Abstract
Species vulnerability is defined based on their exposition, sensitivity and adaptive capacity to a given impact. Considering limitations to estimate the sensitivity component, we developed a framework integrating the knowledge on ecological niche models and extinction thresholds, generating species sensitivity scenarios at the landscape scale. Our aim was to assess species and landscape vulnerability for threatened mammal species from the Brazilian Cerrado by considering seven types of human-impacts and climatic suitability. We assumed that climatic-suitable landscapes with less than 50% of remaining natural vegetation are not suitable for species, while in landscapes with 50–60% of remaining natural vegetation, populations are highly vulnerable. We found a spatial match between climatic-suitable areas and highly-impacted landscape (< 50% of remaining vegetation), specifically in southern Cerrado. We attribute this result to two main reasons: (1) similar characteristics affecting both suitability for species and human activities; and (2) highly impacted landscapes are likely to shelter threatened species. Vulnerable cells, with 50–60% of remaining vegetation, were distributed throughout Cerrado, meaning that there is no spatial bias within their distribution. Range-restricted species exhibited higher variability in vulnerability compared to widely-distributed species, what could be explained by human occupation being spatially clumped. Agriculture is the major impact affecting highly-impacted landscapes (< 50% of remaining vegetation), transport infra-structure has higher impact on vulnerable landscapes. We believe that our approach can be easily applied for assessing species and landscape vulnerability in many ecological domains by adapting extinction thresholds according to the focus taxon.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Aguiar DA, Rudorff BFT, Silva WF et al (2011) Remote sensing images in support of environmental protocol: monitoring the sugarcane harvest in São Paulo State, Brazil. Remote Sens 3:2682–2703. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs3122682
Aguirre-Gutierrez J, Carvalheiro LGLG, Polce C et al (2013) Fit-for-purpose: species distribution model performance depends on evaluation criteria—dutch hoverflies as a case study. PLoS ONE 8:e63708
Alkimim A, Sparovek G, Clarke KC (2015) Converting Brazil’s pastures to cropland: an alternative way to meet sugarcane demand and to spare forestlands. Appl Geogr 62:75–84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeog.2015.04.008
Allouche O, Tsoar A, Kadmon R (2006) Assessing the accuracy of species distribution models: prevalence, kappa and the true skill statistic (TSS). J Appl Ecol 43:1223–1232. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2664.2006.01214.x
Allouche O, Steinitz O, Rotem D et al (2008) Incorporating distance constraints into species distribution models. J Appl Ecol 45:599–609. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2664.2007.01445.x
Anderson RP, Gonzalez I (2011) Species-specific tuning increases robustness to sampling bias in models of species distributions: An implementation with Maxent. Ecol Modell 222:2796–2811. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2011.04.011
Andrén H (1994) Effects of habitat fragmentation on birds and mammals in landscapes with different proportions of suitable habitat: a review. Oikos 71:355–366. https://doi.org/10.2307/3545823
Andrews P, O’Brien EM (2000) Climate, vegetation, and predictable gradients in mammal species richness in southern Africa. J Zool 251:205–231
Araujo MB, New M (2006) Ensemble forecasting of species distributions. Trends Ecol Evol 22:42–47
Attorre F, De Sanctis M, Farcomeni A et al (2013) The use of spatial ecological modelling as a tool for improving the assessment of geographic range size of threatened species. J Nat Conserv 21:48–55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnc.2012.10.001
Barreto L, Van Eupen M, Kok K et al (2012) The impact of soybean expansion on mammal and bird, in the Balsas region, north Brasilian Cerrado. J Nat Conserv 20:374–383
