Elsevier

Molecular Catalysis

Volume 484, March 2020, 110805
Molecular Catalysis

Syngas production via CO2 reforming of methane over noble metal (Ru, Pt, and Pd) doped LaAlO3 perovskite catalyst

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mcat.2020.110805Get rights and content

Highlights

  • LaAlO3 based perovskite catalysts were synthesized by solution combustion synthesis.

  • Ru, Pt and Pd substituted LaAlO3 are active catalysts for DRM.

  • Stability study shows LaAl0.98Ru0.02O3-δ is highly active and coke resistant.

  • Synergetic effect between Ru and Al offers high sintering stability.

Abstract

Recently perovskite materials have received extensive attention for dry reforming of methane (DRM) reaction due to their stable ordered crystalline structure. In this work, materials with ionic substitutions of Ru, Pt, and Pd in LaAlO3 perovskite were synthesized using solution combustion synthesis route. The characterizations of catalysts were carried out by XRD, TEM, XPS, STEM, and BET surface area analyser. H2-TPR was performed to examine the strong metal support interaction between active metal and support that improve the resistance of the perovskite structure. The catalytic activity of these catalysts was examined for DRM. Stable conversion of both CH4 and CO2 were observed on stability test experiments for 50 h over Ru substituted LaAlO3 catalyst. This indicates that it is a highly stable and coke resistant catalyst for DRM. TEM and STEM results show the deactivation of Pt and Pd incorporated LaAlO3 due to sintering and carbon deposition. The apparent activation energy was determined from Arrhenius plot which was found to be 86 kJ mol−1 and 72 kJ mol−1 over LaAl0.98Ru0.02O3-δ for CH4 and CO2 consumption, respectively. DRM reaction mechanism was proposed via formation of oxycarbonates over LaAl0.98Ru0.02O3-δ.

Introduction

Syngas (CO + H2), is a mixture of hydrogen and carbon monoxide, a key intermediate for the production of hydrogen, ammonia and value-added chemicals such as Fischer-Tropsch derived liquid fuels, and methanol [[1], [2], [3]]. Production of syngas via reforming of hydrocarbons has gained much attention in the past decade. The most common employed hydrocarbon source is methane. Syngas can be produced via various technologies such as steam reforming (SRM), dry reforming (DRM), partial oxidation (POM) and auto thermal reforming (ARM) from methane. Predominately they differ in production of CO/H2 ratio, oxidant used, and energies of respective technology. Syngas production via DRM, which utilizes the most important greenhouse gases CH4 and CO2, has received growing scientific interest in the recent past. The dry reforming of methane is represented asCH4+CO22CO+2H2ΔH298Ko=247kJmol1

DRM is a highly endothermic reaction that has to be conducted at high temperature and it yields H2/CO ratio close to unity, which is favourable for the industrial production of oxygenates, methanol and long chain hydrocarbons [4,5]. Although DRM is environmental friendly, it has not been commercialized due to deactivation of catalyst by coke deposition and sintering of active metal at high temperature during the reaction. Thermodynamics of DRM indicates that the coke formation is usually associated with high temperature, feed ratio of CH4/CO2, and the nature of catalyst [6,7]. The most prominent carbon formation pathways are methane decomposition and carbon monoxide disproportionation. Encapsulated carbon is found to be responsible for catalyst deactivation while amorphous carbon is released in the form of CO [8]. Thus, catalysts are highly sensitive for methane reforming reactions due to coke formation. The activation of both CH4 and CO2 in DRM possess relatively higher activation energies compared to individual CH4 and CO2 activation. Therefore, development of catalyst with high activity, selectivity, and resistance to carbon formation for DRM is essential.

