Skip to main content
  • Letter to the Editor
  • Open access
  • Published:

Towards European harmonisation of healthcare for patients with rare immune disorders: outcome from the ERN RITA registries survey

Abstract

The Rare Immunodeficiency, AutoInflammatory and AutoImmune Disease (RITA) network is a European Research Network (ERN) that brings together the leading centres for rare immune disorders. On April 2018 an online survey was sent to all RITA members in order to facilitate the harmonization of data collection in rare immune disorders registries. Currently, as many as 52 different registries collect data on rare immune disorders, of whom 30 (58%) are dedicated primarily to autoimmune diseases, 15 (29%) to primary immunodeficiencies and 12 (23%) to autoinflammatory disorders. Improving data on patient safety, outcome, and quality of life measures is warranted to unfold the full potential of RITA registries.

Background

Immunology is a young discipline, originating from the discovery of innate and adaptive immune responses in the last century [1]. The field has evolved rapidly from the identification of primary immunodeficiencies (PID) predisposing to infection, to the recognition of specific rare immune disorders with disturbed immunoregulatory balances, called Autoinflammatory disorders (AID), and others with defective tolerance to self-antigens, also known as Autoimmune diseases (AI) [2,3,4]. Thus, errors in the immune system can result not only in specific clinical entities, but also in conditions with two or three features of these pathologic processes [5, 6].

A multidisciplinary care for patients with rare immune disorders (RID) using complex diagnostic evaluation and highly specialized therapies is nowadays required. For example, genome-wide analysis platforms and functional immune assays are rapidly developing diagnostic tests shared across all subthemes and usually not available in all centres [7, 8]. Polyvalent immunoglobulin therapy has revolutionised the outlook for antibody deficient patients, specific anti-cytokine (anti-TNF, anti-IL-1 etc) treatments have transformed the lives of patients with AID and AI, and stem cell and gene-based therapies, originally for PID, are now being applied for all the RID and for the first time enable patients to be completely cured with no need for ongoing medical care [9,10,11].

RITA proposal

RITA is a European research network (ERN) that brings together the leading European centres with expertise in diagnosis and treatment of RID. ERNs are virtual networks involving healthcare providers (HCP) and family organization across Europe to facilitate discussion on complex or rare diseases that require highly specialised treatment, concentrating knowledge and resources (https://ec.europa.eu/health/ern_en) [12]. The foundation of RITA has been developed from the resources of successful, already existing, highly specialised international scientific societies, registries and websites, and in particular European Society for Immune Deficiencies (ESID) with ESID registry, Paediatric Rheumatology European Society (PRES), International Society for Systemic Auto-Inflammatory Diseases (ISSAID), Paediatric Rheumatology International Trials Organisation (PRINTO) with EUROFEVER and PHARMACHILD projects, European Vasculitis Society (EUVAS), and BEHCET International.

The main aims of RITA are: i) to provide state of the art for comprehensive clinical care for children and adults with RID, harmonizing diagnostic and therapeutic guidelines across Europe, thus ensuring for every patient an equal access to excellent expertise and care and reducing patient search of cross-border healthcare; ii) to establish sustainable alliances within European centres to accelerate diagnosis, improve access to treatment, and develop transitional care for patients with RID, maximizing the cost-effective use of resources and facilitating mobility of expertise; iii) to ensure the correct codification of quality control on diagnostic tests and targeted therapy, establishing a common tool for pharmacovigilance in these rare conditions; iv) to reinforce epidemiological surveillance and basic research on RID; v) to train future leaders in the field, securing their sustainability in an international perspective, and promote the awareness of RID between clinicians, carers, patients, family organizations and politicians, advocating better resources and measure to ensure early diagnosis by screening and enhanced symptom recognition.

Thus, providing a common shared medical platform for all affected patients and HCPs, independently of nationality and ethnicity, is a major attempt of the network [13, 14]. We report herein the results of an international survey within RITA members about all existing registries and research networks with the aim to harmonise and facilitate future data merging for research and clinical purposes.

Methods

Each RITA member was invited with a formal email to participate in the present survey (Additional file 1). In brief, each member was asked about personal involvement in any registry projects and covered role (coordinator, participant or just knower). We collected data about registries name, website, boundaries extension (national or international with involved countries), considered group of diseases (PID, AID, and/or AI), number of enrolled patients, and types of collected data. Members shared registry protocol and/or case report form when possible.

All data were collected and analysed using the Excel program. Descriptive data were reported as absolute numbers and percentages for categorical variables.

