Skip to main content
Log in

Toward the KRW Composition Conjecture: Cubic Formula Lower Bounds via Communication Complexity

  • Published:
computational complexity Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

One of the major challenges of the research in circuit complexity is proving super-polynomial lower bounds for de Morgan formulas. Karchmer et al. (Comput Complex 5(3/4):191–204, 1995b) suggested to approach this problem by proving that formula complexity behaves “as expected” with respect to the composition of functions \({f\diamond g}\) . They showed that this conjecture, if proved, would imply super-polynomial formula lower bounds.

The first step toward proving the KRW conjecture was made by Edmonds et al. (Comput Complex 10(3):210–246, 2001), who proved an analogue of the conjecture for the composition of “universal relations.” In this work, we extend the argument of Edmonds et al. (2001) further to \({f\diamond g}\) where f is an arbitrary function and g is the parity function. While this special case of the KRW conjecture was already proved implicitly in Håstad’s work on random restrictions (Håstad in SIAM J Comput 27(1):48–64, 1998), our proof seems more likely to be generalizable to other cases of the conjecture. In particular, our proof uses an entirely different approach, based on communication complexity technique of Karchmer & Wigderson in (SIAM J Discrete Math 3(2):255–265, 1990). In addition, our proof gives a new structural result, which roughly says that the naive way for computing \({f\diamond g}\) is the only optimal way. Along the way, we obtain a new proof of the state-of-the-art formula lower bound of n 3-o(1) due to Håstad (1998).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alexander E. Andreev (1987). On a Method for Obtaining more than Quadratic Effective Lower Bounds for the Complexity of π-Schemes. Moscow University Mathematics Bulletin 42(1), 24–29.

  • Boaz Barak, Mark Braverman, Xi Chen & Anup Rao (2010). How to compress interactive communication. In STOC, 67–76.

  • Amos Beimel, Sebastian Ben Daniel, Eyal Kushilevitz & Enav Weinreb (2014). Choosing, Agreeing, and Eliminating in Communication Complexity. Computational Complexity 23(1), 1–42.

  • Maria Luisa Bonet & Samuel R. Buss (1994). Size-Depth Tradeoffs for Boolean Formulae. Inf. Process. Lett. 49(3), 151–155.

  • Mark Braverman (2012). Interactive information complexity. In STOC, 505–524.

  • Mark Braverman & Anup Rao (2011). Information Equals Amortized Communication. In FOCS, 748–757.

  • Richard P. Brent (1974). The Parallel Evaluation of General Arithmetic Expressions. J. ACM 21(2): 201–206

  • Ruiwen Chen, Valentine Kabanets, Antonina Kolokolova, Ronen Shaltiel & David Zuckerman (2015). Mining Circuit Lower Bound Proofs for Meta-Algorithms. Computational Complexity 24(2), 333–392.

  • Thomas M. Cover & Joy A. Thomas (1991). Elements of information theory. Wiley-Interscience. ISBN 0-471-06259-6.

  • Jeff Edmonds, Russell Impagliazzo, Steven Rudich & Jiri Sgall (2001). Communication complexity towards lower bounds on circuit depth. Computational Complexity 10(3), 210–246.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Tomás Feder, Eyal Kushilevitz, Moni Naor & Noam Nisan (1995). Amortized Communication Complexity. SIAM J. Comput.24(4), 736–750.

  • Dmitry Gavinsky, Or Meir, Omri Weinstein & Avi Wigderson (2014). Toward better formula lower bounds: an information complexity approach to the KRW composition conjecture. In Symposium on Theory of Computing, STOC 2014, New York, NY, USA, May 31–June 03, 2014, 213–222.

  • Michelangelo Grigni & Michael Sipser (1991). Monotone Separation of Logspace from NC. In Structure in Complexity Theory Conference, 294–298.

  • Johan Håstad (1998) The Shrinkage Exponent of de Morgan Formulas is 2. SIAM J. Comput. 27(1): 48–64

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Johan Håstad & Avi Wigderson (1993). Composition of the universal relation. In Advances in computational complexity theory, AMS-DIMACS.

