Differential metabolism of neonicotinoids by brown planthopper, Nilaparvata lugens, CYP6ER1 variants

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pestbp.2020.02.004Get rights and content

Highlights

  • N. lugens has developed imidacloprid (IMI) resistance by over-expressing CYP6ER1 variants.

  • CYP6ER1 variants metabolized IMI, but not dinotefuran (DTF).

  • Drosophila over-expressing the CYP6ER1 variant were resistant to IMI, but much less so to DTF.

  • Lack of metabolism by CYP6ER1 variants against DTF resulted in low cross-resistance.

Abstract

Imidacloprid is very effective in controlling Nilaparvata lugens Stål, which severely damages rice plants. Following heavy imidacloprid use, imidacloprid-resistant N. lugens, which showed cross-resistance to other neonicotinoids, appeared. We used the baculovirus/Sf9 expression system to express CYP6ER1 variants carrying A375del + A376G (del3) mutations, either with or without T318S mutation, which confer imidacloprid resistance in N. lugens. These CYP6ER1 variants metabolized imidacloprid but did not metabolize dinotefuran. Moreover, Drosophila expressing a CYP6ER1 variant carrying T318S + del3 mutations were resistant to imidacloprid, with a resistance ratio of 288.7, whereas the resistance ratio to dinotefuran was 3.6. These findings indicate that N. lugens has a low level of resistance to dinotefuran, and the increase of resistance is slow. We also studied the metabolism of other neonicotinoids, as well as sulfoxaflor and flupyradifurone, by CYP6ER1 variants carrying del3 mutations, either with or without the T318S mutation. Sulfoxaflor, was not metabolized by either CYP6ER1-del3 or CYP6ER1-T318Sdel3 variants. However, these variants did metabolize flupyradifurone. This study sheds light on the substrate selectivity of CYP6ER1 variants.

Introduction

Nilaparvata lugens Stål severely damages rice plants by sucking up and transmitting viruses, including rice ragged stunt virus and rice grassy stunt virus. Imidacloprid, which was introduced in 1991, was very effective against planthoppers and was used heavily (Bass et al., 2015). Then, imidacloprid-resistant N. lugens appeared in Asian countries, including Vietnam, China, and Japan (Matsumura et al., 2008). Since 2005, there have been outbreaks of N. lugens in East Asian countries (Nakao, 2017). Imidacloprid, which acts as a nicotinic acetylcholine receptor (nAChR) competitive modulator, belongs to Insecticide Resistance Action Committee (IRAC) group 4A. IRAC 4A includes seven neonicotinoids: imidacloprid, nitenpyram, acetamiprid, thiamethoxam, thiacloprid, clothianidin, and dinotefuran. Structure of dinotefuran is different from those of neonicotinoids, because dinotefuran has a tetrahydrofuran structure instead of pyridine or thiazole ring. According to chemoinformatic analysis of chemical similarity relations (Tanimoto indices), dinotefuran was clearly separated from other neonicotinoids (Nauen et al., 2015). According to the Arthropod Pesticide Resistance Database (APRD) (Michigan State University, 2019), there are many cases of resistance to neonicotinoids. It is interesting to investigate whether the different structure of dinotefuran causes the lack of cross-resistance.

CYP6ER1 overexpression in N. lugens has been associated with imidacloprid resistance in five countries in South and East Asia (Garrood et al., 2016). RNA interference of CYP6ER1 indicated that CYP6ER1 expression was sufficient to confer imidacloprid resistance (Liang et al., 2017). Comparison of a reference sequence (CYP6ER1vL) (Fig. S1) from lab-susceptible N. lugens with the nucleotide sequences from imidacloprid-resistant N. lugens in Asia revealed seven amino acid sequence variants: CYP6ER1vA (Fig. S1), CYP6ER1vB, CYP6ER1vC, CYP6ER1vD1, CYP6ER1vD2, CYP6ER1vE, and CYP6ER1vF (Zimmer et al., 2018). CYP6ER1vA was the main variant expressed in N. lugens from Thailand, Vietnam, and Indonesia, whereas CYP6ER1vB was expressed mainly in N. lugens from India (Zimmer et al., 2018). Recombinantly expressed CYP6ER1vA and CYP6ER1vB metabolized imidacloprid, but other CYP6ER1 variants did not (Zimmer et al., 2018). The findings of susceptibility studies employing transgenic Drosophila over-expressing CYP6ER1 variants revealed that T318S + A375del + A376G in CYP6ER1vA and T318S + P377del in CYP6ER1vB contribute greatly to imidacloprid resistance. CYP6ER1 homology models indicated these mutations give rise to the imidacloprid-binding cavity's hydrophobic interface (Zimmer et al., 2018).

We demonstrate lack of evidence of dinotefuran metabolism by CYP6ER1 variants carrying A375del + A376G (del3) (Fig. S1) and T318S + A375del + A376G (T318Sdel3) (Fig. S1) mutations. In fact, transgenic Drosophila over-expressing CYP6ER1vA exhibited 288.7-fold resistance to imidacloprid but only 3.6-fold resistance to dinotefuran.

Moreover, we investigated the metabolism of other neonicotinoids, as well as sulfoxaflor and flupyradifurone, by CYP6ER1 variants carrying the del3 mutations, either with or without the T318S mutation.

Section snippets

Chemicals

Dinotefuran, sulfoxaflor, and flupyradifurone, with >99% purity, were synthesized at Mitsui Chemicals Agro, Inc. (Chiba, Japan). Other neonicotinoids (imidacloprid, acetamiprid, clothianidin, nitenpyram, thiacloprid, and thiamethoxam), with >98% purity, were purchased from the FUJIFILM Wako Pure Chemical Corporation (Osaka, Japan) as analytical standards.