Survey results

The online survey was sent to all 126 RITA members during April 2018, of whom 45 are HCPs and 8 are patients and family organizations (Table 1). Informative responders were 75 (60%) because 15 members delegated the response to other members of the network. Collectively, 27 members are coordinating 25 registries; 53 members are participating in 38 registries, and 27 members knew the existence of 16 registries without participating. Only two members are not involved in any registries.

Table 1 Registries survey results overview

Data about 52 different registries were collected across 14 European countries (Table 2). Almost 50% of registries collect data on AI, while others are dedicated to PID or AID (respectively 15 registries, 29%, and 12 registries, 23%). Fifteen registries (29%) enrolled patients with a single specific disorder, in particular three registries for monogenic forms of systemic lupus erythematosus, two registries for Kawasaki disease or Behcet disease, and single registry for juvenile dermatomyositis, juvenile systemic sclerosis, juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA)-related uveitis, systemic JIA, Blau syndrome, sarcoidosis, Guillain-Barre syndrome, and myasthenia gravis.

Table 2 Registries among RITA network

More than 55,000 patients with RID are enrolled in a disease registry in Europe (Table 2). The majority of registries (36; 69%) enrols patients from national boundaries and only one registry collect data from two countries (UKIVAS registry). Among the international registries, five collect data on PID (ESID, EBMT, SCETIDE, PCID and HLH registry), four with AI (Pharmachild, BrainWorks, EULAR web library, and JIR cohort), and three are devoted to AID (Eurofever, Infevers, and ImmunAID). The ESID registry and JIR cohort also collect data on AID. Other international registries are devoted to a single specific disorder, i.e. monogenic forms of systemic lupus erythematosus, juvenile systemic sclerosis, Behcet disease and Blau syndrome.

Data usually collected in these registries are demography, diagnosis, clinical manifestations, laboratory tests and treatment, while genetic and imaging data are less frequently reported (respectively in 39 and 10% of registries). A treatment safety profile is reported in 29 registries (56%). Collectively, fifteen biobank are counted.

Discussion

RITA intends to ensure that all patients with RID are included in Europe wide registries to facilitate harmonization of patient care, audit of compliance with agreed guidelines and to create a platform for research.

The present survey of registries clearly shows how the network needs a common plan for inventory the clinical data about patients with RID. Furthermore, key parameters of patient safety, including the use of medicines and medical technologies, communication issues and breaches in continuity of care, as well as outcome data (e.i. mortality, morbidity and disease complications) or quality of life measures are not usually reported in the current registries. Differences in the number of patients registered across countries may be related to a different capacity of each HCP to collect and enter the data in the exiting registries. RITA aims at supporting these HCPs, promoting registry-oriented researches and looking for funding to supports to registry users.

In this line, the European Commission Department for Health & Food Safety recently developed the European Rare Disease Registry Infrastructure (ERDRI) as part of the European Platform on Rare Diseases Registration (EU RD Platform, available at https://eu-rd-platform.jrc.ec.europa.eu). By promoting interoperability between data sources, the EU RD Platform helps reaching the necessary critical numbers to conduct studies and research on rare disease. The major objective of the project is to tackle the enormous fragmentation of patient data contained in hundreds of patient registries across Europe. The ERDRI strategy is to create an inventory of registries about rare diseases, in which 27 characteristics for each registry were considered, and a list of 16 minimum data element to be registered by all registries across Europe, providing instructions on how and in which format each data element should be registered. A phonetic hashing to prevent duplicate registration of patients has been proposed and freely available at https://eupid.eu/.

The next RITA aim will be to support the conversion of all existing registries about RID to the ERDRI format to ensure their interoperability with other European rare disease registries with the belief that cross fertilisation of ideas would enable these registries to be further developed than would be otherwise. In fact, disease registries play an important role in the development of orphan drugs, so essential to the treatment of patients with rare disorders. RITA will seek to facilitate collaboration with industry for the further development of such treatments. It is expected that other registries in the meanwhile identified (e.g. the Spanish Registry of Primary Immunodeficiencies - REDIP), will be identified and invited to participate to any future initiative.

