Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

A confirmatory factor analysis of the behavioral intention to use smart wellness wearables in Malaysia

  • Long Paper
  • Published:
Universal Access in the Information Society Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Wearable technology refers to the next generation of the digital revolution that connects items with embedded sensors to the Internet so as to enhance the quality of human life. Wearables have shifted the focus of the healthcare sector toward prevention programs that empower individuals to be active and liable for their own health. Although the number of smart wearable users has grown significantly, there is still a lack of academic researches on what motivates and prevents the continued usage of these devices. Hence, the main objectives of this study are, namely: to explain the impediments and affecting factors in deciding to use smart wellness wearables from a user’s perspective; and to propose a unified model to explore the impact of these factors on an individual’s behavioral intentions. Accordingly, the “Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology 2” and the “Value-based Adoption Model” were integrated with two additional factors, namely perceived trust and perceived health increase. Following this, a survey was conducted among students and 100 reliable responses were received. As a result of this study, the Confirmatory Factor Analysis from the developed instrument is presented. The findings have confirmed the validity and reliability of the developed instrument. This paper also presents the theoretical understanding of the involved factors in the proposed model.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ashton, K.: That “Internet of Things” Thing. RFID J. 1–2 (2009)

  2. Mishra, D., Gunasekaran, A., Childe, S.J., Papadopoulos, T., Dubey, R., Wamba, S.: Vision, applications and future challenges of Internet of Things A bibliometric study of the recent literature. Ind. Manag. Data Syst. 116, 1331–1355 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1108/02635570710734262

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Zhang, Y., Rau, P.L.P.: Playing with multiple wearable devices: exploring the influence of display, motion and gender. Comput. Hum. Behav. 50, 148–158 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.04.004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Ballve, M.: Wearable gadgets are still not getting the attention they deserve—here’s why they will create a massive new market. https://www.businessinsider.com.au/wearable-devices-create-a-new-market-2013-8

  5. Canhoto, A.I., Arp, S.: Exploring the factors that support adoption and sustained use of health and fitness wearables. J. Mark. Manag. 00, 1–29 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1080/0267257X.2016.1234505

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Holzinger, A., Dorner, S., Födinger, M., Valdez, A.C., Ziefle, M.: Chances of increasing youth health awareness through mobile wellness applications. In: Leitner, G., Hitz, M., Holzinger, A. (eds.) HCI in Work and Learning, Life and Leisure. USAB 2010. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pp. 71–81. Springer, Berlin (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Holzinger, A., Röcker, C., Ziefle, M.: From smart health to smart hospitals. smart health: state-of-the-art and beyond. In: Springer Lecture Notes in Computer Science, LNCS 8700, Springer, Berlin, pp. 1–20 (2015)

  8. Wu, Q., Sum, K., Nathan-Roberts, D.: How fitness trackers facilitate health behavior change. Proc. Hum. Factors Ergon. Soc. Annu. Meet. 60, 1068–1072 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1177/1541931213601247

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Wright, R., Keith, L.: Wearable technology: if the tech fits, wear it. J. Electron. Resour. Med. Libr. 11, 204–216 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1080/15424065.2014.969051

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Hsu, C.-L., Lin, J.C.-C.: An empirical examination of consumer adoption of Internet of Things services: network externalities and concern for information privacy perspectives. Comput. Hum. Behav. 62, 516–527 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.04.023

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Hsu, C.L., Lin, J.C.C.: Exploring factors affecting the adoption of Internet of Things services. J. Comput. Inf. Syst. 0, 1–9 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1080/08874417.2016.1186524

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Gubbi, J., Buyya, R., Marusic, S., Palaniswami, M.: Internet of Things (IoT): a vision, architectural elements, and future directions. Futur. Gener. Comput. Syst. 29, 1645–1660 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.future.2013.01.010

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Kortuem, G., Kawsar, F., Fitton, D., Sundramoorthy, V.: Smart objects as building blocks for the Internet of things. Internet Comput. IEEE 14, 44–51 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1109/MIC.2009.143

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Kranz, M., Holleis, P., Schmidt, A.: Embedded interaction: Interacting with the internet of things. IEEE Internet Comput. 14, 46–53 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1109/MIC.2009.141

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Gao, L., Bai, X.: A unified perspective on the factors influencing consumer acceptance of internet of things technology. Asia Pac. J. Mark. Logist. 26, 211–231 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1108/APJML-06-2013-0061

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Sarma, A.C., Girao, J.: Identities in the future internet of things. Wirel. Pers. Commun. 49, 353–363 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11277-009-9697-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Vermesan, O., Friess, P., Guillemin, P., Gusmeroli, S., Sundmaeker, H., Bassi, A., Jubert, I.S., Mazura, M., Harrison, M., Eisenhauer, M., Doody, P.: Internet of things strategic research roadmap. In: Internet of Things: Global Technological and Societal Trends, River Publishers, pp. 1–50 (2011)

