Skip to main content
Log in

Neurodevelopmental phenotype associated with CHD8-SUPT16H duplication

  • Original Article
  • Published:
neurogenetics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Microdeletions encompassing 14q11.2 locus, involving SUPT16H and CHD8, were shown to cause developmental delay, intellectual disability, autism spectrum disorders and macrocephaly. Variations leading to CHD8 haploinsufficiency or loss of function were also shown to lead to a similar phenotype. Recently, a 14q11.2 microduplication syndrome, encompassing CHD8 and SUPT16H, has been described, highlighting the importance of a tight control of at least CHD8 gene-dosage for a normal development. There have been only a few reports of 14q11.2 microduplications. Patients showed variable neurodevelopmental issues of variable severity. Breakpoints of the microduplications were non-recurrent, making interpretation of the CNV and determination of their clinical relevance difficult. Here, we report on two patients with 14q11.2 microduplication encompassing CHD8 and SUPT16H, one of whom had normal intelligence. Review of previous reports describing patients with comparable microduplications allowed for a more precise delineation of the condition and widening of the phenotypic spectrum.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Coe BP, Witherspoon K, Rosenfeld JA, van Bon B, Vulto-van Silfhout A, Bosco P, Friend KL, Baker C, Buono S, Vissers LE, Schuurs-Hoeijmakers JH, Hoischen A, Pfundt R, Krumm N, Carvill GL, Li D, Amaral D, Brown N, Lockhart PJ, Scheffer IE, Alberti A, Shaw M, Pettinato R, Tervo R, de Leeuw N, Reijnders MR, Torchia BS, Peeters H, O'Roak BJ, Fichera M, Hehir-Kwa JY, Shendure J, Mefford HC, Haan E, Gécz J, de Vries BB, Romano C, Eichler EE (2014) Refining analyses of copy number variation identifies specific genes associated with developmental delay. Nat Genet 46:1063–1071. https://doi.org/10.1038/ng.3092

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Van Den Bossche MJ, Johnstone M, Strazisar M et al (2012) Rare copy number variants in neuropsychiatric disorders: specific phenotype or not? Am J Med Genet Part B Neuropsychiatr Genet Off Publ Int Soc Psychiatr Genet 159B:812–822. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajmg.b.32088

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Breckpot J, Vercruyssen M, Weyts E et al (2016) Copy number variation analysis in adults with catatonia confirms haploinsufficiency of SHANK3 as a predisposing factor. Eur J Med Genet 59:436–443. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejmg.2016.08.003

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Zahir F, Firth HV, Baross A, Delaney AD, Eydoux P, Gibson WT, Langlois S, Martin H, Willatt L, Marra MA, Friedman JM (2007) Novel deletions of 14q11.2 associated with developmental delay, cognitive impairment and similar minor anomalies in three children. J Med Genet 44:556–561. https://doi.org/10.1136/jmg.2007.050823

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Neale BM, Kou Y, Liu L et al (2012) Patterns and rates of exonic de novo mutations in autism spectrum disorders. Nature 485:242–245. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature11011

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Smyk M, Poluha A, Jaszczuk I et al (2016) Novel 14q11.2 microduplication including the CHD8 and SUPT16H genes associated with developmental delay. Am J Med Genet A 170A:1325–1329. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajmg.a.37579

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. McLaren W, Gil L, Hunt SE, Riat HS, Ritchie GR, Thormann A, Flicek P, Cunningham F (2016) The Ensembl variant effect predictor. Genome Biol 17:122. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13059-016-0974-4

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. D’Angelo CS, Varela MC, de Castro CI et al (2014) Investigation of selected genomic deletions and duplications in a cohort of 338 patients presenting with syndromic obesity by multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification using synthetic probes. Mol Cytogenet 7:75. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13039-014-0075-6

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Vuillaume M-L, Naudion S, Banneau G et al (2014) New candidate loci identified by array-CGH in a cohort of 100 children presenting with syndromic obesity. Am J Med Genet A 164:1965–1975. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajmg.a.36587