Conclusions

The survey highlighted the pivotal role of national and international organizations in Europe to collect and organize clinical data on immune diseases, allowing the rapidly growing knowledge on these rare disorders, creating research networks and providing significant numbers of data to support new discoveries in the field. RITA network could improve the coordination of these numerous entities, supporting initiatives of collaboration and cooperation. As a first attempt, the present survey revealed that the collection of key parameters about patient safety, as well as outcome data and quality of life measures should be improved among the registries of RITA network.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets used and/or analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Abbreviations

AI:

Autoimmune diseases

AID:

Autoinflammatory disorders

ERDRI:

European Rare Disease Registry Infrastructure

ERN:

European Reseach Network

ESID:

European Society for Immune Deficiencies

EU RD Platform:

European Platform on Rare Diseases Registration

EUVAS:

European Vasculitis Society

HCP:

Health Care Provider

ISSAID:

International Society for Systemic Auto-Inflammatory Diseases

JIA:

Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis

PID:

Primary immunodeficiencies

PRES:

Paediatric Rheumatology European Society

PRINTO:

Paediatric Rheumatology International Trials Organisation

REDIP:

Spanish Registry of Primary Immunodeficiencies

RID:

Rare immune disorders

References

  1. Wong M. What has happened in the last 50 years in immunology. J Paediatr Child Health. 2015;51(2):135–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Picard C, Al-Herz W, Bousfiha A, Casanova JL, et al. Primary immunodeficiency diseases: an update on the classification from the International Union of Immunological Societies Expert Committee for primary immunodeficiency 2015. J Clin Immunol. 2015;35(8):696–726.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Manthiram K, Zhou Q, Aksentijevich I, Kastner DL. The monogenic autoinflammatory diseases define new pathways in human innate immunity and inflammation. Nat Immunol. 2017;18(8):832–42.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Davidson A, Diamond B. Autoimmune diseases. N Engl J Med. 2001;345(5):340–50.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Fischer A, Provot J, Jais JP. Autoimmune and inflammatory manifestations occur frequently in patients with primary immunodeficiencies. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2017;140(5):1388–93.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Damgaard RB, Walker JA, Marco-Casanova P, et al. The Deubiquitinase OTULIN is an essential negative regulator of inflammation and autoimmunity. Cell. 2016;166:1215–30.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Hardwick SA, Deveson IW, Mercer TR. Reference standards for next-generation sequencing. Nat Rev Genet. 2017;18(8):473–84.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Castro C, Gourley M. Diagnostic testing and interpretation of tests for autoimmunity. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2010;125:S238–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Wolfe RM, Ang DC. Biologic therapies for autoimmune and connective tissue diseases. Immunol Allergy Clin N Am. 2017;37(2):283–99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Ewart DT, Peterson EJ, Steer CJ. Gene editing for inflammatory disorders. Ann Rheum Dis. 2019;78(1):6–15.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Freeman AF. Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in primary Immunodeficiencies beyond severe combined immunodeficiency. J Pediatric Infect Dis Soc. 2018;7:S79–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Heon-Klin V. European reference networks for rare diseases: what is the conceptual framework? Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2017;12(1):137.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Beukelman T, Anink J, Berntson L, et al. A survey of national and multi-national registries and cohort studies in juvenile idiopathic arthritis: challenges and opportunities. Pediatric Reumatology. 2017;15:31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Dolezalova P, Anton J, Avcin T, et al. The European network for care of children with paediatric rheumatic diseases: care across borders. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2019;21:1188–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thanks Eugenia Mosci, MPol and Elisa Patrone, MA research assistants of the Paediatric Rheumatology International Trials Organisation (PRINTO, www.printo.it) for the management of the survey. This survey has been supported by the European Reference Network for Rare Immunodeficiency, Autoinflammatory and Autoimmune Diseases, which is partly co-funded by the European Union with in the framework of the Third Health Programme "ERN-2016-Framework Partnership Agreement 2017-2021".

Funding

This study was supported by the ERN Specific Grant Agreements Year 2 (ERN-SGA-2017).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Consortia

Contributions

RP performed the analysis and interpretation of data and drafted the manuscript; MG and NR concepted and designed the manuscript, revised it critically, and given final approval of the version to be published. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Authors’ information

NR and RP drafted the first and subsequent version of the manuscript. All authors contributed to the planning of the survey. All authors revised critically and approved the content of the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nicolino Ruperto.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Experts involved were invited to complete the survey by clicking on a hyperlink in the email that directed them to the web-based survey. The results discussed in this manuscript are based on a voluntary survey and did not involve any experimental research on human subjects. Hence, ethical approval and informed consent procedures were not applicable.

Consent for publication

The article is original, has not already been published in a journal, and is not currently under consideration by another journal. The authors agree to the terms of the BioMed Central Copyright and License Agreement and Open Data policy.

All authors of the manuscript have read and agreed to its content and are accountable for all aspects of the accuracy and integrity of the manuscript in accordance with ICMJE criteria.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Additional file 1.

The registries survey sheet.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Papa, R., Cant, A., Klein, C. et al. Towards European harmonisation of healthcare for patients with rare immune disorders: outcome from the ERN RITA registries survey. Orphanet J Rare Dis 15, 33 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13023-020-1308-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13023-020-1308-x

Keywords