  18. Weber, R.H.: Internet of Things—new security and privacy challenges. Comput. Law Secur. Rev. 26, 23–30 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clsr.2009.11.008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Khan, R., Khan, S.U., Zaheer, R., Khan, S.: Future internet: the Internet of Things architecture, possible applications and key challenges. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Frontiers of Information Technology, IEEE, pp. 257–260 (2012)

  20. Sundmaeker, H., Guillemin, P., Friess, P., Woelffle, S.: Vision and challenges for realizing the internet of things. In: European Commision (2010)

  21. Tsao, L., Haferkamp, L., Ma, L.: User requirements of wearable technology for activity tracking a comparison between German and Chinese users. In: Pl, R. (ed.) International Conference on Cross-Cultural Design, pp. 436–447. Springer, Berlin (2016)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  22. Sultan, N.: Reflective thoughts on the potential and challenges of wearable technology for healthcare provision and medical education. Int. J. Inf. Manag. 35, 521–526 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2015.04.010

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Levy, D.: Emerging mHealth: paths for growth. mHealth Team PwC 2014, 1–44 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Claes, V., Devriendt, E., Tournoy, J., Milisen, K.: Attitudes and perceptions of adults of 60 years and older towards in-home monitoring of the activities of daily living with contactless sensors: an explorative study. Int. J. Nurs. Stud. 52, 134–148 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2014.05.010

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Steele, R., Lo, A., Secombe, C., Wong, Y.K.: Elderly persons’ perception and acceptance of using wireless sensor networks to assist healthcare. Int. J. Med. Inform. 78, 788–801 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2009.08.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Fraile, J.A., Bajo, J., Corchado, J.M., Abraham, A.: Applying wearable solutions in dependent environments. IEEE Trans. Inf Technol. Biomed. 14, 1459–1467 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1109/TITB.2010.2053849

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Gao, Y., Li, H., Luo, Y.: An empirical study of wearable technology acceptance in healthcare. Ind. Manag. Data Syst. 115, 1704–1723 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1108/IMDS-03-2015-0087

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Park, S., Jayaraman, S.: Smart textiles: wearable electronic systems. MRS Bull. 28, 585–591 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1557/mrs2003.170

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Arias, O., Wurm, J., Hoang, K., Jin, Y.: Privacy and security in internet of things and wearable devices. IEEE Trans. Multi-scale Comput. Syst. 1, 99–109 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1109/TMSCS.2015.2498605

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Yang, H., Yu, J., Zo, H., Choi, M.: User acceptance of wearable devices: an extended perspective of perceived value. Telemat. Inform. 33, 256–269 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2015.08.007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Kim, K.J., Shin, D.-H.: An acceptance model for smart watches: implications for the adoption of future wearable technology. Internet Res. 25, 527–541 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1108/IntR-05-2014-0126

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Chuah, S.H.W., Rauschnabel, P.A., Krey, N., Nguyen, B., Ramayah, T., Lade, S.: Wearable technologies: the role of usefulness and visibility in smartwatch adoption. Comput. Hum. Behav. 65, 276–284 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.07.047

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Cook, D.J., Thompson, J.E., Prinsen, S.K., Dearani, J.A., Deschamps, C.: Functional recovery in the elderly after major surgery: assessment of mobility recovery using wireless technology. Ann. Thorac. Surg. 96, 1057–1061 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.athoracsur.2013.05.092

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Prayoga, T., Abraham, J.: Behavioral intention to use IoT health device: the role of perceived usefulness, facilitated appropriation, big five personality traits, and cultural value orientations. Int. J. Electr. Comput. Eng. 6, 1751–1765 (2016). https://doi.org/10.11591/ijece.v6i4.10546

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Holzinger, A., Searle, G., Pruckner, S., Steinbach-Nordmann, S., Kleinberger, T., Hirt, E., Temnitzer, J.: Perceived usefulness among elderly people: experiences and lessons learned during the evaluation of a wrist device. In: IEEE International Conference on Pervasive Computing Technologies for Healthcare (Pervasive Health 2010), IEEE, Munich, Germany (2010)

  36. Miller, T.W.: Effectiveness of a wearable fitness tracker: practice implications in allied health—a single case study. Internet J. Allied Heal. Sci. Pract. 15, 3 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  37. DataBridge: Asia Pacific (APAC): Wearable devices market – trends and forecast to 2024. https://databridgemarketresearch.com/reports/asia-pacific-wearable-devices-market/

  38. Statista: wearable device unit sales worldwide by region from 2015 to 2021 (in millions). https://www.statista.com/statistics/490231/wearable-devices-worldwide-by-region/

  39. Statista: wearables—Malaysia Statista Market Forecast. https://www.statista.com/outlook/319/122/wearables/malaysia#

  40. Davis, F.D.: User acceptance of information technology: system characteristics, user perceptions and behavioral impacts. Int. J. Man Mach. Stud. 38, 475–487 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1006/imms.1993.1022

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Venkatesh, V., Thong, J.Y.L., Xu, X.: Consumer acceptance and use of information technology: extending the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology. MIS Q. 36, 157–178 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Holzinger, A., Searle, G., Wernbacher, M.: The effect of previous exposure to technology on acceptance and its importance in usability and accessibility engineering. Univ. Access Inf. Soc. 10, 245–260 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10209-010-0212-x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Venkatesh, V., Morris, M.G., Davis, G.B., Davis, F.D.: User acceptance of information technology: toward a unified view. MIS Q. 27, 425 (2003). https://doi.org/10.2307/30036540

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Adams, D.A., Nelson, R.R., Todd, P.A.: Perceived usefulness, ease of use, and usage of information technology: a replication. MIS Q. 16, 227–247 (1992). https://doi.org/10.2307/249577

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Chin, W.W., Todd, P.A.: On the use, usefulness, and ease of use of structural equation modeling in mis research: a note of caution. MIS Q. 19, 237–246 (1995). https://doi.org/10.2307/249690

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Segars, A.H., Grover, V.: Re-examining perceived ease of use and usefulness. MIS Q. 17, 517–525 (1993)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Wang, Y.-S.: Assessing e-commerce systems success: a respecification and validation of the DeLone and McLean model of IS success. Inf. Syst. J. 18, 529–557 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2575.2007.00268.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Wang, Y.S., Yeh, C.H., Liao, Y.W.: What drives purchase intention in the context of online content services? The moderating role of ethical self-efficacy for online piracy. Int. J. Inf. Manag. 33, 199–208 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2012.09.004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Kim, H.W., Chan, H.C., Gupta, S.: Value-based adoption of mobile internet: an empirical investigation. Decis. Support Syst. 43, 111–126 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dss.2005.05.009

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Turel, O., Serenko, A., Bontis, N.: User acceptance of hedonic digital artifacts: a theory of consumption values perspective. Inf. Manag. 47, 53–59 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2009.10.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Nysveen, H., Pedersen, P.E.: Consumer adoption of RFID-enabled services. Applying an extended UTAUT model. Inf. Syst. Front. 18, 293–314 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10796-014-9531-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Chen, L.S.L., Kuan, C.J., Lee, Y.H., Huang, H.L.: Applicability of the UTAUT model in playing online game through mobile phones: moderating effects of user experience. In: 2011 IEEE International Technology Management Conference (ITMC), IEEE, San Jose, CA, USA, pp. 625–629 (2011)

  53. Okazaki, S., Skapa, R., Grande, I.: Global youth and mobile games: applying the extended technology acceptance model. Cross Cult. Buy. Behav. 18, 253–270 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Hsu, C.L., Lu, H.P.: Why do people play on-line games? An extended TAM with social influences and flow experience. Inf. Manag. 41, 853–868 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2003.08.014

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Lin, K.Y., Lu, H.P.: Why people use social networking sites: An empirical study integrating network externalities and motivation theory. Comput. Hum. Behav. 27, 1152–1161 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2010.12.009

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Zeithaml, V.: Consumer perceptions of price, quality, and value: a means-end model and synthesis of evidence. J. Mark. 52, 2–22 (1988). https://doi.org/10.2307/1251446

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. Pura, M.: Linking perceived value and loyalty in location-based mobile services. Manag. Serv. Qual. Int. J. 15, 509–538 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1108/09604520510634005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  58. Kim, B., Han, I.: What drives the adoption of mobile data services an approach from a value perspective. J. Inf. Technol. 24, 35–45 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1057/jit.2008.28

    Article  Google Scholar 

  59. Yang, K., Jolly, L.D.: The effects of consumer perceived value and subjective norm on mobile data service adoption between American and Korean consumers. J. Retail. Consum. Serv. 16, 502–508 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2009.08.005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  60. Turel, O., Serenko, A., Bontis, N.: User acceptance of wireless short messaging services: deconstructing perceived value. Inf. Manag. 44, 63–73 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2006.10.005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  61. Wang, H.-Y., Liao, C., Yang, L.-H.: What affects mobile application use? The roles of consumption values. Int. J. Mark. Stud. 5, 11–22 (2013). https://doi.org/10.5539/ijms.v5n2p11

