Dynamic Delta-like1 expression in presomitic mesoderm cells during somite segmentation
Introduction
Cell-cell interactions play an important role in coordinating gene expression during tissue morphogenesis. One such example is the somite segmentation process, in which a bilateral pair of somites is generated periodically by segmentation of the anterior regions of the presomitic mesoderm (PSM). This periodic event is controlled by the segmentation clock genes, such as the transcriptional repressors Hes1 and Hes7, whose expression oscillates synchronously between neighboring cells (Hubaud and Pourquié, 2014; Kageyama et al., 2012; Oates et al., 2012). This synchronous oscillatory gene expression slows in the anterior PSM, thereby leading to wave-like propagating patterns from the posterior to anterior PSM. This dynamic expression is critical for somite formation, as dampening and/or desynchronization of the oscillations leads to segmentation defects, causing the fusion of somite-derived tissues such as the vertebrae and ribs (Takashima et al., 2011; Niwa et al., 2011). When PSM cells are dissociated, oscillatory gene expression becomes unstable and desynchronized, suggesting that cell-cell interactions play an important role in synchronized oscillations (Maroto et al., 2005; Masamizu et al., 2006).
Notch signaling regulates such cell-cell interactions; the Notch ligand Delta-like1 (Dll1) activates Notch signaling in neighboring cells, in which Hes1 and Hes7 are induced (Artavanis-Tsakonas et al., 1999; Jiang et al., 2000; Horikawa et al., 2006; Riedel-Kruse et al., 2007; Mara et al., 2007; Özbudak and Lewis, 2008; Kageyama et al., 2012). Hes1 and Hes7 expression oscillates with a periodicity of ~2 h by negative feedback in mouse PSM cells (Hirata et al., 2002; Bessho et al., 2003), and these oscillations lead to the oscillatory expression of Dll1 (Shimojo et al., 2016). Optogenetic induction of Dll1 oscillations can entrain Hes1 oscillations in neighboring cells (Isomura et al., 2017), suggesting that Dll1 oscillations regulate synchronous oscillations in the PSM. Indeed, when dissociated PSM cells are re-aggregated, they exhibit synchronous oscillations in a Notch signaling-dependent manner (Tsiairis and Aulehla, 2016). Furthermore, when Dll1 oscillations are dampened, Hes7 oscillations are also dampened, resulting in severe somite fusion (Shimojo et al., 2016). All of these data suggest that Dll1 oscillation-dependent cell-cell interactions are essential for coordinated gene expression during somite segmentation.
Despite the above findings, the dynamics of Dll1 expression in the PSM are still obscure. Particularly, it has been difficult to analyze Dll1 protein dynamics, because Dll1 protein oscillations exhibit amplitudes that are too small to be detected by immunostaining (Okubo et al., 2012), but they have been reliably detected by time-lapse imaging (Shimojo et al., 2016). Furthermore, Dll1 protein, as a ligand, should function on the cell surface, but the oscillatory expression of Dll1 protein in the PSM has only been shown at the tissue level (Bone et al., 2014; Shimojo et al., 2016). Dll1 protein is present not only on the cell surface but also in cytoplasmic vesicles including the Golgi apparatus (Geffers et al., 2007); therefore, the total expression levels of Dll1 protein in the PSM do not reflect the functional Dll1 expression levels. We previously examined Dll1 expression dynamics by using Dll1 reporter mice, in which luciferase cDNA was inserted into the Dll1 gene so that Dll1-luciferase fusion protein was expressed from the endogenous locus. Although we confirmed Dll1 protein oscillations in the PSM (Shimojo et al., 2016), it was technically difficult to examine its expression at the cellular level, because luciferase-dependent luminescence imaging exhibits only a low spatial resolution.
Here, to overcome this problem, we used a new Dll1 reporter mouse line (Dll1-Venus-T2A-mCherry mice), in which Venus fluorescent protein cDNA was inserted into the Dll1 gene so that a Dll1-Venus fusion protein was expressed from the endogenous Dll1 locus (Tateya et al., 2019). We performed time-lapse imaging using these mice to examine Dll1 protein expression dynamics at the cellular level and the mechanism of how oscillatory gene expression slows in the anterior PSM.