DRM has been studied extensively over Ni based catalysts and serious stability problem of those catalysts due to coke deposition was reported [9,10]. Both stability and catalytic activity of catalysts are equally important for high temperature reforming reactions. Noble metals with various supports are highly active and stable catalysts for dry reforming of methane due to high resistance to coke formation. The observed activity order of noble metal is as follows Rh > Ru > Ir > P t > Pd [[11], [12], [13], [14], [15], [16]]. The relatively inexpensive and most active noble metal Ru based catalysts were explored for DRM [[17], [18], [19]]. It is usually accepted that the activation of both CH4 on active metal and CO2 on support takes place. Literature emphasizes that the support is also as important as the active metal for dry reforming of methane. The promising support should be thermally stable and promote more active sites. Moreover, the support also plays a crucial role in catalytic reactions by offering certain key properties such as acid-base characteristics, high oxygen storage capacity, reducibility and strong metal–support interaction for high activity by minimizing the carbon deposition. Ioannis et al. [15] studied the effect of support on the activity, selectivity, and resistance to carbon deposition over Rh supported catalysts. They observed that ceria–zirconia support minimized carbon formation by maintaining Rh in metallic state compared to alumina and alumina-ceria-zirconia. Several supports and combined such as SiO2, Al2O3, CeO2, La2O3 have been investigated extensively for DRM [[20], [21], [22], [23], [24]]. CO2 activation depends on acid-base characteristics of support that could be activated by forming formates and oxy-carbonates on acidic support (Al2O3) and basic support (La2O3) respectively [25]. Li et al. [26] have studied the DRM over Ru supported Mg-Al oxides. The higher catalytic activity of Ru/MgO and Ru/Mg3 (Al)O was speculated due to the strong basicity of the support with more available Ru° surface atoms.

In addition to conventional supports, crystalline mixed oxides such as perovskite, pyrochlores, fluorite, are employed for DRM due to their thermal stability at high temperatures [15,27,28]. The effect of noble metal substitution at B-site of LaZr2O7 has been studied for DRM by Pakhare et al. [29] and they reported that higher resistance to coke deposition was observed for 1%Ru substituted LaZr2O7 compared to 0.5 %Ru/Al2O3. Moreover, the activation of CO2 takes place at the La site by forming La2O2CO3 that further react with carbon formed from methane to produce CO. Mixed oxides such as perovskite (ABO3) type material have been studied as promising support for DRM due to their structure and ability to facilitate high metal dispersion [[30], [31], [32]]. Among the perovskite ceramic material, LaAlO3 becomes attractive for reforming reactions [[33], [34], [35]]. However, there are only few studies on noble metal incorporated LaAlO3 for DRM. LaAlO3 was synthesized using various methods such as sol–gel, hydrothermal, and solution combustion synthesis [36,37]. In the present study, LaAlO3 and noble metal substituted LaAlO3 have been synthesized using solution combustion synthesis, which is a highly versatile and efficient technique to synthesize a variety of materials. Characterizations such as XRD, XPS, TEM and STEM have performed thoroughly for synthesized catalysts. DRM reactions were carried out over these catalysts and reaction mechanism was proposed.

Section snippets

Synthesis of catalysts

LaAlO3 and LaAl1-xMxO3-δ (M = Ru, Pt, Pd, x = 0.02) were synthesized using a single step solution combustion synthesis route. Lanthanum nitrate (La (NO3)3. 6H2O, SDFCL, India), aluminium nitrate (Al (NO3)3. 9H2O, SDFCL, India), ruthenium chloride (RuCl3, sigma aldrich, India), chloroplatinic acid (H2PtCl6, sigma aldrich, India), palladium chloride (PdCl2, sigma aldrich, India) and glycine (C2H5NO2, merck, India) as a fuel, were used as precursors for preparation of solid solution LaAl1-xMxO3-δ.