Barve N, Barve V, Jimenez-Valverde A et al (2011) The crucial role of the accessible area in ecological niche modeling and species distribution modeling. Ecol Modell 222:1810–1819. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2011.02.011
Bascompte J, Sole RV (1996) Habitat fragmentation and extinction thresholds in spatially explicit models. J Anim Ecol 65:465–473
Bellard C, Leclerc C, Leroy B et al (2014) Vulnerability of biodiversity hotspots to global change. Glob Ecol Biogeogr 23:1376–1386. https://doi.org/10.1111/geb.12228
Betts MG, Hagar JC, Rivers JW et al (2010) Thresholds in forest bird occurrence as a function of the amount of early-seral broadleaf forest at landscape scales. Ecol Appl 20:2116–2130. https://doi.org/10.1890/09-1305.1
Boukal DS, Berecwz L (2002) Single-species models of the allee effect: extinction boundaries, sex ratios and mate encounters. J Theor Biol 218:375–394
Brannstrom C, Jepson W, Filippi AM et al (2008) Land change in the Brazilian Savanna (Cerrado), 1986–2002: Comparative analysis and implications for land-use policy. Land use policy 25:579–595. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2007.11.008
Brasil (2014) Lista brasileira de espécies ameaçadas de extinção. Diário Oficial da União, Brasília, DF
Brasil (2015) Mapeamento do Uso e Cobertura do Cerrado: Projeto Terra Class Cerrado 2013. Brasília, DF
Cáceres NC, Hannibal W, Freitas DR et al (2010) Mammal occurrence and roadkill in two adjacent ecoregions (Atlantic Forest and Cerrado) in south-western Brazil. Zoologia 27:709–717. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1984-46702010000500007
Carvalho FMV, De Marco P, Ferreira LG (2009) The Cerrado into-pieces: Habitat fragmentation as a function of landscape use in the savannas of central Brazil. Biol Conserv 142:1392–1403. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2009.01.031
Cunha HF, Moreira FGA, Silva SS (2010) Roadkill of wild vertebrates along the GO-060 road between Goiânia and Iporá, Goiás State, Brazil. Acta Sci Biol Sci 32:257–263. https://doi.org/10.4025/actascibiolsci.v32i3.4752
Dawson TPT, Jackson ST, House JIJ, et al (2011) Beyond predictions: biodiversity conservation in a changing climate. Science (80-) 332:53–58. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1200303
De Marco P Jr, Diniz-Filho JAF, Bini LM (2008) Spatial analysis improves species distribution modelling during range expansion. Biol Lett 4:577–580. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsbl.2008.0210
de Pena JCC, Kamino LHY, Rodrigues M, et al (2014) Assessing the conservation status of species with limited available data and disjunct distribution. Biol Conserv 170:130–136
de Souza RA, De Marco P (2014) The use of species distribution models to predict the spatial distribution of deforestation in the western Brazilian Amazon. Ecol Modell 291:250–259. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2014.07.007
De Souza RA, Miziara F, De Marco Junior P (2013) Spatial variation of deforestation rates in the Brazilian Amazon: A complex theater for agrarian technology, agrarian structure and governance by surveillance. Land Use Policy 30:915–924. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2012.07.001
Diniz MF, Brito D (2013) Threats to and viability of the giant anteater, Myrmecophaga tridactyla (Pilosa: Myrmecophagidae), in a protected Cerrado remnant encroached by urban expansion in central Brazil. Zoologia 30(2):151–156. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1984-46702013000200005
Diniz-Filho J, Bini LM, Vieira CM et al (2008) Spatial patterns of terrestrial vertebrate species richness in the Brazilian Cerrado. Zool Stud 47:146–157
Diniz-Filho JAF, Mauricio Bini L, Fernando Rangel T et al (2009) Partitioning and mapping uncertainties in ensembles of forecasts of species turnover under climate change. Ecography (Cop) 32:897–906. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0587.2009.06196.x
Dobrovolski R, Diniz JAF, Loyola RD et al (2011a) Agricultural expansion and the fate of global conservation priorities. Biodivers Conserv 20:2445–2459. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-011-9997-z
Dobrovolski R, Loyola RD, de Marco P, Diniz JAF (2011b) Agricultural expansion can menace Brazilian protected areas during the 21st century. Nat Conserv 9:208–213
Dormann CF, Purschke O, Marquez JR et al (2008) Components of uncertainty in species distribution analysis: a case study of the great grey shrike. Ecology 89:3371–3386
Dupin M, Reynaud P, Jarosik V et al (2011) Effects of the training dataset characteristics on the performance of nine species distribution models: application to Diabrotica virgifera virgifera. PLoS ONE 6:e20957. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0020957
Elith J, Graham CH, Anderson RP et al (2006) Novel methods improve prediction of species’ distributions from occurrence data. Ecography (Cop) 29:129–151. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2006.0906-7590.04596.x
Elith J, Phillips SJ, Hastie T et al (2011) A statistical explanation of MaxEnt for ecologists: statistical explanation of MaxEnt. Divers Distrib 17:43–57. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1472-4642.2010.00725.x
Fahrig L (2001) How much habitat is enought. Biol Conserv 100:65–74
Fearnside PM (2001) Soybean cultivation as a threat to the environment in Brazil. Environ Conserv 28:23–38
Fearnside PM, Laurance WF (2012) Infraestrutura na Amazônia: As lições dos planos plurianuais. Cad CRH 25:87–98. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0103-49792012000100007
Foden WB, Butchart SHM, Stuart SN et al (2013) Identifying the world’s most climate change vulnerable species: a systematic trait-based assessment of all birds, amphibians and corals. PLoS ONE. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0065427
Fordham DA, Akçakaya HR, Araújo MB et al (2013) Tools for integrating range change, extinction risk and climate change information into conservation management. Ecography (Cop) 36:956–964. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0587.2013.00147.x
Freitas SR, Hawbaker TJ, Metzger JP (2010) Effects of roads, topography, and land use on forest cover dynamics in the Brazilian Atlantic Forest. For Ecol Manag 259:410–417
Fritz SA, Bininda-Emonds ORP, Purvis A (2009) Geographical variation in predictors of mammalian extinction risk: big is bad, but only in the tropics. Ecol Lett 12:538–549. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1461-0248.2009.01307.x
Guillera-Arroita G, Lahoz-Monfort JJ, Elith J et al (2015) Is my species distribution model fit for purpose? Matching data and models to applications. Glob Ecol Biogeogr 24:276–292. https://doi.org/10.1111/geb.12268
Harcourt AH, Coppeto SA, Parks SA (2002) Rarity, specialization and extinction in primates. J Biogeogr 29:445–456
Hastie T, Tibshirani R, Friedman JH (2009) The elements of statistical learning: data mining, inference, and prediction, 2nd edn. Springer, New York
Hijmans RJ, Cameron SE, Parra JL et al (2005) Very high resolution interpolated climate surfaces for global land areas. Int J Climatol 25:1965–1978
Hijmans RJ, Phillips S, Leathwick J, Elith J (2017) Species distribution modeling. Package ‘dismo.’ dismo Species Distrib. Model. R Packag. version 1.1–4. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=dismo Version 1
Huggett AJ (2005) The concept and utility of “ecological thresholds” in biodiversity conservation. Biol Conserv 124:301–310
Humphries MM, Thomas DW, Speakman JR (2002) Climate-mediated energetic constraints on the distribution of hibernating mammals. Nature 418:313–316. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature00903.1
Illoldi-Rangel P, Sanchez-Cordero V, Peterson AT et al (2004) Predicting distributions of mexican mammals using ecological niche modeling. J Mammal 85:658–662. https://doi.org/10.1644/BER-024
International Union for Conservation of Nature [IUCN] (2012) IUCN red list categories and criteria version 3.1 Second Edition. IUCN, Cambridge
Isaac JL (2009) Effects of climate change on life history: implications for extinction risk in mammals. Endanger Species Res 7:115–123. https://doi.org/10.3354/esr00093