Section snippets
Dll1 oscillations in the PSM
To examine Dll1 expression in the PSM, we used Dll1-Venus-T2A-mCherry mice, in which the cDNA for Venus-T2A-mCherry was inserted at the end of the coding sequence of the Dll1 gene (Fig. 1A). In these mice, in addition to the Dll1-Venus fusion protein, mCherry protein was also expressed from the Dll1 locus, but because it is cleaved from the Dll1-Venus fusion protein, mCherry expression is stable and not oscillatory. We first examined the somite segmentation phenotypes of these mice.
Discussion
How cell-to-cell communication is controlled is a major question to understand the mechanism of synchronized oscillations during somitogenesis. Dll1 protein oscillations can entrain oscillatory expression in neighboring cells, and dampening Dll1 oscillations lead to severe somite fusion, demonstrating the important roles of Dll1 oscillations in the somite segmentation (Shimojo et al., 2016; Isomura et al., 2017). However, although it has been shown that Dll1 protein expression oscillates at the
Mice
All animals were handled in accordance with the Kyoto University Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals. Dll1-Venus-T2A-mCherry, pHes7-UbLuc, and pMesp2-UbEluc transgenic mice were developed previously (Takashima et al., 2011; Niwa et al., 2011; Tateya et al., 2019).
Bone and cartilage staining
Skeleton of neonates were stained with alcian blue and alizarin red, respectively, as described previously (Bessho et al., 2001).
PSM and tail-bud explant cultures
Embryos were collected at E9.5 or E10.5. Tails were dissected in pre-warmed PBS, incubated in
Declaration of competing interest
The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
Acknowledgements
We thank the Center for Meso-Bio Single-Molecule Imaging (CeMI), iCeMS, Kyoto University and Fumiyoshi Ishidate for technical assistance. This work was supported by Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research on Innovative Areas (16H06480 to R.K.; 19H04960 and 18H04734 to A.I.) from Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science, and Technology (MEXT) of Japan, Scientific Research (B) from Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (18H03332 to A.I.]), Core Research for Evolutional Science and
References (26)
- et al.
Self-organization of embryonic genetic oscillators into spatiotemporal wave patterns
Cell
(2016) - et al.
Notch signaling: cell fate control and signal integration in development
Science
(1999) - et al.
Dynamic expression and essential functions of Hes7 in somite segmentation
Genes Dev.
(2001) - et al.
Periodic repression by the bHLH factor Hes7 is an essential mechanism for the somite segmentation clock
Genes Dev.
(2003) - et al.
Spatiotemporal oscillations of Notch1, Dll1 and NICD are coordinated across the mouse PSM
Development
(2014) - et al.
Divergent functions and distinct localization of the Notch ligands Dll1 and Dll3 in vivo
J. Cell Biol.
(2007) - et al.
Setting the tempo in development: an investigation of the zebrafish somite clock mechanism
PLoS Biol.
(2007) - et al.
Oscillatory expression of the bHLH factor Hes1 regulated by a negative feedback loop
Science
(2002) - et al.
Noise-resistant and synchronized oscillation of the segmentation clock
Nature
(2006) - et al.
Signalling dynamics in vertebrate segmentation
Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol.
(2014)
Optogenetic perturbation and bioluminescence imaging to analyze cell-to-cell transfer of oscillatory information
Genes Dev.
Notch signaling and the synchronization of the somite segmentation clock
Nature
Oscillatory gene expression and somitogenesis
Wiley Interdiscip. Rev. Dev. Biol.
Cited by (3)
Cellular and molecular control of vertebrate somitogenesis
2024, Nature Reviews Molecular Cell BiologyIn preprints: tick, tick, somite - an intrinsic timer regulates segmentation
2024, Development (Cambridge)Imaging and manipulating the segmentation clock
2021, Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences