ORIGINAL CLINICAL SCIENCEUnderstanding risk factors and predictors for stroke subtypes in the ENDURANCE trials
Section snippets
Methods
The Heartware HVAD ENDURANCE and ENDURANCE Supplemental clinical trial designs have been described previously.7,12 Briefly, the ENDURANCE trial was a prospective, randomized, controlled, unblinded, multicenter trial that compared the safety and effectiveness of the Heartware HVAD system to a Food and Drug administration-approved LVAD in patients with end-stage heart failure who did not qualify for heart transplantation. The trial enrolled 297 patients on HVAD and 148 control patients who had
Results
A total of 604 patients were included in the study. As shown in Figure 1, a total of 178 patients (29.5%) had at least 1 CVA. Forty-four patients (7.3%) had at least 1 HCVA, 116 (19.2%) had at least 1 ICVA, and 44 (7.3%) had at least 1 TIA. Forty-eight (7.9%) had >1 CVA, and if the events were mixed (e.g., HCVA and ICVA), the patient was counted in each stroke subtype group. Seven events (1.2%, n = 4 patients) with known clinical causality were excluded from the analysis, including 5 (0.8%)
Discussion
Our study provides evidence of major modifiable risk factors that correlate with each LVAD-associated subtype of stroke. Most current publications related to LVAD have not analyzed peri-operative strokes separately. Two studies that did investigate this topic concluded that peri-operative stroke was a major cause of LVAD-associated stroke.2,9 In the ENDURANCE trials, peri-operative stroke rate was approximately 5%, and most of these were ischemic events.
HCVA occurred in approximately 7% of our
Conclusions
Supra- and sub-therapeutic INR values at the time of CVA were associated with all stroke subtypes >14 days post-implant. MAPs were higher among those with ICVA and TIA but not with HCVA compared to without CVA. Our study demonstrates the challenges of anti-thrombotic therapy and blood pressure management in LVAD population.
Disclosure statement
Dr. Cho receives a grant from the Extracorporeal Life Support Organization. Dr. Teuteberg serves as speaking and/or advisory board for Medtronic; advisory board for Abiomed; advisory board for EcoR1; speaking and/or advisory board for CareDx; as a member of HeartMate 3 clinical events committee. Nicholas Hiivala, BME, is an employee of Medtronic Inc.The remaining authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose.
The authors acknowledge Brian Van Dorn and Kristie Wallace, Medtronic Inc, for
References (19)
- et al.
Seventh INTERMACS annual report: 15,000 patients and counting
J Heart Lung Transplant
(2015) - et al.
Risk factors, mortality, and timing of ischemic and hemorrhagic stroke with left ventricular assist devices
J Heart Lung Transplant
(2017) - et al.
Pre-operative risk factors of bleeding and stroke during left ventricular assist device support: an analysis of more than 900 HeartMate II outpatients
J Am Coll Cardiol
(2014) - et al.
Hemolysis, pump thrombus, and neurologic events in continuous-flow left ventricular assist device recipients
Ann Thorac Surg
(2014) - et al.
Hemolysis: a harbinger of adverse outcome after left ventricular assist device implant
J Heart Lung Transplant
(2014) - et al.
Persistent blood stream infection in patients supported with a continuous-flow left ventricular assist device is associated with an increased risk of cerebrovascular accidents
J Card Fail
(2015) - et al.
HVAD: the ENDURANCE supplemental trial
JACC Heart Fail
(2018) - et al.
Acquired von Willebrand syndrome after continuous-flow mechanical device support contributes to a high prevalence of bleeding during long-term support and at the time of transplantation
J Am Coll Cardiol
(2010) - et al.
Effect of study setting on anticoagulation control: a systematic review and metaregression
Chest
(2006)
Cited by (13)
Outcomes of heart transplant recipients with prior left ventricular assist device associated stroke
2023, Journal of Stroke and Cerebrovascular DiseasesNeurologic Complications in Patients With Left Ventricular Assist Devices
2023, Canadian Journal of CardiologyCitation Excerpt :A specific INR target has been a source of debate over the past decade given the need to balance the risk of both IS and HS. In a post hoc analysis of the ENDURANCE trial, both supratherapeutic (> 3.0) and subtherapeutic (< 2.0) INR values were associated with increased risk of both HS and IS, which may reflect the difficulty of maintaining INR in the therapeutic target range with day-to-day fluctuations.41 Given these findings and the paucity of high-quality evidence, it appears reasonable to target an INR of 2.0-3.0 to prevent IS while reducing the risk of HS while keeping in mind the role that individual patients’ risk factors may play in balancing ischemic and hemorrhagic complications.39
Impact of frailty on mortality and morbidity in bridge to transplant recipients of contemporary durable mechanical circulatory support
2022, Journal of Heart and Lung TransplantationCitation Excerpt :This bears important implications for patient selection and communication of risks before LVAD implantation. Device-related adverse events remain a challenge in the care of LVAD supported patients.21,22 Pre-existing patient and pump-related factors interact in a complex manner to result in hemocompatibility related adverse events.
Long-Term Neurocognitive Outcome in Patients With Continuous Flow Left Ventricular Assist Device
2021, JACC: Heart FailureCitation Excerpt :In our multivariable analysis models for cognitive decline, 3 factors—male sex, younger age, and HVAD device—were consistently present as independent risk factors for most neurocognitive domains (except clock drawing), especially for patients with impaired cognition at baseline (Table 3). As both ischemic and hemorrhagic strokes were more common with the HVAD (vs. HMII), it is not surprising that the odds of cognitive decline were higher with the HVAD device (13,26). The association of greater decline in younger patients is somewhat counterintuitive, and we suspect that this relationship arises, in part, because younger patients had better cognitive performance at baseline and thus had more “room to decline” (Supplemental Figures 1 and 2).
Postoperative care of 14 patients with left ventricular assist devices: a case series
2024, Journal of International Medical ResearchImplications of Causes of Intracranial Hemorrhage During Left Ventricular Assist Device Support
2022, Neurocritical Care