    Article  Google Scholar 

  62. Chen, Y.C., Shang, R.A., Lin, A.K.: The intention to download music files in a P2P environment: consumption value, fashion, and ethical decision perspectives. Electron. Commer. Res. Appl. 7, 411–422 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.elerap.2008.02.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  63. Lu, H.-P., Hsiao, K.-L.: The influence of extro/introversion on the intention to pay for social networking sites. Inf. Manag. 47, 150–157 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2010.01.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  64. Lin, H.H., Wang, Y.S.: An examination of the determinants of customer loyalty in mobile commerce contexts. Inf. Manag. 43, 271–282 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2005.08.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  65. Chu, C., Lu, H.: Factors influencing online music purchase intention in Taiwan: an empirical study based on the value-intention framework. Internet Res. 17, 139–155 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1108/10662240710737004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  66. Ledden, L., Kalafatis, S.P., Samouel, P.: The relationship between personal values and perceived value of education. J. Bus. Res. 60, 965–974 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2007.01.021

    Article  Google Scholar 

  67. Lee, C.K., Yoon, Y.S., Lee, S.K.: Investigating the relationships among perceived value, satisfaction, and recommendations: the case of the Korean DMZ. Tour. Manag. 28, 204–214 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2005.12.017

    Article  Google Scholar 

  68. Kwon, H., Seo, K.: Application of value-based adoption model to analyze SaaS adoption behavior in Korean B2B cloud market. Int. J. Adv. Comput. Technol. 5, 368–373 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  69. Kim, D., Chun, H., Lee, H.: Determining the factors that influence college students’ adoption of smartphones. J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol. 65, 578–588 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1002/asi

    Article  Google Scholar 

  70. Chang, E.C., Tseng, Y.F.: Research note: E-store image, perceived value and perceived risk. J. Bus. Res. 66, 864–870 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2011.06.012

    Article  Google Scholar 

  71. Roostika, R.: Mobile Internet acceptance among university students: a value-based adoption model. Int. J. Res. Manag. Technol. 2, 21–28 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  72. Luarn, P., Lin, H.H.: Toward an understanding of the behavioral intention to use mobile banking. Comput. Hum. Behav. 21, 873–891 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2004.03.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  73. Wang, Y.-S., Lin, H.-H., Luarn, P.: Predicting consumer intention to use mobile service. Inf. Syst. J. 16, 157–179 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2575.2006.00213.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  74. Sun, Y., Wang, N., Guo, X., Peng, Z.: Understanding the acceptance of mobile health services: a comparison and integration of alternative models. J. Electron. Commer. Res. 14, 183–200 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  75. Yayla, A., Hu, Q.: User acceptance of e-commerce technology : a meta-analytic comparison of competing models. In: European Conference on Information Systems (ECIS), pp. 179–190 (2007)

  76. Yee-Loong Chong, A., Liu, M.J., Luo, J., Keng-Boon, O.: Predicting RFID adoption in healthcare supply chain from the perspectives of users. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 159, 66–75 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2014.09.034

    Article  Google Scholar 

  77. Yadav, R., Pathak, G.S.: Young consumers’ intention towards buying green products in a developing nation: extending the theory of planned behavior. J. Clean. Prod. 135, 732–739 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.06.120

    Article  Google Scholar 

  78. Wong, C.-H., Tan, G.W.-H., Loke, S.-P., Ooi, K.-B.: Mobile TV: a new form of entertainment? Ind. Manag. Data Syst. (2014). https://doi.org/10.1108/imds-05-2014-0146

    Article  Google Scholar 

  79. Techatraiphum, V., Tharnuraikun, A., Krathu, W., Chutimaskul, W.: Telemedicine acceptance framework for the elderly in Thailand. In: 2016 International Conference on Information and Communication Technology Convergence (ICTC), IEEE, Jeju, South Korea, pp. 39–44 (2016)

  80. Qasim, H., Abu-Shanab, E.: Drivers of mobile payment acceptance: the impact of network externalities. Inf. Syst. Front. 18, 1021–1034 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10796-015-9598-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  81. Liew, C.S., Ang, J.M., Goh, Y.T., Koh, W.K., Tan, S.Y., Teh, R.Y.: Handbook of Research on Leveraging Consumer Psychology for Effective Customer Engagement. IGI Global (2017)

  82. Kim, H., Lee, J.Y., Mun, J.M., Johnson, K.K.P.: Consumer adoption of smart in-store technology : assessing the predictive value of attitude versus beliefs in the technology acceptance model. Int. J. Fash. Des. Technol. Educ. 3266, 1–11 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1080/17543266.2016.1177737

    Article  Google Scholar 

  83. Lee, W.: When the future technology is now : paradoxical attitudes of consumer and evaluation of IoT service. Int. J. Smart Home. 10, 115–126 (2016). https://doi.org/10.14257/ijsh.2016.10.6.13

    Article  Google Scholar 

  84. Mani, Z., Chouk, I.: Drivers of consumers’ resistance to smart products. J. Mark. Manag. 33, 76–97 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1080/0267257X.2016.1245212

    Article  Google Scholar 

  85. Dahlberg, T., Mallat, N., Oorni, A.: Trust enhanced technology acceptance modelconsumer acceptance of mobile payment solutions: tentative evidence. Stock. Mob. Roundtable 2003, 22–23 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  86. Ernst, C.H., Rheingans, F., Cikit, B.: The influence of perceived health increase on activity tracker usage. In: Multikonferenz Wirtschaftsinformatik, MKWI, Ilmenau, pp. 621–630 (2016)

  87. Skarmeta, A.F., Hernandez-Ramos, J.L., Moreno, M.V.: A decentralized approach for security and privacy challenges in the Internet of Things. In: 2014 IEEE World Forum on Internet of Things (WF-IoT), IEEE, pp. 67–72 (2014)

  88. Wu, K.W., Huang, S.Y., Yen, D.C., Popova, I.: The effect of online privacy policy on consumer privacy concern and trust. Comput. Hum. Behav. 28, 889–897 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2011.12.008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  89. Kranenburg, R. van Stembert, N., Moreno, M.V., Skarmeta, A.F., Lopez, C., Elicegui, I., Anchez, L.S.: Co-creation as the key to a public, thriving, inclusive and meaningful EU IoT. In: International Conference on Ubiquitous Computing and Ambient Intelligence, pp. 396–403 (2014)

  90. Yazici, H.J.: An exploratory analysis of hospital perspectives on real time information requirements and perceived benefits of RFID technology for future adoption. Int. J. Inf. Manag. 34, 603–621 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2014.04.010

    Article  Google Scholar 

  91. Dinev, T., Xu, H., Smith, J.H., Hart, P.: Information privacy and correlates: an empirical attempt to bridge and distinguish privacy-related concepts. Eur. J. Inf. Syst. 22, 295–316 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1057/ejis.2012.23

    Article  Google Scholar 

  92. Milne, G.R., Gordon, M.E.: Direct mail privacy-efficiency trade-offs within an implied social contract framework. J. Public Policy Mark. 12, 206–215 (1993). https://doi.org/10.2307/30000091

    Article  Google Scholar 

  93. Malhotra, N.K., Kim, S.S., Agarwal, J.: Internet users’ information privacy concerns (IUIPC): the construct, the scale, and a causal model. Inf. Syst. Res. 15, 336–355 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.1040.0032

    Article  Google Scholar 

  94. Zhou, T., Li, H.: Understanding mobile SNS continuance usage in China from the perspectives of social influence and privacy concern. Comput. Hum. Behav. 37, 283–289 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2014.05.008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  95. Slyke, C.Van, Shim, J., Johnson, R., Jiang, J.: Concern for information privacy and online consumer purchasing. J. Assoc. Inf. Syst. 7, 415–444 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  96. Sun, Y., Wang, N., Shen, X.L., Zhang, J.X.: Location information disclosure in location-based social network services: privacy calculus, benefit structure, and gender differences. Comput. Hum. Behav. 52, 278–292 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.06.006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  97. Liao, Z., Cheung, M.T.: Internet-based e-shopping and consumer attitudes: an empirical study. Inf. Manag. 38, 299–306 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-7206(00)00072-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  98. Ho Cheong, J., Park, M.: Mobile internet acceptance in Korea. Internet Res. 15, 125–140 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1108/10662240510590324

    Article  Google Scholar 

  99. Chang, T.Z., Wildt, A.R.: Price, product information, and purchase intention: an empirical study. J. Acad. Mark. Sci. 22, 16–27 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1177/0092070394221002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  100. Davis, F.D., Bagozzi, R.P., Warshaw, P.R.: Extrinsic and intrinsic motivation to use computers in the workplace. J. Appl. Soc. Psychol. 22, 1111–1132 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.1992.tb00945.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  101. Wu, L.-H., Wu, L.-C., Chang, S.-C.: Exploring consumers’ intention to accept smartwatch. Comput. Hum. Behav. 64, 383–392 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.07.005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  102. Park, Y., Son, H., Kim, C.: Investigating the determinants of construction professionals’ acceptance of web-based training: an extension of the technology acceptance model. Autom. Constr. 22, 377–386 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2011.09.016

    Article  Google Scholar 

  103. Agarwal, R., Karahanna, E.: Time flies when you’re having fun: cognitive absorption and beliefs about information technology usage. MIS Q. 24, 665–694 (2000). https://doi.org/10.2307/3250951

    Article  Google Scholar 

  104. Moon, J.W., Kim, Y.G.: Extending the TAM for a world-wide-web context. Inf. Manag. 38, 217–230 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-7206(00)00061-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  105. Lu, J., Yu, C.-S., Liu, C.: Mobile data service demographics in urban China. J. Comput. Inf. Syst. 50, 117–126 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1080/08874417.2009.11645390