Characterizations of catalysts

Fig. 1(a) shows the X-ray diffraction pattern of Ru, Pt, and Pd substituted perovskite LaAlO3 including pristine material. The characteristic diffraction peaks of the synthesized perovskite catalysts were found to be in agreement with reference XRD pattern of LaAlO3 (PCPDF-09-0072) which is a rhombohedral crystal system with R-3 m space group. No other diffraction lines correspond to Ru, Pt, and Pd or their oxides were identified. The single phase of highly crystalline perovskite LaAlO3 was

Conclusions

The synthesised single phase LaAlO3 and Ru, Pt and Pd substituted LaAlO3 perovskite materials by solution combustion synthesis route were confirmed by XRD. The higher catalytic activity was observed for LaAl0.98Ru0.02O3-δ compared to LaAl0.98Pt0.02O3-δ and LaAl0.98Pd0.02O3-δ. The Ru substitution in LaALO3 offers the thermal stability due to strong interaction between Ru and Al which was confirmed by H2-TPR and XPS results. However, carbon formation was observed, which can be converted to CO by

CRediT authorship contribution statement

Ch Anil: Conceptualization, Investigation, Validation, Writing - original draft. Jayant M Modak: Resources. Giridhar Madras: Supervision, Writing - review & editing.

Declaration of Competing Interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Acknowledgements

The authors thank the Department of Science and Technology, India for financial support to this work. GM thanks Department of Science and Technology, India for J C Bose fellowship. The authors thank MNCF, CeNSE, and IISc for XRD and TEM facilities. CA thanks Dr. N K R Eswar and Dr. Satyapaul A Singh, BITS-Hyderabad, for their technical assistance in this work. CA also thanks Mr. Amanuel, IISc for his assistance in TGA characterization.

References (58)

  • A. Galadima et al.

    J. Nat. Gas Sci. Eng.

    (2015)
  • D. Wilhelm et al.

    Fuel Process. Technol.

    (2001)
  • J. Wang et al.

    Appl. Catal. A Gen.

    (2016)
  • L.S. Gangurde et al.

    Chem. Eng. Process.

    (2018)
  • Ş. Özkara-Aydınoğlu et al.

    Chem. Eng. J.

    (2013)
  • M. Khajenoori et al.

    J Ind Eng Chem

    (2013)
  • Z. Xie et al.

    Appl. Catal. B

    (2018)
  • I.V. Yentekakis et al.

    Appl. Catal., B.

    (2019)
  • F. Wang et al.

    Catal. Today

    (2017)
  • C. Ruocco et al.

    J CO2 Util.

    (2019)
  • J. Chen et al.

    Int. J. Hydrogen Energy

    (2010)
  • B. de Caprariis et al.

    Appl. Catal. A Gen.

    (2016)
  • P. Djinović et al.

    Chem. Eng. Process.

    (2011)
  • H.S. Whang et al.

    Catal. Today

    (2017)
  • R.K. Singha et al.

    Catal. Commun.

    (2017)
  • Z. Xie et al.

    Appl. Catal. B.

    (2019)
  • K. Nagaoka et al.

    Catal. Commun.

    (2001)
  • D. Li et al.

    Appl. Catal. B.

    (2017)
  • D. Pakhare et al.

    J CO2 Util.

    (2013)
  • W.Y. Kim et al.

    Appl catal.,A.

    (2019)
  • P.K. Yadav et al.

    Int. J. Hydrogen Energy

    (2019)
  • H.S. Lim et al.

    Int. J. Hydrogen Energy

    (2018)
  • T. Ohno et al.

    Adv. Powder Technol.

    (2016)
  • Y. Sim et al.

    J Energy Chem.

    (2019)
  • D. Mukai et al.

    Appl. Catal. A.

    (2014)
  • G. Lee et al.

    Appl. Surf. Sci.

    (2018)
  • B. Faroldi et al.

    Int. J. Hydrogen Energy

    (2017)
  • Y. Pang et al.

    Appl. Catal. A.

    (2018)
  • C.A. da Silva et al.

    Int. J. Hydrogen Energy

    (2015)
  • Cited by (58)

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text