Skip to main content
Log in

Approximate and exact optimal designs for \(2^k\) factorial experiments for generalized linear models via second order cone programming

  • Regular Article
  • Published:
Statistical Papers Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Model-based optimal designs of experiments (M-bODE) for nonlinear models are typically hard to compute. The literature on the computation of M-bODE for nonlinear models when the covariates are categorical variables, i.e. factorial experiments, is scarce. We propose second order cone programming (SOCP) and Mixed Integer Second Order Programming (MISOCP) formulations to find, respectively, approximate and exact A- and D-optimal designs for \(2^k\) factorial experiments for Generalized Linear Models (GLMs). First, locally optimal (approximate and exact) designs for GLMs are addressed using the formulation of Sagnol (J Stat Plan Inference 141(5):1684–1708, 2011). Next, we consider the scenario where the parameters are uncertain, and new formulations are proposed to find Bayesian optimal designs using the A- and log det D-optimality criteria. A quasi Monte-Carlo sampling procedure based on the Hammersley sequence is used for computing the expectation in the parametric region of interest. We demonstrate the application of the algorithm with the logistic, probit and complementary log–log models and consider full and fractional factorial designs.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alizadeh F, Goldfarb D (2001) Second-order cone programming. Math Progr 95:3–51

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Atkinson AC, Donev AN, Tobias RD (2007) Optimum experimental designs, with SAS. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Ben-Tal A, Nemirovski AS (2001) Lectures on modern convex optimization: analysis, algorithms, and engineering applications. Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics, Philadelphia

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Berger MPF, Wong WK (2005) Applied optimal designs. Wiley, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Bisetti F, Kim D, Knio O, Long Q, Tempone R (2016) Optimal Bayesian experimental design for priors of compact support with application to shock-tube experiments for combustion kinetics. Int J Num Methods Eng 108(2):136–155

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Caflisch RE (1998) Monte Carlo and quasi-Monte Carlo methods. Acta Num 7:1–49

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Chaloner K, Larntz K (1989) Optimal Bayesian design applied to logistic regression experiments. J Stat Plan Inference 59:191–208

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Chaloner K, Verdinelli I (1995) Bayesian experimental design: a review. Stat Sci 10:273–304

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Diwekar UM, Kalagnanam JR (1997) An efficient sampling technique for optimization under uncertainty. AIChE J 43:440–449

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dorta-Guerra R, González-Dávila E, Ginebra J (2008) Two-level experiments for binary response data. Comput Stat Data Anal 53(1):196–208

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Dror HA, Steinberg DM (2008) Sequential experimental designs for generalized linear models. J Am Stat Assoc 103:288–298

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Drovandi CC, Tran MN (2018) Improving the efficiency of fully Bayesian optimal design of experiments using randomised quasi-Monte Carlo. Bayesian Anal 13(1):139–162

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Duarte BPM, Wong WK (2015) Finding Bayesian optimal designs for nonlinear models: a semidefinite programming-based approach. Int Stat Rev 83(2):239–262

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Duarte BPM, Wong WK, Oliveira NMC (2016) Model-based optimal design of experiments—semidefinite and nonlinear programming formulations. Chemom Intell Lab Syst 151:153–163

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Firth D, Hinde JP (1997) On bayesian \(D\)-optimum design criteria and the equivalence theorem in non-linear models. J R Stat Soc 59(4):793–797

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • GAMS Development Corporation (2013) GAMS—A User’s Guide, GAMS Release 24.2.1. GAMS Development Corporation, Washington, DC, USA

  • Gotwalt CM, Jones BA, Steinberg DM (2009) Fast computation of designs robust to parameter uncertainty for nonlinear settings. Technometrics 51(1):88–95

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Graßhoff U, Schwabe R (2008) Optimal design for the Bradley–Terry paired comparison model. Stat Methods Appl 17(3):275–289

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Hammersley JM, Handscomb DC (1964) Monte Carlo methods. Methuen, London