    Article  Google Scholar 

  106. Kim, G.S., Park, S.-B., Oh, J.: An examination of factors influencing consumer adoption of short message service (SMS). Psychol. Mark. 25, 769–786 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1002/mar.20238

    Article  Google Scholar 

  107. Park, Y., Chen, J.V.: Acceptance and adoption of the innovative use of smartphone. Ind. Manag. Data Syst. 107, 1349–1365 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1108/02635570710834009

    Article  Google Scholar 

  108. Lee, Y.K., Park, J.H., Chung, N., Blakeney, A.: A unified perspective on the factors influencing usage intention toward mobile financial services. J. Bus. Res. 65, 1590–1599 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2011.02.044

    Article  Google Scholar 

  109. Ko, E., Kim, E.Y., Lee, E.K.: Modeling consumer adoption of mobile shopping for fashion products in Korea. Psychol. Mark. 26, 669–687 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1002/mar.20294

    Article  Google Scholar 

  110. Shin, D.-H., JinPark, Y.: Understanding the Internet of Things ecosystem: multi-level analysis of users, society, and ecology. Digit. Policy Regul. Gov. 19, 77–100 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1108/dprg-07-2016-0035

    Article  Google Scholar 

  111. Evanschitzky, H., Iyer, G.R., Pillai, K.G., Kenning, P., Schütte, R.: Consumer trial, continuous use, and economic benefits of a retail service innovation: the case of the personal shopping assistant. J. Prod. Innov. Manag. 32, 459–475 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1111/jpim.12241

    Article  Google Scholar 

  112. Balaji, M.S., Roy, S.K.: Value co-creation with Internet of things technology in the retail industry. J. Mark. Manag. 2025, 1–25 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1080/0267257X.2016.1217914

    Article  Google Scholar 

  113. Lai, J.-Y., Ulhas, K.R., Lin, C.-T., Ong, C.-S.: Banking, Finance, and Accounting. IGI Global (2015)

  114. Venkatesh, V., Davis, F.D.: A theoretical extension of the technology acceptance model : four longitudinal field studies. Manag. Sci. 46, 186–204 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  115. Teo, T.S.H., Pok, S.H.: Adoption of WAP-enabled mobile phones among Internet users. Omega 31, 483–498 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.omega.2003.08.005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  116. Zhou, T.: Examining location-based services usage from the perspectives of unified theory of acceptance and use of technology and privacy risk. J. Electron. Commer. Res. 13, 135–144 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  117. Kwee-Meier, S.T., Butzler, J.E., Schlick, C.: Development and validation of a technology acceptance model for safety-enhancing, wearable locating systems. Behav. Inf. Technol. 35, 394–409 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1080/0144929X.2016.1141986

    Article  Google Scholar 

  118. Potnis, D., Demissie, D., Deosthali, K.: Students’ intention to adopt Internet-based personal safety wearable devices: extending UTAUT with trusting belief. First Monday 22, 1–18 (2017). https://doi.org/10.5210/fm.v22i19.7808

    Article  Google Scholar 

  119. Sergueeva, K., Shaw, N.: Improving healthcare with wearables: overcoming the barriers to adoption. In: International Conference on HCI in Business, Government, and Organizations, Springer, Cham, pp. 209–223 (2017)

  120. Jeong, S.C., Kim, S.H., Park, J.Y., Choi, B.: Domain-specific innovativeness and new product adoption: a case of wearable devices. Telemat. Inform. 34, 399–412 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2016.09.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  121. Yang, S., Lu, Y., Gupta, S., Cao, Y., Zhang, R.: Mobile payment services adoption across time: an empirical study of the effects of behavioral beliefs, social influences, and personal traits. Comput. Hum. Behav. 28, 129–142 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2011.08.019

    Article  Google Scholar 

  122. Ain, N., Kaur, K., Waheed, M.: The influence of learning value on learning management system use: an extension of UTAUT2. Inf. Dev. 32, 1306–1321 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1177/0266666915597546

    Article  Google Scholar 

  123. Gefen, D., Karahanna, E., Straub, D.W.: Trust and TAM in online shopping: an integrated model. MIS Q. 27, 51–90 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  124. Pavlou, A.P.: Consumer acceptance of electronic commerce: integrating trust and risk with the technology acceptance model. Int. J. Electron. Commer. 7, 101–134 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1080/10864415.2003.11044275

