ORIGINAL CLINICAL SCIENCE
Understanding risk factors and predictors for stroke subtypes in the ENDURANCE trials

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healun.2020.01.1330Get rights and content

BACKGROUND

Stroke is a devastating morbidity associated with left ventricular assist device (LVAD) support. We report a comprehensive analysis of stroke subtypes in the ENDURANCE destination therapy (DT) and ENDURANCE Supplemental (DT2) trials.

METHODS

Patients in the combined HeartWare LVAD (HVAD) cohorts of the DT and DT2 trials were included. Neurologic events included ischemic stroke (ischemic cerebrovascular accident [ICVA]), hemorrhagic stroke (hemorrhagic cerebrovascular accident [HCVA]), and transient ischemic attack (TIA). Peri-operative strokes were defined as occurring within 2 weeks of the implant.

RESULTS

A total of 604 patients received an HVAD in the DT (n = 296) and DT2 (n = 308) trials. Over 2 years, 178 (29.5%) had at least 1 cerebrovascular accident (CVA). Forty-four (7.3%) had HCVAs, 116 (19.2%) had ICVAs, and 44 (7.3%) had TIAs. Thirty (5.0%) had peri-operative stroke. In multivariable analysis, sub-therapeutic international normalized ratio (INR) values were independently associated with peri-operative stroke. Supra- and/or sub-therapeutic INR values, peripheral vascular disease, and presence of left ventricular thrombus were independently associated with ICVA. No aspirin and supra- and/or sub-therapeutic INR values were independently associated with TIA. No aspirin, supra- and/or sub-therapeutic INR values, and prior stroke and/or TIA were associated with HCVA. In further analysis, mean arterial pressure (MAP) was higher in the ICVA (86.8mm Hg, p = 0.002 4) and TIA (88.8mm Hg, p<0.0001) groups, but not in HCVA, than in the No-CVA group (81.4mm Hg). Time in therapeutic range for INR was 65.3% for the No-CVA group, 62.9% (p = 0.59) for HCVA, 65.1% (p = 0.97) for ICVA, and 63.2% (p = 0.62) for TIA.

CONCLUSIONS

Supra- and sub-therapeutic INR values at the time of CVA were associated with all stroke subtypes >14 days post-implant. MAP was higher among those with ICVA and TIA but not with HCVA compared to without CVA. Our study demonstrates the challenges of anti-thrombotic therapy and blood pressure management in LVAD population.

Section snippets

Methods

The Heartware HVAD ENDURANCE and ENDURANCE Supplemental clinical trial designs have been described previously.7,12 Briefly, the ENDURANCE trial was a prospective, randomized, controlled, unblinded, multicenter trial that compared the safety and effectiveness of the Heartware HVAD system to a Food and Drug administration-approved LVAD in patients with end-stage heart failure who did not qualify for heart transplantation. The trial enrolled 297 patients on HVAD and 148 control patients who had

Results

A total of 604 patients were included in the study. As shown in Figure 1, a total of 178 patients (29.5%) had at least 1 CVA. Forty-four patients (7.3%) had at least 1 HCVA, 116 (19.2%) had at least 1 ICVA, and 44 (7.3%) had at least 1 TIA. Forty-eight (7.9%) had >1 CVA, and if the events were mixed (e.g., HCVA and ICVA), the patient was counted in each stroke subtype group. Seven events (1.2%, n = 4 patients) with known clinical causality were excluded from the analysis, including 5 (0.8%)

Discussion

Our study provides evidence of major modifiable risk factors that correlate with each LVAD-associated subtype of stroke. Most current publications related to LVAD have not analyzed peri-operative strokes separately. Two studies that did investigate this topic concluded that peri-operative stroke was a major cause of LVAD-associated stroke.2,9 In the ENDURANCE trials, peri-operative stroke rate was approximately 5%, and most of these were ischemic events.

HCVA occurred in approximately 7% of our

Conclusions

Supra- and sub-therapeutic INR values at the time of CVA were associated with all stroke subtypes >14 days post-implant. MAPs were higher among those with ICVA and TIA but not with HCVA compared to without CVA. Our study demonstrates the challenges of anti-thrombotic therapy and blood pressure management in LVAD population.

Disclosure statement

Dr. Cho receives a grant from the Extracorporeal Life Support Organization. Dr. Teuteberg serves as speaking and/or advisory board for Medtronic; advisory board for Abiomed; advisory board for EcoR1; speaking and/or advisory board for CareDx; as a member of HeartMate 3 clinical events committee. Nicholas Hiivala, BME, is an employee of Medtronic Inc.The remaining authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose.

The authors acknowledge Brian Van Dorn and Kristie Wallace, Medtronic Inc, for

Cited by (13)

  • Neurologic Complications in Patients With Left Ventricular Assist Devices

    2023, Canadian Journal of Cardiology
    Citation Excerpt :

    A specific INR target has been a source of debate over the past decade given the need to balance the risk of both IS and HS. In a post hoc analysis of the ENDURANCE trial, both supratherapeutic (> 3.0) and subtherapeutic (< 2.0) INR values were associated with increased risk of both HS and IS, which may reflect the difficulty of maintaining INR in the therapeutic target range with day-to-day fluctuations.41 Given these findings and the paucity of high-quality evidence, it appears reasonable to target an INR of 2.0-3.0 to prevent IS while reducing the risk of HS while keeping in mind the role that individual patients’ risk factors may play in balancing ischemic and hemorrhagic complications.39

  • Impact of frailty on mortality and morbidity in bridge to transplant recipients of contemporary durable mechanical circulatory support

    2022, Journal of Heart and Lung Transplantation
    Citation Excerpt :

    This bears important implications for patient selection and communication of risks before LVAD implantation. Device-related adverse events remain a challenge in the care of LVAD supported patients.21,22 Pre-existing patient and pump-related factors interact in a complex manner to result in hemocompatibility related adverse events.

  • Long-Term Neurocognitive Outcome in Patients With Continuous Flow Left Ventricular Assist Device

    2021, JACC: Heart Failure
    Citation Excerpt :

    In our multivariable analysis models for cognitive decline, 3 factors—male sex, younger age, and HVAD device—were consistently present as independent risk factors for most neurocognitive domains (except clock drawing), especially for patients with impaired cognition at baseline (Table 3). As both ischemic and hemorrhagic strokes were more common with the HVAD (vs. HMII), it is not surprising that the odds of cognitive decline were higher with the HVAD device (13,26). The association of greater decline in younger patients is somewhat counterintuitive, and we suspect that this relationship arises, in part, because younger patients had better cognitive performance at baseline and thus had more “room to decline” (Supplemental Figures 1 and 2).

View all citing articles on Scopus
View full text