1027
Shekastehband B, Azaraxsh A, Showkati H (2017) Experimental and numerical study on seismic behavior of LYS and HYS steel plate shear walls connected to frame beams only. Arch Civ Mech Eng 17:154–168
Shukla A (2005) Practical fracture mechanics in design, 2nd edn. Marcel Dekker, New York
Sih G, Lee Y (1986) Tensile and compressive buckling of plates weakened by cracks. Theor Appl Fract Mech 6:129–138
Vetr MG, Shirali NM (2016) Ghamari, A, Seismic resistance of hybrid shear wall (HSW) systems. J Constr Steel Res 116:247–270
Wang P, Xue Z, Xiao S (2017) Seismic behavior of self-buckling-restrained steel plate shear wall made by two incline-slotted infill plates. J Constr Steel Res 133:47–64
Wei MW, Liew JYR, Yong D, Fu XY (2017) Experimental and numerical investigation of novel partially connected steel plate shear walls. J Constr Steel Res 132:1–15
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Shayanfar, M., Broujerdian, V. & Ghamari, A. Numerically and Parametrically Investigating the Cracked Steel Plate Shear Walls (SPSWs). Iran J Sci Technol Trans Civ Eng 44, 481–500 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40996-019-00250-6
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40996-019-00250-6