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Brunetti-Pierri N, Paciorkowski AR, Ciccone R, Della Mina E, Bonaglia MC, Borgatti R, Schaaf CP, Sutton VR, Xia Z, Jelluma N, Ruivenkamp C, Bertrand M, de Ravel TJ, Jayakar P, Belli S, Rocchetti K, Pantaleoni C, D'Arrigo S, Hughes J, Cheung SW, Zuffardi O, Stankiewicz P (2011) Duplications of FOXG1 in 14q12 are associated with developmental epilepsy, mental retardation, and severe speech impairment. Eur J Hum Genet EJHG 19:102–107. https://doi.org/10.1038/ejhg.2010.142

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Terrone G, Cappuccio G, Genesio R et al (2014) A case of 14q11.2 microdeletion with autistic features, severe obesity and facial dysmorphisms suggestive of wolf-Hirschhorn syndrome. Am J Med Genet A 164A:190–193. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajmg.a.36200

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Drabova J, Seemanova E, Hancarova M, Pourova R, Horacek M, Jancuskova T, Pekova S, Novotna D, Sedlacek Z (2015) Long term follow-up in a patient with a de novo microdeletion of 14q11.2 involving CHD8. Am J Med Genet A 167A:837–841. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajmg.a.36957

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Merner N, Forgeot d’Arc B, Bell SC et al (2016) A de novo frameshift mutation in chromodomain helicase DNA-binding domain 8 (CHD8): a case report and literature review. Am J Med Genet A 170A:1225–1235. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajmg.a.37566

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. O’Roak BJ, Vives L, Girirajan S et al (2012) Sporadic autism exomes reveal a highly interconnected protein network of de novo mutations. Nature 485:246–250. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature10989

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Manning BJ, Yusufzai T (2017) The ATP-dependent chromatin remodeling enzymes CHD6, CHD7, and CHD8 exhibit distinct nucleosome binding and remodeling activities. J Biol Chem 292:11927–11936. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M117.779470

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Nishiyama M, Skoultchi AI, Nakayama KI (2012) Histone H1 recruitment by CHD8 is essential for suppression of the Wnt-β-catenin signaling pathway. Mol Cell Biol 32:501–512. https://doi.org/10.1128/MCB.06409-11

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Griesi-Oliveira K, Sunaga DY, Alvizi L et al (2013) Stem cells as a good tool to investigate dysregulated biological systems in autism spectrum disorders. Autism Res Off J Int Soc Autism Res 6:354–361. https://doi.org/10.1002/aur.1296

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Gompers AL, Su-Feher L, Ellegood J, Copping NA, Riyadh MA, Stradleigh TW, Pride MC, Schaffler MD, Wade AA, Catta-Preta R, Zdilar I, Louis S, Kaushik G, Mannion BJ, Plajzer-Frick I, Afzal V, Visel A, Pennacchio LA, Dickel DE, Lerch JP, Crawley JN, Zarbalis KS, Silverman JL, Nord AS (2017) Germline Chd8 haploinsufficiency alters brain development in mouse. Nat Neurosci 20:1062–1073. https://doi.org/10.1038/nn.4592

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Belotserkovskaya R, Oh S, Bondarenko VA, Orphanides G, Studitsky VM, Reinberg D (2003) FACT facilitates transcription-dependent nucleosome alteration. Science 301:1090–1093. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1085703

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Deciphering Developmental Disorders Study (2015) Large-scale discovery of novel genetic causes of developmental disorders. Nature 519:223–228. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature14135

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Deciphering Developmental Disorders Study (2017) Prevalence and architecture of de novo mutations in developmental disorders. Nature 542:433–438. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature21062

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Lelieveld SH, Reijnders MRF, Pfundt R et al (2016) Meta-analysis of 2,104 trios provides support for 10 new genes for intellectual disability. Nat Neurosci 19:1194–1196. https://doi.org/10.1038/nn.4352

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We gratefully acknowledge the following: Alexis Leurent, Heidi Tampere, Delphine Ceraso and Karine Baroli for technical support; European Reference Network ERN-ITHACA; Pr Nigel Quayle for manuscript editing. Also, we thank patients and families who contributed to this study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jamal Ghoumid.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Smol, T., Thuillier, C., Boudry-Labis, E. et al. Neurodevelopmental phenotype associated with CHD8-SUPT16H duplication. Neurogenetics 21, 67–72 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10048-019-00599-w

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10048-019-00599-w

Keywords

Navigation