Abstract
The softwarization of wireless networks has necessitated an overhaul of existing mobility management strategies. Specifically, mobility management is no longer constrained to function within the boundaries of a pre-existing radio access network. Softwarization of the network infrastructure allows resource configurations and associations to be changed on-demand, in a manner so as to support a least cost mobility management framework. To this end, this paper presents an optimal radio access network design framework augmented with user-specific clusters from the perspective of mobility management. The proposed framework is supported by a detailed mathematical model that characterizes user mobility, system traffic, and signaling costs. Performance evaluation is based on a cost comparison with conventional LTE/NR networks, and reinforces the fact that the framework proposed herein results in significant cost reduction, even in the face of changing network scenarios.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Akyildiz, I. F., Nie, S., Lin, S.-C., & Chandrasekaran, M. (2016). 5G roadmap: 10 key enabling technologies. Computer Networks, 106, 17–48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.comnet.2016.06.010.
Akyildiz, I. F., Wang, P., & Lin, S.-C. (2015). SoftAir: A software defined networking architecture for 5G wireless systems. Computer Networks, 85, 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.comnet.2015.05.007.
Giust, F., Cominardi, L., & Bernardos, C. (2015). Distributed mobility management for future 5G networks: Overview and analysis of existing approaches. IEEE Communications Magazine, 53(1), 142–149. https://doi.org/10.1109/mcom.2015.7010527.
Ahmad, I., Liyanage, M., Namal, S., Ylianttila, M., Gurtov, A., & Eckert, M., et al. (2016). New concepts for traffic, resource and mobility management in software-defined mobile networks. In 2016 12th Annual conference on wireless on-demand network systems and services (WONS) (pp. 1–8).
Nguyen, T.-T., Bonnet, C., & Harri, J. (2016). SDN-based distributed mobility management for 5G networks. In 2016 IEEE wireless communications and networking conference (WCNC). https://doi.org/10.1109/wcnc.2016.7565106.
Contreras, L. M., Cominardi, L., Qian, H., & Bernardos, C. J. (2016). Software-defined mobility management: Architecture proposal and future directions. Mobile Networks and Applications, 21(2), 226–236. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11036-015-0663-7.
Tantayakul, K., Dhaou, R., & Paillassa, B. (2016). Impact of SDN on mobility management. In 2016 IEEE 30th international conference on advanced information networking and applications (AINA). https://doi.org/10.1109/aina.2016.57.
Kim, Y., Raza, S. M., Nguyen, D. T., Jeon, S., & Choo, H. (2018). Towards on-demand mobility management in SDN. In Proceedings of the 12th international conference on ubiquitous information management and communication. https://doi.org/10.1145/3164541.3175681.
Yin, X., Wang, L., & Jiang, S. (2018). A hierarchical mobility management scheme based on software defined networking. Peer-to-Peer Networking and Applications, 12(2), 310–325. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12083-017-0615-z.
Alfoudi, A. S. D., Newaz, S. H. S., Ramlie, R., Lee, G. M., & Baker, T. (2019). Seamless mobility management in heterogeneous 5G networks: A coordination approach among distributed sdn controllers. In 2019 IEEE 89th vehicular technology conference (VTC2019-spring). https://doi.org/10.1109/vtcspring.2019.8746712.
Alaez, R. M., Chirivella-Perez, E., Calero, J. M. A., & Wang, Q. (2018). New topology management scheme in LTE and 5G networks. In 2018 IEEE 87th vehicular technology conference (VTC spring). https://doi.org/10.1109/vtcspring.2018.8417677.
Mijumbi, R., Serrat, J., Gorricho, J.-L., Rubio- Loyola, J., & Davy, S. (2015). Server placement and assignment in virtualized radio access networks. In 2015 11th international conference on network and service management (CNSM). https://doi.org/10.1109/cnsm.2015.7367390.
Hock, D., Hartmann, M., Gebert, S., Jarschel, M., Zinner, T., & Tran-Gia, P. (2013). Pareto-optimal resilient controller placement in SDN-based core networks. In Proceedings of the 2013 25th international teletraffic congress (ITC). https://doi.org/10.1109/itc.2013.6662939.
Guo, S., Yang, S., Li, Q., & Jiang, Y. (2015). Towards controller placement for robust software-defined networks. In 2015 IEEE 34th international performance computing and communications conference (IPCCC). https://doi.org/10.1109/pccc.2015.7410301.
Zhong, Q., Wang, Y., Li, W., & Qiu, X. (2016). A min-cover based controller placement approach to build reliable control network in SDN. In 2016 IEEE/IFIP network operations and management symposium (NOMS). https://doi.org/10.1109/noms.2016.7502847.
Wang, T., Liu, F., & Xu, H. (2017). An efficient online algorithm for dynamic SDN controller assignment in data center networks. IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking, 25(5), 2788–2801. https://doi.org/10.1109/tnet.2017.2711641.
Liao, L., & Leung, V. C. M. (2017). Genetic algorithms with particle swarm optimization based mutation for distributed controller placement in SDNs. In 2017 IEEE conference on network function virtualization and software defined networks (NFV-SDN). https://doi.org/10.1109/nfv-sdn.2017.8169836.
Tanha, M., Sajjadi, D., Ruby, R., & Pan, J. (2018). Capacity-aware and delay-guaranteed resilient controller placement for software-defined WANs. IEEE Transactions on Network and Service Management, 15(3), 991–1005. https://doi.org/10.1109/tnet.2017.2711641.
Lin, S.-C., Wang, P., Akyildiz, I. F., & Luo, M. (2018). Towards optimal network planning for software-defined networks. IEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing, 17(12), 2953–2967. https://doi.org/10.1109/tmc.2018.2815691.
Janevski, T. (2003). Traffic analysis and design of wireless IP networks. Norwood, MA: Artech House Publishers.
Strang, G. (2016). Introduction to linear algebra. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Willinger, W., Paxson, V., Riedi, R., & Taqqu, M. (2002). Theory and applications of long-range dependence. Basel, CH: Birkhäuser.
Leland, W., Taqqu, M., Willinger, W., & Wilson, D. (1994). On the self-similar nature of Ethernet traffic (extended version). IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking, 2(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1109/90.282603.
Zukerman, M., Neame, T., & Addie, R. (2003). Internet traffic modeling and future technology implications. In 2003 IEEE conference on computer communications (INFOCOM). https://doi.org/10.1109/infcom.2003.1208709.
The MathWorks, Inc. (2019). MATLAB R2019a. https://www.mathworks.com/ products/new products/release2019a.html. Retrieved December 5, 2019.
Acknowledgements
The research has been partially supported by the Russian Ministry of Science and Higher Education (Contract No. 14.W03.31.0019).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kak, A., Kureev, A., Khorov, E. et al. Radio access network design with software-defined mobility management. Wireless Netw 26, 3349–3362 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11276-020-02264-9
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11276-020-02264-9