Isaac JL, VanDerWal J, Johnson CN, Williams SE (2009) Resistance and resilience: quantifying relative extinction risk in a diverse assemblage of Australian tropical rainforest vertebrates. Divers Distrib 15:280–288
IUCN Standards and Petitions Subcommittee (2014) Guidelines for using the IUCN red list categories and criteria THE IUCN RED LIST OF THREATENED SPECIES™. 11:
Kamath C (2009) Scientific data mining: a practical perspective. Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics, Philadelphia
Karatzoglou A, Smola A, Hornik K, Zeileis A (2004) kernlab—an S4 package for Kernel methods in R. J Stat Softw 11:1–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csda.2009.09.023
Kehoe L, Kuemmerle T, Meyer C et al (2015) Global patterns of agricultural land-use intensity and vertebrate diversity. Divers Distrib 21:1308–1318. https://doi.org/10.1111/ddi.12359
Klink CA, Machado RB (2005) Conservation of the Brazilian Cerrado. Conserv Biol 19:707–713
Kramer-Schadt S, Niedballa J, Pilgrim JD et al (2013) The importance of correcting for sampling bias in MaxEnt species distribution models. Divers Distrib 19:1366–1379. https://doi.org/10.1111/ddi.12096
Kuhn M, Johnson K (2013) Applied predictive modeling. Springer, New York
Lapola DM, Schaldach R, Alcamo J et al (2010) Indirect land-use changes can overcome carbon savings from biofuels in Brazil. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 107:3388–3393. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0907318107
Laurance WF, Albernaz AKM, Schroth G et al (2002) Predictors of deforestation in the Brazilian Amazon. J Biogeogr 29:737–748
Lemos MC, Roberts JT (2008) Environmental policy-making networks and the future of the Amazon. Philos Trans R Soc London B Biol Sci 363:1897–1902. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2007.0038
Liaw A, Wiener M (2002) Classification and regression by random forest. R News 2:18–22. https://doi.org/10.1177/154405910408300516
Liu CR, White M, Newell G (2011) Measuring and comparing the accuracy of species distribution models with presence-absence data. Ecography (Cop) 34:232–243
Lobo JM, Jimenez-Valverde A, Real R et al (2008) AUC: a misleading measure of the performance of predictive distribution models. Glob Ecol Biogeogr 17:145–151. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1466-8238.2007.00358.x
Manly BFJ (1994) Multivariate statistical methods: a primer. Chapman and Hall, London
Marcer A, Sáez L, Molowny-Horas R et al (2013) Using species distribution modelling to disentangle realised versus potential distributions for rare species conservation. Biol Conserv 166:221–230. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2013.07.001
Marmion M, Parviainen M, Luoto M et al (2009) Evaluation of consensus methods in predictive species distribution modelling. Divers Distrib 15:59–69
Martinelli LA, Filoso S (2008) Expansion of sugarcane ethanol production in Brazil: environmental and social challenges. Ecol Appl 18:885–898
Martinez-Meyer E, Townsend Peterson A, Hargrove WW (2004) Ecological niches as stable distributional constraints on mammal species, with implications for Pleistocene extinctions and climate change projections for biodiversity. Glob Ecol Biogeogr 13:305–314
Melo GL, Sponchiado J, Cáceres NC, Fahrig L (2017) Testing the habitat amount hypothesis for South American small mammals. Biol Conserv 209:304–314. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2017.02.031
Mendes P, De Marco P (2017) Bat species vulnerability in Cerrado: integrating climatic suitability with sensitivity to land-use changes. Environ Conserv. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0376892917000194
Metzger JP, Martensen AC, Dixo M et al (2009) Time-lag in biological responses to landscape changes in a highly dynamic Atlantic forest region. Biol Conserv 142:1166–1177. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2009.01.033