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Harman R, Bachratá A, Filová L (2016) Construction of efficient experimental designs under multiple resource constraints. Appl Stoch Models Bus Ind 32(1):3–17

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Harman R, Filová L (2016) Package “OptimalDesign”. https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/OptimalDesign/OptimalDesign.pdf

  • Huan X, Marzouk YM (2013) Simulation-based optimal Bayesian experimental design for nonlinear systems. J Comput Phys 232(1):288–317

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • IBM (2015) IBM ILOG CPLEX Optimization Studio—CPLEX User’s Manual. Version 12, Release 6

  • Li G, Majumdar D (2008) \(D\)-optimal designs for logistic models with three and four parameters. J Stat Plan Inference 138(7):1950–1959

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Lindley DV (1956) On a measure of the information provided by an experiment. Ann Math Statist 27(4):986–1005

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Lobo MS, Vandenberghe L, Boyd S, Lebret H (1998) Applications of second-order cone programming. Linear Algebr Appl 284(1):193–228

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Overstall AM, Woods DC (2017) Bayesian design of experiments using approximate coordinate exchange. Technometrics 59(4):458–470

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Overstall AM, Woods DC, Adamou M (2017) acebayes: An R package for bayesian optimal design of experiments via approximate coordinate exchange. CoRR arXiv:1705.08096 (1705.08096v2)

  • Reznik YA (2008) Continued fractions, diophantine approximations, and design of color transforms. Proc SPIE Appl Digit Image Process 7073:707309. https://doi.org/10.1117/12.797245

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sagnol G (2011) Computing optimal designs of multiresponse experiments reduces to second-order cone programming. J Stat Plan Inference 141(5):1684–1708

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Sagnol G, Harman R (2015) Computing exact \(D-\)optimal designs by mixed integer second order cone programming. Ann Stat 43(5):2198–2224

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Ueberhuber C (1997) Numerical computation 1: methods, software, and analysis. numerical computation 1, vol XVI. Springer, Berlin

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Vandenberghe L, Boyd S (1996) Semidefinite programming. SIAM Rev 8:49–95

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Wang Y, Myers RH, Smith EP, Ye K (2006) \(D\)-optimal designs for poisson regression models. J Stat Plan Inference 136(8):2831–2845

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Waterhouse T, Woods D, Eccleston J, Lewis S (2008) Design selection criteria for discrimination/estimation for nested models and a binomial response. J Stat Plan Inference 138(1):132–144

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Wong WK (1992) A unified approach to the construction of minimax designs. Biometrika 79:611–620

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Woods DC, Lewis SM, Eccleston JA, Russell KG (2006) Designs for generalized linear models with several variables and model uncertainty. Technometrics 48(2):284–292

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Woods DC, van de Ven PM (2011) Blocked designs for experiments with correlated non-normal response. Technometrics 53(2):173–182

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Yang J, Mandal A, Majumdar D (2012) Optimal design for two-level factorial experiments with binary response. Statistica Sinica 22(2):885–907

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Yang J, Mandal A, Majumdar D (2016) Optimal designs for 2\(^k\) factorial experiments with binary response. Stat Sinica 26:381–411

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Yang M, Stufken J (2009) Support points of locally optimal designs for nonlinear models with two parameters. Ann Stat 37(1):518–541

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang Y, Ye K (2014) Bayesian \(D-\)optimal designs for Poisson regression models. Commun Stat 43(6):1234–1247

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors thank Radoslav Harman of Comenius University in Bratislava for valuable comments and advice on an earlier draft of the manuscript. We also thank two anonymous reviewers whose comments allowed to undoubtedly improving the quality of the paper.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Belmiro P. M. Duarte.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Duarte, B.P.M., Sagnol, G. Approximate and exact optimal designs for \(2^k\) factorial experiments for generalized linear models via second order cone programming. Stat Papers 61, 2737–2767 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00362-018-01075-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00362-018-01075-7

Keywords

Mathematics Subject Classification

Navigation