Skip to main content
Log in

Abstract

Mobile IPv6 (MIPv6) is extended to Hierarchical MIPv6 (HMIPv6) by introducing a Mobile Anchor Point (MAP) between home agent (HA) and the mobile node’s (MN’s) temporary location. The MAP acts as a coordinator of the MN and reduces signaling cost for handoff management. It also reduces handoff latency suffered by MN. However, the MAP in the HMIPv6 architecture is a single point of failure, as all packets from any correspondent node (CN) goes via the MAP. In this paper, a thorough analysis of the MAP performance in terms of packet loss probability, packet blocking probability and end-to-end delay is presented. Three classes of users, namely Thin, Normal and Fat, are identified based on the amount of packets transmitted per second by the user. From the analysis carried out in this paper, we wanted to examine the volume users in different classes, i.e., Thin, Normal and Fat that can be supported by a single MAP under its coverage without deteriorating the quality of service (QoS) to the end users. A scheme for selecting an alternative MAP by an MN (MAP selection algorithm) is proposed here in order to preserve the QoS to the end users under the circumstances when the current MAP is unable to satisfy the need of the newly arriving MN. The proposed algorithm named as User-Centric MAP Selection (UCMS) is compared with existing similar protocol, Adaptive Overload Prevention (AOP). Observation shows that UCMS performs better in selecting a new MAP.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. George W, Donley C, Liljenstolpe C, Howard L (2012) IPv6 support required for all IP-capable nodes, RFC 6540

  2. Postel J (1981) Internet protocol, RFC 791

  3. Deering S, Hinden R (1998) Internet protocol version 6 (IPv6) specification, RFC 2460

  4. Johnson D, Perkins C (2004) Mobility support in IPv6, RFC 3775

  5. Soliman H, Castelluccia C, El-Malki K, Bellier L (2005) Hierarchical MIPv6 mobility management (HMIPv6), RFC 4140

  6. Pack S et al (2004) A study on optimal hierarchy in multi-level hierarchical mobile IPv6 networks. In: Proceedings of IEEE Globecom, Texas, USA

  7. Das S, Misra A, Agrawal P, Das SK (2000) TeleMIP: telecommunications-enhanced MIPv4 architecture for fast intradomain mobility. IEEE Pers Commun 7:50–58

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Han Y-H, Min S-G (2009) Performance analysis of hierarchical mobile IPv6: Does it improve mobile IPv6 in terms of handover speed? Wireless Pers Commun 48(4):463–483

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Wang K, Yu S (2010) LT-TMAP fast handover scheme on improved HMIPv6. Comput Des Appl 1:1–4

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  10. Chung WS, Kim M-S, Mo JH, Lee SK (2012) QoS-aware dynamic MAP selection schemes in HMIPv6 networks. J Parallel Distrib Comput 72(7):838–855

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Wan Z, Pan X, Chen J, Cui Y (2006) A three-level mobility management scheme for hierarchical mobile IPv6 networks. J Zhejiang Univ Sci A 7(12):2118–2126

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Zakaria MS, Kusin Z (2012) Experimental framework for mobility anchor point selection scheme in hierarchical mobile IPv6. ACEEE Int J Netw Secur 3(1):29–33

    Google Scholar 

  13. Kadusic E, Zivic N, Kos A (2016) QoS-aware dynamic MAP selection in HMIPv6 architect. IEEE Access 4:3112–3126

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Chiang M-S, Huang C-M, Dao D-T, Pham B-C (2017) GB-PMIPv6: a group-based handover control scheme for PMIPv6 using the ‘hitch on’ concept. Comput J 60(6):822–834

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Kadusic E, Zivic N, Skrbic M, Hadzialic M, Behlilovic N (2015) Euclidean distance-based QoS metric for dynamic MAP selection in HMIPv6 network. In: IEEE international conference on computer and information technology; ubiquitous computing and communications; dependable, autonomic and secure computing; pervasive intelligence and computing, Liverpool, UK, pp 354–358

  16. Tao M, Yuan H, Wei W (2014) Active overload prevention based adaptive MAP selection in HMIPv6 networks. Wirel Netws 20(2):197–208

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Agarwal DP, Zeng Q-A (2004) Introduction to wireless and mobile communication systems, 2nd edn. Thomson, Singapore

    Google Scholar 

  18. Banks J, Carson JS, II, Nelson BL, Nicol DM (2004) Discrete-event system simulation, Pearson Education, London. ISBN 81-7808-505-4

  19. Dshalalow JH (1993) On applications of little’s formula. J Appl Math Stoch Anal 6(3):271–276

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  20. Peng X, Zhang H, Hu J, Zhang S (2003) Modeling in hierarchical mobile IPv6 and intelligent mobility management scheme. In: Proceedings of 14th IEEE international symposium on personal, indoor and mobile radio communication, Beijing, China, pp 2823–2827

  21. Grewal BS (2012) Higher engineering mathematics, 42nd edn. Khanna Publishers, Delhi

    Google Scholar 

  22. Orebaugh A, Ramirez, G, Beale J (2007) Wireshark& Ethereal network protocol analyzer toolkit Syngress, Rockland p 448. ISBN 1-59749-073-3

  23. Soliman H (2004) Mobile IPv6 mobility in a wireless Internet. Pearson Education, London

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hiren Kumar Deva Sarma.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Dutta, N., Sarma, H.K.D. A Scheme for Dynamic MAP Selection in HMIPv6. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci., India, Sect. A Phys. Sci. 90, 371–382 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40010-018-0579-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40010-018-0579-2

Keywords

Navigation