Skip to main content
Log in

Comparative genomics of the aconidial Aspergillus niger strain LDM3 predicts genes associated with its high protein secretion capacity

  • Genomics, transcriptomics, proteomics
  • Published:
Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Aspergillus niger is widely used as a cell factory for homologous and heterologous protein production. As previous studies reported that reduced sporulation favors protein secretion in A. niger, in this study, we conducted a comparative genomic analysis of the non-sporulating industrially exploited A. niger strain LDM3 in China and the reference protein secretion strain CBS 513.88 to predict the key genes that might define the genetic basis of LDM3’s high protein-producing potential in silico. After sequencing using a hybrid approach combining Illumina and PacBio sequencing platforms, a high-quality genome sequence of LDM3 was obtained which harbors 11,209 open reading frames (ORFs). LDM3 exhibits large chromosomal rearrangements in comparison to CBS 513.88. An alignment of the two genome sequences revealed that the majority of the 457 ORFs uniquely present in LDM3 possessed predicted functions in redox pathways, protein transport, and protein modification processes. In addition, bioinformatic analyses revealed the presence of 656 ORFs in LDM3 with non-synonymous mutations encoding for proteins related to protein translation, protein modification, protein secretion, metabolism, and energy production. We studied the impact of two of these on protein production in the established lab strain N402. Both tupA and prpA genes were selected because available literature suggested their involvement in asexual sporulation of A. niger. Our co-expression network analysis supportively predicted the role of tupA in protein secretion and the role of prpA in energy generation, respectively. By knockout experiments, we showed that the ΔtupA mutant displayed reduced sporulation (35%) accompanied by higher total protein secretion (65%) compared to its parental strain. Such an effect was, however, not observed in the ΔprpA mutant.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

Download references

Acknowledgments

Yufei Sui is grateful for a joint-PhD fellowship by the Chinese scholarship council.

Funding

This work was funded by the Basic Research Program of Shenzhen (JCYJ20150629165423751) and the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities No. 22221818014.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

YFS, LMO, and SC performed the genomics analyses and executed in silico quality analyses. YFS and TS constructed the co-expression networks. YFS and TS generated deletion strains and characterized them. YPZ and VM initiated this study and coordinated the project. YFS, LMO, TS and VM co-wrote the final text. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Vera Meyer or Ying-Ping Zhuang.

Ethics declarations

Competing interest

The authors declare that they have no competing interest.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

ESM 1

(PDF 1366 kb)

ESM 2

(XLSX 86 kb)

ESM 3

(XLSX 123 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sui, YF., Ouyang, LM., Schütze, T. et al. Comparative genomics of the aconidial Aspergillus niger strain LDM3 predicts genes associated with its high protein secretion capacity. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 104, 2623–2637 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-020-10398-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-020-10398-1

Keywords

Navigation