  • Russell Impagliazzo & Noam Nisan (1993). The Effect of Random Restrictions on Formula Size. Random Struct. Algorithms 4(2), 121–134.

  • Stasys Jukna (2012). Boolean Function Complexity - Advances and Frontiers, volume 27 of Algorithms and combinatorics. Springer. ISBN 978-3-642-24507-7, I-XV, 1-617 .

  • Yael Tauman Kalai & Ran Raz (2008). Interactive PCP. In ICALP (2), 536–547.

  • Mauricio Karchmer, Eyal Kushilevitz & Noam Nisan (1995a). Fractional Covers and Communication Complexity. SIAM J. Discrete Math. 8(1), 76–92.

  • Mauricio Karchmer, Ran Raz & Avi Wigderson (1995b). Super-Logarithmic Depth Lower Bounds Via the Direct Sum in Communication Complexity. Computational Complexity 5(3/4), 191–204.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Mauricio Karchmer & Avi Wigderson (1990). Monotone Circuits for Connectivity Require Super-Logarithmic Depth. SIAM J. Discrete Math.3(2), 255–265.

  • Khrapchenko V.M. (1972) A method of obtaining lower bounds for the complexity of π-schemes. Mathematical Notes Academy of Sciences USSR 10: 474–479

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Ilan Komargodski & Ran Raz (2013). Average-case lower bounds for formula size. In Symposium on Theory of Computing Conference, STOC’13, Palo Alto, CA, USA, June 1–4, 2013, 171–180.

  • Ilan Komargodski, Ran Raz & Avishay Tal (2013). Improved Average-Case Lower Bounds for DeMorgan Formula Size. In 54th Annual IEEE Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science, FOCS 2013, 26–29 October, 2013, Berkeley, CA, USA, 588–597.

  • Eyal Kushilevitz & Noam Nisan (1997). Communication complexity. Cambridge University Press. ISBN 978-0-521-56067-2.

  • Dana Moshkovitz (2014). Parallel Repetition from Fortification. In 55th IEEE Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science, FOCS 2014, Philadelphia, PA, USA, October 18–21, 2014, 414–423.

  • Mike Paterson, Uri Zwick (1993) Shrinkage of de Morgan Formulae under Restriction. Random Struct. Algorithms 4(2): 135–150

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Ran Raz, Avi Wigderson (1992) Monotone Circuits for Matching Require Linear Depth. J. ACM 39(3): 736–744

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Alexander A. Razborov (1990). Applications of matrix methods to the theory of lower bounds in computational complexity. Combinatorica 10(1), 81–93.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Rahul Santhanam (2010). Fighting Perebor: New and Improved Algorithms for Formula and QBF Satisfiability. In 51th Annual IEEE Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science, FOCS 2010, October 23–26, 2010, Las Vegas, Nevada, USA, 183–192.

  • Philip M. Spira (1971). On time-hardware complexity tradeoffs for Boolean functions. In Proceedings of the Fourth Hawaii International Symposium on System Sciences, 525–527.

  • Bella Abramovna Subbotovskaya (1961). Realizations of linear functions by formulas using +,.,-. Soviet Mathematics Doklady 2, 110–112.

  • Madhu Sudan (2001). Algorithmic introduction to coding theory (Lecture notes). Available from http://theory.csail.mit.edu/~madhu/FT01/.

  • Avishay Tal (2014). Shrinkage of De Morgan Formulae by Spectral Techniques. In 55th IEEE Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science, FOCS 2014, Philadelphia, PA, USA, October 18–21, 2014, 551–560.

  • Andrew Chi-Chih Yao (1979). Some Complexity Questions Related to Distributive Computing (Preliminary Report). In STOC, 209–213.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Or Meir.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Dinur, I., Meir, O. Toward the KRW Composition Conjecture: Cubic Formula Lower Bounds via Communication Complexity. comput. complex. 27, 375–462 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00037-017-0159-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00037-017-0159-x

Keywords

Subject classification

Navigation