    Article  Google Scholar 

  125. Carter, L., Belanger, F.: The utilization of e-government services: citizen trust, innovation and acceptance factors. Inf. Syst. J. 15, 5–25 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2575.2005.00183.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  126. Keikhosrokiani, P., Mustaffa, N., Zakaria, N.: Success factors in developing iHeart as a patient-centric healthcare system: a multi-group analysis. Telemat. Inform. (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2017.11.006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  127. Rajanen, D., Weng, M.: Digitization for fun or reward? A study of acceptance of wearable devices for personal healthcare. In: Proceedings of the 21st International Academic Mindtrek Conference, ACM Press, New York, USA pp. 154–163 (2017)

  128. Lunney, A., Cunningham, N.R., Eastin, M.S.: Wearable fitness technology: a structural investigation into acceptance and perceived fitness outcomes. Comput. Hum. Behav. 65, 114–120 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.08.007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  129. Anthem: The Internet of Things : Background and Marketing Impact. Anthem Mark. Solut (2016)

  130. Acquity Group: The Internet of Things: The Future of Consumer Adoption. Acquity Gr (2014)

  131. Kleijnen, M., de Ruyter, K., Wetzels, M.: An assessment of value creation in mobile service delivery and the moderating role of time consciousness. J. Retail. 83, 33–46 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretai.2006.10.004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  132. Chen, S.C., Lin, C.P.: The impact of customer experience and perceived value on sustainable social relationship in blogs: an empirical study. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change 96, 40–50 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2014.11.011

    Article  Google Scholar 

  133. Yu, J., Zo, H., KeeChoi, M., Ciganek, P.: User acceptance of location-based social networking services: an extended perspective of perceived value. Online Inf. Rev. 37, 711–730 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1108/oir-12-2011-0202

    Article  Google Scholar 

  134. Lamb, K.L., Roberts, K., Brodie, D.A.: Self-perceived health among sports participants and non-sports participants. Soc. Sci. Med. 31, 963–969 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1016/0277-9536(90)90105-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  135. Barcena, M.B., Wueest, C., Lau, H.: How safe is your quantified self? (2014). https://www.symantec.com/content/dam/symantec/docs/white-papers/how-safe-is-your-quantified-self.pdf

  136. Fishbein, M., Ajzen, I.: Belief, attitude, intention, and behavior: an introduction to theory and research (1975). http://home.comcast.net/~icek.aizen/book/ch1.pdf

  137. Janz, N.K., Becker, M.H.: The health belief model : a decade later. Heal. Educ. Behav. 11, 1–47 (1984). https://doi.org/10.1177/109019818401100101

    Article  Google Scholar 

  138. Dahling, J.J., Lauricella, T.K.: Linking job design to subjective career success: a test of self-determination theory. J. Career Assess. 25, 371–388 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1177/1069072716639689

    Article  Google Scholar 

  139. Awodoyin, A., Adetoro, N., Osisanwo, T.: Self-efficacy and new technology adoption and use among trainee mid-wives in Ijebu-Ode, Nigeria. Educ. Inf. Technol. 22, 1911–1925 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-016-9524-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  140. Lee, S.Y.: Examining the factors that influence early adopters’ smartphone adoption: the case of college students. Telemat. Inform. 31, 308–318 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2013.06.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  141. Joseph, F., Hair, J., Hult, G.T.M., Ringle, C.M., Sarstedt, M.: A Primer on Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM). Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks (2014)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  142. Straub, D., Boudreau, M.-C., Gefen, D.: Validation guidelines for IS positivist research. Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst. 13, 380–427 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  143. Lynn, M.R.: Determination and quantification of content validity. Nurs. Res. 35, 382–385 (1986). https://doi.org/10.1097/00006199-198611000-00017

    Article  Google Scholar 

  144. Polit, D.F., Beck, C.T.: The content validity index: are you sure you know what’s being reported? critique and recommendations. Res. Nurs. Health 29, 489–497 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  145. Nov, O., Naaman, M., Ye, C.: Analysis of participation in an online photo-sharing community: a multidimensional perspective. J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci. Technol. 61, 555–566 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.21278

    Article  Google Scholar 

  146. Wu, S.I., Hung, J.M.: The performance measurement of cause-related marketing by balance scorecard. Total Qual. Manag. Bus. Excell. 18, 771–791 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1080/14783360701349831

    Article  Google Scholar 

  147. Lee, F.H., Wu, W.Y.: Moderating effects of technology acceptance perspectives on e-service quality formation: evidence from airline websites in Taiwan. Expert Syst. Appl. 38, 7766–7773 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2010.12.131

    Article  Google Scholar 

  148. Chen, C.F., Myagmarsuren, O.: Exploring relationships between mongolian destination brand equity, satisfaction and destination loyalty. Tour. Econ. 16, 981–994 (2010). https://doi.org/10.5367/te.2010.0004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  149. Lin, C.-L., Jeng, C.-H.: Exploring interface problems in taiwan’s construction projects using structural equation modeling. Sustainability 9, 822 (2017). https://doi.org/10.3390/su9050822