Expression of CYP6ER1 using baculovirus/Sf9 expression system

Sequences of CYP6ER1-del3 variant (GenBank accession number JF928994) (Fig. S1) and Drosophila melanogaster NADPH cytochrome P450 reductase

Expression of CYP6ER1 variants and Drosophila melanogaster NADPH cytochrome P450 reductase (CPR)

Mutations of CYP6ER1-del3 and CYP6ER1-T318Sdel3 were suggested to confer imidacloprid resistance (Zimmer et al., 2018). SDS-PAGE analysis revealed that CYP6ER1 variants carrying CYP6ER1-del3 and CYP6ER1-T318Sdel3 mutations with CPR were expressed successfully in Sf9 cells using baculovirus (Fig. 1). The reduced carbon monoxide difference spectrum of CPY6ER1-del3, and CPY6ER1-T318Sdel3 proteins in microsomes, exhibited distinct peaks at 450 nm (Fig. 2), indicating functional expression of these

Discussion

The emergence of imidacloprid-resistant N. lugens is a grave problem, which is made worse by the apparent cross-resistance to other neonicotinoids. Recent research has shown that mutations in CYP6ER1, T318Sdel3, and T318S + P377del contribute significantly to resistance to imidacloprid (Zimmer et al., 2018). However, whether these mutations confer cross-resistance to other neonicotinoids is not known.

In this study, we confirmed the metabolism of imidacloprid by CYP6ER1-del3 and

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Ms. Yoshimi Umezu for helpful assistance, and Vincent L. Salgado for helpful discussions and for critically reading the manuscript.

References (29)

  • X. Zhang et al.

    Insecticide resistance monitoring and correlation analysis of insecticides in field populations of the brown planthopper Nilaparvata lugens (stål) in China 2012–2014

    Pestic. Biochem. Physiol.

    (2016)
  • X. Zhang et al.

    The role of detoxifying enzymes in field-evolved resistance to nitenpyram in the brown planthopper Nilaparvata lugens in China

    Crop Prot.

    (2017)
  • W.S. Abbott

    A method of computing the effectiveness of an insecticide

    J. Econ. Entomol.

    (1925)
  • D.J. Finney

    Probit Analysis

    (1971)
  • Cited by (19)

    • Impact of the nicotinic acetylcholine receptor mutation R81T on the response of European Myzus persicae populations to imidacloprid and sulfoxaflor in laboratory and in the field

      2022, Pesticide Biochemistry and Physiology
      Citation Excerpt :

      Resistance to sulfoxaflor in these laboratory selection studies is associated with enhanced metabolism by cytochrome P450s, UDP-glycosyltransferases, or esterases (Watson et al., 2021). Interestingly, and in some contrast, in vitro studies to date show that sulfoxaflor is not well metabolized by the cytochrome P450s (e.g., CYP6G1, CYP6CM1, CYP6ER1, CYP6C22) involved in resistance to the neonicotinoids and other insecticides (Sparks et al., 2012; Nauen et al., 2015; Hirata et al., 2017; Hamada et al., 2020). Thus, the P450s involved in resistance to sulfoxaflor may be distinct from those involved in resistance to the neonicotinoids.

    • Functionally characterized arthropod pest and pollinator cytochrome P450s associated with xenobiotic metabolism

      2022, Pesticide Biochemistry and Physiology
      Citation Excerpt :

      Several CYP6ER1 variants have been investigated for their capacity to detoxify imidacloprid, with positive results (Zimmer et al., 2018). A follow up study on the aforementioned CYP6ER1 variants that bear deletions was published by Hamada and colleagues (Hamada et al., 2020) and assayed for their ability to metabolize/detoxify several neonicotinoid insecticide (acetamiprid, thiacloprid, clothianidrin, thiamethoxam, nitenpyram) and one butenolide (flupyradifurone) (Table 2B). S. zeamais CYP6MS1 knockdown experiments revealed its role in terpinen-4-ol (terpineol) susceptibility (Huang et al., 2020).

    • Sulfoxaflor – A sulfoximine insecticide: Review and analysis of mode of action, resistance and cross-resistance

      2021, Pesticide Biochemistry and Physiology
      Citation Excerpt :

      However, it has not yet been demonstrated in these species that the enhanced levels of P450s associated with the observed sulfoxaflor resistance were indeed responsible for that resistance, since other resistance mechanisms could also be present (Liao et al., 2019b). Importantly, there are documented a number of variants for some CYPs (i.e., CYP6ER1) with potentially differing substrate specificities (Zimmer et al., 2018; Hamada et al., 2020) that may help explain some of the observed differences. Interestingly, very recent studies indicate that in addition to P450s other metabolic mechanisms such as enhanced expression of UDP-glycosyltransferases (Table 2) may also exist in these sulfoxalfor selected strains (Ma et al., 2021; Wang et al., 2021).

    • Knockdown of CYP301B1 and CYP6AX1v2 increases the susceptibility of the brown planthopper to beta-asarone, a potential plant-derived insecticide

      2021, International Journal of Biological Macromolecules
      Citation Excerpt :

      Neonicotinoid insecticides are the most widely used and are remarkably effective at controlling these sucking pests [8,9]. Nevertheless, BPH has evolved different degrees of resistance to commercially available neonicotinoid insecticides and has even developed an incredible cross-resistance among them due to unreasonable application [10–13]. Field resistance monitoring has indicated a significant reduction in the susceptibility of BPH to neonicotinoid insecticides simultaneously in China, Japan, Korea, Vietnam, Thailand and Malaysia [14–18].

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text