Meynard CN, Quinn JF (2007) Predicting species distributions: a critical comparison of the most common statistical models using artificial species. J Biogeogr 34:1455–1469. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2699.2007.01720.x
Morton DC, DeFries RS, Shimabukuro YE et al (2006) Cropland expansion changes deforestation dynamics in the southern Brazilian Amazon. PNAS 103:14637–14641
Muylaert RL, Stevens RD, Ribeiro MC (2016) Threshold effect of habitat loss on bat richness in Cerrado-forest landscapes. Ecol Appl 26:1854–1867. https://doi.org/10.1890/15-1757.1
Oppel S, Meirinho A, Ramirez I et al (2012) Comparison of five modelling techniques to predict the spatial distribution and abundance of seabirds. Biol Conserv 156:94–104
Ovaskainen O, Sato K, Bascompte J, Hanski I (2002) Metapopulation models for extinction threshold in spatially correlated landscapes. J Theor Biol https://doi.org/10.1006/jtbi.2001.2502
Overbeck GE, Vélez-Martin E, Scarano FR et al (2015) Conservation in Brazil needs to include non-forest ecosystems. Divers Distrib 21:1455–1460. https://doi.org/10.1111/ddi.12380
Paglia AP, De Rezende DT, Koch I et al (2012) Modelos de Distribuição de Espécies em Estratégias para a Conservação da Biodiversidade e para Adaptação Baseada em Ecossistemas Frente a Mudanças Climáticas. Nat Conserv 10:231–234
Pardini R, de Bueno AA, Gardner TA et al (2010) Beyond the fragmentation threshold hypothesis: regime shifts in biodiversity across fragmented landscapes. PLoS ONE. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0013666
Peres-Neto PR, Jackson DA, Somers KM (2005) How many principal components? stopping rules for determining the number of non-trivial axes revisited. Comput Stat Data Anal 49:974–997
Peterson AT, Nakazawa Y (2008) Environmental data sets matter in ecological niche modelling: an example with Solenopsis invicta and Solenopsis richteri. Glob Ecol Biogeogr 17:135–144
Phillips SJ, Dudík M, Schapire RE (2004) A maximum entropy approach to species distribution modeling. In: Proceedings of the twenty-first international conference on Machine learning. ACM, p 83
Phillips SJ, Anderson RP, Schapire RE (2006) Maximum entropy modeling of species geographic distributions. Ecol Modell 190:231–259. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2005.03.026
Plotnick RE, Gardner RH (2002) A general model for simulating the effects of landscape heterogeneity and disturbance on community patterns. Ecol Modell 147:171–197
Purvis A, Gittleman JL, Cowlishaw G, Mace GM (2000) Predicting extinction risk in declining species. Proc R Soc London Ser B-Biological Sci 267:1947–1952
Rodda GH, Jarnevich CS, Reed RN (2011) Challenges in identifying sites climatically matched to the native ranges of animal invaders. PLoS ONE 6:e14670
Roscioni F, Rebelo H, Russo D et al (2014) A modelling approach to infer the effects of wind farms on landscape connectivity for bats. Landscape Ecol 29:891–903. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-014-0030-2
Rudorff BFT, de Aguiar DA, da Silva WF et al (2010) Studies on the rapid expansion of sugarcane for ethanol production in São Paulo state (Brazil) using Landsat data. Remote Sens 2:1057–1076. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs2041057
Rueda M, Hawkins BA, Morales-Castilla I et al (2013) Does fragmentation increase extinction thresholds? A European-wide test with seven forest birds. Glob Ecol Biogeogr 22:1282–1292. https://doi.org/10.1111/geb.12079
Salcedo-Sanz S, Rojo-Álvarez JL, Martínez-Ramón M, Camps-Valls G (2014) Support vector machines in engineering: an overview: Support vector machines in engineering. Wiley Interdiscip Rev Data Min Knowl Discov 4:234–267. https://doi.org/10.1002/widm.1125
Sano EE, Rosa R, Brito JLS, Ferreira LG (2010) Land cover mapping of the tropical savanna region in Brazil. Environ Monit Assess 166:113–124. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-009-0988-4
Santos AJB, Quesada CA, Da Silva GT et al (2004) High rates of net ecosystem carbon assimilation by Brachiara pasture in the Brazilian Cerrado. Glob Chang Biol 10:877–885