    Article  Google Scholar 

  150. Lok, C.K.: Adoption of smart card-based E-payment system for retailing in Hong Kong using an extended technology acceptance model. In: Quaddus, M., Woodside, A.G. (eds.) E-services Adoption: Processes by Firms in Developing Nations, pp. 255–466. Emerald Group Publishing Limited, Bingley (2015)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  151. Escobar-Rodriguez, T., Carvajal-Trujillo, E.: Online purchasing tickets for low cost carriers: an application of the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology (UTAUT) model. Tour. Manag. 43, 70–88 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2014.01.017

    Article  Google Scholar 

  152. Roca, J.C., Garcia, J.J., La Vega, J.J.D.: The importance of perceived trust, security and privacy in online trading systems. Inf. Manag. Comput. Secur. 17, 96–113 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1108/09685220910963983

    Article  Google Scholar 

  153. Alalwan, A., Dwivedi, Y., Rana, N., Simintiras, A.: Jordanian consumers’ adoption of telebanking influence of perceived usefulness, trust and self-efficacy. Int. J. Bank Mark. 34, 690–709 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1108/09564230910978511

    Article  Google Scholar 

  154. Buttner, O.B., Goritz, A.S.: Perceived trustworthiness of online shops. J. Consum. Behav. 7, 35–50 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1002/cb.235

    Article  Google Scholar 

  155. Hajli, M.: An integrated model for E-commerce adoption at the customer level with the impact of social commerce. Int. J. Inf. Sci. Manag. 10, 77–97 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  156. Kim, Y.H., Kim, D.J., Wachter, K.: A study of mobile user engagement (MoEN): engagement motivations, perceived value, satisfaction, and continued engagement intention. Decis. Support Syst. 56, 361–370 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dss.2013.07.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  157. Haghshenas, H., Chatroudi, E.A., Njeje, F.A.: Does educational level matter in adopting online education? A Malaysian perspective. J. Mark. High. Educ. 22, 117–151 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1080/08841241.2012.705798

    Article  Google Scholar 

  158. Campbell, D.T., Fiske, D.W.: Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait-multimethod matrix. Psychol. Bull. 56, 81–105 (1959). https://doi.org/10.1037/h0046016

    Article  Google Scholar 

  159. Fornell, C., Larcker, D.F.: Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. J. Mark. Res. 18, 39–50 (1981)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  160. Chin, W.W.: The partial least squares approach to structural equation modeling. In: Marcoulides, G.A. (ed.) Modern Methods for Business Research, pp. 295–336. University of Houston, Houston (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  161. Pookulangara, S., Koesler, K.: Cultural influence on consumers’ usage of social networks and its’ impact on online purchase intentions. J. Retail. Consum. Serv. 18, 348–354 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2011.03.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  162. Im, I., Hong, S., Kang, M.S.: An international comparison of technology adoption: testing the UTAUT model. Inf. Manag. 48, 1–8 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2010.09.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  163. Biljon, J.Van, Kotzé, P.: Cultural factors in a mobile phone adoption and usage model. J. Univers. Comput. Sci. 14, 2650–2679 (2008). https://doi.org/10.3217/jucs-014-16-2650

    Article  Google Scholar 

  164. Choi, B., Lee, I., Kim, J., Jeon, Y.: A qualitative cross-national study of cultural influences on mobile data service design. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, ACM Press, New York, New York, USA, pp. 661–670 (2005)

  165. Tabassi, A.A., Abdullah, A., Bryde, D.J.: Conflict management, team coordination, and performance within multicultural temporary projects: evidence from the construction industry. Proj. Manag. J. 50, 101–114 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1177/8756972818818257

    Article  Google Scholar 

  166. Hofstede, G., Bond, M.H.: The confucius connection: from cultural roots to economic growth. Organ. Dyn. 16, 5–21 (1988). https://doi.org/10.1016/0090-2616(88)90009-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Azman Hashim International Business School, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, Johor Bahru, Malaysia

    Naghmeh Niknejad, Ab Razak Che Hussin & Fatemeh Ashraf Ganjouei

  2. Department of Mathematical and Computer Sciences, Indiana University of Pennsylvania, Indiana, USA

    Imran Ghani

Authors
  1. Naghmeh Niknejad
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Ab Razak Che Hussin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Imran Ghani
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Fatemeh Ashraf Ganjouei
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Naghmeh Niknejad.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Niknejad, N., Hussin, A.R.C., Ghani, I. et al. A confirmatory factor analysis of the behavioral intention to use smart wellness wearables in Malaysia. Univ Access Inf Soc 19, 633–653 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10209-019-00663-0

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10209-019-00663-0

Keywords

Search

Navigation