Saranholi BH, Bergel MM, Ruffino PHP et al (2016) Roadkill hotspots in a protected area of Cerrado in Brazil: planning actions to conservation. Rev MVZ Cordoba 21:5441–5448
Silva DP, Aguiar AJC, Melo GAR, et al (2013) Amazonian species within the Cerrado savanna: New records and potential distribution for Aglae caerulea (Apidae: Euglossini). Apidologie 44:673–683. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13592-013-0216-7
Silva D, Gonzalez VH, Melo GA et al (2014) Seeking the flowers for the bees: Integrating biotic interactions into niche models to assess the distribution of the exotic bee species Lithurgus huberi in South America. Ecol Modell 273:200–209. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2013.11.016
Soares-Filho B, Rajão R, Macedo M et al (2014) Cracking Brazil’s forest code. Science 344:363–364. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1246663
Soberón J (2007) Grinnellian and Eltonian niches and geographic distributions of species. Ecol Lett 10:1115–1123. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1461-0248.2007.01107.x
Spera SA, Galford GL, Coe MT et al (2016) Land-use change affects water recycling in Brazil’s last agricultural frontier. Glob Chang Biol 22:3405–3413. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.13298
Strassburg BBN, Brooks T, Feltran-Barbieri R et al (2017) Moment of truth for the Cerrado hotspot. Nat Ecol Evol 1:0099. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41559-017-0099
Swift TL, Hannon SJ (2010) Critical thresholds associated with habitat loss: a review of the concepts, evidence, and applications. Biol Rev 85:35–53. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-185X.2009.00093.x
Syfert MM, Joppa L, Smith MJ et al (2014) Using species distribution models to inform IUCN Red List assessments. Biol Conserv 177:174–184. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2014.06.012
Syphard AD, Franklin J (2009) Differences in spatial predictions among species distribution modeling methods vary with species traits and environmental predictors. Ecography (Cop) 32:907–918
Thornton DH, Branch LC, Sunquist ME (2011) The relative influence of habitat loss and fragmentation: do tropical mammals meet the temperate paradigm? Ecol Appl 21:2324–2333. https://doi.org/10.1890/10-2124.1
Tilman D, May RM, Lehman CL, Nowak MA (1994) Habitat destruction and the extinction debt. Nature 371:65–66
Toms JD, Villard M (2015) Threshold detection: matching statistical methodology to ecological questions and conservation planning objectives. Avian Conserv Ecol 10:1–8. https://doi.org/10.5751/ACE-00715-100102
van der Hoek Y, Zuckerberg B, Manne LL (2015) Application of habitat thresholds in conservation: considerations, limitations, and future directions. Glob Ecol Conserv 3:736–743. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gecco.2015.03.010
Verbruggen H, Tyberghein L, Belton GS et al (2013) Improving transferability of introduced species’ distribution models: new tools to forecast the spread of a highly invasive seaweed. PLoS ONE 8:1–14. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0068337
Wenger SJ, Olden JD (2012) Assessing transferability of ecological models: an underappreciated aspect of statistical validation. Methods Ecol Evol 3:260–267
Acknowledgements
This contribution is part of the cooperative program UFG-ICMBIO entitled “Mapa de vulnerabilidade das espécies brasileiras ameaçadas de extinção”. Paulo De Marco is supported by continuous CNPq productivity Grant (308694/2015-5). Sara Villén-Pérez is supported by a Young Talent Attraction CNPq fellowship (401408/2014-0). Poliana Mendes is supported by a CNPq fellowship (403347/2014-9).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Communicated by Guarino Rinaldi Colli.
Electronic supplementary material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
De Marco, P., Villén, S., Mendes, P. et al. Vulnerability of Cerrado threatened mammals: an integrative landscape and climate modeling approach. Biodivers Conserv 29, 1637–1658 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-018-1615-x
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-018-1615-x